Media and Cultural Globalization
Media and Cultural Globalization
Media and Cultural Globalization
Globalization
• The media are defined in this as the primary carriers of culture.
Newspapers, magazines, movies, advertisements, television, radio, and
the Internet, through the following but not limited to these channels,
media produce and display cultural products, from pop songs to top
films.
Moreover, they also generate communication and interaction among
cultures.
• In some ways, these interactions are like cultural laboratory
experiments. They sometimes result in startling and stunning hybrid
creations. But other times they result in combustible and explosive
mixture. We just have to find mixtures that are complimentary and/or
harmonious.
• Internationally award-winning author Jan Nederveen Pieterse
(Globalization and Culture: Global Mélange), argues that there are
actually three and only three, outcomes with which to consider the
influence of globalization and culture.
• Distinctive cultures will endure, despite globalization and global reach of
Western cultural forms. However, some will be overtaken or is pointing to that
direction which reforms them. Moreover, an example of cultural convergence is
the disappearance of hundreds of languages, as few of them become dominant.
• US political scientist Samuel Humington’s classic though contested work, The
Clash of Civilization and this Remaking of the World Order, argues, for example,
that the west and Islam will be locked in conflict (1996).
• This outcome can suggest ‘cultural imperialism’, in which the cultures of a more
developed nation invade and take over the cultures of less developed nations.
The result will be a worldwide, homogenized, Westernized culture.
• But it is not the only result, Cultural Hybridity suggest that globalization
will bring about increasing blending or mixture of culture. This mélange
will lead to creation of new and surprising cultural forms, from music to
food, even fashion.
• There is also cultural differentialism which involves barriers that prevent
flows that serve to make cultures more alike – so cultures remain
stubbornly different from one another.
Dark Contours of the Global Village
• Globalization and media have done wondrous deeds. They have
succeeded in bringing the world closer together. They have removed
the shackles of time and space. They have given us the ability to truly
imagine the world as a global village.
• But problems arise, Why? Because of human nature. According to
Lewis Mumford’s worst fears, they have built a village with large
tracts/sections of economic injustice, political repression, and cultural
conflict.
Pointers
• An argument that Mr. Lule makes is that globalization and media are
inseparable.
• Globalization would have never happened without the aid of media
messages – which are the following but not limited to oral, script,
printed, transmitted electronically or encoded digitally.
• Actually, Mr. Lule also credits Lewis Mumford and his vision that the
global village would become, not a place of harmony, but one where
differences, divisions and conflicts would be strengthened because of
a new struggle over capital and power fought through the use, and
thanks to the availability, of the newest media. This is the pivotal
argument of the entire book: that, even in light of the revolution
brought about by the digital media, both
• McLuhan and Mumford were proved right. The world has become a
global village, but is so fragmented that it is like the biblical Tower of
Babel.