The document discusses the characteristics of global cities. Global cities are defined as hubs of economic and political power that facilitate the flow of capital, information, and culture on a global scale. They have large, diverse populations and are centers of innovation, business, higher education, media, and culture. The document outlines some key attributes that define global cities, such as being seats of economic power like New York and Tokyo, centers of authority and political influence, and hubs of culture and learning. It also discusses indexes that measure and rank global cities based on factors like business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experiences, and political engagement.
The document discusses the characteristics of global cities. Global cities are defined as hubs of economic and political power that facilitate the flow of capital, information, and culture on a global scale. They have large, diverse populations and are centers of innovation, business, higher education, media, and culture. The document outlines some key attributes that define global cities, such as being seats of economic power like New York and Tokyo, centers of authority and political influence, and hubs of culture and learning. It also discusses indexes that measure and rank global cities based on factors like business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experiences, and political engagement.
The document discusses the characteristics of global cities. Global cities are defined as hubs of economic and political power that facilitate the flow of capital, information, and culture on a global scale. They have large, diverse populations and are centers of innovation, business, higher education, media, and culture. The document outlines some key attributes that define global cities, such as being seats of economic power like New York and Tokyo, centers of authority and political influence, and hubs of culture and learning. It also discusses indexes that measure and rank global cities based on factors like business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experiences, and political engagement.
The document discusses the characteristics of global cities. Global cities are defined as hubs of economic and political power that facilitate the flow of capital, information, and culture on a global scale. They have large, diverse populations and are centers of innovation, business, higher education, media, and culture. The document outlines some key attributes that define global cities, such as being seats of economic power like New York and Tokyo, centers of authority and political influence, and hubs of culture and learning. It also discusses indexes that measure and rank global cities based on factors like business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experiences, and political engagement.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18
1. What are attributes of global city?
Global City
2. What are the characteristics of global city?
Defining Global City • New global cities have since arisen not only as financial centers but also a producers of services that are global in scope • Global cities are post-industrial • Manufacturing has been scattered across national and global networks • Turn from “landscapes of production” to “landscapes of consumption” • Global cities are “brain hubs” and centers of a “knowledge economy” • Economies of scale and concentration are necessary despite the proliferation/production of communications technology • Network economies and spillover effects include “thick labor markets” in knowledge workers. • Polarization/separation extends to differentiation by human capital (skills and formal education) 21st century–is a hub for the closer relation of states and for a wider perspective in technological development. As such the world became a web where people can witness the interconnectivity of nations. It is globalization that make nations closer to each other. Thomas Friedman, in his book The World is Flat (2005) there are three stages of globalization: First, Globalization 1.0- lasted from 1492-1800 and “shrank the world from a size large to a size medium”. This is known as the age of mercantilism and colonialism and the driving forces were the workforce, housepower, windpower and later on steam power. Second stage, is Globalization 2.0 – the age of Pax Britannica when Great Britain was the hegemonic power in terms of trade and economy. The driving force was new institutions, particularly the emergence of global markets and multinational corporations. Third stage, is Globalization 3.0 – refers to the age of Pax Americana which occurred during the second half of the 20 th century, when the US of America was the hegemonic power in terms of security, trade and economy. The US of America became the sole superpower in the so- called Unipolar World, after the fall of Soviet Union in 1980s. This system was developed by the reigning hegemonic state by defeating other great powers in terms economy and influence to other states in the world. Soft power – is the strategy used to retain one’s dominance over the less powerful states. This termed was coined by Joseph Nye (2004) who uses a different method to establish cooperation-attraction. This form of power “arises from attractiveness of a country’s culture, political ideals and politics”. Soft power was enhanced when these policies are deemed justifiable by other states. The US of America has been employing its soft power in various ways. Gore (2013) explained that the world is changing dramatically and there are six driving forces in this global change. One of the drivers of global change is the emergence of a deeply interconnected global economy that increasingly operates as a whole entity. Multinational corporations- (MNCs) play a substantial role in the global economy and enjoy a multitude of privileges such as: - unquestionable access to vast amount of wealth they draw from their income - theoretical immortality to a certain extent - the ability to pit themselves against one another MNCs play a pivotal role not only in the global economy but in the international political community as well, alongside