BEDAH JURNAL

(JOURNAL ARTICLE ANALYSIS,

JOURNALS CRITICAL ANALYSIS)

Didin Wahidin
UNIVERSITAS PASUNDAN
Analisis Jurnal …
• Kegiatan untuk memperhatikan esensi utama dari penelitian yang
dipublikasikan oleh sumber daya ilmiah, kemudian memadukannya
dengan gagasan dan gagasan penganalisis.
• Kegiatan membaca dan memahami artikel ilmiah yang terbit di
sebuah jurnal untuk memahami isinya dengan baik dan benar.
Sehingga dengan cara analisis jurnal ini, seseorang bisa memahami isi
jurnal dg baik.
BAGAIMANA MEKANISMENYA ?

IDENTIFY

REPORT UNDERSTAND

ANALYZE
TAHAPAN MENULIS ANALISIS JURNAL
PILIH JURNAL
(RELEVAN DAN
BERKUALITAS)

TULIS / LAPORKAN BACA RINGKASAN

HASIL ANALISIS (ABSTRAK)

BACA LATAR
SIMPULKAN BELAKANG (RESEARCH
GAP)
TEMUKAN
ARGUMAN /POSISI
JURNAL
ANALISIS JURNAL, BEBERAPA TIP:

TEMUKAN JURNAL YANG RELEVAN

PASTIKAN STNDAR KUALITAS JURNAL YANG DIANALISIS

PASTIKAN ILMIAH

BACA RINGKASAN / ABSTRAK

BACA LATAR BELAKANG DAN PERMASALAHANNYA

TEMUKAN POIN, ARGUMEN DAN POSISI JURNAL YANG DIANALISIS

BACA SIMPULAN
FORMAT ANALISIS JURNAL 1

JUDUL

RANGKUMAN ISI JURNAL

KEKUATAN / KELEBIHAN JURNAL

KELEMAHAN JURNAL

SIMPULAN
FORMAT ANALISIS JURNAL 2

1. IDENTITAS JURNAL

2. ABSTRAK & KATA KUNCI

3. PENDAHULUAN & PERMASALAHAN

4. TUJUAN
FORMAT ANALISIS JURNAL …
LANJUTAN

4. LANDASAN TEORI

5. METODE

6. HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN

7. SIMPULAN
Pengertian …
Journal article analysis

Journal article analysis

assignments require you to
summarize and critically assess
the quality of an empirical
research study published in a
scholarly journal.
Benefits

Improve reading
skill
Benefits
Improve
comprehension
skill
STRUCTURE …

an introduction

a body

a conclusion
STRUCTURE & ORGANIZATION
1. Introduction Section
• Describe the topic of the article and highlight the author’s main points: the research
problem and theoretical framework, the rationale for the research, the methods of
data gathering and analysis, the key findings, and the author’s final conclusions and
recommendations.
• The narrative should focus on the act of describing rather than analyzing

Possible questions:
Who are the authors and what credentials that contributes to the validity of the study?
What was the research problem being investigated?
What type of research design was used to investigate the research problem?
What theoretical idea(s) and/or research questions were used to address the problem?
What was the source of the data or information used as evidence for analysis?
What methods were applied to investigate this evidence?
What were the author's overall conclusions and key findings?
 2. Critical Analysis Section
The second section of a journal analysis paper should describe the strengths
and weaknesses of the study and analyze its significance and impact.

Possible questions
A. Introduction
Did the author clearly state the problem being investigated?
What was your reaction to and perspective on the research problem?
Was the study’s objective clearly stated? Did the author clearly explain why the study was necessary?
How well did the introduction frame the scope of the study?
Did the introduction conclude with a clear purpose statement?

