0% found this document useful (0 votes)
59 views22 pages

Constitutional Development in India

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 22

Constitutional

Development in
India
DR. S K YADAWA
Synopsis
The Regulating Act-1773
The Pitt’s Indian Act-1784
The Act of -1786
The Charter Act- 1793
The Charter Act- 1813
The Charter Act- 1833
The Charter Act- 1853
Conti…..
● The GOI Act -1858
● The Council Act -1861
● The Council Act -1892
● The Council Act -1909
● The govt. India Act -1919
● The Govt. India Act -1935
● The Crips Mission-1942
● Wavell Plan/ Shimla Conference-1945
● The Cabinet Mission-1946
Introduction
Lack of central command and control
Divided House
Fighting
Hostility
European Power
East Indian Company
Colonialism begins from Bengal
The East India Company-1600
Joint Stock Company
● Alivarda Khan -1740 to 1756
● Siraj ud-Daulah ( Grandchild of Alivarda Khan)
● Mir Jafar
● Mir Qasim- 1760 -1763
● Dual Administration- 1765-1772
Battel of Plassey( on the Ganga, in Nadia district) – June 23,1757- the victory of the
British
Battel of Boxer-1764- this decisive battle confirmed British power over Bengal and marked
the end of the attempt to rule Bengal through a puppet Nawab.
Dual Administration
Misgovernance
Rampant Corruption
Over collection of taxation
Famine in Bengal
Attack of Hyder Ali on Karnataka
London Stack Exchange- Prices of Share fell sharply.
Demand for a government loan to Bank of England
The Regulating Act -1773
1. It designated the Governor-General of Bengal and created an
Executive Council of four members to assist the GG.
2. Warren Hastings was the first Governor-General of Bengal.
3. Governors of Bombay and Madras presidencies subordinate to the
Governor-general of Bengal.
4. It provided for the establishment of a Supreme Court in Calcutta
(1774) with one Chief Justice and three other Judges.
5. It prohibited the servants of the Company from engaging in any
private trade or accepting presents or bribes from the natives.
● Short comings:
● Governor General’s lack of veto power.
● Most of the times councillors were busy in fighting.
● There was no defined jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
● Pitt’s India Act named after the name of the then British PM
William Pitts
The Pitt’s India Act- 1784
• It bifurcated political and commercial functions of the company.
• Dual Government: Created a Board of Directors to manage the political
affairs while commercial affairs were managed by the Court of Directors.
• Board of Directors was empowered to supervise and direct all operations
of the civil and military government and revenues of the British
possessions in India.
● Importance of the act
• First time company’s possession was called as British possessions
• British government was given the supreme control over Company’s affairs
and its administration in India
The Charter Act 1793
● The East India Company’s dominance over the British
possessions in India was maintained.
● The Company’s trade monopoly in India was extended for 20
years.
● In some circumstances Governor General can override the
council’s judgement.
● When Governor General in Madras and Bombay , he can
supersede the authority of Governors.

Charter Act of 1813
• Continental System in the Napoleonic wars, the blockade designed by Napoleon to
paralyze Britain through the destruction of commerce and the miseries it caused
prompted the traders to pressurize the government to end the monopoly in trade that
East India Company enjoyed.
• The company’s rule was extended to another 20 years.
• British merchants were allowed to trade in India, However, trade with China and
the tea and opium trade, the company still retained its monopoly.
• It provided for a financial grant towards the revival of Indian literature and the
promotion of science.
The company was asked to take up a greater role in the education of the Indians
under them and There was also a provision that company should invest Rs. 1 Lakh
every year on the education of Indians.
• The act granted permission to Christian Missionaries to function.
The Charter act of 1833

