Fractures of The Talus - Current Concept

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 32

Click to edit Master title style

Fractures of the Talus:


Current Concepts
1
Click to edit Master title style

FRACTURES of the TALUS


Subtitle

2 2
Click to edit Master title style
INTRODUCTION

• Talus injuries present a diverse, unique set of challenges in


management with a profound impact on the short- and longterm
functional outcomes for the patient
• Complicated by :
• the predominantly articular nature of the bone
• its prominent role in the weightbearing process
• the tenuous blood supply network that perfuses it

3 3
Click to edit Master title style
EPIDEMIOLOGY

• Relatively rare
• Account for 0.1% to 2.5% of all fractures, and 3% to 5% of foot and
ankle fractures
• Talar neck are the most common anatomic site for injury and
account for 45% to 50% of all fractures of the talus.
• More common in men than women
• Average patient age early to mid-30s, with a broad range

4 4
Click to edit Master
CLASSIFICATION title style
of TALAR NECK FRACTURE

5 5
Click to edit Master title style
ANATOMY

• Transfers loads from the tibia to the remainder of the foot.


• 3 main structures:
• Body
• Trapezoidal, bordered superiorly by the convex talar dome
• Neck
• No articular cartilage,
• Varus and plantarflexed neck-body angles of 10 to 44 degrees and 5 to 50 degrees, respectively
• Head
• Convex, fully coated in articular cartilage
• Articulates with the navicular bone.
• Supported by the calcaneonavicular (“spring”) ligament that maintains the plantar arch

6 6
Click to edit Master title style
ANATOMY

7 7
Click toSUPPLY
BLOOD edit Master title style
of TALUS

• The extraosseous blood supply of the


talus is an amalgam of contributions
from :
• Anterior tibial artery
• Posterior tibial artery
• The largest contributor through its branch to
the tarsal canal
• Perforating peroneal artery
• Talar head also gets contributions
from the dorsalis pedis and the artery
of the tarsal sinus
8 8
Click to edit OF
MECHANISM Master title style
INJURY

Motor vehicle collision (most common)


Fall from height
Pedestrian struck by automobile
Crush injuries
Athletic injuries
9 9
Click to edit Master title style
DIAGNOSIS

• 6.9% of talus fractures were undiagnosed at the time of


presentation
• most commonly occurred in lower-energy scenarios such as falls from 1 m,
rotational injuries during the loading phase of rock climbing ascent, and
rotational injuries during community ambulation.

1010
Click to edit IMAGING
DIAGNOSTIC Master title style

• The sensitivity for any talar injury is only 74%, with displacement being
the largest driver of radiographic sensitivity.
Plain radiographs • Talar dome osteochondral fracture, lateral process fracture, and
posterior process fracture are the most frequently missed fracture sites

Computed • Gold standard


• Provide information on degree of comminution, articular involvement,
tomography (CT) and surgical planning

Magnetic resonance • Useful for persistent pain after trauma to aid in diagnosis
of peritalar soft tissue injuries and osteochondral injuries
imaging (MRI) such as those in the talar head or dome

1111
Click to edit Master title style

Osteochondral fracture noted on (A) axial and (B) sagittal magnetic resonance images. The
osteochondral lesion is marked with an asterisk

1212
Click to edit
SURGICAL Master title
INDICATION andstyle
TIMING of FIXATION

• Maintenance of a reduced joint line and stable articulation are key to


short-term functional status and long-term mitigation of post
traumatic arthritis risk
• Nonoperative should only be considered when there are :
• nondisplaced neck and body fractures
• nonambulatory patients
• medically unable to tolerate surgery
• A low threshold for operative treatment should be employed
because unsuccessful closed reduction attempts will lead to further
decompensation to compromised soft tissues.
1313
Click to edit
SURGICAL Master title
INDICATION andstyle
TIMING of FIXATION

• Contraindication of early open treatment (early multiplantar external


fixation (EF) should be considered):
• severe soft tissue swelling or fracture blisters
• extensive open fracture wounds that limit access to the fracture
• severely comminuted open fracture wounds with gross contamination
• Soft tissue healing precludes conversion of EF to an open articular
and bony reduction and internal fixation (ORIF)

