The document discusses the retraction of Jose Rizal, the Philippine national hero, from his political writings and beliefs. There are differing accounts of whether Rizal truly recanted his beliefs in a deathbed retraction document or if it was a forgery by the Spanish friars. Handwriting experts concluded the document was genuine, but some claim it was fabricated in order to deny Rizal a Christian burial and undermine his legacy. The validity of the retraction continues to be debated by historians.
The document discusses the retraction of Jose Rizal, the Philippine national hero, from his political writings and beliefs. There are differing accounts of whether Rizal truly recanted his beliefs in a deathbed retraction document or if it was a forgery by the Spanish friars. Handwriting experts concluded the document was genuine, but some claim it was fabricated in order to deny Rizal a Christian burial and undermine his legacy. The validity of the retraction continues to be debated by historians.
The document discusses the retraction of Jose Rizal, the Philippine national hero, from his political writings and beliefs. There are differing accounts of whether Rizal truly recanted his beliefs in a deathbed retraction document or if it was a forgery by the Spanish friars. Handwriting experts concluded the document was genuine, but some claim it was fabricated in order to deny Rizal a Christian burial and undermine his legacy. The validity of the retraction continues to be debated by historians.
The document discusses the retraction of Jose Rizal, the Philippine national hero, from his political writings and beliefs. There are differing accounts of whether Rizal truly recanted his beliefs in a deathbed retraction document or if it was a forgery by the Spanish friars. Handwriting experts concluded the document was genuine, but some claim it was fabricated in order to deny Rizal a Christian burial and undermine his legacy. The validity of the retraction continues to be debated by historians.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17
RETRACTION
OF RIZAL
Presented by: Rose Jean I. Gallego BSE MATH 1 RETRACTION
The act of retracting or the state of
being retracted. withdrawal of a promise, statement and opinion. DR. JOSE P RIZAL
• Was a Filipino nationalist and polymath
during the tail end of the Spanish colonial period of the Philippines. • He is tagged as the national hero of the Filipino people. • He was a multifaceted intellectual and a political activist, best known for his political writings that inspired the Philippine revolution and ultimately led to his execution by the Spanish colonizers. PRIMARY SOURCE
• Documents
• Testimonies The Retraction of Rizal
One of the most intriguing of all was
the issues of Jose Rizal was his alleged retraction which was all about his reversion to the Catholic Faith and all other issues linked to it such as his marriage to Josephine Bracken. That issue was claimed to be true by the Roman Catholic defenders but asserted to be deceptive by anti-retractionists. They claim that the retraction document is a forgery, but handwriting experts concluded a long time ago that it is genuine. Rafael Palma’s opus on Rizal, titled “Biografia de Rizal” is so anti- Catholic that the Church successfully opposed its publication using government funds. The exact copy had been received by Fr. Balaguer in the evening immediately preceding Rizal's execution. Jose Rizal with the addition of the names of the witnesses taken from the texts of the retraction in the Manila newspapers. Fr. Pi's copy of Rizal's retraction has the same text as that of Fr. Balaguer's "exact" copy but follows the paragraphing of the texts of Rizal's retraction in the Manila newspapers. In order to marry Josephine, Rizal wrote with the help of a priest a form of retraction to be approved by the Bishop of Cebu. This incident was revealed by Fr. Antonio Obach to his friend Prof. Austin Craig who wrote down in 1912 what the priest had told him; “The document (the retraction), enclosed with the priest's letter, was ready for the mail when Rizal came hurrying I to reclaim it.“ Rizal realized (perhaps, rather late) that he had written and given to a priest what the friars had been trying by all means to get from him. Surely whether Rizal died a Catholic or an apostate adds or detracts nothing from his greatness as a Filipino. It is because of what he did and what he was that we revere Rizal. Catholic or Mason, Rizal is still Rizal: the hero who courted death “to prove to those who deny our patriotism that we know how to die for our duty and our beliefs” AUSTIN COATES’S CRITICAL ANALYSIS THE RETRACTION OF RIZAL DUBBED AS AN ECCLESIASTICAL FRAUD. IT WAS THE FRIARS WHO WANTED RIZAL’S RETRACTION
THERE WAS NO SIGNED LETTER OF RETRACTION
BECAUSE RIZAL KNEW TOO WELL THE DAMAGE DUNCH THE LETTER WOULD DO TO HIM
IT IS INCONCEIVABLE THAT THEY WOULD NOT GIVEN HIM
CHRISTIAN BURIAL WHICH THE TWO JESUITS AT THE EXECUTION DIDN’T DO.
RIZAL’S FAMILY FOUND DIFFICULT TO ACCEPT
RETRACTION OR MARRIAGE. THEY KNEW IT NE RETRACTED IN HIS 6 am COMMUNICATION WITH HIS MOTHER. THE ANALYSIS OF RAFAEL PALMA
ACCORDING TO HIS ANALYSIS THE RETRACTION RIZAL IS
A HEARSAY WITH THE FOLLOWING REASONS :
1. THE DOCUMENT OF RETRACTION WAS KEPT SECRETS.
2. PETITIONS WERE DENIED AFTER THE RIZAL’S FAMILY ASKED
FOR THE ORIGINAL OR COPY BE THE RETRACTON DOCUMENT AS WELL AS THE MARRIAGE CERTIRCATE WITH JOSEPHINE BRACKEN.
3. RIZALS BURIAL WAS KEPT SECRET.
4. NO MASSES WERE HELD OR FUNERAL HELD BY THE
CATHOLICS ON THE DEATH OF RIZAL.
5. HE WAS NOT BURIED JN THE CATHOLIC CEMETERY IN PACO.
THE ACCOUNT OF FR. PIO PI
ACCORDING TO HIS ACCOUNT. A LONG
DISCUSSION WITH FATHER BALAGUER HAPPENED BEFORE RIZAL WILLINGLY SURRENDERED TO TURN BACK TO CATHOLICISM
RIZAL FOUND CERTAIN OBJECTIONS WITH
FIRST COMPOSITION PRESENTED BY FR. BALGUER, HIS WORK SATISFIED RIZAL AND MADE SOME LITTLE MODIFICATIONS TO MAKE IT RIZAL’S OWN AND SPONTANEOUS WORK, THEN WROTE IT WITH RIZAL’S HAND AND SIGNED IT.
BENEATH RIZALS SIGNATURE THE CHIEF OF
THE PICKET, JUAN DEL FRESNO. AND THE ADJUTANT OF THE PLAZA ,ELOY MOURE AS WITNESSES THE ACCOUNT OF FR. VICENTE BALAGUER
ACCORDING TO THE ACCOUNT, RIZAL
ACCEPTED A SHORTER RETRACTION DOCUMENT PREPARED BY THE SUPERIOR OF THE JESUIT SOCIETY IN THE PHILIPPINES, FATHER PIO PI .
RIZAL THEN WROTE HIS RETRACTION AFTER
MAKING SOME MODIFICATIONS IN THE DOCUMENT IN HIS RETRACTION. HE DISAVOWED MASONRY AND RELIGIOUS THOUGHTS THAT OPPOSED CATHOLIC BELIEF. THE RETRACTION WAS SIGNED TOGETHER WITH DR. RIZAL BY SEÑOR FRESNO, CHIEF OF THE PICKET AHD SENOR MOURE, ADJUTANT OF THE PLAZA.
HE ALSO CLAIMED THAT HE WAS THE ONE WHO
SOLEMMIZED THE MARRIAGE OF JOSEPHINE BRACKEN AND RIZAL HOURS BEFORE EXECUTION THANK YOUUUU!