Feelings

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

FEELINGS


NOTHING MORE BUT FEELINGS…
AND MORAL DECISIONS
LEARNING
OUTCOMES
At the end of this Module, you should be able to:

• Compare responses based on reason and those based on


feelings
• Identify and analyze your feelings in personal moral
experiences
• Compare reasonable and emotional responses
In this lesson, we will tackle how feelings
as instinctive responses to moral dilemmas
can serve as obstacles to making right
decisions.

We will likewise tackle how feelings and


emotions as trained responses to situations
may help/aid in taking ethical decisions.
Feeling is…

• “To feel is to be involved in something” in a person,


concept, myself, process, problem, another feeling.
• Feelings can be in the foreground or background.
• Feelings are instinctive response to moral
dilemmas.
• Feeling is a blind faculty of the will that should be
guided by right reason
Feelings as Obstacles
There are TWO Feeling-Based Theories
in Ethics:

1. ETHICAL SUBJECTIVISM
2. EMOTIVISM
Ethical Subjectivism
• Ethical Subjectivism runs CONTRARY to the principle that there is objectivity
in morality.
• It grasps that moral judgments holds that the truth or falsity of ethical
propositions is DEPENDENT on the feelings, attitudes or standards of a person
or group of persons.
• It interprets ethical sentences as statement of fact, particularly reports the
speaker’s attitude.
Ethical Subjectivism
• When someone states his/her view, he/she is not just stating a fact about the
matter but merely saying something about his/her feelings toward it.
• Subjectivists hold that there is no such thing as objective right or real wrong.
• When something is morally good (and vice-versa), this just means that WE
APPROVE OF THAT THING.
• Emotivism is an improved version of subjectivism

Emotivism • Developed by the American philosopher Charles L.


Stevenson.
• The theory states that moral judgments express positive
and negative feelings.
• Moral judgments are not statement of fact but are mere
expressions of the emotions of the speaker, especially
since they are feeling-based.
Emotivism
• Emotivism claims that utterances in Ethics (such as “Boo on the price of
gasoline!”, “Hooray for SOGIE!”) are NOT fact-stating sentences, but
have TWO PURPOSES:
• 1. they are used as means of influencing other’s behavior (e.g. “Stealing
is immoral”) – it is an attempt to stop you from doing the act.
Emotivism
• 2. Moral sentences are used to EXPRESS (not report) the speaker’s
attitude.
• Example: “Fair play is good” is NOT saying that I approve of fair play.
Evaluating Ethical
Subjectivism and
Emotivism
TO DO: Reflect on what are the strengths
and weaknesses of Ethical Subjectivism and
Emotivism
Conclusion: Feelings can Help
in Making the Right Decisions
• Ethical subjectivism and Emotivism should not be interpreted as completely
removing people’s feelings, tastes, emotion, liking, and the like in the sphere
of morality.
• Ethics without feeling goes against Christian philosophy’s emphasis on
LOVE (strong liking or desire).
Conclusion: Feelings can Help
in Making the Right Decisions
• Our moral compasses are also strongly influenced by the fleeting
forces of disgust, fondness or fear.
• So sometimes, subjective feelings matter when deciding right and
wrong.
REGION'S PREMIER UNIVERSITY
PCHOICE
A N G A S I N A N S TAT E U N I V E R S I T Y

Thank you!
14

You might also like