Qualitative and Quantitative Research

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25
At a glance
Powered by AI
Some of the key takeaways are that qualitative and quantitative research share foundational similarities like being able to code qualitative data quantitatively and generate quantitative research from qualitative inquiries. However, their main difference is that quantitative research is confirmatory and deductive while qualitative research is exploratory and inductive.

Some foundational similarities discussed are that all qualitative data can be measured and coded using quantitative methods, and quantitative research can be generated from qualitative inquiries. The main foundational difference discussed is that quantitative research is viewed as confirmatory and deductive in nature while qualitative research is considered exploratory and inductive.

Some common qualitative research methods discussed include grounded theory, ethnography, phenomenology, and field research.

Qualitative Research

Comparing Qualitative and


Quantitative Methods

Before discussing the differences between


qualitative and quantitative methodologies
one must understand the foundational
similarities.

?
=
Foundational Similarities
 All qualitative data can be measured
and coded using quantitative methods.
 Quantitative research can be generated
from qualitative inquiries.
 Example: One can code an open-ended
interview with numbers that refer to
data specific references, or such
references could become the origin of a
randomized experiment.
Foundational Differences
 The major difference between
qualitative and quantitative research
stems from the researcher’s underlying
strategies.

 Quantitative research is viewed as


confirmatory and deductive in nature.

 Qualitative research is considered to be


exploratory and inductive.
Qualitative Research
 Terminology
 Methods
 Strengths and weaknesses
Terminology
 Grounded theory
 Ethnography
 Phenomenology
 Field research
Grounded Theory
 Grounded theory refers to an inductive
process of generating theory from data.

 This is considered ground-up or bottom-


up processing.

 Grounded theorists argue that theory


generated from observations of the
empirical world may be more valid and
useful than theories generated from
deductive inquiries.
Grounded Theory (con’t)
 Grounded theorists criticize deductive reasoning
since it relies upon a priori assumptions about the
world.

 However, grounded theory incorporates deductive


reasoning when using constant comparisons.

 In doing this, researchers detect patterns in their


observations and then create working hypotheses
that directs the progression of the inquiry.
Ethnography
 Ethnography emphasizes the
observation of details of everyday life as
they naturally unfold in the real world.
This is sometimes called naturalistic
research.

 Ethnography is a method of describing a


culture or society. This is primarily used
in anthropological research.
Phenomenology
 Phenomenology is a school of thought
that emphasizes a focus on people’s
subjective experiences and
interpretations of the world.

 Phenomenological theorists argue that


objectivity is virtually impossible to
ascertain, so to compensate, one must
view all research from the perspective
of the researcher.
Phenomenology (con’t)
 Phenomenologists attempt to
understand those whom they observe
from the subjects’ perspective.

 This outlook is especially pertinent in


social work and research where
empathy and perspective become the
keys to success.
Field Research

 Field research is a general term that


refers to a group of methodologies used
by researchers in making qualitative
inquiries.

 The field researcher goes directly to the


social phenomenon under study and
observes it as completely as possible.
Field Research (con’t)

 The natural environment is the priority


of the field researcher. There are no
implemented controls or experimental
conditions to speak of.

 Such methodologies are especially


useful in observing social phenomena
over time.
Methods

 Participant observation
 Direct observation
 Unstructured or intensive
interviewing
 Case studies
Participant Observation
 The researcher literally becomes
part of the observation.

 Example: One studying the


homeless may decide to walk the
streets of a given area in an
attempt to gain perspective and
possibly subjects for future study.
Direct Observation
 Direct observation is where the researcher
observes the actual behaviors of the subjects,
instead of relying on what the subjects say
about themselves or others say about them.

 Example: The observation booth at the CECP in


Martha Van may be used for direct observation
of behavior where survey or other empirical
methodologies may seem inappropriate.
Unstructured or Intensive
Interviewing

 This method allows the researcher to


ask open-ended questions during an
interview.

 Details are more important here than a


specific interview procedure.

 Here lies the inductive framework


through which theory can be generated.
Case Studies
 A particular case study may be the focus of any
of the previously mentioned field strategies.

 The case study is important in qualitative


research, especially in areas where exceptions
are being studied.

 Example: A patient may have a rare form of


cancer that has a set of symptoms and
potential treatments that have never before
been researched.
Strengths and Weaknesses
 Objectivity
 Reliability
 Validity
 Generalizability
Objectivity
 It is given that objectivity is
impossible in qualitative inquiry.
Instead the researcher locates
his/herself in the research.

 Objectivity is replaced by
subjective interpretation and mass
detail for later analysis.
Reliability
 Since procedure is de-emphasized in
qualitative research, replication and
other tests of reliability become more
difficult.

 However, measures may be taken to


make research more reliable within the
particular study (such as observer
training, or more objective checklists,
and so on).
Validity
 Qualitative researchers use greater detail to
argue for the presence of construct validity.

 Weak on external validity.

 Content validity can be retained if the


researcher implements some sort of criterion
settings.

 Having a focused criterion adds to the study’s


validity.
Generalizability
 Results for the most part, do not extend
much further than the original subject
pool.

 Sampling methods determine the extent


of the study’s generalizability.

 Quota and Purposive sampling


strategies are used to broaden the
generalizability.
Summing Up
 Are you willing to trade detail for
generalizability?

 Will exploratory research enable you to


generate new theories?

 Can you ask such sensitive questions on a


questionnaire?
Summing Up (con’t)
 Will the results add any evidence toward
any pre-existing theory or hypothesis?

 Is FUNDING available for this research?

 Do you really need to see numbers to


support your theories or hypotheses?

 Are there any ethical problems that could be


minimized by choosing a particular
strategy?

You might also like