INVESTMENT AND COMPETITION LAW - Unit 2
INVESTMENT AND COMPETITION LAW - Unit 2
INVESTMENT AND COMPETITION LAW - Unit 2
COMPETITION LAW
UNIT 2 - Banks and Securities
Role of Banks In India
• Filing of reply
The defendant is required to file for the reply within one month
from the date of service of the notice. The defendant can be
allowed to file the reply after some time only with the
permission of the DRT. DRT may proceed ex-parte if the
defendant even after the extension of time is not able to file his
reply.
• The claim for counterclaim
The defendant can file for counterclaim only on the first
hearing. After that, the permission of DRT would be required.
The claim for counterclaim will have the same impact as a
countersuit would in any proceedings.
• Admission of liability by the defendant
The Presiding Officer would pass an order if the defendant
admits his liability, instructing him to pay the required
amount within a period of 30 days from the date of the
order of DRT.
• Interim Order by DRT
As per Section 19(12) of RDDBFI, DRT has the power to
pass an interim order against the defendant, restricting him
from disposing or transferring his property without the prior
assent of the Tribunal. DRT is also authorized to confine the
defendant for a period of three months on the ground of
disobedience of any order issued under Sections 19(12),
19(13) and 19(18) of the SARFAESI Act.
• Judgement and Recovery Certificate by DRT
DRT after hearing both the parties and their submissions
would pass the final judgement within 30 days from hearing.
DRT will issue a Recovery Certificate within 15 days from the
date of judgement and pass on the same to Recovery Officer.
RC shall have the same effect as the decree of the civil court.
• Appeal
An aggrieved party can file for an appeal to Debt Recovery
Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) having the jurisdiction to entertain
the matter, against the order passed by the Debt Recovery
Tribunal (DRT) within 30 days from the date of passing of the
order by DRT. However, an appeal will not be entertained if
the judgement given by the DRT was discharged with the
consent of both the parties. DRAT shall entertain the appeal
after the expiry of 30 days from the date of passing the order
by DRT if he is satisfied that there was a sufficient cause for
the same.
• In Axis Bank v/s SBS Organic Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.,
the Supreme Court held that the appeal in DRAT
would be entertained only on the condition that the
borrower deposits the 50% of the amount in terms
of the order passed by DRT or 50% of the sum due
from the borrowers as asserted by the secured
creditor, whichever is less. The DRAT in his
discretion may reduce the amount to 25%.