0% found this document useful (0 votes)
159 views

Activator

The document discusses the history, origin, classification, mechanism of action and various modifications of the activator appliance. The activator is best suited for achieving gross changes in growing patients with malocclusions like Class II div 1, div 2, Class III, and open bites. It works by applying and eliminating forces via its construction bite, wire elements, and acrylic portion.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
159 views

Activator

The document discusses the history, origin, classification, mechanism of action and various modifications of the activator appliance. The activator is best suited for achieving gross changes in growing patients with malocclusions like Class II div 1, div 2, Class III, and open bites. It works by applying and eliminating forces via its construction bite, wire elements, and acrylic portion.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 69

Activator

Modifications of activator
Bionator

Dr Harsha Kidiyoor
Dept of orthodontics &
dentofacial orthopedics
Introduction and history
• Genes / perioral muscles / dentition
• Ortho- 3rd order of articulation-Moffett
• Fox–application of extra oral force-1803
• Kingsley –Jumping the bite –1880
• Hotz –Vorbissplatte
• Angle- Cl-II elastics –1907
• Robin-monobloc
Origin of activator
• Modified Kingsley plate retainer
• Biomechanic working retainer –Andresen
• Denmark to Oslo in Norway
• Karl Haupl & Viggo Andresen -activator
Classification
Based on the kind of malocclusion
Activator is best suited for achieving gross
changes in growing patients
– Cl II div I,div II
– Cl III
– Open bite

• Based on various modifications

• Classification of views
Classification of views
• Myotatic reflex activity and isometric contractions
induce musculoskeletal adaptation to new
mandibular closing pattern-Kinetic energy

– Andresen-Haupl –1938-based on ‘shaking of bone


‘hypothesis of Roux 1883
– Petrik 1957
– McNamera –1973
– Petrovic –1984
• Grude 1952-mismatch of bite & mechanism

• Viscoelastic property of muscle and stretching of


soft tissues -potential energy
• Emptying of vessels
• Pressing out of interstitial fluid
• Stretching of fibers
• Elastic deformation of bone
• Bioplastic adaptation of bone

• Selmer,Olsen,Herren 1953-incisal crossbite


• Woodside 1973 10–15 mm vertical opening
• Harvold 1974
• Transitional type of action
• Eschler 1952 muscle stretching method
• Cycle of isotonic and isometric contractions

• Ahlgren’s electromyographic research 1970


• Reiten 1951 –no special histologic results
from use of functional appliances
• Witt 1981, Scmuth 1994,
• Witt & Komposh 1979,
Mechanism of action of activator
The neuromuscular basis
Mechanism of action of activator
• Force analysis
• Static force
• Gravity, posture, elasticity of soft tissues
• Dynamic force
• Swallow, mastication
• Rhythmic force
• Activator works by
• Force application
• Force elimination
3-D Skeletal & dentoalveolar effects
• Trimming-dental
• Construction bite
• Condylar cartilage
is secondary
type- Moss,
Woodside &
Petrovic-LPM
Stutzmann angle
• Factors which determine activator function
– Individual facial skeleton
– Growth status
– Nature of malocclusion
– Inter occlusal clearence, head posture
– State of mind ,level of consciousness
– Treatment goal - Constriction bite
Activator therapy
• Diagnostic preparation
• Treatment planning
• Bite registration
• Laboratory procedures
• Management of the appliance
– Trimming of activator
Diagnostic preparation
• History
• Growth status
• VTO -‘instant correction’
• Patient compliance
• Study models
• Molar relations
• Midlines
• Asymmetries
• Curve of spee
• Dental discrepancies
• Functional analysis
• Postural rest position in NHP
• ICP habitual occlusion
• path of closure-Prematurities
• Freeway space –inter occlusal clearence
• TMJ & RCP
• Respiration
• Cephalometric analysis
• Direction of growth
• Position & size of jaw bases
• Morphologic peculiarities of mandible
• Position &inclination of incisors
Treatment planning-constriction bite

• Low construction bite


with marked forward
positioning
H-activator

• High construction
bite with slight
anterior positioning
V-activator
• Construction bite without forward
mandibular positioning
– Vertical problems
• Deep overbite
• Open bite
– Crowding in mixed dentition
• Construction bite with opening &
posterior positioning of mandible
• Construction bite for asymmetries
• Exaggerated construction bite
• Step wise advancement of bite
Bite registration

• Mark the midlines, molar relation & desired


mesial shift on the cast
• Train the patient after seating him in a upright
& relaxed posture
• Soften a sheet of bees wax
roll it (1cm dia) shape it press
it on the lower arch and mark
the midline
• Transfer the wax to the patients
mouth & fit it on the mandible
• Move the mandible as previously
practiced
• Remove the wax chill it & remove
the excess
• Place it on the cast and check
• Replace the hard wax in patients
mouth and check after asking him
to bite hard
Vertical dimension during bite registration

• Postural rest
– Phonetic
– Command
– Non command
– Combined
• In occlusion
• Freeway space
• With the bite
Laboratory procedures
• Mounting the casts to a fixator
• Preparation of wire elements
• Labial bow –0.9 mm
• Additional wire elements
– Stabilizing wire
– Active springs
• Fixation of jackscrews and wire elements
• Fabrication of acrylic portion
• Finishing and polishing
Management of the appliance
• Insert the appliance & give instructions
• Worn for 2-3 hrs day time in the 1st week
• Night wear & 1-3hrs day wear for 2nd week
• Patient recalled for check up on 3rd week
• Check up appointments every 6 weeks
• Trimming according to the plan
• Activation of wire elements
• Jackscrew activated by pt at 2 weeks interval
Trimming for tooth guidance
• Force application and force elimination
• During use the acrylic areas that contact the teeth
are likely to become polished and shiny

