7 Membrane Filtration

Advanced Redox Technology
(ART) Lab
고도산화환원 환경공학 연구실
http://artlab.re.kr
Membrane Filtration
(from MWH's Water Treatment Principles and Design by Crittenden et al.)
Changha Lee
School of Chemical and Biological Engineering

Seoul National University
Membrane
Filtration
Classification of Membrane
Processes
MF
UF
NF
RO
- Osmosis is the preferential diffusion of water through a semipermeable
membrane in response to a concentration gradient.
- Reverse osmosis is for removal of truly dissolved solutes (ions such as
sodium, chloride, calcium, or magnesium, and dissolved NOM).
- Used for desalination, micropollutant removal, and softening
Cross-flow
(LMH)
Principal Features of Membrane
Processes
Adsorption
√ PRESSURE-VESSEL CONFIGURATION ( 가압식 )
√ SUBMERGED CONFIGURATION ( 침지식 )
Reduced fouling
√ Destabilization is not necessary
-The void spaces in a membrane filter are much smaller; particles are
literally strained from the water so destabilization is not necessary.
-No requirement of coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation

facilities for effective particle removal.
-Reduce the facilities for chemical storage and handling and

residual-handling and allow membrane plants to be more compact
and automated.
-Furthermore, the more compact installation can result in

considerable cost savings in densely populated areas or other areas
where land costs are high.
√ Performance is not dependent on the feed water quality
-The most significant advantage, however, is that the filtered water

turbidity from membrane filters is independent of the concentration
of particulate matter in the feed.
Compact &
Stable !!
Properties of Membrane
Materials
Hydrophilic
Hydrophobic
Particle Capture in Membrane
Filtration -For MF, pore size is typically used for retention rating.
-For UF, pore size or MWCO is used for retention rating
-The standard procedure for determining the MWCO value of a UF
membrane involves filtration of dextran solutions with varying average
molecular weights
STRAINING ADSORPTION CAKE FORMATION
√ REMOVAL OF PROTOZOA AND HELMINTHS
-At least 10 times larger than the retention ratings of MF and UF membranes.
-Rejection of greater than 7 log (limited by the initial population) has been observed
for both MF and UF membranes
√ REMOVAL OF BACTERIA
-In many studies, bacteria are removed to below the
detection limit by MF and UF
√ REMOVAL OF VIRUSES
-The efficiency depends on the virus species and the
membrane.
-For MF, straining, adsorption and cake filtration all
contribute to rejection, and virus rejection can vary
from LRV < 1 to LRV > 4.
-For UF, complete rejection (LRV > 7.2) of MS2
bacteriophage, a model virus with a diameter of
about 25 nm, with a 100,000-Da UF membrane but
LRV < 1 with a 500,000-Da UF membrane.
100,000-Da 
dH = 21 nm
500,000-Da 
Hydraulics of Flow Through
Membrane
Similarly for membrane filtration

Increasing T  Decreasing   Increasing J
Membrane
Fouling
Operation at a constant flux
Operation at a constant pressure

Figure 12- Variation in specific flux during filtration of natural waters. The loss
of specific
18 flux from the initial clean membrane permeability, which cannot be
recovered by backwashing or cleaning, is called irreversible fouling; that which
can be recovered is called reversible fouling.
- The resistance-in-series equation can be defined in different ways.
- E.g., The resistance-in-series equation can be applied to any number of individual
resistances, which may be due to irreversible and reversible components,
specific fouling materials (organic fouling resistance, biological fouling resistance, etc.),
fouling mechanisms (cake fouling resistance, pore constriction fouling resistance,
etc.).
-Biofouling is the loss of system performance due to the formation of a
biofilm
-Biofilm formation: Adhesion of microorganisms on the membrane
surface,
excretion of extracellular material to form organic films
-Biofouling is particularly important for wastewater applications, e.g.,
MBR.
-Disinfectants are often used to control the biofouling (a related issue:
chlorine-resistant membranes).
-The most problematic and least controllable membrane fouling is due

to the adsorption of natural organic matter (NOM) to the membrane
surface.
-Surface cake formation and pore constriction have both been
proposed as mechanisms for fouling
-Models that simulate fouling mechanisms under specific laboratory operating
condition
-The filtration blocking laws apply only to constant-pressure, dead-end filtration.
V =  Jta dt
 dV/dt = Jta
 dt/dV = 1/Jta
 d2t/dV2 = d(1/Jta)/dt(dt/dV)
= a(dJt/dt)(Jta)2(dt/dV)
= a(dJt/dt)(dt/dV)3
-It is useful to have empirical models that can compare fouling under different conditions,
such as with different source waters, different membrane products, or at different scales.
-A fouling index can be derived using the resistance-in-series model with two resistance terms:
one for clean membrane resistance and another for fouling resistance:
(< 1)
(> 1)
Jsp0
Raw data
3rd to 10th filter runs

7 Membrane Filtration

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

7 Membrane Filtration

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

7 Membrane Filtration

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Advanced Redox Technology

School of Chemical and Biological Engineering

-No requirement of coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation

-Reduce the facilities for chemical storage and handling and

-Furthermore, the more compact installation can result in

√ Performance is not dependent on the feed water quality

-The most significant advantage, however, is that the filtered water

Similarly for membrane filtration

Operation at a constant pressure

-The most problematic and least controllable membrane fouling is due

You might also like