Dairy’s paradox: Production climbs while prices fall – yet margins stay healthy. What’s driving this contradiction, and can it last?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. dairy market in early 2025 faces growing price pressure as milk production rises amid economic uncertainty, with February output up 1% year-over-year despite already-expanded herds. Despite falling farmgate prices (all-milk price down $0.50/cwt to $23.60/cwt), margins remain relatively healthy thanks to moderating feed costs, maintaining the DMC margin at $13.12/cwt – well above triggering levels. Two significant developments offer potential bright spots: the advancing Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act could boost fluid consumption in schools, while the FDA’s approval of Bovaer methane reducer presents environmental and economic opportunities for producers. With USDA forecasts projecting continued production growth but lower milk prices in 2025, successful operations will focus on margin management rather than chasing record prices.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Supply outpacing demand: The national milk cow herd has expanded significantly (+66,000 head YoY in January), driving production higher while economic uncertainty constrains consumption growth
Component value trumps volume: While fluid production shows modest growth (1%), components like butterfat and protein are increasing more rapidly, reflecting the market’s shifting value proposition
Policy shifts create opportunities: The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act advancing through Congress (24-10 committee vote) could provide significant demand stimulus for fluid milk in schools after a decade-long absence
Margins, not prices, are key: Despite falling prices, the DMC margin remains healthy at $13.12/cwt, highlighting the importance of cost management over revenue maximization
Regional variation growing: Geographic differences in production conditions are creating dramatically different operating environments across states, requiring region-specific strategies
Rising milk production, economic uncertainty, and expanding dairy herds put downward pressure on milk prices across the U.S. dairy industry. Farmers are watching their milk checks shrink even as their margins remain relatively comfortable – creating a complex market picture heading into summer 2025.
Let’s face it – the numbers don’t lie. February milk production jumped 1% year-over-year when adjusted for leap year, with the national dairy herd now 66,000 head larger than January 2024. This production surge has pushed the U.S. average all-milk price down $0.50/cwt to $23.60/cwt in February.
Are we producing our way into trouble again? It’s starting to look that way, as improving genetics and expanding herds drive production higher even as the industry navigates ongoing challenges like those HPAI outbreaks in California.
DAIRY PRODUCTS TAKING A PRICE HIT
All four NDPSR commodity prices took a nosedive in March, dragging Federal Order class prices down for the second month.
Class III milk fell to $18.62/cwt from $20.18 in February, while Class IV dropped to $18.21/cwt from $19.90. What are the products behind these declines? Butter ($2.339/lb), cheddar cheese ($1.822/lb), nonfat dry milk ($1.218/lb), and dry whey ($0.553/lb) all saw significant drops.
“These new processing facilities boost regional demand for raw milk but simultaneously add substantial volumes of whey and surplus cream to the market,” says dairy market analyst Mary Ledman. “This flood of byproducts is hammering prices across the board.”
MARGINS STAYING SOLID DESPITE PRICE DROPS
Here’s the silver lining – despite falling milk prices, the Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) margin remains relatively healthy at $13.12/cwt in February. That’s down $0.73/cwt from January but still comfortably above the $9.50/cwt trigger level for government payments.
The DMC feed cost calculation showed corn prices climbing to $4.58 per bushel in February (up from $4.29), while soybean meal prices fell to $305 per ton (down from $317). Premium alfalfa hay held steady at around $243 per ton.
But don’t be fooled by the DMC calculations – they don’t tell the whole story. DMC only factors in major feed components against the all-milk price. What about labor costs? Fuel? Utilities? Repairs? These can eat up half or more of your production costs, and they’re not getting any cheaper.
EXPORT MARKET THROWING MIXED SIGNALS
U.S. dairy exports continue to play a crucial balancing role, absorbing roughly 16-18% of our milk solids production. The percentage of U.S. milk solids exported rose from 14.6% in January to 15.9% in February.
Some export categories are crushing it. Butter exports jumped 74%, anhydrous milk fat/butteroil skyrocketed an astonishing 448%, and all cheese varieties combined rose 16% during December 2024-February 2025 compared to a year earlier.
But here’s where things get dicey – other key export categories are struggling badly. Dry skim milk exports plummeted 24%, and whey products declined. The overall percentage of U.S. milk solids exported dropped by 3% year-over-year during December-February. Can we lose ground in these international markets when production is climbing?
CONGRESS SET TO BRING WHOLE MILK BACK TO SCHOOLS
Finally, some good news on the fluid milk front! The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act of 2025 is gaining serious momentum in Washington. This bill would allow schools to once again offer whole (3.25%) and reduced fat (2%) milk in cafeterias, potentially boosting consumption significantly.
“Federal policy, based on flawed, outdated science, has kept whole milk out of school cafeterias for more than a decade,” says Rep. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-Pennsylvania), who introduced the bill alongside Rep. Kim Schrier (D-Washington).
The legislation passed the House Committee on Education and the Workforce in February by a vote of 24-10. Schools accounting for roughly 8% of U.S. fluid milk purchases could be a game-changer for the fluid category, which has been in freefall for years. Isn’t it time we put real milk back in kids’ hands?
REVOLUTIONARY METHANE REDUCER GETS FDA GREEN LIGHT
In a massive win for dairy sustainability, the FDA has approved Bovaer, a feed additive that slashes enteric methane emissions from dairy cattle. Developed by DSM-Firmenich and distributed by Elanco Animal Health, Bovaer hits the U.S. market in Q3 2025.
Just a quarter teaspoon per cow per day (60 parts per million) reduces methane emissions by 30% in dairy cattle without hurting milk production or components. That’s a potential reduction of 1 ton of CO2 equivalent per cow annually!
“This isn’t just an agricultural product; it’s pivotal in our conversation about the environmental future,” explains Dr. Ermias Kebreab, a leading researcher. The carbon credit potential could generate returns of $20+ per cow annually. How often do you get to save the planet AND improve your bottom line at the same time?
REGIONAL SHIFTS REDRAWING THE DAIRY MAP
The dairy industry’s geographic footprint keeps evolving, with stark regional differences emerging in production trends. The Western powerhouses aren’t having it all their way anymore.
California, traditionally America’s dairy king, faces serious challenges from HPAI outbreaks and sky-high labor, feed, water, and environmental compliance costs. These headwinds have knocked California’s production growth off track.
Meanwhile, Texas, South Dakota, Kansas, and Colorado are booming, often thanks to massive new processing investments. The Upper Midwest and Northeast are showing remarkable resilience, too, with faster milk yield growth per cow potentially closing the efficiency gap with western operations. Who would’ve thought we’d see this regional rebalancing just a few years ago?
FEDERAL ORDER REFORMS SET TO SHAKE UP PRICING
Buckle up for some significant changes! The Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) reforms kick in on June 1, 2025, and they’ll substantially reshape regional economics. Changes to Class I differentials, manufacturing make allowances, and other pricing factors will completely rewrite the minimum prices paid for milk across different uses and locations.
These adjustments will boost most Class I differentials nationwide, with the impact varying by county. For example, differentials in Ohio will jump by $1.10 to $2.30/cwt, depending on where you’re located.
The reforms, including the return to the “higher-of” Class I mover formula and increased make allowances, will likely favor areas with higher fluid milk utilization over regions dominated by manufacturing. Are your farm’s finances ready for these changes?
ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY CLOUDING THE CRYSTAL BALL
The broader economic picture isn’t exactly crystal clear. While inflation is cooling, consumers remain cautious with their spending habits.
The Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all items set a record in March 2025 but was just 2.4% higher than a year earlier, showing relatively modest inflation. But here’s the rub – there’s a huge disconnect between farm-level prices and what consumers pay at retail.
While farm prices have been falling, retail prices are still climbing! Fluid whole milk rose to $4.050 per gallon in March (up from $4.026 in February), and cheddar cheese jumped to $5.737 per pound (up from $5.536). This price transmission lag means consumers aren’t yet benefiting from lower farm prices. And if consumers can’t catch a break at the grocery store, how can we expect dairy demand to stay strong?
WHAT’S AHEAD FOR THE REST OF 2025?
The USDA’s April World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) report revised the 2025 annual milk production forecast upward by 700 million pounds to 226.9 billion pounds. At the same time, they lowered their price forecasts, projecting an average all-milk price of $21.10/cwt for 2025 – down $0.50/cwt from earlier expectations.
Success in 2025 won’t come from chasing record milk prices. You must focus on cost control, operational efficiency, and smart risk management. Keep your eyes on economic conditions, trade policies, disease outbreaks, and weather impacts – any of these could throw a wrench.
For dairy producers navigating these tricky waters, several strategies can help maintain profitability and resilience. These include aggressive cost management, focusing on component production rather than just volume, using risk management tools, tracking regional processing opportunities, and building financial reserves to weather market volatility.
THE BOTTOM LINE
The U.S. dairy market 2025 presents a mixed bag of opportunities and challenges. Production continues to grow despite economic headwinds, creating price pressure partially offset by lower feed costs.
The potential return of whole milk to schools and introducing Bovaer for methane reduction offer exciting possibilities for fluid milk demand and sustainability efforts. Meanwhile, upcoming FMMO reforms will reshape the economic landscape starting in June.
Let’s face it – success in 2025 won’t come from record milk prices. It’ll come from managing margins through strategic cost control, component optimization, and smart risk management. Isn’t it time to focus on what you can control rather than what you can’t?
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Milk-based protein drinks boost recovery 40% better than water! Dairy farmers: cash in on this $47B market goldmine.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Milk outperforms water as a protein shake base, delivering 40% more muscle-building power through its natural whey-casein blend, carbs for energy, and electrolytes for hydration. With the global protein supplement market hitting $47.2B by 2032, dairy farmers can leverage this trend by creating farm-direct recovery drinks, partnering with fitness communities, or diversifying into value-added protein products. While plant-based alternatives grow, they lack milk’s nutritional density (3% protein vs. almond milk’s 1%). Farmers should prioritize lactose-free options and transparent labeling to address consumer needs.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Milk’s edge: Adds 8g protein/cup + sustains muscle repair 2x longer than water
Market boom: Protein supplements to hit $47.2B globally by 2032 – dairy dominates 60% of ingredients
Plant limitations: Soy/oat milks have ≤50% of milk’s protein; require heavy fortification
Customize wisely: Whole milk for muscle gain, water for weight loss, lactose-free for sensitive consumers
Protein drinks with milk deliver 40% more muscle-building protein, faster recovery, and superior rehydration than water-based alternatives. This isn’t just good science – it’s a $27.53 billion global market opportunity projected to reach $58.97 billion by 2034, creating a prime opportunity for dairy farmers to capture more value from their products.
Let’s face it – when choosing between milk and water as a base for your protein shake, you’re not just picking a liquid. You’re deciding between a nutritional powerhouse and, well, just water. A cup of milk transforms an ordinary protein supplement into a complete recovery solution by adding 8 grams of high-quality protein, 12 grams of energy-restoring carbohydrates, and essential micronutrients that water simply can’t deliver. Think of it as the difference between using premium diesel in your farm truck and regular gasoline – both will get you moving, but one offers better performance.
Three Ways Your Dairy Farm Can Cash In On This Trend
1. Develop Farm-Direct Recovery Products
The natural combination of fast-acting whey (20%) and slow-releasing casein (80%) in milk creates the perfect protein blend that commercial supplement companies try desperately to recreate. It’s like having a sprinter and a marathon runner on your team – one handles the immediate needs while the other goes the distance.
Haven’t you wondered why protein companies spend millions developing complex formulations when milk already provides the perfect solution? Your dairy operation could create premium, minimally processed recovery drinks using milk and partnering with a local processor.
Forward-thinking farms are already developing simple, farm-branded protein shakes by combining fresh milk with high-quality whey protein concentrate. These products fetch premium prices at local gyms, with sports teams, and among health-conscious consumers looking for “farm-to-fitness” options with transparent sourcing. Isn’t it time you captured more value from your product instead of letting processors take all the profit?
2. Partner With Local Fitness Communities
Research shows milk consumption after resistance exercise can stimulate muscle protein synthesis and improve net muscle protein balance. When combined with resistance training (12 weeks minimum), milk increases muscle hypertrophy and lean mass compared to carbohydrate-only or soy protein beverages. That’s right – the same milk you’re producing outperforms specialized recovery products that sell for 5-10 times the price!
Have you connected with your community’s CrossFit box or high school athletic department? These partnerships create direct consumer relationships while showcasing milk’s functional benefits. It’s like setting up a direct-to-consumer pipeline that bypasses the processor middleman.
A practical approach is offering chocolate milk as a recovery option at local sporting events. Here’s the kicker: athletes who experience the benefits firsthand become lifelong dairy advocates, creating immediate sales and long-term brand loyalty. When was the last time you turned consumers into evangelists for your product?
3. Diversify Into Value-Added Protein Products
With nearly half of Americans regularly consuming protein shakes, demand for high-quality dairy ingredients continues to skyrocket. This trend directly benefits dairy producers through increased fluid milk consumption and opportunities for value-added processing.
Farms with processing capabilities can develop specialized milk protein concentrates (MPCs) or ready-to-drink protein beverages at premium prices. Don’t have on-farm processing? No problem. You can still partner with regional processors to create branded protein products using your milk.
Think of it like breeding decisions – just as you wouldn’t sell your best genetics for commodity prices, why sell your milk as a commodity when it could be transformed into premium protein products? Ultrafiltered milk products that concentrate protein while reducing sugar and fat have seen explosive market growth, with coffee chains and retailers clamoring for these options to satisfy health-conscious consumers.
Global Market Insights You Can’t Afford To Ignore
The dairy protein market shows strong growth across multiple regions, with distinct opportunities in each:
United States: The U.S. protein supplements market was valued at $10.49 billion in 2024 and is projected to reach $24.17 billion by 2034, growing at a CAGR of 8.7%. North America held the largest revenue share of over 50.65% in the global market in 2024, driven by increased awareness of protein supplements’ health and wellness benefits. Isn’t it time you got your piece of this growing pie?