1414
Click to edit
SURGICAL Master title
INDICATION andstyle
TIMING of FIXATION

• Relative contraindication of open reduction and internal fixation


(ORIF) :
• superficial soft tissue infections
• advanced peripheral vascular disease, chronic venous insufficiency (with
skin ulceration)
• systemic immunodeficiency
• noncompliant patients

1515
Click to edit
SURGICAL Master title
INDICATION andstyle
TIMING of FIXATION

• Historically, emergent treatment and fixation was recommended for


talus fractures because of the known risk of osteonecrosis with talar
neck fractures
• Open injuries, as with any other fracture, require emergent
debridement and stabilization
• Closed injuries are amenable to a more situational
approach to surgical timing.
• Delayed fixation is protective of soft tissue complications (wound
dehiscence, skin necrosis, and infection)

1616
Click to edit Master
NONOPERATIVE title style
TREATMENT

• Closed reduction and immobilization is a temporizing measure to


relieve the high soft tissue stress delivered by displaced fracture
fragments, and typically requires substantial muscular relaxation
• Nondisplaced fractures of the head and body can be treated by
casting the foot and ankle in a neutral position for 6 weeks
• Partial weightbearing is required for approximately 8 to 10 weeks
until radiographic proof of union of the fracture is obtained.
• Trial of cast immobilization of acute posterior or lateral talar process
fractures of at least 6 weeks is useful, as articular congruity is
typically maintained
1717
Click to editMANAGEMENT
OPERATIVE Master title style

• External Fixation
• Indication
• used to stabilize a reduced talus fracture
• dislocation when soft tissue injury
• patient medical status preclude safe open reduction and internal fixation
• Sometimes it is necessary to place pin in the talus
• medial safe zone is along the anteromedial neck, proximal to the talonavicular joint and
superior to the tibialis posterior tendon
• Lateral safe zone is a small nonarticular portion of the neck (requires fluoroscopic
localization due to difficulty with reliable palpation )
• Classic deltaframe constructs can be used in stable reductions

1818
•Click
Internal Fixation
to edit Master title style
• The mainstay of treatment
• avoid alteration of contact pressures between the ankle and hindfoot articulations
• minimize the risk of osteonecrosis
• talus fractures malunion tolerances are less than 3 degrees
• The goal of fixation methods
• direct anatomic compression of fracture lines without comminution
• maintenance of length and alignment where comminution precludes compressive
forces

1919
Click to edit
Internal Master title style
Fixation

• Combined anteromedial and anterolateral approaches facilitate maximal


exposure
• An adjunct oblique medial malleolus osteotomy offers additional exposure to the
talar dome, if indicated
• Percutaneous screw fixation of nondisplaced, noncomminuted talar neck and
body fractures can be considered, though strict care to cross the fracture
perpendicularly in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior planes is necessary
to achieve maximal fragment compression
• Anatomic reduction is best obtained through dual approaches to directly visualize
both the medial and lateral talar neck
• Lag screw fixation confers maximal construct stability, though it sacrifices the
alignment control of plate constructs with or without supplementary lag or
interfragmentary fixation
2020
Click to edit
Internal Master title style
Fixation

• Intraoperative contouring of
minifragment plating on the lateral
surface of the talus is recommended to
avoid medial shortening and varus
malunion, particularly in cases of neck
shortening greater than 2 mm
• Medial plates have proven to be
potentially symptomatic, screws (most
commonly headless or countersunk) is
often preferred to supplement lateral
plate fixation

2121
Click to
ROLE OFedit Master title style
ARTHROSCOPY

• Not suitable as a sole method of fracture visualization and reduction for


large, displaced fragments
• Enables direct visualization of smaller articular fractures that are difficult to
visualize through an open approach and avoids the soft tissue stripping of
an extensile dissection
• Good short-term results in the arthroscopic reduction and fixation of a
coronal talar body fracture that occurred in conjunction with an
osteochondral fracture of the talar dome
• Facilitated earlier rehabilitation, beginning at 15 days postoperatively
• An adjunct method of fracture visualization to assist with an open reduction
for percutaneous screw fixation
2222
Click to edit Master title style
OUTCOME

