Handling of Central Administrative Tribunal Cases
Handling of Central Administrative Tribunal Cases
Handling of Central Administrative Tribunal Cases
Administrative
Tribunal Cases
Benches of CAT
Principal bench (New Guwahati Bench
Delhi Hyderabad bench
Allahabad Bench Jabalpur bench
Lucknow Bench Jodhpur bench
Bangalore bench Jaipur bench
Calcutta bench Madras bench
Chandigarh Bench Bombay bench
Cuttack bench Patna bench
Ernakulam Bench
Functioning of the CAT
Single Bench
Change of Date of Birth
Adverse entries in ACR
Compassionate Appointment
Allowances
L.T.C.
Transfer
Pension
GPF
Functioning of the CAT
Division Bench
Seniority
Promotion
Termination
Disciplinary proceedings
Full Bench – constituted as and when
required.
Specific issues wherein there have been
conflicting order on various occasions
CAT Terms
Affidavit Contempt
Applicant Cost
Application Division / Single Bench
Members Default
Bench Deponent
Cause List Estoppel
Brief Transmission Form Ex-parte
CCP Interim order
CAT Terms
Index Rejoinder
Jurisdiction Reply
Limitation Res-Judicata
On Board Respondent
Oral order Restoration
Part heard Review Application
Pleadings Special leave Petition
Preliminary Objections Ultra Vires
Presenting Officer Verification
Types of Applications
Original Application
Transferred Application
Review Application
Contempt Petition
Petition for Transfer
Miscellaneous Application
Who can file an application
Subject to the provisions of the
AT Act, 1985 a person, aggrieved
by any matter within the
jurisdiction of the Central
Administrative Tribunal can file an
application in the CAT.
On Reciept of Notice
Either by post or through officials
Dasti
To be acknowledged indicating Date and Time of
receipt
Type of notices
Notice to show cause against admisison
Notice after admission – for the purpose of contesting
the case
Notice meant for the employees working under the
respondent department
On Reciept of Notice
HoD to get the notices served on private
respondents and file an affidavit confirming
compliance
Check who will defend the case
Call information from the co-respondents
Primary respondent to engage a Government
Counsel
A departmental officer can also be authorized
(Group A officer with the approval of Minister-in-
Charge)
Preparation and Filing of Reply
Ascertain the veracity of the facts narrated
by the applicant
Ascertaining the correct facts relating to
the issue agitated in the OA
Exploring the possibility of raising any
preliminary objections regarding
maintainability of the OA
Collection of documents in support of the
cases of the respondents
Preparation and Filing of Reply
Collection of documents in support of the
case of the respondents
Identification of any identical case file dby
any other employees of the department
for similar relief
No need to reinvent wheel
Will facilitate linking and disposal together
Identification of any precedent –
especially unreported cases.
Preparation and Filing of Reply
Prepare the reply as per the prescribed
format –
Identity of the official filing the reply
His competence to file the reply
Confirmation that he has read the OA fully
etc.
Brief background of the case
Specifically “Admit” or “Deny”. If denying
give reasons.
Preliminary Objections
Jurisdiction
Place of filing application
Limitation
Mis-Joinder & Non-Joinder of parties
Res-judicata (A thing which has been
decided)
Estoppel
Non-exhausting of official rememdies
Preliminary Objections
Suggestio falsi and suppressio veri
Plural remedies
Place of filing application
The applicant is posted for the time being,
or
The cause of action, wholly or in part, has
arisen
With the leave of Chairman, can also be
filed in PB
A person who is not in service – at the
place where he is ordinarily residing.
Limitation
Section 21
Within one year from the date of passing
of the final order
Representation – six months + 1 year
Three years preceding the date on which
the jurisdiction, powers and authority of
the Tribunal becomes exercisable if not
already challenged – to be filed within six
months
Limitation
Can be condoned – generally a separate
MA is filed by the applicant
Respondents can challenge the
maintainability of the OA on the ground of
Limitation alone
Repeated representations not a valid
ground
Preparation and Filing of Reply
While drafting reply:
Avoid repetition of facts and invite attention
to the relevant facts
Point out the additional facts given by the
applicant which are not relevant to the OA
and which the respondent is not in a position
to prove.
Formal statements does not call for reply.
Keep the language clear
Preparation and Filing of Reply
Avoid abbreviations
Quote exact statutory provisions
Bring out the prayer clearly.
Get the draft reply approved by the Govt
Counsel
Get it vetted by the Legal Adviser
Get it signed by an authorised signatory
File the reply and take acknowledgement
Listing and Posting of Cases
Ready List – for internal use
Warning List –cases likely to be listed for regular
hearing
Daily cause list – published by 5:30 p.m.
everyday giving details of the cases to be heard
on the next day.
Quorum, Court Halls, Details of the cases – party
name, legal practition name etc.
Regular matters and cases for pronouncement of
Order, for admission, direction etc.
Listing and Posting of Cases
Order in which cases are taken:
Pronouncement of judgements
Mention
Cases for admission / direction etc.
Regular matter
If applicant is absent – may be dismissed
in default or decided on merit after
hearing the respondent
If
Listing and Posting of Cases
If the respondent is absent, the case may be
decided ex-parte by hearing the applicant
If both the parties are absent, the case may be
dismissed for default or appearance of the
applicant or may be decided on merit by perusal
of the written submission
If both the parties are present, the case will be
heard.
Part Heard cases – to be heard by the same
bench
Review Application
Section 22 of the AT Act, 1985
Same power as are vested in a Civil Court under
the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 under the
following circumstances
On the basis of discovery of new and important
matter of evidence which after exercise of due
diligence, was not within the applicant’s knowledge or
could not be produced by the party at the time when
the order was passed;
On account of mistake or error apparent on the face
of the judgement;
Or for any other sufficient reason.
Review Application
Detailed argument is not necessary
Party will not be allowed to reopen a case
under the guise of review
Plea not taken in the OA cannot be taken
To be filed within 30 days from the date of
receipt of the copy of the order
Can be decided by circulation without
listing the cases.
Review Application
RA and CA to it to be supported by sworn
affidavits.
Review is without prejudice of right to
appeal.
Even after losing SLP in SC, RA can be
filed.
Pendency of RA valid defence in Contempt
proceedings