This document discusses and compares legal systems around the world. It outlines five factors that constitute a legal system according to Hart, and then discusses the basic elements for distinguishing between legal systems, focusing on sources of law, legal principles/concepts, and historical background. It defines what makes a legal system by examining sources of law, law-making institutions, law-enforcing institutions, substantive/procedural principles and concepts, and the organization of the legal profession. The document then contrasts the two major legal traditions - civil law and common law systems - focusing on their different sources of law, law-making bodies, approaches to legal principles, and types of legal procedure.
This document discusses and compares legal systems around the world. It outlines five factors that constitute a legal system according to Hart, and then discusses the basic elements for distinguishing between legal systems, focusing on sources of law, legal principles/concepts, and historical background. It defines what makes a legal system by examining sources of law, law-making institutions, law-enforcing institutions, substantive/procedural principles and concepts, and the organization of the legal profession. The document then contrasts the two major legal traditions - civil law and common law systems - focusing on their different sources of law, law-making bodies, approaches to legal principles, and types of legal procedure.
This document discusses and compares legal systems around the world. It outlines five factors that constitute a legal system according to Hart, and then discusses the basic elements for distinguishing between legal systems, focusing on sources of law, legal principles/concepts, and historical background. It defines what makes a legal system by examining sources of law, law-making institutions, law-enforcing institutions, substantive/procedural principles and concepts, and the organization of the legal profession. The document then contrasts the two major legal traditions - civil law and common law systems - focusing on their different sources of law, law-making bodies, approaches to legal principles, and types of legal procedure.
This document discusses and compares legal systems around the world. It outlines five factors that constitute a legal system according to Hart, and then discusses the basic elements for distinguishing between legal systems, focusing on sources of law, legal principles/concepts, and historical background. It defines what makes a legal system by examining sources of law, law-making institutions, law-enforcing institutions, substantive/procedural principles and concepts, and the organization of the legal profession. The document then contrasts the two major legal traditions - civil law and common law systems - focusing on their different sources of law, law-making bodies, approaches to legal principles, and types of legal procedure.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18
Legal systems of the world
Five factors that create a legal system (Hart)
Rules that forbid certain conduct and rules that compel certain conduct on pain of sanctions; Rules requiring people to compensate those whom they injure; Rules stating what needs to be done in certain ‘mechanical’ areas of law, such as making a will or a contract; A system of courts to determine what the rules are, whether they have been broken and what the appropriate sanction is; A body whose responsibility is to make rules and amend or repeal them when necessary. Basic elements for distinguishing legal systems sources of law legal principles and concepts historical background What makes a legal system? 1. sources of law and their hierarchy 2. law-making institutions (and their hierarchy) 3. law-enforcing institutions and their powers (mostly courts) 4. substantive and procedural principles and concepts 5. the organisation of the legal profession (the judiciary, the lawyers) National legal systems Each state has its own legal system. The structure and characteristics of these systems are highly variable. Some legal systems are organized on the basis of a written constitution (e.g. the United States), some have constitutional systems not resulting from a single written text – unwritten constitution (e.g. the United Kingdom), and some do not have an explicit constitutional framework. Sources of the law Statutes Customs Judicial decisions Legal principles The opinions of jurists Legal systems of the world Two major legal traditions Civil law (continental law) system Common law system Civil law v. Common law CIVIL LAW COMMON LAW MAIN SOURCE OF LAW legislation case law (codified law) (precedents) LAW-MAKING BODIES legislative bodies the judiciary CREATION OF LEGAL from general and from specific and PRINCIPLES abstract; individual; deductive reasoning: inductive reasoning: applying a general legal principles derived principle to a particular from individual cases case ROLE OF THE interprets and applies the creates the law JUDICIARY law (precedents) TYPE OF LEGAL inquisitorial adversarial PROCEDURE Inquisitorial legal procedure
the role of the judge:
to establish facts asks questions in order to get to the truth
the role of the legal representatives:
to ask additional questions to point to what they think might be relevant details in the case Adversarial procedure the role of the parties: to provide evidence and convince the judge and/or jury of their version of the truth
the role of the jury:
to establish facts based on the presented evidence
the role of the judge:
to make sure procedure is followed and to make a ruling applying the law to the facts established by the jury or him/herself Civil law system Countries that have inherited the Romano-Germanic traditions. Within the civil law tradition, the French legal tradition and the German legal tradition can be distinguished. They are based on Roman law and they share a tradition of devising systematic, authoritative and comprehensive codifications as their law-making style, working from general concepts and providing solutions to individual problems Common law systems Most common law systems do not have codes. Great importance is given to the decisions of judges to be followed in later, similar cases (precedents). The decisions of higher courts are binding on lower courts, and much of the law is left to the courts to develop. New trends The division of national legal systems into families or cultural groupings is weakened by the increasing contemporary influence of international agreements and legal sources. For instance, the national laws of member states of the European Union are increasingly shaped by the need to comply with the requirements set out by EU law. In other cases, international agreements with a potentially universal scope determine to a large extent the contents of national law. Answer the following questions: What constitutes a legal system? What is a source of law? What are the major sources of law? How would you define case law? How can we define a precedent? Which type of legal reasoning is deductive: civil law or common law? Which type of legal reasoning is inductive: civil law or common law? Why have civil law and common law systems come closer together recently? What is the impact of international law on national legal systems? Match two parts of the following sentences: 1.Case law is a. … an established written law, especially an Act of Parliament 2.Code is b. ... law established by precedents 3.Consolidation is c. … decisions of courts in earlier similar cases 4.Enactment is d. … an official set of laws or regulations 5.Precedents are e. … the action of making a law 6.Statute is f. … the act of bringing together various Acts of Parliament which deal with one subject into a single Act Fill in the missing words:
The nature of ________________in French law could not be further from its English counterpart. Whereas some of the leading English _____________ decisions contain the reasoned ________________of judges, distinguishing and applying a long list of _____________ and stretching through over 100 pages in the law ______________ French judgments, even emanating from the Cour de Cassation, rarely amount to two pages. They are in the form of a syllogism: they set out the facts, the _____________issue and the conclusion, usually without citing any previous case _________________. Because judgments are so short, they are normally published accompanied by _____________commentary. Thank you for your attention!
Contribution of The Supervisory Board As Corporate Governance Body in The Development of The Company Strategy of State-Owned Enterprises in Bosnia and Herzegovina
Judge Bruce C. Mills Serial Misconduct Catalog: Prosecutions by California Commission on Judicial Performance - Hon. Bruce Clayton Mills Contra Costa County Superior Court Code of Judicial Ethics Violations Compilation
California Judicial Branch News Service - Investigative Reporting Source Material & Story Ideas