European Union: Europe represents the second-largest market for protein supplements globally. The growing focus on functional foods drives demand, with manufacturers heavily investing in research and development to create milk protein concentrates with improved flavor and nutrient profiles. What innovations could you implement to tap into this market?
New Zealand: As a major dairy exporter, New Zealand’s dairy exports were valued at approximately £7.9 billion (about $10.4 billion USD), with whole milk powder making up over half (around 54%) of the total value. They’re treating their milk like a premium resource rather than a commodity – shouldn’t you be doing the same?
What This Means For Your Operation’s Future
The booming protein supplement market isn’t just another health fad – it’s a fundamental shift in how consumers view nutrition, and it represents both an immediate revenue opportunity and a long-term strategic advantage for dairy farms willing to innovate.
As consumers increasingly recognize milk’s superior nutritional profile and recovery benefits, dairy can strengthen its position against plant-based alternatives, which typically contain less protein (soy milk provides 6-8g per cup, while almond milk contains only about 1g per cup) and have different digestibility profiles. It’s like comparing a high-producing Holstein to a goat – they’re both dairy animals, but one delivers more of what you’re looking for.
For your dairy farm, this trend creates opportunities to diversify revenue streams beyond commodity milk production. By developing branded protein products, you can capture more value from each gallon produced while building direct relationships with consumers who appreciate milk’s functional benefits. Isn’t that better than being at the mercy of commodity milk prices?
Let’s face it – the industry needs to focus on communicating milk’s natural advantage as a complete recovery solution that simultaneously addresses protein requirements for muscle repair, carbohydrate needs for energy replenishment, and electrolyte needs for rehydration. That’s a combination that water-based protein drinks simply cannot match without numerous additives. It’s like comparing your modern milking parlor to a hand-milking operation – both get the job done, but one is superior in every measurable way.
The Bottom Line
Milk-based protein drinks aren’t just better for consumers – they’re better for your dairy’s future. As you wouldn’t run your operation on outdated equipment, consumers shouldn’t fuel their bodies with inferior recovery drinks.
The science is clear: the market is growing, and the opportunity is knocking. Will you answer by continuing to produce commodity milk or explore the value-added potential of protein-focused products? Your decision today could determine whether your operation thrives or merely survives in tomorrow’s dairy landscape.
Important note for consumers: When selecting protein supplements, be aware that some products, particularly plant-based and chocolate-flavored varieties, have been found to contain heavy metals like lead and cadmium. A recent report from the Clean Label Project found that organic protein powders contained, on average, three times more lead and twice as much cadmium compared to non-organic options. In contrast, plant-based protein powders showed triple the lead levels of whey-based alternatives. Consider choosing dairy-based options from reputable manufacturers who conduct third-party testing for contaminants.
The question isn’t whether milk makes better protein drinks – that’s been proven. The real question is: what will you do with this information to secure your dairy’s future?
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Tariffs are reshaping dairy demand—discover which products thrive or die in the trade war crossfire.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Tariffs are fracturing global dairy markets, with butterfat exports surging due to global shortages while whey and lactose face collapse from Chinese retaliation. The U.S.-China trade war triggered a $6B profit loss for dairy farmers, exposing vulnerabilities in export-dependent sectors. Price elasticity dictates outcomes: butter’s global price gap buffers tariffs, but high-elasticity products like cheese face demand destruction. Retaliatory measures and TRQ administration amplify risks, forcing farmers to diversify markets, differentiate products, or risk consolidation. Adaptation isn’t optional—it’s survival.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Whey/lactose demand has cratered (23% prices) due to China’s 125% tariffs, with no quick fixes for glutted markets.
Butter exports defy tariffs, up 224% YoY, fueled by a $1.10/lb global price gap—proof fundamentals trump politics.
Retaliation risks outweigh protection: Losing China’s market took years; regaining it may be impossible amid shifting global supply chains.
Diversify or die: Farms reliant on single products/markets face extinction; value-added dairy and Southeast Asia exports offer lifelines.
TRQ loopholes matter: Canada’s “processor-only” quotas show nominal trade access ≠ to real market share—read the fine print.
The global dairy market is facing unprecedented disruption as tariff battles escalate. While politicians claim to protect domestic industries, the reality for dairy farmers is far more complex – and potentially devastating. This analysis cuts through the political BS to reveal how tariffs are reshaping dairy demand patterns, creating unexpected winners and losers, and why your operation needs to prepare now for the ripple effects that could make or break your future.
Let’s be brutally honest about where we stand: The escalation has been breathtaking in speed and scope. On February 4, the US reinstated a 10% tariff on Chinese imports. By March 4, this jumped to 20%. China wasted no time responding, slapping 10% retaliatory tariffs on US dairy products by March 10. Then came the hammer blow – on April 3, the US imposed an additional 34% tariff on Chinese imports, prompting China to retaliate with an 84% tariff on US goods, later increasing to a staggering 125%.
And this isn’t just a US-China problem. The US has simultaneously imposed 25% tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada – two of our most critical dairy trading partners. Despite a 90-day pause on some global tariffs, the restrictions affecting America’s three largest dairy export markets remain firmly in place.
Are you paying attention yet? This trade war is about to hit your milk check-in ways.
Why Tariffs Hit Dairy Differently: The Economics You Need to Understand
To protect your operation, understand how tariffs fundamentally reshape dairy economics. Tariffs aren’t just political tools – they’re taxes on imported products that increase their effective price to importers and consumers.
The Price Elasticity Factor
The demand response to tariff-induced price increases varies dramatically across dairy products due to differences in price elasticity. This isn’t theoretical – it directly impacts which products face demand collapse and which might weather the storm:
Fluid Milk: Often shows inelastic demand, particularly for conventional milk – much like how your high-producing Holsteins keep pumping regardless of minor management changes
Specialty Cheeses: Demonstrate significantly higher price elasticity (around -1.73 for natural cheese) – think of how quickly your heifers respond to even small changes in their ration
Butter: Research shows mixed elasticity, with some studies finding highly elastic demand (-1.87) – like how butterfat responds dramatically to even minor feed adjustments
Yogurt: Generally elastic demand across product types – comparable to how quickly somatic cell counts can spike with even minor lapses in milking hygiene
Dairy Ingredients: Whey and lactose show highly elastic derived demand from food manufacturers – like how quickly your milk truck will pass by if you miss quality parameters by even a small margin
This elasticity differential explains why certain products experience more dramatic demand destruction when hit with tariffs. The proliferation of plant-based alternatives has further increased the elasticity of traditional dairy products, making them more vulnerable to tariff impacts than in previous decades.
The Substitution Myth
Politicians love to claim tariffs will simply shift demand to domestic producers. The reality? That’s complete bullshit. This substitution is neither automatic nor complete:
Effectiveness depends on whether domestic products match the quality and characteristics of imports – just like how you can’t simply swap a high-genetic-merit Holstein for a commercial Jersey and expect the same components
If imported products possess unique attributes not easily replicated domestically, substitution may be limited – like how no amount of TMR adjustments can make up for poor-quality forage
The domestic industry must have sufficient capacity and competitive cost structures to capitalize on the opportunity – just as your parlor throughput can’t suddenly double without significant infrastructure investment
When was the last time you saw politicians understand how dairy markets work? These are the same people who can’t tell the difference between a Holstein and an Angus.
The Product Battlefield: Winners and Losers in the Tariff War
The dairy portfolio is experiencing wildly divergent tariff impacts, with some products flourishing despite trade barriers while others face devastating demand destruction.
Whey and Lactose: The Casualties
The impact on whey and lactose markets has been particularly severe:
US exports of these products to China have plummeted as tariffs escalated
Dry whey prices crashed 23% between February and April 2025
Lactose prices fell 21% during the same period
China represents 42% of US whey exports and 43% of US lactose exports
Inventories of these products have ballooned by 57% as export channels close
The magnitude of this demand destruction stems from China’s dominant position in these markets and the products’ high price elasticity. The outlook for producers heavily invested in these products is grim unless alternative markets can be developed rapidly.
Butter: The Surprising Survivor
In stark contrast to whey markets, butter demand shows remarkable resilience despite the tariff environment:
Global butter supply shortages have driven up international prices substantially
European Union butter prices have surged 47% compared to 2023
The average Global Dairy Trade auction price for butter reached $3.45 per pound in recent trading
US butter prices ($2.3475/lb as of April 11) sit well below international levels
This price gap provides a substantial buffer against tariff impacts
US butterfat exports increased dramatically by 224.5% in February 2025 compared to the previous year, totaling 8,642 metric tons—the largest monthly export volume since April 2014. This growth persists despite the challenging tariff environment precisely because the global price premium exceeds the tariff costs for many markets.
Cheese: The Mixed Bag
Cheese markets demonstrate a nuanced response to tariffs:
Mexican retaliatory tariffs (20-25%) in 2018-2019 reduced US cheese exports by about 12%
However, recent data shows US dairy exports to Mexico rose 8% in value terms in February 2025
Canada has included cheese among products subject to 25% retaliatory tariffs
Global Dairy Trade auction results show Cheddar prices increased 8% to $4,257/MT in recent trading
This mixed picture reflects varying price elasticities across cheese types and the complex interplay between tariffs, supply constraints, and shifting consumer preferences.
Global Market Reshuffling: The New Trade Reality
The tariff environment fundamentally restates global dairy trade patterns with potentially long-lasting consequences for demand.
Market Share Redistribution
As US products face prohibitive tariffs in key markets like China, competitors are rapidly filling the void:
“We’re seeing a shift toward European and New Zealand suppliers to fill the gap,” noted Maria Chen, a Beijing-based dairy analyst
New Zealand is ramping up shipments to China, with exports projected to grow by 15% this year
European dairy exporters are positioned to benefit, though they maintain caution about potential supply constraints
This redistribution of market share can have permanent effects even if tariffs are eventually removed, as suppliers establish new relationships and supply chains adapt. Once you lose market position, regaining it can take years – if it happens at all. It’s like trying to get your milk quality premium back after losing it – the processor has already found another farm to fill that high-quality slot.
Do you think Chinese buyers will return to US suppliers once they’ve established relationships with European and New Zealand producers? Not a chance.
The China Paradox
A particularly interesting dynamic is emerging in China:
China’s milk production dropped 9.2% in early 2025
Despite this domestic production decline, tariffs are blocking affordable US supplies
This forces Chinese buyers to source from more expensive alternative suppliers or reduce consumption
What This Means for Your Operation
The current tariff situation has several important implications for dairy operations of all sizes:
Demand Destruction vs. Diversion
For products with high tariffs, like whey and lactose, the primary effect is not merely demanding diversion but potential demand destruction:
Prohibitive tariffs can force manufacturers to reformulate products to use less of the affected ingredients – like how feed companies reformulate when a specific ingredient becomes too expensive
Once reformulation occurs, demand may not return even if tariffs are removed – just as cows don’t immediately return to peak production after a bout of acidosis
This represents a permanent loss of market share rather than a temporary disruption
Accelerated Consolidation
The financial pressure from tariff-related market disruptions will likely accelerate industry consolidation:
Small farms face particular vulnerability as margins compress
The current low culling rates (down 30% in June) may reverse as financial pressures mount – much like how you might have held onto marginal cows during high milk prices but must make harder decisions when the milk check shrinks
Farms without diversified markets or substantial risk management tools will face the greatest pressure
Let’s face it – the industry was already consolidating. These tariffs are like pouring gasoline on that fire. Are you prepared to be one of the survivors, or will you be another statistic in the ongoing decline of dairy farm numbers?
Market Fragmentation
The global dairy market is fragmenting along geopolitical lines:
US producers are pivoting to Mexico and Southeast Asia as China’s access diminishes
European and Oceanian suppliers are strengthening positions in China
This reorganization of trade flows will create new demand patterns that outlast specific tariffs
Strategic Responses: Protecting Your Operation
Diversify Your Product Mix
The varying impact of tariffs across product categories creates both risks and opportunities:
Farms heavily dependent on whey and lactose revenue streams face the greatest exposure
Operations with the flexibility to shift toward butter production may benefit from continued strong export demand
Cheese producers should evaluate their specific varieties and target markets for vulnerability
Explore Alternative Markets
As traditional export channels face disruption, forward-thinking producers are exploring new opportunities:
Southeast Asian markets (Vietnam, Philippines, Indonesia) show growing dairy demand and fewer trade restrictions
Middle Eastern markets continue to expand dairy imports with less political volatility
Domestic specialty markets may offer premium opportunities as imports face tariff-induced price increases
When was the last time you looked beyond your current milk market? The days of passive milk marketing are over. Your future depends on actively seeking new opportunities before your current ones disappear.
Invest in Product Differentiation
Generic commodity products face the greatest vulnerability to tariff-induced substitution:
Specialty products with unique characteristics face less substitution pressure – just like how your registered Holsteins with superior genetics command premium prices compared to commercial animals
Value-added processing can create products less vulnerable to commodity market swings – like how farms with on-site processing can capture more of the consumer dollar
Sustainability certifications may provide access to premium markets less sensitive to price – much like how organic certification provides a buffer against conventional milk price volatility
Implement Robust Risk Management
The tariff environment demands more sophisticated risk management approaches:
Traditional hedging strategies may be insufficient in rapidly changing trade environments
Forward contracts with domestic processors provide greater certainty as export markets fluctuate
Maintaining financial reserves becomes increasingly critical as market volatility increases
Are you still managing risk like it’s 2010? Because the market has fundamentally changed, and your approach needs to change with it.
The Tariff Endgame: What Happens Next?
