Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16
Chapter Nine
Organizational Structure and
Design Definition According to Koontz and Donnel organizational structure as ‘the establishment of authority relationships with provision for coordination between them, both vertically and horizontally in the enterprise structure’. Vertical structure indicates the line authority and reporting channel. Horizontal structure indicates the division of work and specialization. Tiers of organizational structure are indicative of power structure, positions and its interrelationship, roles, channels of reporting, delegation and accountability. Good organizational structure indicates the following: The structure must lay down formal reporting hierarchy right from the lowest level of worker to the highest level of board of directors. Coordination of various activities be laid down and coordinating authority specified. Individual, group and departmental goals should be laid down with specific time frame. Standing orders, policies, procedures, drills, rules and regulations should exit in an organization. Bureaucracy Basics A bureaucracy is a form of organization based on logic, order, and the legitimate use of formal authority. Bureaucracies are meant to be orderly, fair, and highly efficient. Their features include a clear-cut division of labor, strict hierarchy of authority, formal rules and procedures, and promotion based on competency. Max Weber, a German Sociologist has introduced a mechanistic form of organizational structure. The system is based on logic, a systematic order of delegation of authority. In bureaucratic model every individual has an equal chance of personal growth based on performance. The model is highly rigid, that creates inflexibility in the organization. Bureaucracy promotes politics in an organization. This system tends to serve interests of few elite personalities. Forms of organization Structure a) Mechanistic form of organizational structure: It is organizational structure based on formalized system that is relatively rigid in nature. This is generally applicable to those organizations that are not influenced by technological, product, market changes and generally maintains a constant pattern. Authority is centralized at the top level of management, emphasizes achieving high level of production and efficiency through extensive use of rule and procedures and has a rigid hierarchy of authority. The structure is characterized by plenty of written orders and instructions. b) Organic form of organizational structure: Organizations those are subject to change due to environmental factors like technology, market changes and product development generally adopt organic form of organizational structure. Decentralized decision making is practiced that allows people to make their own decisions There are very few levels of organizational hierarchy and existence of flexible Factors Affecting Organizational Design i. Organizational size: The larger an organization becomes, the more complicated its structure. ii. Organization life cycle: Organizations, like humans, tend to progress through stages known as a life cycle. Like humans, most organizations go through the following four stages: birth, youth, midlife, and maturity. iii. Strategy: How an organization is going to position itself in the market in terms of its product is considered its strategy. iv. Environment: The environment is the world in which the organization operates, and includes conditions that influence the organization such as economic, social-cultural, legal- political, technological, and natural environment conditions. Environments are often described as either stable or dynamic. v. Technology: Advances in technology are the most frequent cause of change in organizations since they generally result in greater efficiency and lower costs for the firm. Technology is the way tasks are accomplished using tools, equipment, techniques, and human know-how. Guidelines for Organizational Structure and Design There should be clear definition of the duties and responsibilities of personnel and employed in the organization. The structure must be directed towards promoting effective work at all levels of management. Adequate decentralization of decision making through the delegation of responsibilities Clear line of responsibility linking the chief executive to the various points of decision operations The span of responsibility of a manager should be limited to a reasonable number of subordinates The structure should make accountable each manager in every level for his/her actions and the action of his/her subordinates The organizational structure should define the policies, procedures, and rules that guide the activities and relationship of people in the organization. Steps in the Structure Designing Process The following steps need to be followed while designing an organizational structure: Review plans and objectives
Determine work activities that are necessary to accomplish the objectives
Classifying and grouping activities in to manageable work units/departments
Assigning work and delegating authority to accomplish the task
Designing a hierarchy relationship to determine the vertical and horizontal
operating relationships of the organization as a whole Five Approaches to Organizational Design Managers must make choices about how to group people together to perform their work. Five common approaches functional, divisional, matrix, team, and networking help managers determine departmental groupings (grouping of positions into departments). 1. Functional structure: The functional structure group positions into work units based on similar activities, skills, expertise, and resources. A functional structure features well-defined channels of communication and authority/responsibility relationships. Not only can this structure improve productivity by minimizing duplication of personnel and equipment, but it also makes employees comfortable and simplifies training as well. The downsides of functional structure is decisions and communication are slow to take place because of the many layers of hierarchy. Authority is more centralized. The functional structure gives managers experience in only one field their own. 2. Divisional structure: Because managers in large companies may have difficulty keeping track of all their company's products and activities, specialized departments may develop. These departments are divided according to their organizational outputs. Examples include departments created to distinguish among production, customer service, and geographical categories. Divisional structure also makes performance easier to monitor. As a result, this structure is flexible and responsive to change. However, divisional structure does have its drawbacks. Because managers are so specialized, they may waste time duplicating each other's activities and resources. In addition, competition among divisions may develop due to limited resources. 