Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 31

RINI ANDRIANI

CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM TUMOR BOARD


DHARMAIS NATIONAL CANCER HOSPITAL

Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO)


• Response Assessment
• As the standard for in Neuro-Oncology
(RANO)
Theassessment of 2010
1990
The MacDonald criteria response and
MacDonald
progression • Assessing disease
criteria
• HGG progression and
treatment response
in glioblastoma
multiforme (GBM)

The product of the maximal Pseudo progression


perpendicular diameters
Pseudo response
Changes in corticosteroid doses
Non enhancing tumor progression
Changes neurologic function
Summary of current response criteria.
• Image Acquisition
• MRI is the only modality used to assess
response and progression
Response • Minimum sequences required:
Assessment in T2/FLAIR
■ Pre-contrast T1,

Neuro- ■ Post-contrast T1, with two


orthogonal planes (or a volume acquisition)
Oncology recommended

(RANO) • Recommended slice thickness ≤5 mm with no


gap
• Additional imaging that may be helpful:
■ Diffusion (DWI, ADC)
Definitions
Pseudo response

•Antiangiogenic drug effects


can look like response
•Occurs within 4 weeks of
therapy
• Confirm CR and PR at least
4 weeks later
Pseudo progression
• Enhancement that simulates tumor growth, most often caused by
radiation (whole brain or focal).
• Growth of existing lesions or appearance of new lesions within 12
weeks of completion of radiation therapy may be the result of
treatment effects rather than growth of tumor.
• Continued follow-up imaging can determine whether initial lesion
growth was true progression or pseudo progression.
• If lesion continues to enlarge, the initial growth is called true
progression
• If lesion stabilizes or shrinks, the initial growth is confirmed as pseudo
progression
Laki-laki, 30 tahun,
Fibrillaryastrocytoma
dgn komponen
gemistocytic grade II
MRI Brain kontras pre terapi
CT Scan Pre Radiasi (7x5 cm)

Pasien masih diberikan steroid


Status klinis tidak ada perburukan CT Scan
Post Radiasi (6x5 cm)
KRITERIA RANO
Criteria

T1-Gd+ 14 % (< 25%)

T2/FLAIR ↓ Stabil
Response
New Lesion none

Corticosteroids Stable

Clinical Status Stable


Sesuai guideline
NCCN yang
dimodifikasi
dilakukan evaluasi
rutin

Pasien tidak minum steroid

Status klinis menetap


• T1 + Kontras • T1 + Kontras
• 2017 • 2018
KRITERIA RANO 2017 Vs
2018
Criteria

T1-Gd+ 47,9 % (≥25%)

T2/FLAIR ↑
Progresive
Disease
New Lesion none

Corticosteroids Stable

Clinical Status Stable


Wanita, 46 tahun
PA: Anaplastik astrocytoma grade III dd anaplastik ependimoma
IHK: GFAP: positif, S100: positif fokal,EMA: negatif, Vimentin: positif
MGMT: positif > 50% sel tumor, EGFR: positif
Post operasi
RANO
Criteria

T1 None

T2/FLAIR Stable

New Lession None

Cortico-steroid None

Clinical Status Stable

Pre Operasi Post operasi


Ukuran 2,2x2,2x2,8 cm Tidak tampak lesi Summary CR
10 Juli 2017
RANO
Criteria

T1 None

T2/FLAIR Stable

New Lession None

Cortico- None
steroid

Clinical Status Stable

Summary CR
26 November 2016 10 Juli 2017
Tidak tampak lesi Tidak tampak lesi

You might also like