• It made the governor-general of Bengal as governor general of India. All


civil and military powers were vested in him.
• Lord William Bentinck was first governor-general of India.
• It deprived the governor of Bombay and Madras to make laws. All law
making powers now vested with Governor-General of India.
• Ended the commercial monopoly of East India Company completely
• An Indian Law Commission was appointed under the provisions of the
act. Lord Macaulay was the first chairman of this commission
• The act provided for the Presidency of Bengal to be divided into
the Presidencies of Agra and Fort William. However, this never
came into effect
• The British Parliament abolished slavery in Britain and all its
possessions in 1833.
• Centralization of the administration reached new heights
• Codification of laws was taken up for the first time
• It acknowledged the need to involve Indians in administration
The Charter Act of 1853
• It provided for the separation of executive and legislative functions of the council
• It provided for the addition of six new member for legislative council (Indian Central
legislative council)
• Civil service was thrown open to Indians through competitive exam.
• Local representation in the Indian central legislative council (Bombay, Agra, Madras,
Bengal)
• The Court of Directors could create a new presidency or province.
• The Act provided for the appointment of a separate governor for the Bengal Presidency.
• The Macaulay Committee on Civil Service appointed in 1854
• Establishment of a dedicated rule-making body
GOI Act 1858
• It was also known as ‘Act for the Good government of India’
• It ended the Dual government scheme initiated due to Pitt’s India act-1784
• The powers of the Company’s Court of Directors were transferred to the Secretary of State for India. He was going to
be the member of British Parliament. He was provided with an advisory body consisting of 15 members
• Secretary of state-in-council was setup as a body corporate, capable of suing and being sued in India and in England
• A viceroy would be appointed who would serve as the representative of British crown. Lord Canning was first such
viceroy
• India became a direct British colony through the passage of this act
• The act ended the controversial ‘Doctrine of Lapse’
• The Indian Civil Services was to be constituted for the administration of the country. There was also a provision for
Indians to be admitted to the service.
• Indian princes were allowed to retain their principalities so long as they accepted the suzerainty of the British
● Criticism of the act: It did not in any way alter the system of government in India. Most of the provisions were enacted
to safeguard the jewel of British empire against any future threats or rebellions
The Indian council act of 1861
● It made a beginning of representative institutions by associating Indians with law-making
● Viceroy nominated some Indians as non-official members of his expanded council
● Raja of Benaras, the maharaja of Patiala and Sir Dinkar Rao were nominated in council.
● Restored legislative making powers of Bombay and Madras
● Establishment of new Legislative councils for Bengal, North-Western Frontier Province and
Punjab
● Viceroy could make provisions for convenient transactions of business in the council. It
gave recognition to the ‘portfolio system’ of Lord Canning
● Ordinances could be issued by the Viceroy without the concurrence of the council during an
emergency.
● Portfolio System was introduced.
The Indian council act of 1892
● Increased non-official members in the council.
● Nomination for non-official members to central legislative council
(Bengal chamber of commerce, governors for provincial legislative
council based on recommendation of district boards, municipalities,
universities, trade associations, zamindars and chambers)
● Made a limited and indirect provision for the use of election in filling
up non-official seats both in central and provincial councils
Morley-Minto reforms, 1909
1. The legislative councils at the Centre and the provinces increased in size.
2. It introduced non-official majority at the provincial legislature level.
3. It enlarged the deliberative functions of the legislative councils at both the levels.
4. It provided for the first time for Indians to be associated with the executive
council. SP Sinha became the law member in Viceroy’s executive council.
5. System of communal representation was introduced for Muslims.
6. Separate representations were provided for presidency corporations, chambers of
commerce, universities and Zamindars.
• It sowed the seed for partition in India
• It belied the expectations of self-governance that congress
had sought
● No meaningful representations at the central legislature level
The Govt. of India Act-1919
• It laid the foundations for many features that we associate with Indian constitution in the present times
• Important features of the act are:
1. Objective: Gradual introduction of responsible government in India
2. It relaxed the control of centre over the provinces by demarcating and separating the central and provincial subjects
3. Dyarchy: provincial subjects were divided into- transferred list and reserved list. Reserved lists were administered by the
governor and his executive council that were not answerable to the legislature whereas transferred lists were administered by
governor on the advice of the ministers responsible to the council.
4. Bicameralism and direct elections were introduced for the first time
5. The act mandated that the three of the six members of the Viceroy’s executive council were to be Indian
6. Principle of separate electorates was extended to Sikhs, Indian Christians, Anglo-Indians and Europeans
7. It granted franchise to a limited number of people on the basis of property, tax or education
8. High commissioner of India position created. Some powers of Secretary of State was transferred to the commissioner
9. Provincial budgets was separated for the first time from central budget
10.Central public service commission was established
11.Statutory commission to analyze the impact of this act after 10 years
● Simon Commission: 1927
● 1930- Major recommendations
• Abolition of dyarchy
• Extension of responsible government in provinces
• Continuation of communal representation
• Establishment of  a federation of British India and princely
states
The Govt. of India Act-1935
• It provided for the establishment of an All India federation consisting of provinces and princely states as units.
• It divided the powers between the centre and units in terms of three lists- Federal list, provincial list and the concurrent
list. Residuary powers were given to the Viceroy. However, this federation never fructified since princely states did not join it.
• It abolished dyarchy in the provinces and introduced ‘provincial autonomy’ in its place
• The act introduced responsible government in provinces, that is, the governor was required to act with the advice of ministers
responsible to the provincial legislature
• It provided for the adoption of dyarchy at the centre. However, this provision did not come into effect at all
• Bicameralism was introduced in six provinces- Bengal, Bombay Madras, Bihar, Assam and the United Provinces
• Separate electorates was further extended to depressed classes, women and labour
• Council of India which was established as per the 1858 act was abolished The secretary of state was instead provided with a team
of advisors.
• The act provided for setting up- Federal public service commission, provincial public service commission, joint public service
commission, federal court, Reserve Bank of India
● Practice question:
● It would have been difficult for the Constituent Assembly to complete its historic task of drafting the Constitution for Independent
India in just three years but for the experience gained with the Government of India Act, 1935. Discuss.(250 words)

You might also like