The current tariff situation represents a fundamental shift in global trade patterns rather than a temporary disruption. While specific tariff rates may change, the era of relatively frictionless global dairy trade appears to be ending.
Scenario Planning
Forward-thinking dairy operations should prepare for multiple potential scenarios:
Scenario 1: Prolonged Tariff War
China and US maintain high retaliatory tariffs for 2+ years
Permanent loss of US market share in China for whey, lactose
Continued strong butter exports due to global supply shortages
Accelerated consolidation of smaller dairy operations
Scenario 2: Partial Resolution
Targeted tariff reductions in specific product categories
The gradual recovery of some export volumes but at a lower market share
Continued market fragmentation along geopolitical lines
Persistent price volatility as markets adjust to new trade patterns
Scenario 3: New Trade Framework
Comprehensive trade agreement replacing tariffs with managed trade
Establishment of product-specific quotas and market access provisions
Greater government intervention in agricultural markets globally
The Bottom Line
Will tariffs impact dairy demand? The evidence overwhelmingly suggests they will—and already are—have significant effects. However, these impacts vary dramatically across products, markets, and time horizons.
For products like whey and lactose, prohibitive Chinese tariffs have collapsed demand, creating domestic surpluses and price depression. Meanwhile, butter exports surged despite the tariff environment due to global shortages and substantial price differentials.
The dairy industry faces a period of profound readjustment as trade flows reorganize, market shares shift, and supply chains adapt to the new tariff reality. While temporary tariff suspensions may provide brief relief, the fundamental uncertainty introduced by weaponized trade policy will continue to reshape dairy demand patterns for years.
The resilience of butterfat exports amid this turbulence demonstrates that market fundamentals like global supply shortages can sometimes overcome tariff barriers. However, tariffs represent a significant and potentially permanent disruption to established demand patterns for most dairy products.
The operations that will thrive in this new environment will be those that:
Understand the specific tariff impacts on their product mix
Diversify their market exposure beyond vulnerable export channels
Invest in product differentiation to reduce substitution pressure
Implement robust risk management strategies
Maintain financial flexibility to weather market disruptions
The era of predictable global dairy trade is ending. The question isn’t whether tariffs will impact dairy demand—it’s how effectively your operation can adapt to the new reality.
What’s Your Tariff Exposure?
Take a hard look at your operation’s vulnerability to tariff-induced market disruptions:
What percentage of your milk goes into products that are heavily dependent on export markets?
How diversified are your processor relationships and their end markets?
What financial reserves do you maintain to weather market volatility?
What risk management tools are you currently employing?
How quickly could you adapt your production mix if market conditions change dramatically?
The answers to these questions will determine whether your operation becomes a casualty or a survivor in the new tariff warfare reshaping global dairy markets. As the old farm saying goes, “Don’t put all your eggs in one basket” – or in this case, don’t stake your dairy’s future on a single export market that could vanish overnight with the stroke of a politician’s pen.
It’s time to stop pretending these trade wars are someone else’s problem. They’re your problem now. The question is: what are you going to do about it?
Take action today: Contact your processor to understand exactly where your milk ends up and which markets it serves. Review your risk management strategy with your financial advisor. Join forces with other producers to explore new market opportunities. The dairy industry has survived countless challenges, but only those who adapt will thrive in this new tariff reality.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
GLP-1 drugs are reshaping diets. Dairy’s protein edge could dominate this $260B shift—if farmers act now. The clock’s ticking.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The rise of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs is accelerating consumer demand for high-protein, nutrient-dense foods—a trend dairy is uniquely positioned to dominate. With superior protein quality (DIAAS scores 1.0+ vs plant-based 0.5-0.9), yogurt and cottage cheese are already winning with GLP-1 users, seeing 40% and 13% sales spikes respectively. However, plant-based alternatives and lab-grown proteins threaten dairy’s market share. To capitalize, producers must pivot breeding programs toward protein yield, innovate lactose-free options for 36% of Americans, and aggressively market dairy’s natural nutritional advantages. Farmers clinging to butterfat-focused genetics risk losing $35K/year as cheese demand declines 7.2%.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Protein > Fat: GLP-1 users slash cheese/butter spending but drive 40% yogurt growth—prioritize protein yield in herds
The protein revolution is reshaping food markets worldwide, and dairy stands at a critical crossroads. While weight-loss drugs like Ozempic disrupt traditional consumption patterns, they create unprecedented opportunities for protein-rich dairy products. The industry must act boldly to capitalize on this shift or risk being left behind.
The GLP-1 Tsunami: Threat or Opportunity?
Let’s cut straight to the chase: GLP-1 medications like Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro fundamentally reshape food consumption patterns across America. These drugs, originally developed for diabetes management but now widely prescribed for weight loss, are creating the most significant shift in consumer eating habits we’ve seen in decades.
The numbers tell a compelling story. The GLP-1 market is exploding, with projections suggesting it could reach $150-260 billion globally by 2030. Currently, about 3.5% of Americans (roughly 13 million consumers) are taking these medications, but that number is skyrocketing. Morgan Stanley Research predicts that 7% of the U.S. population will take GLP-1s by 2035. A KFF Health Tracking Poll found that 12% of U.S. adults reported using a GLP-1 medication, with nearly 35% expressing interest in using it for weight loss.
But here’s what you need to know: these consumers aren’t just eating less – they’re eating differently. And that difference creates a massive opportunity for dairy producers who understand the shift.
What GLP-1 Users Want
The conventional wisdom that GLP-1 users eat less of everything is wrong. Yes, overall caloric intake typically decreases by 20-30%, but the spending shifts reveal a more nuanced story:
Yogurt purchases have surged 40% among GLP-1 users
Cottage cheese sales have jumped 13%
High-protein options are consistently prioritized
Foods supporting satiety and muscle maintenance are in high demand
Meanwhile, traditional high-fat dairy products face headwinds, with some studies showing spending decreases on cheese (-7.2%), butter (-5.8%), and ice cream (-5.5%).
What’s happening is clear: GLP-1 users actively seek protein-rich, nutrient-dense foods that help them maintain muscle mass while losing fat. They’re not just cutting calories but strategically reallocating their food dollars toward options that support their health goals.
Are you still chasing butterfat premiums while the market pivots to protein? If so, you’re milking yesterday’s cow. The low-fat paradox is real – while whole milk advocates promote traditional dairy, GLP-1 users vote decisively with their wallets for protein over fat.
Dairy’s Protein Advantage: The Science You Need to Know
Here’s where dairy has a massive competitive advantage that most producers aren’t fully leveraging: the superior quality of dairy protein compared to alternatives.
The science is unequivocal. When measured using the FAO’s preferred Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score (DIAAS), dairy proteins consistently outperform plant-based competitors:
Protein Source
DIAAS Score
Complete Protein?
Milk Protein Concentrate
1.08
Yes
Whey Protein Isolate
1.09
Yes
Whole Milk Powder
1.22
Yes
Casein
~1.0-1.2+
Yes
Soy Protein Isolate
0.90
Borderline
Pea Protein
0.64
No
Most Grains
<0.50
No
This isn’t just academic trivia – it’s a decisive marketing advantage. Dairy proteins provide all essential amino acids in highly digestible forms, making them superior for muscle maintenance and satiety – exactly what GLP-1 users seek.
Beyond protein quality, dairy delivers a complete nutritional package with 13 essential vitamins and minerals. While plant-based alternatives often require extensive fortification to match this profile, dairy provides these nutrients naturally with higher bioavailability.
Let’s be blunt: Why are we letting plant-based alternatives claim the health high ground when science clearly shows dairy protein is superior? It’s time to stop playing defense and start aggressively communicating our nutritional advantage. As Julian Mellentin, director of New Nutrition Business, puts it: “Protein quality is going to become more important because dairy protein has the advantage of offering the full breadth and quantity of the essential amino acids.”
The Yogurt Revolution: Leading the Protein Charge
If you’re looking for proof that dairy can win in the protein economy, look no further than yogurt. According to Dairy Management Inc., yogurt is the top food product purchased by GLP-1 consumers. This isn’t happening by accident.
Yogurt has become dairy’s flagship in the protein revolution because it delivers exactly what today’s health-conscious consumers want:
High protein content (mainly Greek and Icelandic varieties)
Versatile flavor profiles and textures
Convenient, portion-controlled formats
Options for zero/low-fat and zero/low-sugar
Functional benefits from prebiotics and probiotics
The economic impact is substantial. Yogurt now represents a $10.8 billion category, growing 10% year-over-year. Leading manufacturers have capitalized on this trend with specialized high-protein formulations – Chobani offers products with 15-30 grams of protein, while Danone’s Oikos Pro yogurt delivers up to 25 grams per serving.
As Sally Lyons Wyatt, Global EVP & Chief Advisor at Circana, explains: “The part of dairy that is very well-positioned to assist consumers on their GLP-1 journey is yogurt. The functional benefits, including protein, pre-and probiotics, and variety of low and no sugar options are currently doing well with these consumers.”
The Cottage Cheese Comeback
Perhaps no dairy product better exemplifies the protein revolution’s impact than cottage cheese. Once dismissed as an outdated diet food, cottage cheese has transformed into a social media protein sensation. Its renaissance has been fueled by creative recipe sharing on platforms like TikTok and Instagram, where users showcase its versatility in sweet and savory applications.
The sales data confirms this resurgence, with cottage cheese unit sales growing 12.6% in recent months. This growth demonstrates how effectively dairy can pivot existing products to align with contemporary consumer priorities.
“Many of the cottage cheese varieties align to the protein needs of consumers, and social media has also given the category a nice bump in sales, with engaging recipes that demonstrate the versatility of the food,” notes Lyons Wyatt.
When was the last time you seriously considered cottage cheese as a growth opportunity? If you’re still treating it as a commodity product rather than a premium protein powerhouse, you’re leaving money on the table. With 12g of protein per half cup, cottage cheese is perfectly positioned for the protein-hungry GLP-1 market.
Inferior protein quality: Most plant proteins lack sufficient amounts of one or more essential amino acids, making them “incomplete” compared to dairy. Peas score just 0.64 on the DIAAS scale compared to dairy’s 1.08+.
Heavy processing requirements: Creating palatable plant-based alternatives often requires extensive processing and additives, conflicting with the growing consumer demand for clean labels.
Nutrient gaps: Plant-based alternatives typically require fortification to match dairy’s natural nutrient profile, and the bioavailability of these added nutrients is often lower.
Market saturation: After years of explosive growth, the plant-based milk market is contracting, with sales declining 5.2% in the year leading up to September 2024.
This creates a strategic opening for dairy to reclaim market share by emphasizing its natural protein advantage and clean-label credentials. The industry should aggressively communicate these benefits rather than defensively reacting to plant-based marketing claims.
How much longer will we let plant-based marketers control the narrative? The science is on our side – it’s time to stop apologizing for being dairy-free and start proudly promoting our superior protein quality. Research shows dairy protein and calcium content stimulate the release of natural GLP-1, suggesting an antiobesity effect that plant-based alternatives simply can’t match.
Strategic Imperatives: How Dairy Must Adapt
To fully capitalize on the protein revolution, the dairy industry needs to make strategic shifts in production, processing, and marketing:
1. Rebalance Breeding and Production Priorities
The decade-long focus on maximizing milkfat has left many producers ill-equipped for the protein economy. Farms that have heavily invested in Jersey herds (with their characteristic 4.26% fat versus 3.41% protein profile) may need to reconsider their genetic strategies.
Forward-thinking producers should utilize advanced genomic selection to develop herds with high yield and elevated protein content. This represents a significant pivot from the fat-maximization approach that dominated breeding decisions through the early 2020s.
Are your breeding decisions still stuck in 2015? The market has shifted, but many producers still select bulls based on fat yield rather than protein. It’s time to update your genetic strategy for today’s protein-driven market. Wisconsin dairy farmer Lyle Kasten says, “We’re culling anything under 3.2% protein. Fat’s a bonus, not the goal.”
2. Innovate Beyond Basic Protein Claims
Simply adding “high protein” to packaging is no longer enough. The most successful dairy products will:
Deliver specific protein quantities tailored to consumer needs (15-30g for meal replacement, 8-12g for snacks)
Combine protein with functional benefits (probiotics, prebiotic fiber, etc.)
Offer clean labels with minimal ingredients
Provide convenient formats aligned with modern consumption patterns
Address specific need states (post-workout recovery, satiety, muscle maintenance)
The innovation opportunities are endless. Arla Foods Ingredients has launched a “Go High in Protein” campaign showcasing concepts like 10% protein ice cream, high-protein, non-fat drinking yogurt with fruit, and 12% protein spoonable yogurt – all designed to demonstrate how manufacturers can address technical challenges while maintaining good taste and texture.
3. Target Specific Consumer Segments
Different protein-seeking consumers have distinct needs and preferences:
GLP-1 Users: Focus on portion control, high satiety value, easy digestibility, and formulations addressing side effects like muscle loss. According to Morgan Stanley research, 93% of GLP-1 users have reduced their portion sizes, indicating a significant shift in consumption patterns.
Athletes/Fitness Enthusiasts: Offer products optimized for muscle recovery and performance, emphasizing protein content and potentially added functional ingredients.
Aging Consumers: Provide options supporting muscle maintenance and bone health, often combined with lactose-free formulations and fortification.
4. Embrace Lactose-Free as Strategic Necessity
Lactose intolerance affects approximately 68% of the global population and 36% of Americans. This isn’t just a niche concern – it’s a major market reality that the dairy industry must address.
Expanding lactose-free options across all relevant dairy categories (milk, yogurt, cheese, ice cream) is essential for capturing this large consumer segment. The global lactose-free dairy market is projected to reach nearly $29.2 billion by 2033, representing a massive growth opportunity.
Why are we still treating lactose-free as a specialty segment when it should be a mainstream priority? With over a third of Americans having some degree of lactose intolerance, every dairy processor should be aggressively expanding their lactose-free offerings.
