Why Change Programs Don't Produce Change: By: Michael Beer, Russell A. Eisenstat Bert Spector

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Why Change Programs Don’t

Produce Change
By: Michael Beer,
Russell A. Eisenstat
Bert Spector
Presented To: Dr. Fawad Bashir
Presented By: Areesha Khan
Touqeer Ahmed
Faiz Ul Hassan
Business Problem

 Traditional Change Management doesn't work


 Critical Path: 6 steps that start small and
spread
Methodology or Approach

 Hierarchical and Bureaucratic Structures


 Analysis of Six Corporations
 New Theory - Task Alignment
Methodology or Approach

 SixSteps on the Critical Path


Mobilize
Develop shared vision
Foster consensus
Spread revitalization
Institutionalize revitalization
Monitor and adjust strategies
Hypotheses

An approach to organizational transformation


that is based on task alignment , starting at the
department level and moving progressively
towards the top, is the most effective way to
achieve lasting change.
Hypotheses
Factors Preventing Change
 Factors required for revitalization:
 Coordination
 Commitment
 Competency

 Lack of commitment and support of the


change program
 Misunderstanding the concept of "Change”
Factors Preventing Change

 Managers may not be able to place key


employees in new roles

 Introducing too many change programs

 Managers must be inclusive and not manage


from the top down
Lessons Learned
 Align employee roles, responsibilities , and
relationships.

 Important to identify the units with the


likeliest success rates.

 Seniorexecutives can maintain a competitive


advantage by using the critical path.
Relevance to Our Course
 Leaders apply the behavior, attitude, and skill
changes that they have demanded of others to
themselves.

 The mindset for managing change focuses on:

 Process over specific content


 Change as a step-by-step learning process
 Persistence, instead of quick fixes

You might also like