8apr Action Research Session 1
8apr Action Research Session 1
8apr Action Research Session 1
Session 1
Positivist
Interpretive
Critical theory
Mixed-methods
Paradigms of social research
(Cohen, Manion and Morrison, 2011)
Positivist
Postivist paradigm
It isscience
Natural based
on Generalisation
the assumption that it is
Objectivity
basis
possible to observe social life and establish
reliable, valid knowledge about how it
Testable works
Law based – cause
explanations Causality
and effect
/prediction
It is argued that it encourages misleading
emphasis on superficial facts without any
Knowledge
attention
Control, to underlying mechanisms
Quantification, obtainedthat
through
manipulation cannotlarge
be scale
observed observation and
measurement
Review previous Formulate
Identify a topic
literature hypothesis
Report findings /
or look for Postivist
alternative
explanations design
Positivist methods
Surveys
Tests
Experiments
Paradigms of social research
(Cohen, Manion and Morrison, 2011)
Interpretive
Interpretive paradigm
Naturalistic Understanding
Reality is constructed by subjective Interpretation
perceptions
and predictions cannot be made
Knowledge and meanings are socially constructed
Agency
Subjectivity,
People have free(capacity
will, purposes, goals and
of Context-based
intentionality
intentions, so peopleagents)
should be studied as active
agents
Social life consists of interaction processes rather
Fluidity, Specific / non- Multiple
than structures and is constantly changing
change generalisable perspectives
Identify topic
Literature review
Research design
Interpretive
Data collection
Ethnographic
Data analysis design
Elaboration of
concepts and
theories
Report of findings
Naturalistic methods
Interviews
Thick
Observation
descriptions
Narratives,
documents
Ethnography
Paradigms of social research
(Cohen, Manion and Morrison, 2011)
Critical theory
Critical theory paradigm
Ideology Political
Feminist
critique research
Power
Social justice
relations
Ideology critique
- critical theory
Describe existing situation
Biographical;
Interpretive Qualitative Phenomenological;
Ethnographical; case
study
Conducted through
Integration of
collaborative
research and action
partnership
Stimulates
High level of
transformative
reflexivity
learning
all the
participants as the main purpose
participants knowledge and the whole
co-researchers is the reflection and
have theory are learning-by-doing
and co-learners, improvement of a action are two
something to inseparable from process is what
including the real situation or core elements
contribute practice counts
researcher problem
and to learn
Purpose of action research
• To change the world by understanding it
better;
• To simultaneously assist in problem-solving
and adding to the knowledge base;
• To find and understand a way to achieve an
end rather than to find the best way;
• To enhance the competence of those involved
Nature of action research
Personal
Practitioner as
researcher and the
process of self-
reflection, planning
and introducing
changes to improve
self-practice
Political
Generate Professional
democratic Professional
processes to development
empower groups - purposes, to enhance
leads to social profession
change
These are overlapping and may be present in any action research study
The action research cycle
Identify
a • Develop a PLAN of action to
problem improve what is happening
• ACT to implement the plan
Plan
Reflect
action • OBSERVE the effects of the
action
• REFLECT on these effects as
a basis for subsequent
cycles
Observe Act
(Kemmis, 1981)
Cyclical process
Steps in action research (McNiff, 2002, p.71)
• Few experiences taking an interdisciplinary and holistic approach (Tilbury et al., 2004, Ryan, 2011)
• No existence of a model for research universities
Context of the research
• UoS commitment
– Funding a PhD
– Green Academy programme – Curricula for Tomorrow project (HEA
ESD Project + EAUC + NUS)
– Curriculum Innovation Programme (CI) – Sustainability Module
– University staff who is already embedding sustainability? How do
they refer to it?
– Teaching fellows and lecturers that use innovative and
‘unorthodox’ approaches
– Potential community of practice
Stage I
• Exploratory – reconnaissance phase
– Gain a deeper understanding of UoS
organisation – baseline data
– Learn from and connect the every
day experiences of academic staff
members at the UoS
• Research aims
– Explore the factors influencing
academic staff members engagement
in EfS
– Views and vision of academic staff
members in relation to EfS
34
Stage I - rationale
• International student
• University as a unique social system
– University of Southampton –
Russell Group University –
Research-led
• Walk the talk – learn from
academics and put in practice EfS
principles - research with people,
foster collaboration and empower
• Inform subsequent stages –
identify key individuals
35
Next session
• Different types of action research
• Activity: design your own action research
project
– HOMEWORK: Think about real problems in
sustainable clothing to be tacked through action-
research. Think about possible action strategies,
agents involved, research methods, etc.