The Competitive Landscape: New Threats on the Horizon
While plant-based alternatives have dominated industry discussions, emerging technologies pose potentially more disruptive threats:
Precision Fermentation: The Next Frontier
Several food tech startups and even some dairy majors like the Bel Group are gearing towards launching either ingredient solutions such as fermentation-derived casein or fully-fledged dairy alternatives that contain no dairy ingredients derived from a cow.
Investment in fermentation has been increasing, with the Good Food Institute reporting startups raising €49 million in the first six months of 2024, up from €33 million in the entire 2023. Big names such as Danone, Fonterra, and Leprino Foods are all making moves in this segment.
While these products currently face challenges in cost competitiveness and consumer acceptance, they represent a long-term threat that the dairy industry must monitor closely.
Are we prepared for a future where dairy proteins can be produced without cows? The industry needs to either partner with these technologies or differentiate conventional dairy in ways that go beyond just the protein itself.
The Bottom Line: Dairy’s Protein Moment
The protein revolution represents both a challenge and an unprecedented opportunity for the dairy industry. While GLP-1 medications are reshaping consumption patterns away from high-fat dairy indulgences, they drive demand for protein-rich dairy options that support muscle maintenance during weight loss.
For dairy farmers and processors, success in this new landscape requires strategic adaptation:
Pivot from fat maximization to protein optimization in breeding and production
Develop innovative high-protein formulations that address specific consumer needs
Effectively communicate dairy’s protein quality advantage over alternatives
Expand lactose-free offerings to capture the large lactose-intolerant market
Invest in sustainability initiatives and transparently communicate progress
The question isn’t whether dairy can win in the protein revolution – it’s whether we dare to change our decades-old practices and mindsets to seize this opportunity.
The future belongs to those who can deliver protein with purpose – precisely what dairy is naturally designed to do. The industry has all the inherent advantages needed to dominate the protein economy, but only if it moves boldly to seize this opportunity.
Calculate Your Farm’s GLP-1 Risk Now
(Current Cheese Revenue × 0.07) ÷ Total Milk Income × 100 = % Revenue Loss
Is your operation prepared for this financial impact?
It’s time to stop defending the status quo and start leading the protein revolution. Will you be part of dairy’s protein-powered future or be left behind clinging to outdated priorities?
The protein revolution is here. The choice is yours.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Arla-DMK merger forms €19B dairy giant! 12k+ farmers, 19B kg milk. Will EU regulators bite? Game-changer for European dairy.
Dairy Titans Unite: Arla-DMK Merger
Reshaping Europe’s Dairy Landscape
Executive Summary
The proposed merger between Arla Foods (Denmark) and DMK Group (Germany) aims to create Europe’s largest dairy cooperative. This €19B entity seeks to address stagnant production, rising costs, and global competition through increased scale, innovation, and market reach. However, it faces significant regulatory hurdles, particularly in Germany, and challenges in balancing farmer interests with operational efficiency.
Merger by the Numbers
~ €19 BillionCombined Annual Revenue
12,200+Farmers United (7 Nations)
19 Billion kgAnnual Milk Volume (~13% EU Total)
#1 in EuropeLargest Dairy Cooperative
Key Drivers & Takeaways
✓Unprecedented Scale: Controls 13% of EU milk, dwarfing rivals.
✓Defensive Consolidation: Response to stagnant supply, rising costs, and global competition.
✓Innovation & Efficiency: Aims to leverage scale for better technology and processes.
✓Market Reach: Expanded presence across Europe and potentially globally.
✓Industry Catalyst: Forces smaller players to merge or specialize, accelerating consolidation.
Challenges & Risks
!Regulatory Wildcard: High risk of EU demanding concessions, especially in Germany due to market dominance.
!Farmer Trade-offs: Balancing promised “strong milk prices” with complex governance for 12k+ members.
!Integration Complexity: Merging operations, cultures, and systems across nations is difficult.
!Competitive Response: Rivals like FrieslandCampina may react strongly.
Infographic based on research report analysis | Data as of report date
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Arla Foods and DMK Group’s proposed merger would create Europe’s largest dairy cooperative, uniting 12,200 farmers and controlling 19B kg of milk annually. The €19B entity aims to combat stagnant production, volatile costs, and global competition through scale, innovation, and expanded market reach. While leadership touts farmer benefits and resilience, regulatory scrutiny—particularly in Germany—threatens approval. The deal accelerates industry consolidation, challenging rivals and reshaping power dynamics. Success hinges on balancing efficiency gains with member interests and navigating EU antitrust concerns.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Unprecedented Scale: Merged co-op controls 13% of EU milk, dwarfing rivals like FrieslandCampina-Milcobel.
Defensive Consolidation: Driven by stagnant EU milk supplies, rising costs, and need for global competitiveness.
Regulatory Wildcard: EU likely to demand concessions in Germany, where combined entity dominates procurement and product markets.
Farmer Trade-offs: Promised “strong milk prices” risk being overshadowed by governance complexity for 12k+ members across 7 nations.
Industry Catalyst: Forces smaller players to specialize or merge, accelerating Europe’s shift toward mega-cooperatives.
In a seismic shift that will reverberate through tie-stall barns and rotary parlors across Europe, Danish dairy giant Arla Foods and Germany’s powerhouse DMK Group dropped a bombshell announcement last week: they’re joining forces to create the continent’s largest dairy cooperative. This isn’t just another corporate handshake – it’s a fundamental power play that will reshape the European dairy landscape for generations to come, affecting everyone from the 80-cow family operation to the 2,000-head mega-dairies.
The numbers tell a jaw-dropping story: 12,200 farmers across seven countries, a staggering 19 billion kilograms of milk annually (enough to fill 9,720 Olympic-sized swimming pools), and a combined revenue approaching €19 billion ($20.8 billion). This merger creates a dairy behemoth that will dwarf the recently announced FrieslandCampina-Milcobel combination and establish a new competitive benchmark for the global dairy industry.
But behind the eye-popping statistics lies a more nuanced reality. This mega-merger reflects offensive ambition and defensive necessity in an increasingly challenging European dairy environment. With bulk tank collections stagnating across the continent, nutrient management regulations tightening, and global trade tensions simmering, the drive for scale has never been more urgent.
For dairy farmers from Denmark to Germany, Sweden to the UK, the question is: Will this new dairy superpower deliver on its promise of a “strong milk price” and a “strong home for farmers”? Or will the pursuit of efficiency and global competitiveness come at a cost to the members the cooperative serves – much like when a high-producing Holstein gets culled despite her production because her somatic cell count is just a bit too high?
Let’s dive into what this blockbuster deal means for the future of European dairy – and what lessons it holds for producers worldwide.
THE NEW DAIRY SUPERPOWER: UNPRECEDENTED SCALE AND REACH
When Arla Foods and DMK Group officially announced their intention to merge on April 8, 2025, they weren’t just proposing another business combination but declaring the birth of Europe’s undisputed dairy leader. The sheer magnitude of this union is staggering, creating a cooperative colossus that will fundamentally alter competitive dynamics across the continent.
By the Numbers: A Dairy Giant Emerges
The combined entity will boast a pro forma revenue of approximately €19 billion ($20.8 billion), dwarfing the €14 billion projected for the FrieslandCampina-Milcobel merger announced just months earlier. This revenue base establishes the new Arla as Europe’s largest dairy cooperative by a considerable margin and positions it as the second-largest dairy company overall in Europe, trailing only the French giant Lactalis.
The farmer membership base is equally impressive – approximately 12,200 dairy producers (7,600 from Arla and 4,600 from DMK) spread across Denmark, Sweden, the UK, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. This member network surpasses the roughly 11,000 farmers projected for the FrieslandCampina-Milcobel merger, creating an unprecedented concentration of dairy production power.
Most critically, the combined annual milk pool managed by the merged cooperative is estimated at around 19 billion kilograms. To put this volume in perspective for those of us who think about bulk tanks, if you have a standard 6,000-gallon bulk tank on your farm, it will take over 830,000 of these tanks to hold this much milk. That’s more milk than the US Grade A supply for nearly three months.
But here’s what everyone’s missing: controlling this much milk in a stagnant or declining production environment gives the new Arla unprecedented leverage with retailers, competitors, and even regulators. When you control 13% of the EU’s total milk supply, you’re not just another market player – you’re the market.
Who’s Running the Show?
The leadership structure reveals much about the power dynamics at play. The combined entity will operate under the Arla name, with headquarters remaining in Viby J, Denmark. Jan Toft Nørgaard (current Arla Chair) will serve as Chair, and Peder Tuborgh (current Arla CEO) will continue as CEO of the merged cooperative. Ingo Müller, the current CEO of DMK Group, will join the Arla executive management team as Executive Vice President (EVP) responsible for post-merger integration.
Let’s call this what it is: Arla is absorbing DMK, not merging as equals – like when a dominant Holstein herd absorbs a Jersey operation and gradually phases out the colored cows. While strategically logical, given Arla’s size and global brand recognition, this arrangement represents a significant transition for the German cooperative and its members. DMK farmers who proudly belong to Germany’s largest independent dairy cooperative will soon be part of a Danish-headquartered entity. This cultural and identity shift, like switching from a herringbone parlor to a rotary after 30 years, shouldn’t be underestimated.
Are we witnessing the slow death of regional dairy identity in Europe? When cooperatives of this size merge, local priorities, and regional distinctiveness inevitably get sacrificed on the altar of efficiency and standardization. DMK members should ask hard questions about what this means for their voice in the new mega-cooperative.
Strategic Fit: Complementary Strengths
Despite the clear Arla dominance in the leadership structure, the merger brings together two entities with complementary strengths and market positions. Arla Foods excels in branded consumer products with global reach through brands like Arla, Lurpak, Puck, and Castello. It also boasts a significant ingredients division focusing on specialized nutrition segments. DMK Group, while perhaps less globally recognized, holds a powerful position in the German market and brings expertise in branded products and private-label offerings.
The combination leverages Arla’s established global market presence with DMK’s strong German and regional foothold, creating a more balanced and diversified portfolio across branded and private label segments. This positions the merged entity to serve a broader customer base and strengthens its negotiating leverage with major retailers – a critical advantage in an era where supermarket chains wield enormous buying power, much like crossbreeding. Holstein with Jersey gives you both components and volume.
WHY NOW? THE STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES DRIVING CONSOLIDATION
The leadership of both Arla and DMK have articulated several compelling reasons for joining forces, but reading between the lines reveals both defensive necessity and offensive ambition in an increasingly challenging dairy landscape.
European Dairy’s Perfect Storm
Let’s be blunt: European dairy producers face a perfect storm of challenges that make going alone increasingly tricky – like trying to manage a 40-cow tie-stall operation with no family help and rising feed costs. Overall, EU milk production is forecast to decline slightly (-0.2%) in 2025 to around 149.4 million metric tons, continuing a trend driven by shrinking dairy herds as farmers exit the industry. Environmental regulations under the EU Green Deal add cost and operational burdens, particularly around nitrogen emissions and nutrient management plans. Volatile input costs for feed and energy, labor shortages, and rising wages are squeezing farmer margins and accelerating farm exits, particularly among smaller operations.
The uncomfortable truth is that European dairy is in structural decline. The days of expansion and growth are over, replaced by a brutal game of survival where only the largest, most efficient players will remain standing. This merger isn’t just about opportunity – it’s about necessity.
In this context, scale becomes crucial for weathering market turbulence. Heinz Korte, Chair of DMK Group, explicitly noted the merger “strengthens the resilience of our cooperatives.” The combination aims to create a more commercially robust entity through diversified product portfolios and broader market positions to buffer against volatility – much like how a TMR provides more consistent nutrition than separate component feeding.
Global Ambitions: Expanding Market Reach
Expanding market reach represents another key strategic driver. Peder Tuborgh, CEO of Arla Foods, highlighted that DMK’s market presence complements Arla’s existing footprint. The merger aims to leverage Arla’s established global distribution network to access consumers and customers beyond DMK’s current geographic scope.
Ingo Müller, CEO of DMK Group, echoed this motivation: “Through Arla’s global reach, we can access consumers and customers beyond our current geographical reach.” The combined entity intends to build stronger customer partnerships by offering a more comprehensive and attractive product portfolio.
This global ambition comes at a critical time. US dairy analyst Ben Laine recently observed, “What separates a really good year from a really bad year, from a milk price perspective, has been exports.” With domestic consumption relatively stable in mature markets, export growth has become the primary driver of dairy profitability. The merged Arla-DMK will have more significant resources to invest in developing new export markets and weathering the inevitable trade disruptions that have become a feature of the global dairy landscape.
But here’s what they’re not telling you: European dairy’s obsession with exports puts farmers at the mercy of volatile global markets and geopolitical whims. When your milk check depends on whether China decides to buy powder this month or if Middle Eastern tensions disrupt shipping routes, you’re building your business on quicksand. Is this the future we want for European dairy?
Innovation and Value Creation: The R&D Advantage
Both companies emphasize that combining their complementary strengths will enhance innovation capabilities. The leadership anticipates that merging their expertise will enable them to “keep advancing in dairy technology and innovation.” This includes jointly driving the development of innovative products for the benefit of members and consumers, particularly in high-value segments.
The existing ArNoCo joint venture provides a template for this collaboration. This project processes whey from DMK’s cheese production into high-quality whey protein concentrate and lactose for Arla’s global ingredients business – a perfect example of how vertical integration can create value from what was once considered a waste product, like how modern dairy farms have transformed manure from a disposal problem into a valuable fertilizer through advanced nutrient management plans.
