Hipgnosis shares plunge as it withdraws dividend over lower-than-expected streaming royalties windfall

Shares in the Hipgnosis Songs Fund lost as much as 15%, leaving it valued at half of its 2021 peak
Hipgnosis owns many of the most-streamed songs from 2018 to 2022, including hits by artists such as Shakira, Ed Sheeran and Coldplay.
Getty Images
City Spy

Our unmissable weekly email of all the gossip, rumours and covert goings-on inside the Square Mile

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Shares in the Hipgnosis Songs Fund plunged this morning after the music rights investor withdrew its dividend because it now expects a windfall from a US decision on streaming royalties to be much lower than previously thought.

The fund had expected royalties of $21.7 million (£17.8 million) from a ruling by the US Copyright Royalties Board, a set of three judges which makes decisions on royalty payments. The decision would force services like Spotify to increase the amount they pay to artists or rights-holders for music streamed between 2018 and 2022 from the current rate of 10.5% to 15.1%. Hipgnosis owns many of the most-streamed songs over this period, including hits by artists such as Shakira, Ed Sheeran and Coldplay.

Today, the fund revealed that it now expects only $9.9 million from the decision, as its previous evaluation underestimated the amount that streaming giants were already paying. The reduced income caused Hipgnosis to pull its dividend, which sent shares down as much as 15% to 62.8p. That leaves the fund valued at a little over £750 million, having peaked at twice that valuation.

The fund founded by Merck Mercuriadis and Chic guitarist Nile Rodgers said it had to withdraw the dividend in order to meet minimum earnings requirements for its loans. It added that it was in discussions with lenders about these requirements. If discussions are “satisfactory”, Hipgnosis expects to be able to pay future dividends as planned.

Earlier this year, the Hipgnosis Songs Fund agreed a deal to sell many of its songs to an unlisted fund also owned by Hipgnosis, as it said the market was undervaluing its portfolio. However, some shareholders questioned the $440 million deal, arguing the price was too low.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in