Lecture 4 - Needs
Lecture 4 - Needs
Lecture 4 - Needs
Needs
Chemical product design begins by
identifying the customer needs.
Who are these customers and how can
their needs be identified?
When our product is primarily used by
consumers their needs will be described
in nonscientific terms.
Needs and Specifications
Needs are often vague, qualitative desires for
solutions to ill-defined problems.
These needs must be translated into product
specifications.
These specifications will require continuing
revision and re-evaluation.
This revision greatly facilitated by using
“benchmarks” which are often competing
products that we hope to replace.
Customer Needs
Elucidating customer needs involves three
sequential steps:
Interviewing customers
Interpreting their expressed needs
Translating these needs into product specifications
In each step, we must be careful not to
narrow the product definition prematurely.
We must not jump directly into identifying
new products or some ways to improving
existing products.
Interviewing Customers
Our primary source should be the final users
of the product.
These users may not be those who buy the
product from us (e.g. patients in a hospital)
The users can be organizations, including
government agencies.
These users needs to be contacted and a
time arranged to discuss their needs.
Lead Users
Lead users depend very much on existing and
competing products.
Lead users will have needs that are well in advance
of the marketplace.
They benefit most from any product improvements.
Lead users are important sources in two ways:
They often invent minor product improvements on their
own.
They often clearly express what is wrong with existing
products.
When they can be identified, lead users are an
invaluable source of information.
Interviews
General consensus: face-to-face interviews
are the best to discuss needs.
Fewer than ten may miss important
information.
More than fifty result in little new information.
Normal target ~ 15.
Seems silly with only one or two corporate
customers – but, persons within a single
corporate can express differing views that can
shape the final product design.
Alternatives to interviews
Two alternatives:
Focus groups and trained test panels
Focus groups have a leader and perhaps eight panel members.
Focus groups may show a synergism leading to suggested
innovation.
Focus groups often show less variance of opinions than
individuals.
Many unconvinced by this strategy.
Trained test panels are common in evaluating small differences
in consumer goods.
These panels may guide consumer product improvements.
Before beginning interviews…
Each member of the core team must write out:
The project scope
The product’s target market
The key business goals
The project scope should be one, simple sentence.
The target market should include both primary and
secondary customers, and estimates from sales from
each.
The business goals should include:
The timing of the new products
The organization’s technical advantage(s)
Once done, entire team should reach a consensus.
Standard Interview Format
Core team should develop a standard interview
format to ensure a common starting point.
E.g. a list as follows:
What do you do now?
How do you use the existing product?
What features work?
What does not work?
How do you buy the product?
The list should preferably be simple and generic
without references to specific product ideas.
Interviewing Tips
Interviews depend on interviewers’ skill in eliciting
useful responses.
Core team can often seek assistance from marketing.
If possible, all core team members should participate
in at least one interview.
In every interview:
Encourage tangents
Stimulate with alternatives
Remove assumptions
Be alert for surprises
Interpreting Customer Needs
The result of interviews will be a potpourri of responses which
need to be organized.
The customers’ needs recorded will be a random collection,
filled with redundancy and irrelevancy.
We may often have to drop stated needs which are for
perpetual motion machines or beyond company’s expertise.
Ranking of needs:
Essential – the new product must meet all essential needs to be
successful
Desirable – new product might meet desirable needs especially if
existing competitive products do not meet these needs.
Useful – we do not plan to design products explicitly to meet them.
Interpreting Customer Needs
Ways of organizing and ranking needs differs depending on whether
we are inventing a new product or modifying an existing product.
In seeking an improved product we are familiar with the existing
product.
We can easily define the essential, desirable and useful product
attributes.
We can reach a consensus within core team on these needs.
This may need additional review with customers, especially with lead
users.
The importance of the additional review will depend on how major the
improvements are.
In seeking a new product, needs may be grouped by target market or
by common function.
In seeking a new product, we almost certainly must return to the
customers, perhaps to a somewhat different set, to specify needs
tightly.