The Farmer’s Bottom Line: Securing the Future
The merger is framed at its core around protecting dairy production and delivering farmer benefits. The leadership emphasizes safeguarding the production of healthy dairy products and ensuring stable food production in Europe. A central promise to the farmer-owners is securing a “strong milk price” and providing a “strong home for farmers.” The merger is expected to provide the necessary financial capacity to invest in the future of dairy for generations to come.
But here’s the million-euro question: Will the pursuit of scale and efficiency translate to better milk prices for farmers? History suggests that mega-mergers often prioritize operational streamlining over maximizing returns to suppliers in the short term – much like how focusing too heavily on milk volume can sometimes come at the expense of components and cow health. The leadership’s ability to balance these competing priorities will determine whether this merger delivers on its promise to farmer-owners.
When did a major dairy merger last result in higher farmgate prices? I’ll wait.
THE CONSOLIDATION WAVE: EUROPEAN DAIRY’S SHIFTING LANDSCAPE
The Arla-DMK announcement represents the latest – and largest – move in an accelerating consolidation trend reshaping the European dairy sector. This isn’t happening in isolation; it’s part of a fundamental restructuring driven by the need for scale to navigate challenging market conditions.
Europe’s Dairy Consolidation Heats Up
Just months before the Arla-DMK bombshell, Dutch cooperative FrieslandCampina announced plans to merge with Belgian peer Milcobel in December 2024. That deal, which would have created Europe’s largest dairy cooperative at the time, has now been eclipsed by the Arla-DMK combination.
This merger wave isn’t limited to mega-deals. Smaller consolidations are also occurring, such as the creation of European Dairy Co. by merging Belgian firms Vache Bleue Group and Flanders Food Production. This pattern suggests a fundamental restructuring of the European dairy landscape, driven by the need for scale to navigate challenging market conditions – not unlike how many small dairy farms have either grown substantially or exited the industry entirely over the past two decades.
The Race for Scale: A Defensive Necessity
The convergence of declining raw milk volumes with projections of overall dairy market value growth points toward a crucial industry pivot from volume to value. Large-scale consolidation, exemplified by the Arla-DMK merger, provides the financial muscle and operational capacity required to invest heavily in value-added processing – expanding cheese production, developing sophisticated ingredients, building strong brands, and driving innovation in health and wellness categories.
In a future where raw milk represents a potentially constrained resource, maximizing the margin extracted from each liter becomes paramount. Processors require greater scale to absorb market pressures, invest in necessary innovation and sustainability initiatives, and compete effectively in global markets – like how modern dairy operations focus on maximizing income over feed cost rather than just raw milk production.
This isn’t just a European phenomenon. As US dairy analyst Ben Laine recently noted, “American dairy farmers are going to find a way. They are going to make it happen. If there’s a need for milk, somebody’s going to be willing to build that”. However, the dynamics are shifting from a decade ago when surplus heifers were commonly kept on hand. Today, factors like strong cull cow checks and beef-on-dairy income have altered the equation, making such practices less prevalent.
The industry’s dirty little secret: we’re witnessing the end of the traditional European dairy farm. The family-scale operations that have defined European agriculture for generations are being systematically squeezed out. Is this consolidation wave really about efficiency and global competitiveness, or is it about concentrating power in fewer and fewer hands?
The lesson is clear: Whether in Europe or North America, dairy is increasingly a scale game where size provides resilience against market volatility and the financial firepower to invest in value-added processing and innovation – much like how a 1,000-cow dairy can afford specialized staff and equipment that a 100-cow operation simply cannot.
REGULATORY HURDLES: WILL BRUSSELS WAVE IT THROUGH?
Before this dairy mega-merger can be finalized, it faces significant regulatory scrutiny, primarily from the European Commission under EU merger regulations. The outcome is uncertain, and the path to approval may require significant concessions.
The EU’s Competition Concerns
Given the combined turnover of Arla and DMK significantly exceeds the thresholds defined in the EU Merger Regulation, the transaction falls squarely under European Commission jurisdiction. The Commission’s primary task will be to assess whether the proposed merger would “significantly impede effective competition” in the internal market or a substantial part of it.
The EC will evaluate whether the merging parties are major competitors and analyze the impact on market structure, pricing power, and consumer choice. Particular attention will focus on whether the merged entity could act independently of competitors, customers, and ultimately consumers, for instance, by raising prices or reducing choice – like how a dominant AI bull can reshape an entire breed’s genetics if used too extensively.
Let’s be honest – if the EU were genuinely concerned about competition, they would have blocked several previous dairy mergers. The Commission’s track record suggests they’ll find a way to approve this deal, perhaps with token divestments that won’t meaningfully impact the new entity’s market power. When was the last time Brussels truly stood up to big business?
The German Market: A Potential Sticking Point
The Germany market will be particularly critical in this review. DMK is the leading dairy cooperative there, and Arla also has a significant presence through milk sourcing and sales. The combination creates a dominant player in this critical market, potentially triggering demands for remedies – such as divesting specific brands, processing facilities, or milk collection routes – to ensure sufficient competition post-merger.
The EC will examine several distinct markets where the companies’ activities overlap:
Procurement of Raw Milk: This fundamental market assessment will analyze the combined entity’s buying power for raw milk. Due to logistical constraints in milk transport, the geographic scope is typically defined as regional or national. The merged Arla-DMK’s control over ~19 billion kg of milk could lead to very high market shares for milk purchasing in specific regions, particularly Germany, Denmark, and the Benelux countries.
Dairy Product Categories: The EC will analyze overlaps in various downstream product markets, including fresh dairy products (liquid milk, cream, yogurt), long-life dairy products, butter, cheese (segmented by type), and whey derivatives. The geographic scope varies significantly by product category, from national to EEA-wide.
Potential Outcomes: Clearance, Conditions, or Complications
Based on precedent from previous Arla acquisitions reviewed by the EC, several scenarios are possible:
Unconditional Clearance: If the EC finds no serious doubts about the merger’s compatibility with the internal market.
Conditional Clearance: Approval subject to commitments (remedies) offered by Arla-DMK to address identified competition concerns, such as divestments.
In-depth Investigation: If the initial review raises serious doubts, leading to a longer, more detailed analysis. This could still result in clearance (conditional or unconditional) or, in rare cases, prohibition if concerns cannot be resolved.
Previous Arla mergers reviewed by the EC, such as the acquisition of Milk Link in the UK and Allgäuland Käsereien in Germany, were ultimately cleared, demonstrating that consolidation involving Arla is possible under EU rules. However, the scale of the Arla-DMK merger significantly exceeds these previous transactions, inviting more intensive scrutiny – like how a 10% increase in somatic cell count might not trigger penalties. Still, a 50% jump would set off alarms.
The leadership is optimistic, targeting regulatory clearance by the end of 2025. But don’t be surprised if the path to approval involves significant concessions, particularly regarding the German market, where the combined entity’s dominance will be most pronounced.
WINNERS AND LOSERS: IMPACTS ACROSS THE DAIRY VALUE CHAIN
The proposed mega-merger will send ripple effects throughout the European dairy ecosystem, creating winners and losers across the value chain. Let’s break down who stands to gain – and who might get squeezed – if this deal goes through.
For Farmer-Owners: Promise and Pressure
For the 12,200 farmer-members of the combined cooperative, the merger offers potential market security and milk price stability benefits. The leadership has explicitly promised to deliver a “strong milk price” and provide a “strong home for farmers.” The enhanced scale should provide greater negotiating power with retailers and improved market access, potentially translating to more stable returns for members.
However, the very size of this organization creates governance challenges. Managing a cross-border entity with over 12,000 members across seven countries introduces significant complexity in balancing diverse member interests regarding milk price, local processing, and strategic direction. Particularly for DMK farmers, the transition from Germany’s largest independent cooperative to part of a larger, Danish-headquartered entity represents a significant shift in identity and control – like switching from a conventional dairy system to an organic or pasture-based approach after generations of confinement dairying.
The elephant in the milking parlor: Individual farmers lose their voice as cooperatives grow to this scale. How much influence do you have when you’re one of 12,200 members spread across seven countries? The democratic principles that once defined cooperatives become increasingly theoretical as scale and complexity grow. Are we creating dairy democracies in name only?
The merger’s success will ultimately be judged by its ability to deliver tangible financial benefits to members, particularly relative milk prices compared to competitors. This creates pressure to achieve operational efficiencies while maintaining member returns – a delicate balancing act in the short-term during integration, much like managing a high-producing cow through transition without metabolic issues.
For Competitors: A New Competitive Reality
For rival dairy processors, the emergence of this dairy giant creates a formidable new competitive reality. The merged Arla-DMK’s enhanced scale brings significant advantages in procurement, production efficiency, R&D capacity, and customer negotiating power. Smaller regional players may find themselves increasingly squeezed between mega-cooperatives like Arla-DMK and FrieslandCampina-Milcobel on one side and specialized niche players on the other.
This competitive pressure may accelerate further consolidation as mid-sized players seek their scale-building mergers or strategic partnerships to remain viable. Alternatively, some may pivot toward greater specialization in niche products or regional markets where the mega-cooperatives hold less advantage – like how some dairy farms had found success by transitioning to value-added on-farm processing or adopting management-intensive rotational grazing when conventional dairying became less viable.
Mid-sized processors without a clear specialty are the walking dead of the dairy industry. They’re too small to compete with the giants on efficiency and too large to be truly nimble niche players. The Arla-DMK merger will only accelerate their demise. If you’re running a mid-sized dairy operation or processing plant, it’s time to pick a lane: get big or get specialized. There’s no middle ground anymore.
For Retailers and Consumers: Shifting Power Dynamics
The merger potentially shifts power dynamics with major retailers. The combined entity’s increased scale and enhanced portfolio breadth strengthen its negotiating position with large retail customers. This may enable the merged Arla to secure better shelf positioning and pricing terms, particularly in core markets across Northern Europe.
Consumers’ immediate impact will depend mainly on competition levels in specific local markets. In regions where the merged entity achieves very high market share, there may be concerns about reduced choice or price increases absent sufficient competitive pressure. Conversely, the enhanced innovation capabilities and operational efficiencies could potentially lead to new product development and value creation, benefiting consumers over time – much like how improved genetics and management have allowed dairy farmers to produce more milk with fewer resources and a smaller environmental footprint.
THE ROAD AHEAD: INTEGRATING TWO DAIRY GIANTS
The journey from announcement to fully integrated dairy powerhouse involves several critical milestones and integration challenges. The timeline is ambitious, but the real work begins after the deal closes.
The Approval Timeline
The proposed merger follows a defined timeline toward completion:
Internal Consultations: Following the April 2025 announcement, detailed discussions with cooperative members and employee representatives will occur over the “coming months.”
Board Approvals: The formalized merger agreement is scheduled for approval votes by the respective Boards of Representatives in June 2025.
Regulatory Review: Assuming internal approvals are secured, the merger will be submitted to competition authorities, primarily the European Commission. The parties anticipate receiving regulatory clearance by the end of 2025.
This timeline reflects the transaction’s complexity and the multiple stakeholder groups whose approval is required. While leadership presents a unified vision, securing approval from thousands of individual farmer members represents a significant hurdle. Transparent communication and compelling articulation of the value proposition for all members will be essential before the regulatory process even commences – much like how a successful breeding program requires clear goals and consistent implementation.
The real question: are rank-and-file members being presented with the full picture or just the rosy scenario? Cooperative leadership has a vested interest in pushing this deal through. Are farmers getting the unvarnished truth about potential plant closures, route consolidations, and the inevitable “efficiencies” that will follow? If you’re a member of cooperative, demand complete transparency before casting your vote.
Integration Challenges Ahead
If approved, the actual integration process presents complex operational and cultural challenges:
Operational Integration: Combining two large, complex cooperatives with distinct processing networks, product portfolios, and operating procedures requires careful planning and execution. Key decisions around facility rationalization, brand portfolio management, and supply chain optimization will shape the merged entity’s efficiency and competitive positioning.
Cultural Alignment: While both organizations are farmer-owned cooperatives with similar stated values, national and organizational cultural differences between a Danish-led global player and a German cooperative will require thoughtful management. Particularly for DMK, the subsuming of its identity under the Arla banner represents a significant transition – like the challenges faced when merging herds with different management styles and breeding philosophies.
Synergy Realization: Capturing the projected cost savings and revenue enhancements while maintaining operational stability and member satisfaction will be a delicate balancing act. Early synergy wins will build momentum and demonstrate value to skeptical stakeholders.
Regulatory Compliance: Meeting any conditions imposed by competition authorities, potentially including divestments of specific brands, facilities, or collection routes, adds another layer of complexity to the integration process.
The appointment of DMK CEO Ingo Müller as EVP of post-merger integration is a smart move, providing continuity for DMK members while ensuring their interests are represented in integration planning. However, the real test will come in execution – merging cultures, systems, and operations while maintaining business continuity and member satisfaction.
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOUR DAIRY OPERATION
As this dairy behemoth takes shape, farmers across Europe and beyond need to consider the implications for their operations. The days of the middle-of-the-road dairy farm are numbered. This merger is another sign that the industry is polarizing between massive-scale operations with rock-bottom production costs and specialized premium producers who command higher prices.
Where does your operation fit in this new reality? Suppose you’re not actively positioning yourself at one end of this spectrum or the other. In that case, you’re likely to get caught in the uncomfortable middle – too small to compete on cost with the giants but too conventional to capture premium markets.
For those supplying Arla or DMK directly, the merger presents both opportunity and risk. The potential for more stable markets and enhanced global reach must be weighed against the inevitable pressure for efficiency and standardization that comes with scale. Will your voice still matter in a cooperative of 12,200 members? The time to secure meaningful governance guarantees is before the merger is finalized.
