The document discusses strategies for critically reading, listening, and viewing various media. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating texts for their purpose, arguments, evidence, and language rather than just what they say. When critically engaging, one should distinguish facts from interpretations, ideas from their expression, and make preliminary judgments while asking clarifying questions. The strategies outlined include previewing texts, reflecting on one's views, evaluating arguments and evidence, and expressing a reasoned judgment.
The document discusses strategies for critically reading, listening, and viewing various media. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating texts for their purpose, arguments, evidence, and language rather than just what they say. When critically engaging, one should distinguish facts from interpretations, ideas from their expression, and make preliminary judgments while asking clarifying questions. The strategies outlined include previewing texts, reflecting on one's views, evaluating arguments and evidence, and expressing a reasoned judgment.
The document discusses strategies for critically reading, listening, and viewing various media. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating texts for their purpose, arguments, evidence, and language rather than just what they say. When critically engaging, one should distinguish facts from interpretations, ideas from their expression, and make preliminary judgments while asking clarifying questions. The strategies outlined include previewing texts, reflecting on one's views, evaluating arguments and evidence, and expressing a reasoned judgment.
The document discusses strategies for critically reading, listening, and viewing various media. It emphasizes the importance of evaluating texts for their purpose, arguments, evidence, and language rather than just what they say. When critically engaging, one should distinguish facts from interpretations, ideas from their expression, and make preliminary judgments while asking clarifying questions. The strategies outlined include previewing texts, reflecting on one's views, evaluating arguments and evidence, and expressing a reasoned judgment.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20
Topic 2: Be a Critical
Reader, Listener Viewer
Reading effectively requires approaching texts with a critical eye: evaluating what you read for not just what it says, but how and why it says it. Effective reading is central to both effective research (when you evaluate sources) and effective writing (when you understand how what you read is written, you can work to incorporate those techniques into your own writing). Being an effective reader also means being able to evaluate your own practices, working to develop your critical reading skills Critical Evaluation Defined • Reading critically is not a fast process. Many students do not set aside enough study time for reading (and rereading), and read everything either too quickly or at the same speed. If you know what you’re reading for, you can better distinguish information that can be skimmed from that which should be more closely examined, and make better use of your reading time. • Preview or survey the text before detailed reading begins, looking for clues related to its purpose, its relevance, its difficulty, and how it connects with ideas or information you already know. • Be willing to struggle with the text in order to understand it – but don’t get hung up on single, tough details in first readings. Rather, hold confusing passages in mental suspension, and continue to read with the idea that what seems difficult to understand now may be cleared up as you go along. Making Important Distinctions Evaluation is making judgments about a text. If you were a detective, this is when you would run with one educated guess and build a case for or against a suspect’s credibility. Some guiding questions related to evaluation include: • Is the thesis strong? • Are the points argued well? • Are the examples valid? • Are the sources reliable? • Is the argument logically consistent? Convincing? • Does the argument contribute to the discipline? Ask Questions about why? the context of the text why written? where? when? who? how relevant? the structure of the text Do the parts fit together logically? Is there a clear argument? the arguments are they fair? the evidence used Is evidence given to support the point of view? is the evidence from an authority in this field? is the evidence evaluated from different perspectives? the language used Is the language coloured to present some things as more positive than others? Are claims attributed clearly to specific sources? Strategy for Critical Reading, Listening and Viewing Critical Reading: Making important distinctions when reading Distinction between the Person & the Idea Distinction between Taste & Judgment Distinction between Fact & Interpretation Critical Reading: Making important distinctions when reading Distinction between Literal & Ironic Statements Distinction between an Idea’s Validity & its Expressive Quality Distinction between Language & Reality Strategy for Critical Reading SKIM: Go over what you need to read quickly to get the main ideas. REFLECT: Examine your views separately from the author’s. READ: Read the whole work & underline or highlight important ideas. EVALUATE: Make a preliminary judgment & ask questions. EXPRESS YOUR JUDGMENT: Fully judge what you have read, explaining clearly where you disagree with the author. Critical Listening We need to think, evaluate & question what we listen to on a daily basis, whether it is what our friends are saying to us, or a talk given by somebody, or a debate between two persons, or a speech given by a personality, or a radio or TV program, etc., etc. Strategy for Critical Listening Set aside preconceptions. Don’t let your perception of the speaker interfere with the message. Focus on the message. Identify key assertions & supporting information. Evaluate the message. Make a preliminary judgment & ask questions about unclear points. Express your judgment. Judge & include explanation for points raised by the speaker with which you don’t agree. Critical Viewing There are various types of visual communication that needs to be critically viewed by us. These include: Statistical Graphs. Advertisements. Drama. Critical Viewing of Statistical Graphs These are numbers or statistics represented by pictures, drawings, or graphics, including figurative graphs, pie-charts, and bar-charts, among others. Critical Viewing of Advertisements These can be the static form or the dynamic form. Viewing ads critically means asking some questions. An analysis of the ad words, sounds, & visuals needs to be made. Critical Viewing of Drama There are various types of drama, such as movies, sitcoms, mini- series, episodic drama, soap opera, etc., etc. When viewing drama, questions need to be asked. Questions to ask while/after watching TV drama Is the plot logical or not? Is the setting conducive to the plot or not? Is the drama just for entertainment, or are there lessons to be learned? Are some elements uncalled for or irrelevant to the plot—such as too many technical terms or frequent obscene scenes or too much violence? Questions to ask while/after watching TV drama Does the film-maker have an agenda (such as certain prejudices) presented in the drama, & is this agenda suitable or not, relevant or not, timely or not? Does the drama have anti-Islam rhetoric or un-Islamic elements?