Inter Subjectivity PP T

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

INTERSUBJECTIVITY

The way we treat others may not be necessarily be


consistent with the way we think we treat others. Let us
then validate the consistency of these two things:
whether (1.) the way we treat others is consistent with
the way we think we treat them, (2.) the way we treat
others is consistent with the way others would like to be
treated. Let us limit the other to three persons.
(a.)relatives (b.) close friend (c.) acquaintance. First,
identify who these three persons are, and write down how
you think you treat these persons. Then ask these
persons what they think about the way you treat them.
Check your consistency of your answers to their answers.
Intersubjectivity is a coined word from the prefix
“inter” which connotes “among and between” and the
philosophical term “subject” that is equivalent to a
conscious being. Thus, intersubjectivity would mean
in the general sense as “sharing of subjective states
by two or more individuals.” (Scheff 2006). It is the
organic union of the subjective reality and the
objective reality of beings. Meaning to say, as a
person, we have a personal regard to self but we
cannot deny the fact (objective – fact of reality we all
share) that we live with others so we also regard
them as part of ourselves.
This lesson discusses about intersubjective relations. The
issues concerning the intersubjective relations maybe
traced back to the philosophical problem known as “the
problem of the other minds”. This problem may be
expressed and answered in different ways but, in a
nutshell. Simply asks the questions of whether there are
other consciousness that can be deduced from the
experience of encountering other human beings. We do not
doubt that they have inner life, just like us. And it is the
aim of this lesson to acquaint us first with the issues
involved in this problem and eventually leading us to a
clearer understanding of the issues concerning
intersubjective relations.
Cartesian Beginnings

In philosophy, the Cartesian Self, part of a thought experiment, is an


individual's mind, separate from the body and the outside
world, thinking about itself and its existence. It is distinguished from
the Cartesian Other, anything other than the Cartesian self.
The dualism of Decartes created a lot of difficulties in
Philosophy. The distinction and eventually the separation
of the mind and the body resulted to the formation of an
internal and external world. Decartes’ desire to rid
himself of all errors and establish something which he
cannot doubt made him consider everything that is
delivered by his senses as false. Thus everything that his
senses perceive-the mountains, trees,skies, heavenly
bodies, and even his own body-must be regarded as not
real. This lead him to his conclusion that the only thing
certain is that he is existing because he is thinking: I
THINK THEREFORE, I AM.
Dualism-the quality of state of having two
different or opposite parts or elements
Frailty-weakness of character that causes
a person to do things that are morally
wrong.
Husserl’s Phenomenology

The German philosopher Edmund Husserl was influenced


by the Cartesian dualism in the formulation of his own
philosophical method known an PHENOMENOLOGY.
Phenomenology comes from the Greek words
phainomenon and logos which mean that which
appears and study respectively. Thus
phenomenology, literally means a study of that which
appears. Husserl wanted an approach to the world
that will focus simply on that which appears because
the philosophical approaches during his time were
going beyond which appears. And even when we look
at our own approach of reality, we will realize that we
generally go beyond that which appears to our
consciousness' because this apparently our natural
attitude.
Stereotyping- it is also a way of
looking things beyond that which
appears- Example: when a male
meets a homo sexual and thinks that
homo sexual is interested in him.

You might also like