For dairy farmers worldwide, this merger signals the acceleration of trends reshaping the industry for decades. Scale, efficiency, and value-added processing are no longer just advantages but survival requirements. The question isn’t whether consolidation will continue but how.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
GLP-1 drugs slash cheese sales 7.2% but boost Greek yogurt 40%. Dairy farmers: Adapt to protein or risk $35k losses.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: GLP-1 weight-loss medications are reshaping dairy demand, with users cutting cheese/butter spending by 5-7% while propelling protein-rich Greek yogurt (+40%) and cottage cheese (+13%). This pharmaceutical-driven shift threatens farms prioritizing milkfat, as component values tilt toward protein. Economic modeling shows cheese-dependent operations face $35k annual revenue risks. Farmers must rebalance genetics, lock in protein contracts, and monitor Class III/IV spreads to survive. Dairy’s inherent protein advantage offers growth—if producers pivot from fat maximization to nutrient density.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
GLP-1 users reduce cheese/butter spending 5-7% while increasing protein beverage intake 38%
Milkfat’s decade-long dominance faces reversal as protein gains value in FMMO pricing formulas
Farms risk $0.15/cwt losses per 1% butter decline – strategic pivots to whey/NFDM streams critical
Genetic rebalancing essential: Jersey herds’ 4.26% fat vs 3.41% protein now misaligned with market needs
2025 projections favor protein: Greek yogurt powder ($500M), milk isolates (7% CAGR) signal new opportunities
The dairy industry faces a pharmaceutical disruption that’s silently reshaping your milk check. In medicine cabinets across America, injectable pens of Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro create a seismic shift in the food economy—cutting cheese sales by 7.2% while sending Greek yogurt soaring 40%. This isn’t speculation; it’s happening now.
These appetite-suppressing medications translate to a potential ,000 annual revenue risk for the average dairy farm dependent on cheese markets. Yet amid this disruption lies perhaps the most significant protein opportunity since whey processing went mainstream. The divide is stark: farms optimized for butterfat face headwinds, while those pivoting to protein ride a pharmaceutical-driven wave.
As GLP-1 medications race toward 31.5 million American users by 2035—reshaping appetites, cravings, and shopping habits—the fundamental economics of milk components hang in the balance. The once-reliable premium commanded by butterfat is now facing its most significant challenge in decades. This isn’t merely about changing consumer preferences; it’s about a medication-driven revolution in eating behavior that threatens to upend component values at breathtaking speed.
Will your operation be positioned to capitalize on protein’s ascendancy, or will you watch your milk check shrink along with your customers’ waistlines? The protein pivot is no longer optional—it’s existential.
The Appetite Apocalypse: Hard Data Behind Dairy’s New Reality
A stunning 43.1% of GLP-1 users anticipate systemic food industry impacts versus just 14.3% of non-users. These appetite-suppressing drugs are creating quantifiable market shifts:
Cheese spending: -7.2%
Butter purchases: -5.8%
Ice cream sales: -5.5%
Yet protein-rich dairy categories are thriving amid this disruption:
Cho bani’s Greek yogurt: 40% sales surge
Cottage cheese volumes: 13.3% growth
Whey protein consumption: 38% increase
This isn’t temporary—pharmaceutical forecasts suggest GLP-1 drugs will reach 31.5 million Americans by 2035, representing 7% of the population and fundamentally altering food consumption patterns.
5 Proven Strategies for Surviving Dairy’s Protein-First Future
1. Genetic Rebalancing: Jersey herds average 4.26% fat vs 3.41% protein—a dangerous imbalance in today’s market. Holstein Canada data shows a 16-year industry shift toward balanced component traits.
2. Processor Partnerships: Forward-thinking farmers are now locking in whey isolate contracts. Milk processors report a $0.15/cwt risk per 1% butter demand decline.
3. Feed Cost Optimization: Simply pushing components without ROI leads to bankruptcy. USDA projects a 5.4% NFDM price increase—signaling protein’s ascendancy in market value.
4. Strategic Consumer Education: Leading dairy organizations highlight leucine’s GLP-1-boosting properties—positioning dairy protein as complementary to weight management medications.
5. Real-Time Market Monitoring: Daily vigilance of Class III/IV spreads is now essential. Market volatility will intensify as GLP-1 adoption accelerates among primary dairy consumers.
The Low-Fat Paradox: What Consumer Data Reveals
While whole milk advocates promote traditional dairy, GLP-1 users are voting decisively with their wallets:
Consumer Segment
Preferred Dairy Fat %
Protein Priority
General Population
3.25-4% Whole Milk
48% seek more
GLP-1 Users
≤2% Low-Fat
86% prioritize
“We’re culling anything under 3.2% protein,” says Wisconsin’s Lyle Kasten. “Fat’s a bonus, not the goal.”
Urgent Wake-Up Call for Dairy Processors
Are processors still paying premium butterfat incentives? That’s dangerously outdated thinking. Forward-looking operations are securing protein-based contracts as market research confirms:
Greek yogurt powder market hitting $500M by 2025
Milk protein isolate demand is growing at 7% CAGR
Class III milk price formulas increasingly favor $2.94/lb protein vs $0.31/lb other solids
Calculate Your Farm’s GLP-1 Risk Now
(Current Cheese Revenue × 0.07) ÷ Total Milk Income × 100 = % Revenue Loss
Is your operation prepared for this financial impact?
The Bottom Line: Adapt or Face Declining Milk Checks
GLP-1 medications aren’t a passing trend—they’re reshaping food economics at pharmaceutical speed. Dairy’s protein advantage positions the industry to dominate the appetite-reduced future, but only for farmers who:
Abandon single-component breeding strategies
Secure processor protein premiums
Breed for balanced nutritional profiles, not just volume
The Bullvine Verdict: This isn’t our first industry pivot (remember rBST debates?). However, unlike previous challenges, the GLP-1 disruption offers dairy its greatest protein opportunity since whey went mainstream. Adapt your breeding program now, or watch your milk check shrink faster than a Wegovy user’s waistline.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
30M ton milk shortage by 2030 threatens US dairy profits. Climate stress, global shifts demand urgent action. Can farmers adapt?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The International Dairy Federation warns of a potential 30-million-ton global milk shortage by 2030, driven by population growth, climate-driven yield declines, and shifting production patterns. While traditional dairy powerhouses like the U.S. and EU face stagnation, emerging regions like India struggle to fill the gap. U.S. producers must adapt through protein-focused breeding, feed cost management, and specialty product diversification as milk prices rise. Climate stress compounds challenges, with heat reducing yields by 7% per 1°C. The crisis presents both risks and opportunities for U.S. dairy, leveraging innovation to counter global competition.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
IDF vs. IFCN divide: 30M vs. 6M ton shortage forecasts highlight uncertainty in balancing global supply/demand.
Climate costs: Heat stress threatens 7% yield drops per 1°C, disproportionately impacting small farms.
US stagnation: 0.9% production growth lags India’s 5%, risking lost export market share.
Price surge: USDA forecasts $22.60/cwt milk prices in 2025, with further hikes likely.
Adapt now: Focus on component pricing, feed contracts, and A2/organic diversification to survive.
The global dairy industry faces a looming crisis as the International Dairy Federation (IDF) projects a potential milk shortage of 30 million tons by 2030. This alarming forecast, announced by Laurence Rycken, Director General of IDF (Belgium), during her presentation at the 2025 Dairy Olympics in Al Ain, UAE, signals a fundamental shift in the global dairy landscape that demands immediate attention from producers, processors, and policymakers alike.
Why Your Dairy Farm’s Future Hangs in the Balance: Population Boom vs. Shrinking Herds
The projected milk deficit stems from a perfect storm of converging factors. Global population growth, expected to reach 10 billion by 2050, combined with rising prosperity in developing nations, dramatically increases demand for dairy products. Meanwhile, production in traditional dairy powerhouses is stagnating or declining under mounting pressures. “We are facing not only a volume challenge but also the need to preserve nutritional value and ensure the sustainability of production,” Rycken emphasized during her presentation. “The solutions must be global in design, but local in execution.” This 30-million-ton shortage projection starkly contrasts the International Farm Comparison Network’s (IFCN) more modest forecast of a 6-million-ton deficit by 2030. This discrepancy highlights the uncertainty in long-term dairy forecasting and underscores the complexity of the challenges ahead.
Competing Shortage Projections (2030)
Organization
Projected Global Milk Shortage (2030)
Key Drivers Cited
International Dairy Federation (IDF)
30 million tons
Population growth, declining production in developed regions
International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN)
6 million tons
Developing regions’ deficit (14M tons) is partially offset by developed regions’ surplus (8M tons)
7% Less Milk Per Cow: Climate’s Crushing Impact on Your Dairy Profits
Climate change is emerging as a critical threat to dairy production worldwide. Research shows that for every 1°C rise in temperature, dairy cows experience a 7% drop in milk yield due to heat stress. This translates to billions of dollars in lost production annually. A University of Illinois study found that high temperatures and humidity already lead to a 1% annual decline in milk yield in the U.S. Midwest alone. Smaller farms disproportionately lack resources for cooling systems and other mitigation strategies. As global temperatures continue to rise, these losses could increase by 30% in the coming decades, further exacerbating the projected shortage.
The Winners and Losers: Which Dairy Regions Will Survive the Coming Shortage?
While the European Union and the United States experience production stagnation, countries including India, Pakistan, and nations across Africa and Latin America are showing growth potential. Traditional dairy exporters—the EU, New Zealand, and Australia—face mounting resource constraints and environmental pressures that limit their ability to increase output. “While the EU debates nitrogen caps, New Zealand farmers are culling herds. Your takeaway? Sustainability policies without profitability are a recipe for collapse.” The changing landscape is already reshaping global dairy trade flows. New Zealand’s share in global exports is shrinking while China and other Asian countries are bolstering local production. For every 1kg of milk powder China produces domestically, it imports 2kg from struggling EU farms—a rapidly changing ratio as Asian production capacity grows.
Regional Production Outlook (2025)
Region
2025 Production Forecast
Change from Previous Year
Key Factors
United States
227.2 billion pounds
+1.7 billion pounds
New cheese processing capacity, herd expansion despite HPAI challenges
$22.60 Per CWT: The Economic Reality of Dairy’s New Scarcity
Current USDA forecasts put the all-milk price at $22.60 per cwt for 2025, reflecting the tightening supply situation. However, if the IDF’s shortage projections materialize, prices could climb significantly higher, creating profitability challenges for processors and affordability issues for consumers. India’s 5% production growth vs. the U.S.’s 0.9% stagnation isn’t just a gap—it’s a chasm. This divergence highlights the shifting center of gravity in global dairy production and suggests emerging markets may be key to addressing the looming shortage.
Survive and Thrive: 3 Critical Strategies Every U.S. Dairy Producer Needs Now
Adaptation is not optional for dairy farmers facing this changing landscape—it’s essential. Three critical strategies emerge for producers looking to thrive in this new environment:
Breed for protein, not just volume – With component pricing becoming increasingly important, genetics focused on protein and fat content rather than fluid volume will maximize returns.
Lock in feed contracts now – With 2025 prices projected to spike 12% amid global grain market volatility, securing long-term feed supplies at current prices provides crucial cost stability.
Diversify into specialty products – A2 milk, grass-fed, and organic dairy products command premium prices and offer some insulation from commodity market volatility.
Can India’s Dairy Surge Save the World? (Spoiler: Not Without These 3 Fixes)
India shows significant potential to bridge the growing supply-demand gap in the global dairy sector. IDF President Piercristiano Brazzale states that India’s dairy industry is positioned to play an increasingly important role in meeting global demand. However, realizing this potential requires addressing three critical challenges:
Infrastructure investment – Cold chain development and processing capacity must expand dramatically
Quality standards harmonization – Export growth depends on meeting international standards
Climate adaptation strategies – India’s producers face some of the most severe heat stress challenges globally. “The global dairy trade is reshuffling faster than a Vegas blackjack table. Bet on Asia’s production—or fold.”
Global Milk Production Growth by Region (2017-2030)
Region
Projected Growth (2017-2030)
South Asia (India & Pakistan)
+64%
Africa
+33%
Near & Middle East
+37%
East & Southeast Asia
+22%
Latin America
+24%
North America
+14%
Western Europe
+6%
Eastern Europe & CIS
+32%
Oceania
+22%
Global Average
+35%
Adapt or Perish: Why Dairy’s Golden Era Is Over
The IDF’s warning isn’t a forecast—it’s a wake-up call. Forget “milk does a body good.” By 2030, it might just harm the bank account. With global shortages looming, dairy’s golden era is over. The question isn’t if you’ll adapt—it’s how bloody the transition will be. As dairy producers worldwide navigate these challenges, the industry faces a critical adaptation period. Success will require balancing increased production with sustainability concerns while ensuring nutritional quality remains paramount—a complex but essential task for securing the future of global dairy. For U.S. producers specifically, this global shortage presents both challenges and opportunities. While competition for export markets will intensify, domestic production advantages—including technological innovation, established infrastructure, and the U.S. Dairy Net Zero Initiative—position forward-thinking American dairy farmers to capitalize on higher prices while addressing sustainability demands.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Dairy prices surge 20% while feed costs drop—discover how this rare market alignment creates a golden opportunity for your herd’s profitability.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The FAO Food Price Index for March 2025 reveals a remarkable opportunity for dairy producers as prices stand nearly 20% higher than last year while feed costs decline by 2.6%. This divergence creates an exceptional profit environment where butter prices have surged 3.9% despite cheese experiencing its first decline in nine months. With RaboResearch forecasting continued milk supply growth of 0.8% in 2025 and gains expected across all major exporting regions for the first time since 2020, producers can capitalize on this favorable market through strategic breeding decisions focused on butterfat (which has 50% heritability) and implementing precision feeding strategies that optimize component production rather than simply volume. The article provides actionable guidance for dairy farmers to maximize returns during this unique market window where input costs are falling while component values remain strong.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Dairy prices are 19.9% higher than March 2024 while feed costs are declining, creating a rare profit opportunity window
Butter prices rose 3.9% while cheese declined 1.8%, signaling the importance of breeding for butterfat components
Genetic selection is crucial as butterfat has high heritability (50%), making it responsive to breeding strategies
Feed efficiency improvements directly impact profitability—each 1% increase in NDF digestibility yields 0.51 lb/day more milk
All major dairy exporting regions are expected to see production gains in 2025 for the first time since 2020
The FAO Food Price Index (FFPI) held steady in March 2025, averaging 127.1 points and remaining virtually unchanged from February, as declining cereal and sugar prices counterbalanced rises in vegetable oils and meat. Despite the month-to-month stability, the index registered 6.9% higher than March 2024 levels, though still sitting 20.7% below its historic peak in March 2022.
