Barclays must pay £30 million legal bills it ran up in High Court fight

Amanda Staveley sued the bank for hundreds of millions of pounds after complaining about behaviour of bosses when negotiating 2008 investment deals
Amanda Staveley legal fight
PA Wire
Brian Farmer11 March 2021

Barclays’ bosses must pick up the £30 million lawyers’ bills they ran up during a High Court fight with a businesswoman – despite coming out on top, a judge has ruled.

Amanda Staveley sued the bank for hundreds of millions of pounds after making complaints about the behaviour of bosses when negotiating investment deals during the 2008 financial crisis.

She said PCP Capital Partners, a private equity firm she runs, would have invested in the bank on “vastly better terms” 13 years ago, but for Barclays’ “false representations”.

Amanda Staveley legal action
PA Archive

Mr Justice Waksman, who heard evidence at a High Court trial during the summer of 2020, in February ruled against Ms Staveley.

He concluded that Barclays which had wanted to avoid going into Government ownership, had been guilty of “serious deceit” and said Roger Jenkins a Barclays boss in 2008, had knowingly made false representations.

Nevertheless, he dismissed Ms Staveley’s claim after deciding that she had not established “loss”.

But he has now declared a fight over who should pick up which legal bills as a draw.

He heard that Barclays had run up in the region of £30 million in lawyers’ bills and PCP around £20 million.

Normally losers pick up winners’ legal bills, and Barclays bosses said the judge should follow the normal rule.

Lawyers representing Barclays said the bank should get most, if not all, of their costs.

Ms Staveley disagreed and said she had been vindicated despite losing the battle.

She argued that the normal rule should not be followed, because the judge found in her favour on a number of issues, and said Barclays should pay some of PCP’s costs.

Mr Justice Waksman decided on Thursday that each side should pay its own costs.

Ms Staveley welcomed the decision.

“The court found that Barclays had orchestrated a fraud against PCP – that it was ‘guilty of serious deceit’,” she said.

“I am grateful that the court has again recognised the significance of the deceit which was perpetrated on PCP and the ‘very large financial benefit’ which Barclays obtained from its deceit, by ensuring that PCP does not pay Barclays’ legal costs.”

Lawyers representing PCP told the judge that an initial damages claim was for a sum between £1.6 billion and £400 million.

By the end of the trial, PCP was arguing for amounts ranging between around £830 million and around £600 million.

The judge heard that PCP was being bankrolled by litigation funders.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Create Account you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy policy .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in