3. Matrix structure: The matrix structure combines functional specialization with the focus of divisional structure. This structure uses permanent cross-functional teams to integrate functional expertise with a divisional focus. Employees in a matrix structure belong to at least two formal groups at the same time a functional group and a product, program, or project team. They also report to two bosses one within the functional group and the other within the team. This structure not only increases employee motivation, but it also allows technical and general management training across functional areas as well. As a drawback, the two-boss system is vulnerable to power struggles and members of 4. Team structure: Team structure organizes separate functions into a group based on one overall objective. These cross-functional teams are composed of members from different departments who work together as needed to solve problems and explore opportunities. The intent is to break down functional barriers among departments and create a more effective relationship for solving ongoing problems. The disadvantages include conflicting loyalties among team members and increased time spent in meetings. 5. Network structure: The network structure relies on other organizations to perform critical functions on a contractual basis. In other words, managers can contract out specific work to specialists. This approach provides flexibility and reduces overhead because the size of staff and operations can be reduced. On the other hand, the network structure may result in unpredictability of supply and lack of control because managers are relying on contractual workers to perform important work. Concepts of Organizational Structure The working relationships vertical and horizontal associations between individuals and groups that exist within an organization affect how its activities are accomplished and coordinated. Effective organizing depends on the mastery of several important concepts: A. Work specialization: It is the degree to which organizational tasks are divided into separate jobs. Employees within each department perform only the tasks related to their specialized function. With too much specialization, employees are isolated and perform only small, narrow, boring tasks. B. Chain of command: The chain of command is an unbroken line of authority that links all persons in an organization and defines who reports to whom. This chain has two underlying principles: unity of command and scalar principle. Unity of command: This principle states that an employee should have one and only one supervisor to whom he or she is directly responsible and Scalar principle: The scalar principle refers to a clearly defined line of authority that includes all employees in the organization. C. Authority: Authority is the formal and legitimate right of a manager to make decisions, issue orders, and allocate resources to achieve organizationally desired outcomes. Authority comes in three types: o Line authority gives a manager the right to direct the work of his or her employees and make many decisions without consulting others. o Staff authority supports line authority by advising, servicing, and assisting, but this type of authority is typically limited. o Functional authority is authority delegated to an individual or department over specific activities undertaken by personnel in other departments. D. Delegation: Delegation is the downward transfer of authority from a manager to a subordinate. Most organizations today encourage managers to delegate authority in order to provide maximum flexibility in meeting customer needs. Managers need to take four steps if they want to successfully delegate responsibilities to their teams: o Specifically assign tasks to individual team members. o Give team members the correct amount of authority to accomplish assignments. o Make sure that team members accept responsibility. o Create accountability. E. Span of control: It refers to the number of workers who report to one manager. A wide span of management exists when a manager has a large number of subordinates. Generally, the span of control may be wide when: o The manager and the subordinates are very competent. o The organization has a well-established set of standard operating procedures. o Few new problems are anticipated. A narrow span of management exists when the manager has only a few subordinates. The span should be narrow when: o Workers are located far from one another physically. o The manager has a lot of work to do in addition to supervising workers. o A great deal of interaction is required between supervisor and workers. o New problems arise frequently. F. Centralization versus decentralization: A centralized organization systematically works to concentrate authority at the upper levels. In a decentralized organization, management consciously attempts to spread authority to the lower organization levels. Factors that can influence the extent to which a firm is centralized or decentralized are: o The external environment in which the firm operates. o The nature of the decision itself. o The abilities of low-level managers. o The organization's tradition of management G. Power: Power is the ability to get someone to do something you want done or the ability to make things happen in the way you want them to. Power is the force you use to make things happen in an intended way, whereas influence is what you have when you exercise power, and it is expressed by others’ behavioral response to your exercise of power. Managers derive power from both organizational and individual sources. These sources are called position power and personal power: i. Position power: three bases of power are available to a manager solely as a result of his or her position in the organization. Rewards: This power source derives from the person’s control over resources, for example power to control human resources, pay and promotion. Coercive: The power to punish or reward, the power to threaten and to use one’s position to force others to take action. Legitimate power or formal authority is the extent to which a manager can use the “right of command” to control other people. ii. Personal power: Referent: This depends on charisma or personal attraction of the individual. Referent power is the ability to control another’s behavior because of the individual’s desire to identify with the power source. Expert: Power which derives from knowledge. Expert power is the ability to control another’s behavior because of the possession of knowledge, experience, or judgment that the other person does not have but needs. Information: Information about people, events or other facts assist prediction about future behavior or events.