FAO Food Price Index Key Metrics (March 2025)
Category
Index Value
Monthly Change
Annual Change (vs. March 2024)
Overall FFPI
127.1
0%
+6.9%
Cereals
109.7
-2.6%
-1.1%
Vegetable Oils
161.8
+3.7%
+23.9%
Meat
118.0
+0.9%
+2.7%
Dairy
148.7
0%
+19.9%
Sugar
116.9
-1.6%
-12.3%
Dairy Markets Show Remarkable Strength: What It Means for Your Operation
The FAO Dairy Price Index remained unchanged from February at 148.7 points but stands nearly 20% higher than its March 2024 level – signaling continued strength in global dairy markets. This sustained price elevation creates significant opportunities for producers focused on component optimization and strategic breeding decisions.
International cheese prices fell 1.8%, marking the first decline in nine months, as steady European supply met weakening demand, particularly in Oceania. However, stronger performance in other dairy categories fully offset this decline.
Butter prices surged 3.9% on strong retail sales and lower seasonal output in Oceania, marking the third consecutive monthly rise. This butter strength aligns with broader market trends showing premium values for milkfat components, suggesting producers should consider genetic selection strategies prioritizing butterfat yield.
“When butterfat premiums rise, we adjust rations to optimize milk components,” says Dr. Mike Hutjens, University of Illinois feed specialist. This approach reflects the ongoing shift in component values that began several years ago.
Component Values Shift: Butterfat Takes the Lead
The strength in butter prices continues to be a long trend in dairy markets. According to Hoard’s Dairyman, butterfat has increasingly overtaken protein as the price leader in milk checks. This shift reflects changing consumer preferences as medical, nutrition, and public perceptions of saturated fats in foods like butter have evolved.
“For many years, protein was the consistent component leader in milk checks as it fetched the highest pay price. However, prices and demand for butterfat began to improve as medical, nutrition and public perception changed on saturated fats in foods such as butter, cheese, eggs, and meat,” notes Hoard’s Dairyman.
The 2.6% decline in the FAO Cereal Price Index creates a favorable environment for dairy producers, as feed costs typically represent over 50% of total milk production expenses. This feed cost relief is optimal, potentially enhancing margins for producers who strategically manage their feed programs.
Research from the University of Wisconsin has demonstrated the significant impact of feed digestibility on production efficiency. “A 14% unit difference in Starch Digestibility would translate into a 10% unit difference in TDN,” according to work from Shaver at UW. Michigan State researchers found that for every one percentage-unit increase in NDF digestibility, there is a 0.51 lb/d increase in milk yield.
Strategic Breeding Decisions Critical in the Current Market
Dairy prices show remarkable strength compared to other agricultural commodities, so breeding decisions are critical. The current market environment particularly rewards producers who align their breeding programs with component-focused production strategies.
Since butterfat content is highly heritable (about 50%), genetic selection is crucial for improving performance and obtaining higher milk prices. Lactanet states, “The goal is to breed profitable cows that efficiently yield high volumes of butterfat and protein throughout their productive lives.”
Experts recommend improving overall selection indexes while paying special attention to fat content and yield. The Genetic Herd Inventory report can help assess a herd’s genetic potential for butterfat production, with percentile rankings providing context for how a herd compares to the industry average.
Vegetable Oils and Meat Markets Also Show Strength
The FAO Vegetable Oil Price Index rose significantly, increasing by 3.7% from February to average 161.8 points, positioning it 23.9% higher than its year-earlier level. Higher quotations across palm, soy, rapeseed, and sunflower oils drove this upward momentum.
The FAO Meat Price Index increased by 0.9% in March to 118.0 points, positioning it 2.7% above March 2024. This rise was predominantly attributed to higher pig meat prices in Europe, which strengthened following renewed demand in the European Union.
Historical Perspective Shows Stabilization After Volatility
While the current FFPI shows a 6.9% increase from March 2024, it remains significantly below (20.7%) the peak reached in March 2022 following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.
Historical FFPI Comparison
Year
Average Index
Notable Events
2022
159.7
Peak post-Russia-Ukraine invasion
2024
126.5
Pre-March 2025 baseline
2025
127.1
Current stabilization phase
What This Means for Your Dairy Operation
The continued strength in dairy prices, particularly the nearly 20% year-over-year increase, combined with declining feed costs, creates exceptional profit opportunities for dairy producers in 2025. To maximize returns in this favorable environment, consider these strategic approaches:
Monitor Feed Grain Prices Against Milkfat Premiums
With cereal prices declining while butter values surge, the spread between input costs and component-based revenue streams is widening. This creates opportunities to optimize feeding programs that maximize valuable components rather than simply volume.
Consult Breeding Specialists to Align Genetics with Market Demands
The current market particularly rewards butterfat production. With butterfat’s high heritability (about 50%), genetic selection can significantly impact your herd’s ability to capitalize on current market conditions.
Implement Precision Feeding Strategies
Research shows that fiber and starch digestibility improvements can significantly impact production efficiency. Michigan State researchers found that for every percentage-unit increase in NDF digestibility, cows produced 0.51 lb/d more milk.
The March 2025 FAO Food Price Index reflects a complex global food market with divergent trends across commodity groups. Combining strong dairy prices and declining feed costs for dairy producers creates a uniquely favorable profit environment that rewards strategic management decisions focused on component optimization, efficient feed utilization, and aligned breeding strategies.
Milk consumption plummets 40% since 1970s! Senate battles to bring whole milk back to schools—discover how this impacts dairy farmers’ profits and genetics.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Senate Agriculture Committee’s hearing on the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act revealed a stark 40% decline in adolescent milk consumption since the 1970s, linked to the 2012 school milk fat restrictions. New science debunks old fat-phobia myths, showing no obesity or heart risks from whole milk consumption. If passed, the bipartisan bill could reverse decades of lost demand, boost farm revenues via component pricing, and reshape breeding strategies for higher milkfat yields. Producers must adapt genetics and advocate now—schools waste 2.6B lbs of milk annually, while global competitors like the EU already prioritize whole milk in cafeterias.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Consumption Crisis: Only 35% of teens drink milk daily vs. 75% in the 1970s—a $2.6B annual waste issue.
Science Shift: Modern research shows dairy fat doesn’t harm heart health or cause obesity in kids.
Profit Potential: Schools could drive 3-5% higher Class I milk demand, rewarding farms breeding for butterfat.
Genetic Edge: Holstein fat % jumped 0.31% in a decade; crossbreeding and DGAT1 gene selection maximize gains.
Act Now: Contact Senate Ag leaders to pass legislation—your milk check could rise $127K/year per 1,000 cows.
In a packed Senate Agriculture Committee hearing on April 1, USDA officials dropped a bombshell statistic: American adolescent milk consumption has plummeted from 75% in the 1970s to a dismal 35% today. This alarming decline comes directly after a 2012 federal ban on whole and 2% milk in school cafeterias. This restriction might soon be overturned as the bipartisan Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act gains momentum. With 30 million daily school lunches at stake and billions in potential dairy revenue on the line, the hearing showcased mounting scientific evidence challenging the decade-old “fat phobia” that removed fuller-fat dairy options from America’s schools.
The Dairy Consumption Crisis
The hearing quickly centered on troubling nutritional trends that have emerged since whole and 2% milk were banned from school lunch programs in 2012. Dr. Eve Stoody, Director of Nutrition Guidance with USDA, presented sobering statistics about America’s deteriorating relationship with dairy products.
“In adolescents, the percent reporting drinking milk was about 75 percent in the 1970s, just under 50 percent in the early 2000s, and the most recent data suggests that about 35 percent of adolescents report drinking milk on any given day,” Stoody testified. This represents a staggering 40-percentage-point decline over five decades.
Even more alarming, Dr. Stoody revealed that 90% of Americans don’t consume the daily recommended amount of dairy. The problem is particularly acute among school-aged children, with research showing between 68% and 94% of school-age boys and girls fail to meet recommended daily intake levels. This widespread underconsumption cuts across demographic groups and directly impacts nutritional status during critical developmental years.
“Across the board, current consumptions need to increase, so whatever the form is, we need to have greater consumption of dairy,” emphasized Dr. Stoody. The timing of these consumption declines correlates directly with the 2012 nutritional guidelines that removed whole and 2% milk from federal school meal programs.
The Home-School Milk Disconnect
One of the most compelling arguments presented during the hearing highlighted the disconnect between milk options available in schools and what children consume at home. Executive Vice President of the International Dairy Foods Association Matt Herrick testified that “83% of shoppers purchase whole and 2% milk for their families” for home consumption. This creates a double nutritional standard where children are offered milk different from what they’re accustomed to drinking at home and school.
This mismatch potentially undermines consumption patterns and contributes to declining milk consumption overall. When schools can only offer fat-free and 1% options while families predominantly purchase whole and 2% milk at home, children receive conflicting nutritional messages.
Evolving Science Challenges Old Assumptions
Kansas Senator Roger Marshall, a physician and chairman of the Make America Healthy Again Caucus, raised concerns about the need for healthy fats in children’s diets and noted troubling increases in osteoporosis cases linked to reduced bone mass density.
Pediatric nutritionist Dr. Keith Ayoob delivered pivotal testimony challenging the scientific foundation of the 2012 restrictions. “The body of credible nutrition science has evolved,” Dr. Ayoob testified. “It no longer supports the previous policy of only allowing fat-free and low-fat milk in schools.”
Dr. Ayoob presented evidence directly contradicting previous assumptions about dairy fat and children’s health. “A systematic review of studies that looked at cardiometabolic health in children ages 2 to 18 years found that consumption of dairy products, including whole and reduced-fat milk, had no association with cardiometabolic risk,” he explained.
This represents a significant shift in understanding since 2012 when the USDA specifically removed whole and 2% milk to keep saturated fat levels below 10% in school meals. Dr. Stoody acknowledged that “part of the reasoning for the 2012 Nutritional Guidelines was because of the limited room for the extra calories in high-fat dairy products.”
The Nutritional Matrix in Milk Fat
The hearing delved into the unique nutritional properties of dairy fat that weren’t fully understood when the 2012 restrictions were implemented. Recent research indicates that dairy fat doesn’t exist in isolation but as part of a “dairy protein-fat matrix” that the body processes differently than other saturated fats. In this form, dairy fat appears less likely to increase bad cholesterol and may even reduce harmful lipid fractions.
Moreover, testimony highlighted that consumption of whole milk has not been associated with increased obesity rates in children, directly challenging one of the primary concerns that led to the 2012 restrictions.
Farm Economics: What Whole Milk Legislation Means for Your Bottom Line
The economic implications of the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act extend far beyond school cafeterias—they reach directly into the milk checks of America’s dairy farmers. With school meal programs providing nearly 30 million lunches and 15 million breakfasts daily, this legislation could significantly boost dairy demand nationwide and restore critical revenue streams for producers.
Potential Market Impact
The math is straightforward: schools represent one of America’s largest institutional milk markets. When whole and 2% milk were banned in 2012, consumption plummeted as students rejected the taste of fat-free alternatives. This created a double economic hit—dairy farmers lost volume while schools wasted significant quantities of undrunk milk.
A USDA study shows that school meal programs provide 77% of daily dairy milk consumption for low-income children aged 5-18. With the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, this massive institutional market could transition from primarily fat-free to higher-component milk options, creating multiple revenue advantages for producers:
Higher Component Utilization: Milk pricing formulas reward butterfat and protein—the very components that would see increased demand
Reduced Waste: Students consume more of what they enjoy, reducing the estimated 2.6 billion pounds of milk currently wasted annually in schools
Long-term Consumer Development: Children who develop taste preferences for dairy in school become lifelong consumers
For the average producer, this translates to potentially higher milk prices through Federal Milk Marketing Order component pricing. While exact projections vary by region, industry analysts suggest the legislation could increase Class I utilization rates by 3-5% nationally while raising average component values.
Breeding Implications: Selecting for Butter Fat in a Whole Milk Future
The potential shift in school milk policy comes at a fascinating moment in dairy genetics. Over the past decade, the industry has rushed toward higher component production, creating a perfect alignment between consumer demand, policy changes, and genetic selection.
The Component Revolution
Data from DHIA testing shows remarkable progress in boosting milk components through breeding:
Breed
Milkfat % 2010
Milkfat % 2020
Change
Holstein
3.65%
3.96%
+0.31%
Jersey
4.69%
4.82%
+0.13%
The genomics revolution has accelerated this progress. According to industry experts, Holstein milk fat percentages have continued climbing to approximately 4% as of 2025, representing a stunning half-percentage point increase in just a decade and a half. This rapid progress is no accident—it reflects deliberate selection pressure enabled by genomic testing and the economic incentives of component pricing.
The DGAT1 Effect
At the genetic level, this transformation has been driven partly by selection for specific genes that control fat synthesis. Most notably, the DGAT1 gene plays a crucial role in assembling fatty acids in the udder. Breeders have increasingly selected the high-fat version of this gene, helping overcome the traditional genetic antagonism between milk volume and fat percentage.
