Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Treatment of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Complications Prognosis
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) is a disease of variable progression Management based on understanding of pathogenesis,clinical features and correct neuroimaging investigation.
Many patients have evidence of significant compression on MRI but relatively asymptomatic Spinal cord has high degree of tolerance to chronic deformation
75%
Stepwise deterioration
20%
5%
Improvement
Typically slowing progressive Step ladder progression Once moderate symptoms occur, prognosis poor
Non operative
Operative
Indications
Neuroradiological evidence of compression but no symptom/sign of myelopathy Mild neuropathy
Slight gait disturbance No functional deficit/ weakness
Plateau phase
Intermittent cervical collar Anti-inflammatory Active discouragement of high risk activities Physiotherapy Regular monitoring/ follow up Epidural steroid injection
Severity of disease Nurick 3- 5 Pain Rate of progression Compression with severe neuroradiologic findings
Kyphosis Myelomalcia Small cord area Cord atrophy
Posterior approach
Laminoplasty Laminectomy +/- fusion procedures
Anterior approach
Multiple anterior diskectomies with fusion Corpectomy with fusion +/- anterior instrumentation
Combined
Indirect technique Increases transverse diameter and size of canal Requires posterior shift of cord to diminish effect of anterior compression
Canal expansion by opening the posterior elements in a trapdoor fashion effective diameter of the spinal canal from C3 to C7 by shifting the laminae dorsally Osseous posterior arch not completely removed Post op instability reduced muscular and osseous support preserved
Decompression of spinal canal by removal of part of posterior elements useful alternative for multiple-level decompression in patients with preserved cervical lordosis Lateral margins are the junctions of the lateral masses and laminae
May require posterior instrumentation to prevent kyphosis or instability Visible expansion of the dural sac intraoperatively and pulsation of the dura suggest good canal expansion
Allows anterior decompression of dura Choice of type depending on location of compression Confined to disc@ 1-3 levels anterior cervical diskectomy + grafting Disc,PLL,end plates corpectomy with strut graft
Direct decompression the removal of disc material and posterior osteophytes impinging on the spinal cord at the level of the disc space cartilaginous end plate is completely removed, the thin osseous end plate preserved Bone graft inserted into interspace
Advantage
Dissection along fascial planes Relative preservation of stability of spinal column Low prevalence of graft extrusion
Disadvantage
Decreased visalization- incomplete decompression or injury to cord Not recommended for primary tx of severe congenital spinal stenosis
Removal of the cervical body and intervening disc 15 to 19-mm central trough is removed from the anterior aspect of the vertebral body provides a safety margin of 5 mm to the medial border of the foramen transversarium PLL also resected Defected filled with graft +/- Instrumentation
Post laminectomy kyphosis Patients with severe osteoporosis Multilevel corpectomy in 3 or more levels
No single preferred approach both have been used successfully Neither is optimal for every patient although either may be appropriate Both approaches give similar results with appropriate patient selection Various determinants of choice of approach
No of levels Cervical kyphosis Instability Spinal canal size/presence of stenosis Revision Surgeons expertise
Stabilization with arthrodesis Not as technically demanding Correction of deformity Good axial pain relief Disavantages Technically demanding Graft complications Post op bracing Loss of motion Adjacent segment degeneration Indirect decompression Late instability Inconsistent axial pain results Pre op kyphosis/instability limitation Less bracing needed Avoids graft complications
Approach related
RL nerve hoarseness Dysphagia Upper airway compromise- edema,hematoma
Decompression related
Spinal cord /nv root injury C5 nerve injury Vertebral ay injury Spinal fluid leaks
Graft related
Dislodgement Fracture Severe settling into cancellous bone Displacement with esophageal injury
Anterior approach
Pseudoarthrosis Adjacent segment degeneration
Laminectomy
Post laminectomy kyphosis, Instability with neurological deteroriation
Laminoplasty
Inadvertent closure with recurrent stenosis Incomplete decompression
Age Shorter duration of symptoms Single level Severity of myelopathy before intervention Larger transverse area of cord Preoperative bladder dysfunction