Strategic Analysis and Recommendations: Group 4 - Section B
Strategic Analysis and Recommendations: Group 4 - Section B
Strategic Analysis and Recommendations: Group 4 - Section B
Group 4 – Section B
Alex Brown
Luis Cavero
Amedeo Giacomantonio
Unni Pedersen
Jung-Ho Song
Tetsuma Suzuki
Presentation Outline
Company Overview
External Analysis
Internal Analysis
SWOT Analysis
Lego‘s 8-Point Action Plan
Additional Recommendations
Conclusion
Mission, Vision & Core Values
Competitors Industry
• Mattel: # 1 - strong growth • Highly fragmented
Financial Performance
Net sales fell by 26% in 2003 - only the 3rd loss since 1939
No major investments in 2003
Physical Assets
Reduced total assets by 20% by reducing working capital
Technical Resources
The Vision Lab, setting up in 2003 (researching trends and innovations)
39 Lego Mindstorm centres around the world (working with leading
universities and science centres)
Costs
Cut of 600 positions globally in 2003
Closing Switzerland factory in 2004
S.W.O.T
Strengths Weaknesses
• Strong Brand Power • Limited brand image
• Wide product line • Loss of focus on key businesses
• Well developed global distribution • Indifferent cultural knowledge
channel • Easy to copy
Opportunities Threats
• Electronic/technology driven toys • PC / Video Games
• Sales to the Education industry • Increasing power of distributors
• Alliances in the Entertainment • Increased dependency on licensed
industry products
• Growth in emerging markets • Low cost competitors
Lego’s Action Plan
Cost Reduction
-Reduce development and lead times by as much as 50%
-Terminate non-core ventures
Technical Technical
Quality Quality
Service Service
Quality Quality
Alignment
Timing Timing
Quality Quality
Reputation Reputation
Quality Quality
Relationship Relationship
Quality Quality
Price Price
Strategic Recommendations
IND
High CHN
USA
MARKET EU
ATTRACTIVE-
Medium
NESS
Low
Strategic Recommendations (cont’d)