Hohfeld'S Theory of Rights and Duties

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

HOHFELD’S THEORY OF

RIGHTS AND DUTIES


Hohfeld Theory of Jural Relations

 According to Hohfeld, there are eight fundamental legal


conceptions. Those fundamental legal conceptions are sui
generis.
 The most satisfying approach is to lay down various relations
in a scheme of opposites and correlatives, and of then, to
proceed with stating examples of their individual and scope
application in concrete cases.
 Hohfeld saw every Jural relation as a relation between two
persons. His notions might be presented in a slightly
modified version of Glanville Williams’ table.
Hohfeld’s eight-fold conception
 Right Privilege

Duty No-Right
Power Immunity

Immunity Disability
Jural Relations Explained

 The vertical arrows couple jural correlatives, ’’two legal


positions that entail each other.
 The diagonal arrows couple jural opposites, ’’two legal
positions that deny each other’’.
 Every pair of correlatives must always exist together.
 None of the pairs of opposites can exist together. If person
A has a right, he cannot have a no-right in relation to the
same subject matter and the same
person.
Basis of the Theory

 Hohfeld based his analytical system on earlier Salmond’s system.


Salmond identified three jural relations.
 According to Salmond, the notion of right was used in a wider
sense in order to indicate “any advantage or benefit which is in
any manner conferred upon a person by a rule of law”.
 Rights in the strict sense, which are defined as interests protected
by the law by imposing its duties with respect to the rights upon
other persons.
 Liberties defined as “interests of unrestrained activity” and;
 Powers “when the law actively assists me in making my will
effective”
Eight Jural Relations

 The Eight Jural Relations are basic parts of the more complex
legal relationships with which the law must deal.
 Hohfeld divided the eight into pairs which cannot exist
together (opposites), and those which must exist together
(correlatives).
 Jural Opposites- Right-No right Privilege-Duty Power-
Disability Immunity-Liability.
 Jural Correlatives- Right-Duty Privilege-No right Power-
Liability Immunity-Disability.
Definitions
 PRIVILEGE- “The legal relation of A to B when A(with respect to B) is free or at liberty to
conduct himself in a certain manner for the benefit of B by the command of society; and
when he is not threatened by with any penalty for disobedience, for the reason that
society has made no command.”
 NO-RIGHT- “The legal relation of a person, A, in whose behalf society commands nothing
of another, B.”
 POWER- “The legal relations of A to B when A’s own voluntary act will cause new legal
relations either between B and A or between B and the third person.”
 LIABILITY- “The relation of A to B when A may be brought into new legal relations by the
voluntary act of B.”
 IMMUNITY- “The relation A to B when B has no legal power… to affect someone or more
of the existing legal relations of A, as to that particular existing relation A has an immunity
with respect to B.”
 DISABILITY- “The relation of A to B when by no voluntary act of his own can A extinguish
one (or more) of the existing legal relations of B.”
Explanation
 Rights, privileges, powers, immunities - these four seem
fairly to constitute a comprehensive general classification of
legal “rights” in the generic sense.
 The four correlative terms - duty, no-right, liability and disability
- likewise sufficiently classify the legal burdens which
correspond to the legal benefits.
 In Terry’s Principles of Anglo-American Law, rights stricto sensu
appears as “correspondent rights”, privileges as “permissive
rights”, privileges as “permissive rights”, powers as “faculative
rights”; but immunities not at all.
THANK YOU

You might also like