User talk:Tailikku: Difference between revisions
(→SW:1RV: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
In case you haven't been reading the repetitive edit summaries, I will clarify it one time only for you on your talk page. AVOID reverting back to your edit when someone else has already undone it until AND unless the discussion on a talk page has ruled in favor of that edit. You can try to continue the discussion if and only if there is no clear consensus. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 20:08, 2 November 2018 (EDT) | In case you haven't been reading the repetitive edit summaries, I will clarify it one time only for you on your talk page. AVOID reverting back to your edit when someone else has already undone it until AND unless the discussion on a talk page has ruled in favor of that edit. You can try to continue the discussion if and only if there is no clear consensus. [[File:Nyargleblargle.png|16px]][[User: Nyargleblargle|<span style="color:LawnGreen">'''Nyargle</span>]][[User talk:Nyargleblargle|<span style="color: orange;">'''blargle'''</span>]] ([[Special:Contributions/Nyargleblargle|Contribs]]) 20:08, 2 November 2018 (EDT) | ||
== Are you okay? == | |||
Revision as of 18:15, September 4, 2019
SW:TRIVIA
Read our guideline on what constitutes good trivia, particularly the part about uninteresting trivia:
"Even if a piece of trivia doesn't fall under any of the above, it still shouldn't be added if it's just plain uninteresting. While it is subjective what constitutes as "uninteresting", as a general rule of thumb, avoid adding any observations of the banal, or stating some minor fact that's not at all unique to the fact's subject." Omega Tyrant 
06:46, 22 July 2013 (EDT)
Hey
Please do not use a wikia page for a reference for information. We do not regard it as a trusted source. Berrenta (talk) 00:17, 14 November 2015 (EST)
SW:1RV
In case you haven't been reading the repetitive edit summaries, I will clarify it one time only for you on your talk page. AVOID reverting back to your edit when someone else has already undone it until AND unless the discussion on a talk page has ruled in favor of that edit. You can try to continue the discussion if and only if there is no clear consensus. 
Nyargleblargle (Contribs) 20:08, 2 November 2018 (EDT)
