Assessment Presentation - High Quality Classroom Assessment

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

HIGH QUALITY

CLASSROOM
ASSESSMENT
Rezza Anugerah
Types of Assessment Methods
• Selected responses (multiple choice, true/false,
matching, etc.)
• Cunstructed response
Brief constructed response – short answer
Performance tasks – products, skills
Essay – restricted response, extended response
Oral questioning – informal questioning, examination, etc.
• Teacher Observation – formal, informal
• Student assessment – self-report surveys,
questionnaires, self-evaluation on own and
others’ performances
Judging the Quality of an
Assessment
Validity – Realibility – Fairness – Usability
Validity
• The adequacy and appropriateness of
the interpretations and uses of
assessment results
• The extent to which a concept,
conclusion or measurement is well-
founded and corresponds accurately to
the instruction
Validity – Important Points
• A matter of degree (how valid)
• Always spesific to a particular use or
purpose (validity for)
• Must be inferred from evidence
(cannot be directly measured)
Sources of Evidence for
Validity
• Content validity – the extent to which the
assessment matches up to the content was
taught and how it was taught
• Criterion validity – the relationship between an
assessment and another measure of the same
trait
• Construct validity – the extent to which the
assessment is a meaningful measure of an
observable trait or characteristic
Alignment
Standards – Objective & targets – Assessment
Realibility
• Refers to consistency of
assessment results
• Concerned with consistency of
results rather than the
appropriatness of interpretations
made from the result (validity)
Fairness
• Learning targets should match assessments
• Students knowledge of learning targets and
assessments
• Opportunity to learn
• Prerequisite knowledge and skills
• Avoiding student stereotyping
• Avoiding bias in assessment tasks and
procedures
• Accommodating diverse learners
Usability
High-quality assessments are
practical and efficient
• Teacher and student familiarity with method
• Time required
• Ease of administration
• Ease of scoring
• Ease of interpretation
• cost
Conclusion
• Assessment should be matched with
learning targets and aligned with
standards
• It is important to think about the type of
assessment to most appropriately use
• An understanding of validity, reliabilty,
fairness, and usability is important in
developing quality

You might also like