B. Literature Review
Did the literature review lay a foundation for understanding the significance of the research problem?
Did the literature review provide enough background information to understand the problem in
relation to relevant contexts [e.g., historical, economic, social, cultural, etc.].
Did literature review effectively place the study within the domain of prior research? Is anything
missing?
Was the literature review organized by conceptual categories or did the author simply list and describe
 C. Literature Review
Did the literature review lay a foundation for understanding the significance of the research problem?
Did the literature review provide enough background information to understand the problem in relation to relevant
contexts [e.g., historical, economic, social, cultural, etc.].
Did literature review effectively place the study within the domain of prior research? Is anything missing?
Was the literature review organized by conceptual categories or did the author simply list and describe sources?

D. Methods
Did the author accurately explain how the data or information were collected?
Was the data used sufficient in supporting the study of the research problem?
Was there another methodological approach that could have been more illuminating?
Give your overall evaluation of the methods used in this article. How much trust would you put in generating relevant
findings?

E. Results and Discussion

Were the results clearly presented?
Did you feel that the results support the theoretical and interpretive claims of the author? Why?
What did the author(s) do especially well in describing or analyzing their results?
Was the author's evaluation of the findings clearly stated?
How well did the discussion of the results relate to what is already known about the research problem?
Was the discussion of the results free of repetition and redundancies?
F. Results and Discussion
Were the results clearly presented?
Did you feel that the results support the theoretical and interpretive claims of the author? Why?
What did the author(s) do especially well in describing or analyzing their results?
Was the author's evaluation of the findings clearly stated?
How well did the discussion of the results relate to what is already known about the research problem?
Was the discussion of the results free of repetition and redundancies?
What interpretations did the authors make that you think are in incomplete, unwarranted, or overstated?

G. Conclusion
Did the conclusion effectively capture the main points of study?
Did the conclusion address the research questions posed? Do they seem reasonable?
Were the author’s conclusions consistent with the evidence and arguments presented?
Has the author explained how the research added new knowledge or understanding?
H. Overall Writing Style
If the article included tables, figures, or other non-textual elements, did they contribute to understanding the
study?
Were ideas developed and related in a logical sequence?
Were transitions between sections of the article smooth and easy to follow?
 3. Overall Evaluation Section
This section is where the narrative flow transitions from analyzing specific elements of
the article to critically evaluating the overall study.

Possible questions :
1. Was the structure of the article clear and well organized?
2. Was the topic of current or enduring interest to you?
3. What were the main weaknesses of the article? [this does not refer to limitations stated by the author, but what you
believe are potential flaws]
4. Was any of the information in the article unclear or ambiguous?
5. What did you learn from the research? If nothing stood out to you, explain why.
6. Assess the originality of the research. Did you believe it contributed new understanding of the research problem?
7. Were you persuaded by the author’s arguments?
8. If the author made any final recommendations, will they be impactful if applied to practice?
9. In what ways could future research build off of this study?
10. What implications does the study have for daily life?
11. Was the use of non-textual elements, footnotes or endnotes, and/or appendices helpful in understanding the
research?
12. What lingering questions do you have after analyzing the article?
 Article
1. Introduction
Analysis Template
1. State the title of the work that you analyze, specify author’s name and the date of
publication, if available.
2. Outline the main ideas of a news report or a research journal article to identify the author’s
thesis.
3. Come up with your own thesis statement and talk briefly of your main vision and ideas
related to original paper.
4. Keep it short! After all, it is an introduction!

2. Summary
5. Provide a brief outline of the main ideas presented in your research article,
news report, book or a movie.
6. This is an actual part that should answer to the questions what, why, who, when
and how exactly.
7. Discuss the structure of an article that you are working with, talk about the
style and the point of view presented by the author.
3. Analysis

1.State what you like and what you do not like about the
article or a news report in a critical way.
2.Explain your own ideas by offering specific examples from
an actual article, a news report or a book.
3.Next, you have to state and explain whether the author has
achieved his or her intentions and goals or not.
Conclusion

a) Restate your thesis in a different way, using new

words.
b) Summarize your main thesis and ideas presented,
using core points in a different tone.
c) If necessary and if appropriate, you should make a
call to action for your target audience.