MM Ansoff & BCG Matrix
MM Ansoff & BCG Matrix
MM Ansoff & BCG Matrix
MATRIX
INTRODUCTION
MATRIX
THE BCG GROWTH-SHARE
MATRIX
STARS
High growth, High market share
Stars are leaders in the category
They also require heavy investment, to maintain its large market
share
It leads to large amount of cash consumption and cash
generation- net cash flow is usually modest
Potential for high revenue growth
Products located in this quadrant are attractive as they are
located in a robust category and these products are highly
competitive in the category
Attempts should be made to hold the market share ALAP
otherwise the star will become a premature CASH COW
If successful, a star will become a cash cow when the category
matures (assuming they maintain their relative market share)
CASH COWS
Low growth , High market share
To assess :
Profiles of products/businesses
The cash demands of products
The development cycles of products
Resource allocation and divestment
decisions
MAIN STEPS OF BCG MATRIX
Identifying and dividing a company into SBU.
Assessing and comparing the prospects of
each SBU according to two criteria :
1. SBU’S relative market share.
2. Growth rate OF SBU’S industry.
Classifying the SBU’S on the basis of BCG
matrix.
Developing strategic objectives for each SBU.
BCG MATRIX WITH CASH FLOW
STARS: What to do?
• Huge potential
• May have been expensive to develop
• Worth spending money to promote
• Consider the extent of their PLC in decision making
• Cheap to promote
• Generate large amounts of cash – use for further R&D?
• Costs of developing and promoting have largely gone
• Need to monitor their performance – the long term?
• At the maturity stage of the PLC?
• Cash Cows have to protect and keep the market share
and maximize cash flow.
Maintain the strong market position and
defend your market share. Take
advantage of sales volume and leverage
the size of operations. Support other
businesses.
DOGS: What to do?
• Are they worth persevering with?
• How much are they costing?
• Could they be revived in some way?
• How much would it cost to continue to support such
products?
• Low scale of economies: so difficult to make a profit
• More likely this business is a loser
• Needs consideration and new strategy development
• Potential strategies are withdrawal, selling, repositioning,
and reducing the operating cost
Optimize your current operations. Get rid of all
non value added activities and features.
Reposition your offering to generate positive
cash flow or sell this business.
? MARKS: What to do?
(2) Hold: here the company invest just enough to hold its
present position
Considers only MS & MG: this may tempt the management to emphasis
investment on a particular product or to divest a product prematurely
Neglects small competitors that have fast growing market shares
CONCLUSION
This well known marketing tool was first published in the Harvard
Business Review (1957) in an article called 'Strategies for
Diversification'.
Market Product
Penetration Development
New Markets
Market
Diversification
Development
ANSOFF GROWTH MATRIX
1. Market Penetration
Note: the product is same and does not seek any new customers ie. Sell more
of the same thing to the same people.
Note: product remains the same, but it is marketed to a new audience ie.
Sell more of the same thing to different people.
Note: develop and innovate new product offerings to replace existing ones
and then market to existing customers ie. Sell more things to the same
people.
Note: completely new products to new customers ie. Sell completely different
products or services to different customers.
More risk strategy because the business is moving into markets in which it has
little or no experience.
Must have a clear idea about what it expects to gain from the strategy and an
honest assessment of the risks.
(i) Related diversification: get into a new market or industry with which
we are familiar
(ii) Unrelated diversification: get into a new market or industry with which
we have no previous experience