nation-states in terms of their capacity to sustain themselves and considerably to influence the members of the international community, due to established premises. MNCs seem to tie together an otherwise politically separated and clouted world under an all encompassing banner of commerce and economy. Products and goods have the intrinsic capability to attract a target market regardless of geographical location and political ideology. MNCs in the sense, have the capacity to erase and transcend the borders of the world. MNCs and irrefutable continuity of nation-state act as key actos of the global community. With these, the world at least figuratively seems to be smaller and more connected. The evidence of such connectivity is the concept and actual manifestation of the global city. Global city- serves as a hub/heart/center for production, finance and telecommunications. Sassen (2005) outlined the different characteristics of globality that maintains its link to globalization. Characteristics of global city are: 1. The cultural diversity of the people 2. Existence of the center of economy 3. Geographic dispersal of economic activities that marks globalization 4. Global reach performance Sociologist Saskia Sassen popularized this term. Her The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo (1990) has shaped the concepts and methods used to analyze the role of cities and their networks in the contemporary world. Sassen’s concept of Global City gives emphasis on the flow of information and capital. Global Cities are major nodes in the interconnected systems of information and money, and the wealth that they capture is intimately related to the specialized businesses that facilitate those flows. • making sense of urban systems and their global networks These characteristics are observed in famous global cities: New York, Tokyo, Singapore and Seoul. According to the 22018 Global Cities Index; New York – ranked the highest in terms of general criteria i.e. business activity, human capital, information exchange, cultural experience and political engagement. Followed by London, Paris, Tokyo and Hongkong. Cities are hub for high economic, commercial, cultural and at times even political activities which can contribute to human progress and development through collaborative efforts of multi- cultural individuals situated therein. Thus, global cities represent cities around the world that exemplify these characteristics of a city better than other cities. Example , the cities of San Francisco and New York in the US of America were showcased as global cities that exhibit strength in innovation and strong performance in business activity and human capital respectively. Further, global cities are also perceived as sources of economic growth and are also economic powerhouses themselves, coupled with being industry leaders and regional hubs. Global cities house industries that promote the globalization of markets. Global cities have been established , through the Development of multinational corporations. In the coming decades The number of global cities will dramatically increase. Attributes of Global City SEATS OF ECONOMIC POWER New York have the largest stock market in the world Tokyo houses has the most number of corporate/ business headquarters Shanghai plays critical role in the global economic supply Attributes of Global City CENTERS OF AUTHORITY • Washington DC, not wealthy as New York, but it’s the seat/place of American Power • Canberra is Australia political capital: home to country’s politicians and bureaucrats/officials/officeholders CENTERS OF POLITICAL INFLUENCE • Cities that house major International Organizations: UN- New York, EU-Brussels CENTERS OF HIGHER LEARNING AND CULTURE The question then becomes how to identify these cities, and perhaps to determine to what extent they function as global cities specifically, beyond all of the other things that they do simply as cities. AT Kearney’s list, developed in conjunction with the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Global Cities Index uses criteria across five dimensions: A. Business Activity (headquarters, services firms, capital markets value, number of international conferences, value of goods through ports and airports) B. Human Capital (size of foreign born population, quality of universities, number of international schools, international student population, number of residents with college degrees) C. Information Exchange (accessibility of major TV news channels, Internet presence (basically number of search hits), number of international news bureaus, censorship, and broadband subscriber rate) D. Cultural Experience (number of sporting event, museums, performing arts venues, culinary establishments, international visitors, and sister city relationships). E. Political Engagement (number of embassies and consulates, think tanks, international organizations, political conferences) The Institute for Urban Strategies at The Mori Memorial Foundation in Tokyo published another study called “The Global Power City Index 2011.” This report examined cities in terms of functions demanded by several “actor” types: Manager, Researcher, Artist, Visitor, and Resident. The functional areas were: 1. Economy (Market Attractiveness, Economic Vitality, Business Environment, Regulations and Risk) 2. Research and Development (Research Background, Readiness for Accepting and Supporting Researchers, Research Achievement) 3. Cultural Interaction (Trendsetting Potential, Accommodation Environment, Resources of Attracting Visitors, Dining and Shopping, Volume of Interaction) 4. Livability (Working Environment, Cost of Living, Security and Safety, Life Support Functions) 5. Environment (Ecology, Pollution, Natural Environment) 6. Accessibility (International Transportation Infrastructure, Inner City Transportation Infrastructure) In the age of globalization, the activities of production are scattered on a global basis. These complex, globalized production networks require new forms of financial and producer services to manage them. Global City Power Top 10 (2016) 1. London, 6. Seoul 2. New York City, 7. Armsterdam 3. Tokyo, 8. Berlin 4. Paris, 9. Hongkong 5. Singapore, 10. Sydney