Activator
Activator
Modifications of activator
Bionator
Dr Harsha Kidiyoor
Dept of orthodontics &
dentofacial orthopedics
Introduction and history
• Genes / perioral muscles / dentition
• Ortho- 3rd order of articulation-Moffett
• Fox–application of extra oral force-1803
• Kingsley –Jumping the bite –1880
• Hotz –Vorbissplatte
• Angle- Cl-II elastics –1907
• Robin-monobloc
Origin of activator
• Modified Kingsley plate retainer
• Biomechanic working retainer –Andresen
• Denmark to Oslo in Norway
• Karl Haupl & Viggo Andresen -activator
Classification
Based on the kind of malocclusion
Activator is best suited for achieving gross
changes in growing patients
– Cl II div I,div II
– Cl III
– Open bite
• Classification of views
Classification of views
• Myotatic reflex activity and isometric contractions
induce musculoskeletal adaptation to new
mandibular closing pattern-Kinetic energy
• High construction
bite with slight
anterior positioning
V-activator
• Construction bite without forward
mandibular positioning
– Vertical problems
• Deep overbite
• Open bite
– Crowding in mixed dentition
• Construction bite with opening &
posterior positioning of mandible
• Construction bite for asymmetries
• Exaggerated construction bite
• Step wise advancement of bite
Bite registration
• Postural rest
– Phonetic
– Command
– Non command
– Combined
• In occlusion
• Freeway space
• With the bite
Laboratory procedures
• Mounting the casts to a fixator
• Preparation of wire elements
• Labial bow –0.9 mm
• Additional wire elements
– Stabilizing wire
– Active springs
• Fixation of jackscrews and wire elements
• Fabrication of acrylic portion
• Finishing and polishing
Management of the appliance
• Insert the appliance & give instructions
• Worn for 2-3 hrs day time in the 1st week
• Night wear & 1-3hrs day wear for 2nd week
• Patient recalled for check up on 3rd week
• Check up appointments every 6 weeks
• Trimming according to the plan
• Activation of wire elements
• Jackscrew activated by pt at 2 weeks interval
Trimming for tooth guidance
• Force application and force elimination
• During use the acrylic areas that contact the teeth
are likely to become polished and shiny
• Palate-free activator-Metzelder
• Elastic open activator-G.Klammt
• Combined activator and head gear
– Pfeiffer and Grobety therapy
– Stocklie and Teuscher therapy
– Stockfisch approach
– Hickham approach
• Bass appliance-Neville M Bass
• Bonded activator-Hamilton
Harvold-Woodside
activator –Cl-II
• Construction bite
– Vertical opening of
12-15 mm
• Flanges
• Labial arch wire
• Palatal contact and
expansion
Dislodging springs • Cl III
Herren-Shaye activator
• Paul Herren of Zurich
• L.S.U of Robert Shaye
• Mandible positioned 2-3 mm
beyond neutroclusion
• Incisal edges are 2-4 mm
apart
• Trangular arrow head clasps
• Lingual flanges
Wunderer activator
• Used for Cl III malocclusion
• Appliance is split horizontally
• Screw is embedded in the
acrylic behind the incisors
• Occlusal surfaces are
covered with acrylic
• Weise screw
Bow activator- A.M.Schwarz
• Upper and lower parts are
connected by a elastic bow
• Transverse mobility is believed
to provide additional stimulus
• Independent expansion is
possible
• Step wise advancement is
possible
• Can be used in unilateral
distoclusion
• Distortion and breakages
common
U-bow activator –Karwetzky
• Maxillary and
mandibular
active plates are
joined in the 1st
perm molar
region using a U
shaped bow
made of 1.1mm
ss wire
Kinetor –Stockfisch
Propulsor-Muhlemann
Cybernator-Schmuth
Palate-free activator-Metzelder
Elastic open activator-G.Klammt
Combined activator and head gear
therapy
• rationale
Pfeiffer and Grobety therapy
• Labial bow has a spur
• Long and rolled out lingual flanges
Stocklie and Teuscher therapy
Stockfisch approach
• Bands on first molar
with tubes to
receive head gear
• Clasp on the kinetor
snaps above the
buccal tube
assemblage
Hickham approach
• Hooks on labial bow to receive J hook
head gear
Bass appliance
-Neville M Bass
Bonded activator-Hamilton
• Mainly used in non compliant patients
• Used for expansion along with forward
positioning of jaws
Bionator-Balters 1960
• Balters concept-position of
the tongue is decisive
• Equilibrium between tongue
and circumoral muscles is
responsible for shape of
dental arches and inter
cuspation
• Bite taken in an edge to edge
relation
– Dorsum of tongue in contact
with soft palate
– Lip closure
Appliance design
• Horse shoe shaped acrylic lingual plate
• Upper anterior part kept free for proper
tongue function
Labial bow with buccinator loops
Palatal bar
Basic Cl II appliance
Open bite appliance
Class III or reversed bionator
Other differences
• Less bulky more patient compliance
• Can be worn all time except during
meals
• Vulnerable to distortion
• Simultaneous requirement of
stabilization of the appliance and
selective grinding for eruption guidence
Ideal cases for bionator therapy
• Mild Cl II in mixed dentition
• Well aligned arches
• Abnormal muscle pattern
• Buccal teeth are in infraclusion,-large
freeway space
• Adults with TMJ problems
• Bruxism and clenching during REM
Terminology used to
describe trimming of
bionator
• Articular plane
• Loading area
• Tooth bed
• Nose
• Ledge
Sequence of trimming of bionator
• Trimming of acrylic and elimination of
influence of tongue and cheeks allow
the teeth to erupt up to the articular
plane
• Sequence –lower molar & upper molar-
lower pre molars –upper premolars
• Additional anchorage from
– Lower incisal margins
– Deciduous molars and edentulous areas
– Noses
references
• Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliances-
Graber,Rakosi & Petrovic