The document discusses how the Indian Constitution and its principles of justice, equality, and human dignity have strongly influenced labour laws and policies in India to protect workers' rights and promote welfare. Key aspects discussed include how the Preamble, Fundamental Rights, and Directive Principles of State Policy establish the philosophy of a social welfare state. Articles addressing equality, living wages, dignity of work, and more have guided labour legislation. The judiciary has also played a role through public interest litigation to enhance access to justice for vulnerable workers.
The document discusses how the Indian Constitution and its principles of justice, equality, and human dignity have strongly influenced labour laws and policies in India to protect workers' rights and promote welfare. Key aspects discussed include how the Preamble, Fundamental Rights, and Directive Principles of State Policy establish the philosophy of a social welfare state. Articles addressing equality, living wages, dignity of work, and more have guided labour legislation. The judiciary has also played a role through public interest litigation to enhance access to justice for vulnerable workers.
The document discusses how the Indian Constitution and its principles of justice, equality, and human dignity have strongly influenced labour laws and policies in India to protect workers' rights and promote welfare. Key aspects discussed include how the Preamble, Fundamental Rights, and Directive Principles of State Policy establish the philosophy of a social welfare state. Articles addressing equality, living wages, dignity of work, and more have guided labour legislation. The judiciary has also played a role through public interest litigation to enhance access to justice for vulnerable workers.
The document discusses how the Indian Constitution and its principles of justice, equality, and human dignity have strongly influenced labour laws and policies in India to protect workers' rights and promote welfare. Key aspects discussed include how the Preamble, Fundamental Rights, and Directive Principles of State Policy establish the philosophy of a social welfare state. Articles addressing equality, living wages, dignity of work, and more have guided labour legislation. The judiciary has also played a role through public interest litigation to enhance access to justice for vulnerable workers.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20
Constitution and Labour Welfare
Dr. Adarsh .M.N
Assistant Professor CBR National College of Law Shivamogga Introduction: To be called civilized, a society has to concede to its working class the right to live with dignity and security as human beings. The aspiration of the working class finds expressions, at national level, in the Constitution of the nation. Constitution is a document of social revolution casting an obligation on every instrumentality including the judiciary to transform the status quo ante into a new human order in which justice, social, economic and political will inform all institutions of national life and there should be equality of status and opportunity to all. The trinity of Indian Constitution, the Preamble, the Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles of State Policy, embody the fundamental principles, which provide guide to all legislations, including the labour legislations. This constitutional trinity assures its citizens to provide "Socialistic Pattern of Society" and create "Welfare State" and all legislations, specially the Labour legislations, are deeply influenced by them. Preamble and Labour welfare: The Preamble to our Constitution serves two purposes.
It indicates the source from which it derives its authority.
It starts the objectives which it seeks to establish and promote.
The preamble states to secure to all its citizens:
Justice, Social, Economic and Political Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship Equality of status and of opportunity Fraternity, assuring the dignity of the individual and unity and integrity of nation These principles run through our labour legislations like invisible golden threads and provide them strength and stamina to meet the aspirations of working classes; whether it is protective legislations, social security legislations, welfare legislations or even industrial relations legislations, they all heavily lean towards working classes due to the philosophy provided in the preamble. Fundamental Rights and Labour Welfare Article 12: A liberal interpretation is made of the words "other authorities" so as to include any instrumentality or agency of the Government whether an individual or a corporation like Life Insurance Corporation (Som Prakash Rakhi vs. Union of India-SC 1981) or society like the Indian Statistical Institute registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1960,or a company like Steel Authority of India. All have to fulfill the tests laid down by the court in their dealings with their employees (Ajay Hasia vs.Kahlid Mujid-SC 1981). Article 14: dealing with the right to equality and equal protection of law is subject to reasonable classification as absolute equality is impossibility. In Charanjit Lal Choudhary vs. Union of India- SC 1951, it is observed "The guarantee... forbids class Legislation but does not forbid classification which rests upon reasonable grounds of distinction". Classification can be on the basis of age, sex (provisions under Factories Act,1948, Sections 26,27 etc. for children and women), nature of trade profession or occupation framing rules for recruitment or promotions of public servants to secure efficiency (Gangaram vs. Union of India-SC. 1970), fixing of different minimum wages for different industries to be valid, the classification must be operational and not arbitrary. (Chandra Boarding vs. State of Mysore-SC. 1970). Article 16 (1) and (2) of the Constitution guarantees equality of opportunity to all the citizens in matter of appointment to any office or any other employment under the State. Clauses (3), (4) &(5) lay down, by way exceptions, reasonable classification and provisions for backwards and for religious institutions. Article 19 in its various sub clauses provides, inter alia, freedom of association; freedom to carry on trade or business and freedom of speech, which are relevant to labour legislation. Article 21 proclaims that "no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedures established by law". In Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India-SC 1984, it was held that Article 21 assures a citizen the right to live with human dignity free from exploitation. The Govt. is bound to ensure observance of social welfare and labour laws enacted to secure for workmen a life compatible with human dignity. Article 23 and 24 guarantee the right against exploitation. Clause(1) of Article 23, prohibits traffic in human beings; and any form of forced labour and makes them punishable offence. Article 23 and 24 guarantee the right against exploitation. Clause(1) of Article 23, prohibits traffic in human beings; and any form of forced labour and makes them punishable offence. In People's Union for Democratic Rights vs. Union of India Sc. 1983, it was held that labour or services for a remuneration less than a minimum wages amounts to "forced labour". In this case, a letter written to Justice Bhagwati regarding the working conditions of construction workers engaged in building structures connected with Asian Games was entertained as Writ Petition, setting aside the technicalities of locus - standi and other procedures. The court held that when judicial redressal is sought for legal injury suffered by a person or persons who by reason of poverty, disability or socially or economically disadvantaged position are unable to approach the court and the attention of the court is drawn to such legal injury by a member of public, even by a letter, the same will be entertained by the court as a writ petition to bring justice within the reach of the poor masses. In Bandhua Mukti Morcha vs. Union of India (SC 1984) S.C. held that Government was bound to ensure observance of social welfare and labour laws enacted to secure to workmen a life of basic human dignity. Neerja Choudhary vs. State of MP SC - 1984, held that wherever it is found that any workman is forced to provide labour for no remuneration or nominal remuneration, the presumption would be that he is a bonded labour, unless the employer or the state government proves otherwise. Similarly, the Court said that the plainest requirement of Article 21 and 23 is that bonded labour not only be identified and redressed but also suitably rehabilitated. Article 24 of the Constitution prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years in factories, mines or any other hazardous work. The idea is to protect the health and well being of children. However, the article does not prohibit the employment of children in easy and less strenuous work. Articles 32 to 35 guarantee the right to constitutional remedies, as right without a remedy is a meaningless formality. It is the remedy which makes the right real. In view of this, the S.C. has evolved the innovative strategy by encouraging Public Interest Litigation aimed at providing easy access to justice to the poor and weaker sections of Indian Society (generally labourers) and giving a powerful tool to public spirited individuals and social action groups to combat exploitation and injustice. DPSP and Labour Welfare: Articles 36 to 51 form Part IV of the Constitution and they deal with the goal of economic democracy the socio-political content of political freedom and the concept of Welfare State. the Directives which are the backbone of labour jurisprudence, may be examined as follows. Article 38 - (a) directs the state to promote welfare of the people by securing and protecting a social order in which justice social, economic and political, shall inform all the institutions of national life. (b) directs that State shall, in particular, strive to minimise inequality in income and Endeavour to eliminate inequality in status, facilities and opportunities amongst individuals as well as groups of people in different areas and vocations. Article 39- declares that the state shall in particular, direct its policy towards securing a. that citizens, men and women equally, have the right to an adequate means of livelihood. b. that the ownership and the control of the material resources of the community are so distributed as to best sub serve the common good. c. that the operation of the economic system does not result in concentration of wealth and means of production to the common detriment. d. that there is equal pay for equal work for both men and women. e. the health and strength of the workers, men and women and the tender age of the children not abused and that the citizens are not forced by economic necessity to enter the avocations unsuited to their health and strength. f. the children are given opportunities and facilities to develop in a healthy manner and in condition of freedom and dignity and are protected against exploitation against moral and material abandonment. Article 41 - directs that the State shall within the limit of its economic capacity and development make effective provision for securing right to work, to education, and to public assistance in case of unemployment old age, sickness and disablement and in other cases of undeserved want.
Article 42 - directs the state to make provision for
securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief. Article 43 - directs that the state shall endeavour to secure, by suitable legislation or economic organisation or in any other way to all workers, agricultural, industrial or other living wage, conditions of work ensuring a decent. standard of life and full enjoyment of leisure and social and cultural opportunities and, in particular, the state shall endeavour to promote cottage industries on an individual or cooperative basis in rural areas. Article 43A - inserted in Constitution (42nd Amendment) directs that the state shall take steps, by suitable legislations, or in any other way, to secure the participation of workers in management of undertakings, establishments or other organisations engaged in any industry. Conclusion: The Constitution of India has gone out of way to protect rights and privileges of workers, ensuring a decent and dignified life. But a lot is required to be done for the workers of unorganised sector - bonded labour, child labour, female labour, labourers of sweated industry and agricultural labour. The Constitution has the inherent potency, but its instrumentalities have not come-up to the expectation and have failed the Constitution. Therefore, even after seven decades of independence, labourers in these areas are exploited, despite best intentions of the Constitution. Much is required to be done.