Week 2 - Pygmalion, Intertextuality, Context
Week 2 - Pygmalion, Intertextuality, Context
Week 2 - Pygmalion, Intertextuality, Context
An individual collection of your work done throughout the two years of this course
It is a place for your to reflect on literary and non-literary texts, and to establish connections among them and
with the AoEs & the central concepts
As you collect your work, you can reflect on your responses to the works you have studied in the
corresponding Area of Exploration
You may choose the format of this collection, it could be a wiki, a scrapbook, a blog, a padlet, a google drive
folder
It is mandatory, but it is not graded
mouth without making some In the preface for the print version of
the play, Shaw laments the social
other Englishman hate or divisions that this diversity reinforces.
As we study this book, we will
despise him. consider the way it makes comment on
the concept of language as an identifier
of social class, and how altering one’s
George Bernard Shaw, in the preface to Pygmalion language might affect that identity.
Pygmalion the play as an allegory
A speech A photograph
An opinion piece in a newspaper A public service announcement
A magazine article A cartoon
An interview transcript An advertisement
An essay An artwork
Intertextuality
Up until the 1960s, literary analysis focused heavily on the author’s intention when composing a work. This
method meant that most works were viewed as having only a singular meaning.
Post-structuralism arose as a reaction to this. It divorces the work from the author, instead assuming that
there are a plethora of meanings within a work, and that a reader’s background and situation in fact direct
or elucidate those meanings.
Essentially, this new theory argued that it is not only the thoughts of the writer that control the meaning of
the text, but also the thoughts of the reader.
In the 1960s, critics of structuralism such as Julia Kristeva published essays on their new approach to
interpreting meaning.
Kristeva put forward that all texts borrow and quote from other texts whether the author knows it or not.
She coined the word transtextuality as a way to describe how a text’s meaning is not contained within the
bounds of a text, and in fact when you read other related works, you realize new meanings in the primary
text.
Barthes’ essay The Death of The Author, published in 1965, argued that a reader’s own personal experiences
inform how they engage with a text.
For example if you and a friend see the same movie, different scenes will make you cry, or laugh, or cheer,
because your personality informs how you interpret the movie.
In the Death of the Author, Barthes also put forward that texts cannot be purely original, because every
author is influenced by the culture they are born into, which itself is influenced by the texts that exist within
it.
A palimpsest is an old term for a manuscript page which has been washed clean to be used for a new piece of
writing, from a time when paper was expensive to make.
Genette expanded on the prior work of these other literary thinkers, outlining three main points that underpin
intertextuality:
That there are multiple meanings in all texts
Texts quote from & borrow from other texts
The reader is the essential creator of meaning in the text
Here is a short text you have not seen before. Can Even though you have never seen this particular piece
you read it? of writing before you probably had no difficulty
making sense of it. This is because the passage
It was nine thirty on a wet August morning. The rain contains much that is already familiar, and only a
settled like machine-gun fire on the tin roof of the little that is new. Make note of the following list of
warehouse next door, accompanied by the features and label them familiar (F) or unfamiliar (N)
monotonous plunk! Of water drops falling into a tin The meanings of individual words in the passage
bucket from a leak in the office ceiling. I hadn’t had a
The conventions of the “detective” genre
new case in three weeks. Work was the only thing that
had dried up that winter; seemed like even the The concepts of character and plot
mobsters had gone into hibernation. I was about ready The rules of narrative (storytelling)
to do the same when the phone rang. Details about the narrator’s present situation
Try to imagine a completely original text – one that
contained nothing that was familiar to you.
1. Imagine you’re taking an exam in which you’re asked Your culture’s perceptions of Shakespeare
to analyze a Shakespearean sonnet. The factors on the Your training in critical analysis
right might shape the reading you produce. Some might
shape the reading in a very direct way, others might Your ‘personal’ experiences and values
have an indirect influence. Number the items from 1 Shakespeare’s “personal” reasons for writing the
(most direct) to 10 (least direct/not available). sonnet
The dominant values and beliefs of your society
2. Does this suggest the reading will be most powerfully The politics and literary values of Elizabethan
shaped by “present day” factors, or by “historic”
England
factors?
The ’original’ (17th century) meaning of the words
The structure and workings of the modern
3. Is it possible for you to produce the same reading that
might have been produced by a reader in Elizabethan education system
England? Why/why not? The exact wording of the exam question
COMPOSER
T
CONTEX
HISTORICAL CONTEX
T
TEX CONTEX
T
SOCIAL
T
CONTEX
T
RESPONDER