• Difficult to quantify given the variability of :


• the fracture’s anatomic location
• displacement severity
• associated soft-tissue injuries
• surgical approach
• associated orthopedic and nonorthopedic injuries
• No significant difference in outcomes between talar body and talar neck fractures
• Lateral process fractures showed the best functional outcomes after surgery, when
compared with fractures of any other portion of the talus
• Anatomic union of talar neck and body fractures, without post-traumatic arthritis or
osteonecrosis, yields a satisfactory functional outcome
• Postsurgical complications are poorly tolerated by most patients
2323
Click to edit Master title style
COMPLICATIONS

• Post-traumatic arthritis
• post-traumatic arthritis is
thought to be the most common
• range of 4% to 100% incidence
rate with a mean of 49%
• treatment of post-traumatic
arthritis can be accomplished
through arthrodesis of the
affected joints

2424
•Click to edit
Avascular Master title style
necrosis
• the second most common post-
surgical complication
• rate of osteonecrosis increases with
fracture grade
• overall osteonecrosis rates of 0%,
42%, and 91% for Hawkins types I, II,
and III, respectively
• the rate of AVN in neck fractures
(55%) and body fractures (27%)
• post-traumatic talus AVN is classically
managed with a hindfoot
intramedullary fusion nail
• newer therapies have emerged, such as
vascularized bone grafting and total talus
replacement
2525
Click to edit Master title style

Post-traumatic avascular necrosis of the talar dome after talar neck fracture, as indicated by focal area
of sclerosis. The asterisk indicates the region of avascular necrosis
2626
Click to edit Master title style
INFECTION

• Significant concern given the high rate of (at least) shortterm local
devascularization
• Open fractures were found to have a deep infection rate of 25%
• To minimize infection, should undergo serial debridement until contamination
and soft tissue necrosis has been eradicated
• Closed fractures, the rate of infection is not well reported, but the
estimated overall deep infection rate is 21%
• should be managed when soft tissue swelling has diminished to avoid high
stress and malperfusion of incisional skin flaps

2727
Click to editand
MALUNION Master title style
NONUNION

• Poorly tolerated by talus fractures


• Anatomic union is the foundation of a satisfactory clinical outcome
• Persistent pain in the absence of infection, arthritis, or necrosis raises
the suspicion of a deviation from a well-aligned talus
• Overall rate of nonunion at 5% and malunion at 17% in a talar neck
fractures
• the rate of overall nonunion is highly variable, with rates ranging from 3% to
20%
• The most common malunion is varus through the talar neck
• treated with a medial-based opening wedge osteotomy of the talar neck
2828
Click toCOMPLICATIONS
OTHER edit Master title style

• Complex regional pain syndrome


• Venous thromboembolic event
• Rare occurences

2929
Click to edit Master
ADDITIONAL title style
PROCEDURES

• Repeat surgical intervention after an index treatment of a talus


fracture can stem from treatment of the aforementioned
complications
• secondary surgery was needed in aprox. 19% of talus fracture
• the incidence of secondary surgery rose from 24% at 1 year after the injury
to 48% after 10 years.

3030
Click to edit Master title style
SUMMARY

• Talus fractures represent a challenging and heterogeneous group of injuries


• Identification and characterization of talus fractures can be difficult with plain radiography,
and 3-dimensional imaging is often necessary
• Anatomic reduction and stable fixation are crucial to preserving lower extremity function
• Open fractures may be treated with external fixation or early fixation with surgical
debridement, depending on soft tissue contamination and the location of traumatic wounds
• Fixation methods range from extensile open plate fixation to limited, percutaneous, and/or
arthroscopy-assisted screw fixation depending on fracture pattern and displacement
• Complications, like post-traumatic arthritis and AVN, can result in a significant decline in
functional status
• Understanding of the bony and vascular anatomy and respect for soft tissues is crucial to
maximizing the likelihood of a successful outcome

3131
Click to edit Master title style

Thank You

32

You might also like