• Acrylic surfaces that transmit the desired


intermittent force and contact the teeth are called
guide planes
Trimming for 3-D control
• Trimming the activator for vertical control
– Intrusion of teeth
• Extrusion of teeth

• Selective trimming of activator


Trimming for sagital control
• Incisors
• Protraction of incisors
• Loading
– entire lingual surface
– incisal 3rd of lingual surface
• Protraction springs
• Wooden pegs
• guttapercha
• Passive bow
• Active bow & its position
• Retrusion of incisors
– Interaction between labial bow and
acrylic decides the type of force and
tooth movement
• Incisal-C rtn at apex
• Gingival –C rtn junction of apex and middle
3rd
• Incisal with fulcrum- C rtn middle 3rd
Importance of lower incisors
• Activator loads the lingual surface of lower
incisors and tips them labially
• If this is necessary labial tipping further
enhanced by loading the lingual area
• Prevent labial tipping by relieving lingual acrylic
• Or by incisal capping
Sagital movement of posteriors
Movement of teeth in transverse plane
• Asymmetric constriction
bite
• Guide planes
loading & trimming
• Jack screw
• Wire elements
summery
• Cl II div I with hypodivergent jaw bases
H-activator
• Normodivergent
• Cl II div I with hyper divergent jaw bases
V activator
• Cl II div II
• Cl I ,Cl I with deep bite,Cl I with Open bite
• Cross bites
• Cl III
Modifications of activator
• Harvold-Woodside activator
• Herren-Shaye activator (LSU)
• Wunderer activator
• Bow activator- A.M.Schwarz
• U-bow activator –Karwetzky
• Kinetor –Stockfisch
• Propulsor-Muhlemann
• Cybernator-Schmuth
Modifications of activator

• Palate-free activator-Metzelder
• Elastic open activator-G.Klammt
• Combined activator and head gear
– Pfeiffer and Grobety therapy
– Stocklie and Teuscher therapy
– Stockfisch approach
– Hickham approach
• Bass appliance-Neville M Bass
• Bonded activator-Hamilton
Harvold-Woodside
activator –Cl-II
• Construction bite
– Vertical opening of
12-15 mm
• Flanges
• Labial arch wire
• Palatal contact and
expansion
Dislodging springs • Cl III
Herren-Shaye activator
• Paul Herren of Zurich
• L.S.U of Robert Shaye
• Mandible positioned 2-3 mm
beyond neutroclusion
• Incisal edges are 2-4 mm
apart
• Trangular arrow head clasps
• Lingual flanges
Wunderer activator
• Used for Cl III malocclusion
• Appliance is split horizontally
• Screw is embedded in the
acrylic behind the incisors
• Occlusal surfaces are
covered with acrylic
• Weise screw
Bow activator- A.M.Schwarz
• Upper and lower parts are
connected by a elastic bow
• Transverse mobility is believed
to provide additional stimulus
• Independent expansion is
possible
• Step wise advancement is
possible
• Can be used in unilateral
distoclusion
• Distortion and breakages
common
U-bow activator –Karwetzky

• Maxillary and
mandibular
active plates are
joined in the 1st
perm molar
region using a U
shaped bow
made of 1.1mm
ss wire
Kinetor –Stockfisch
Propulsor-Muhlemann
Cybernator-Schmuth
Palate-free activator-Metzelder
Elastic open activator-G.Klammt
Combined activator and head gear
therapy
• rationale
Pfeiffer and Grobety therapy
• Labial bow has a spur
• Long and rolled out lingual flanges
Stocklie and Teuscher therapy
Stockfisch approach
• Bands on first molar
with tubes to
receive head gear
• Clasp on the kinetor
snaps above the
buccal tube
assemblage
Hickham approach
• Hooks on labial bow to receive J hook
head gear
Bass appliance
-Neville M Bass
Bonded activator-Hamilton
• Mainly used in non compliant patients
• Used for expansion along with forward
positioning of jaws
Bionator-Balters 1960
• Balters concept-position of
the tongue is decisive
• Equilibrium between tongue
and circumoral muscles is
responsible for shape of
dental arches and inter
cuspation
• Bite taken in an edge to edge
relation
– Dorsum of tongue in contact
with soft palate
– Lip closure
Appliance design
• Horse shoe shaped acrylic lingual plate
• Upper anterior part kept free for proper
tongue function
Labial bow with buccinator loops
Palatal bar
Basic Cl II appliance
Open bite appliance
Class III or reversed bionator
Other differences
• Less bulky more patient compliance
• Can be worn all time except during
meals
• Vulnerable to distortion
• Simultaneous requirement of
stabilization of the appliance and
selective grinding for eruption guidence
Ideal cases for bionator therapy
• Mild Cl II in mixed dentition
• Well aligned arches
• Abnormal muscle pattern
• Buccal teeth are in infraclusion,-large
freeway space
• Adults with TMJ problems
• Bruxism and clenching during REM
Terminology used to
describe trimming of
bionator
• Articular plane
• Loading area
• Tooth bed
• Nose
• Ledge
Sequence of trimming of bionator
• Trimming of acrylic and elimination of
influence of tongue and cheeks allow
the teeth to erupt up to the articular
plane
• Sequence –lower molar & upper molar-
lower pre molars –upper premolars
• Additional anchorage from
– Lower incisal margins
– Deciduous molars and edentulous areas
– Noses
references
• Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances-
Graber,Rakosi & Petrovic

• Removable orthodontic appliances-Graber & Neumann

• Orthodontics- current principles & technique-Graber & Swain

• Orthodontics- current principles & technique-Graber &


Vanarsdall

• Bass Orthopedic Appliance System Part 1 - Design and


Construction - Neville M Bass -JCO April 1987

You might also like