Holstein Association USA reported that the correlation between milk production and fat percentage—historically around -0.60—has shifted to approximately -0.30 in recent years. This means today’s elite genetics can deliver higher volume and higher components, previously thought impossible.
Strategic Breeding Decisions
Forward-thinking producers should consider these breeding strategies to position their herds for a whole milk future:
Prioritize Fat Yield + Percentage: Select sires that boost both total fat pounds and fat percentage
Consider Crossbreeding Options: F1 Holstein-Jersey crosses deliver component advantages while maintaining volume
Balance Component Traits: Look for bulls that maintain protein levels alongside fat improvements
Emphasize Feed Efficiency: Higher component production requires efficient conversion of feed to milk solids
Many progressive breeders are already finding success with these approaches. Holstein-Jersey crossbreeds (or F1s) are gaining popularity, with some AI organizations reporting sales of 5,000 units monthly of F1 semen. These animals produce milk with approximately 4.25% fat while maintaining a reasonable volume.
Producer Action Plan: Five Steps to Prepare for Whole Milk Legislation
Please make your voice heard where it matters. The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) has established an advocacy campaign connecting producers directly with their elected officials. Visit www.nmpf.org/take-action/ to contact your senators and representatives, urging them to support the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act.
2. Adjust Your Breeding Program
Review your genetic selection criteria with your breeding specialist. Prioritize bulls with superior fat and protein genetic evaluations, particularly those with positive deviations in both volume and components. Consider these breeding approaches:
Holstein herds: Select for bulls with fat percentages >0.20% PTA
Jersey herds: Focus on combined fat and protein yield
Crossbreeding: Evaluate F1 Holstein-Jersey options for component advantages
3. Optimize Nutrition for Components
Work with your nutritionist to fine-tune rations for maximum component production through these proven strategies:
Consider dietary fat supplements like rumen-protected fat
Monitor feeding management: bunk space, feed pushups, and feed availability
4. Engage With Local Schools
Build relationships with school nutrition directors in your area to understand how they might implement expanded milk options:
Offer farm tours for school nutrition professionals
Provide educational materials about dairy nutrition
Discuss potential sourcing arrangements if the legislation passes
Support infrastructure needs for milk dispensers or refrigeration
5. Prepare for Market Transitions
The transition to whole milk in schools won’t happen overnight. Make these operational adjustments to maximize opportunities:
Review your milk marketing arrangements for component optimization
Consider maintaining flexibility in production if component premiums increase
Monitor regional processing capacity for higher-fat milk products
Develop contingency plans for seasonal adjustments to school milk demand
Global Context: How Other Countries Handle School Milk
Several witnesses referenced international approaches to school milk programs that could inform U.S. policy. Unlike the restrictive U.S. approach, the European School Milk Scheme provides subsidies for whole and reduced-fat milk options, recognizing their nutritional value for growing children.
Canada has similarly maintained flexibility in its school milk programs, allowing provincial and local authorities greater discretion in milk options. These international examples demonstrate that restrictive fat policies are not universal and that alternative approaches prioritize overall dairy consumption.
Most European dairy producers benefit from this more flexible policy approach, with school milk providing a stable market for dairy products across fat specifications. This contributes to stronger dairy consumption patterns in countries with flexible school milk standards.
Voices of Opposition
While support for the legislation was strong among committee members and most witnesses, opposing viewpoints were also presented. The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, representing 17,000 doctor members, expressed concerns that the legislation prioritizes dairy industry profits over health considerations.
“Congress should be putting less saturated fat on school lunch trays, not more, and it can do that by making it easier for students to access nondairy beverages and plant-based entrees,” stated Neal Barnard, MD, President of the Physicians Committee.
This opposition highlights the ongoing debate about saturated fat in the American diet and reflects evolving nutritional understanding. Proponents of the bill countered that the legislation provides more options than mandating higher-fat milk consumption, allowing students and parents to choose based on their dietary needs and preferences.
Legislative Momentum Building
The Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act has garnered impressive bipartisan support. The House of Representatives previously passed the legislation with an overwhelming vote of 330-99 in December 2023, demonstrating broad support across party lines. More recently, in February 2025, the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce passed the current version by a decisive 24-10 vote.
Bipartisan sponsors, including Reps, introduced the 2025 version of the bill. Glenn “GT” Thompson (R-Pennsylvania) and Kim Schrier (D-Washington) in the House, and Sens. Roger Marshall (R-Kansas), Peter Welch (D-Vermont), Dave McCormick (R-Pennsylvania) and John Fetterman (D-Pennsylvania) in the Senate.
In his opening statement at the hearing, Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman John Boozman (R-AR) emphasized the bill’s strong support: “This bill, which would permit schools to offer students whole, reduced-fat, low-fat, and fat-free flavored and unflavored milk, has enjoyed strong bipartisan support in both the House and Senate, including from many members on this committee.”
If passed, the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act would:
Allow schools to offer whole, reduced-fat, low-fat, and fat-free flavored and unflavored milk
Exempt fluid milk from saturated fat content calculations for school meals
Provide greater flexibility to school nutrition programs while maintaining nutritional standards
Herd Management Strategies to Maximize Component Production
For producers looking to capitalize on the potential shift toward higher-fat milk in schools, implementing proper management practices alongside genetic improvements is essential. Research shows that environment and management account for approximately two-thirds of the improvements in Holstein fat percentages in recent years.
The CowSignals Approach
Industry experts recommend the CowSignals methodology to optimize cow comfort for maximum component production:
Feed Space: Provide at least 24 inches of bunk space per cow to maximize intake
Water Access: Ensure clean, accessible water with 3-4 inches of linear space per cow
Light Management: Maintain 16-18 hours of light followed by 6-8 hours of darkness
Air Quality: Proper ventilation reduces heat stress that can depress components
Rest: Target 12-14 hours of lying time in comfortable stalls
Space: Avoid overcrowding, which reduces lying time and feed intake
Critical Management Factors
During the transition to potentially higher-fat milk demand, focus on these key management areas:
Heat Stress Mitigation: Components drop significantly during heat stress; invest in cooling systems, including fans, sprinklers, and shade
Mastitis Prevention: Clinical and subclinical mastitis dramatically reduce fat test; prioritize milking hygiene and udder health
Feed Timing and Availability: Push the feed 6-8 times daily and ensure 24-hour access.
Consistent Routines: Minimize stress by maintaining consistent milking times and handling practices
What’s Next for Whole Milk in Schools?
Following this hearing, the Senate Agriculture Committee will likely vote on whether to advance the legislation to the entire Senate floor. Given the strong bipartisan support already demonstrated in the House, prospects for passage appear promising.
Michael Dykes, President and CEO of the International Dairy Foods Association, urged swift action: “It’s time for Congress to pass the Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act and bring whole and 2% milk back to schools.”
The legislation represents a potential turning point for America’s dairy farmers after more than a decade of restricted school milk options and declining consumption. If passed, the bill would create immediate demand for dairy products while helping establish consumption patterns that could benefit the industry for future generations.
The testimony makes clear that this isn’t just about producer profits—it’s about reversing troubling nutritional trends and ensuring American children have access to the full range of dairy options they need for optimal growth and development. As nutritional science continues to evolve, so too must policies that affect the health and well-being of our nation’s youth.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
50% of U.S. dairies have vanished since 2013. Will yours survive the next bloodbath? The math doesn’t care about tradition – adapt or die.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The U.S. dairy industry’s consolidation is accelerating, with half of all farms disappearing since 2013 and another 50% projected to vanish by 2035. Survival hinges on scaling to 1,000+ cows or pivoting to niche markets like organic/grass-fed production while leveraging cost-slashing techs like robotics and genomics. Mega-dairies now dominate 70% of milk output, leaving smaller farms battling volatile prices and 34% higher feed costs. Brutal economics favor radical growth or hyper-specialization, with collaboration and tech adoption becoming non-negotiable. The clock is ticking farms must choose their path now or join the 4% annual closure rate.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Consolidation is accelerating: Industry half-life shrunk from 12 to 10 years – 12,000 farms will remain by 2035.
Tech is the great equalizer: Robotics, genomics, and methane digesters separate winners from casualties.
Collaborate or perish: Resource-sharing cooperatives and collective bargaining offset consolidation pressures.
No middle ground: Operators must commit to growth or specialization – hesitation guarantees obsolescence.
The numbers don’t lie: 50% of U.S. dairy farms vanished between 2013 and 2025. If that gut-punch statistic doesn’t rattle you, consider this—the industry’s consolidation “half-life” is accelerating. What took 12 years to cull half our farms now happens in 10. By 2035, only 12,000 dairies will remain. The question isn’t whether consolidation will claim more farms but whose. Are you evolving fast enough to outpace the 4% annual closure rate, crushing your neighbors? Let’s pull no punches: survival demands radical adaptation.
The Great Dairy Shakeout: By the Numbers
Here’s the cold reality:
Milk production surged 25.3 billion pounds since 2013, but 48 states lost dairy farms.
Texas added 195,000 cows while traditional strongholds like California bled operations.
80% of farms milk <500 cows, yet 70% of U.S. milk flows from 1,000+ herd mega-dairies.
This isn’t your grandfather’s industry. The USDA confirms what every farmer feels: scale equals survival. Herds under 500 cows face average costs exceeding milk prices, while 2,000+ cow operations turn profits. Dennis Rodenbaugh, CEO of Dairy Farmers of America (DFA), says, “Anticipating disruption isn’t optional. You build bridges to the future or get washed away”.
Scale or Fail: The New Reality of Milk Production
Forget ‘if’—ask ‘how fast’ you’ll scale. The 1,000-cow threshold isn’t arbitrary. USDA data shows these herds achieve 18% lower production costs than 500-cow operations through bulk purchasing, robotic efficiencies, and negotiating power.
But growth ain’t for the faint-hearted. Rodenbaugh warns, “Get disciplined or get out. The storm separating winners from casualties is accelerating”. Case in point: Midwest families selling out to Panhandle conglomerates where 25,000 cow goliaths churn out milk cheaper than Wisconsin’s pastures ever could.
The Price of Standing Still:
Feed costs up 34% since 2020
Heifer replacement expenses doubling
Milk price volatility swinging ±25% annually
“You’re either acquiring neighbors or becoming acquired,” says a fourth-gen Wisconsin dairyman who tripled his herd to 900 cows. “My kids won’t survive on 300-head nostalgia.”
Beyond Expansion: Alternative Paths Through the Storm
Not everyone can—or should—chase mega-dairy status. For sub-500 herds, niching down beats scaling up:
1. Organic Premium Play
Organic milk fetches $32.69/cwt vs. $21.50 conventional
But tread carefully: transitioning requires 3 years and $150K+ certification costs
2. Grass-Fed Guerrilla Tactics
Direct-to-consumer raw milk sales bypass processors, capturing a 300% markup
Caveat: Regulatory landmines lurk in 38 states
3. Tech-Enabled Micro-Dairies
Robotic milkers slashed labor by 40% for a 150-cow Vermont operation
AI breeding algorithms boosted conception rates by 22%
Sarah Lloyd, a Wisconsin dairy advocate, argues: “We’ve romanticized ‘get big or get out.’ Smart-small dairies leveraging tech and margins can outmaneuver dinosaurs”.
The Innovators: Tech Titans Reshaping Dairy
Game-changing tools separating survivors from the bankrupt:
Technology
Cost Range
ROI Timeline
Herd Size Suitability
Automated Feed Systems
$50K–$200K
2–4 years
500+ cows
Methane Digesters
$1M–$5M
5–7 years
1,000+ cows
Genomics Testing
$25/head
Immediate
All sizes
Robotic Milkers
$150K–$250K/unit
3–5 years
100–500 cows
Texas’s 5,000-cow colossus slashed labor costs by 60% via drones monitoring herd health. Meanwhile, Idaho’s 120-cow boutique dairy uses blockchain to trace grass-fed butter to Manhattan chefs at $12/lb.
The Bottom Line: Blood, Sweat, and 4% Annual Decline
Dairy’s Darwinian reckoning won’t pause for sentiment. Here’s your survival checklist:
Crunch your half-life math: If scaling to 1,000+ cows seems impossible, pivot to hyper-specialization now.
Embrace ‘coopetition’: Pool resources with neighbors for bulk inputs, tech sharing, and collective bargaining.
Bet on genomics: Top 1% genetics can boost yields 2,000+ lbs/cow annually.
Rodenbaugh’s final word? “The dairy game isn’t dying—it’s evolving. Future winners think in decades, not seasons”.
Your move. Will you be among the 12,000 left in 2035—or a statistic in The Bullvine’s following obituary for America’s heartland?
Dairy Product Alternatives: What is the Situation? Dive into the impact of plant-based dairy alternatives on traditional milk markets and learn how producers are fighting back to protect their industry.
Join the Revolution!
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Ozempic users are ditching chips for cottage cheese. Discover how dairy farmers are turning weight-loss drugs into a $25B protein gold rush.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The American dairy industry is capitalizing on three converging forces – GLP-1 medications driving protein demand, MAHA’s pro-real-food policies, and genomic breeding breakthroughs – to dominate the $25B protein snack revolution. While plant-based competitors scramble to reformulate under new ultra-processed food definitions, dairy leverages its natural muscle-preserving advantages and component-focused genetics. Farmers must prioritize high-protein breeding strategies, clean-label reformulations, and targeted marketing to healthcare providers as 57% of weight-loss drug users maintain or increase dairy consumption. The sector faces economic headwinds, but strategic positioning in this protein shift offers a lifeline for operations optimizing milk components.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
GLP-1 Synergy: Dairy proteins naturally stimulate appetite-regulating hormones while combating medication-induced muscle loss
MAHA Momentum: New food policies threaten plant-based alternatives but favor clean-label dairy with $1.7T federal spending power
Genetic Edge: Holstein breeding programs now achieve both high yield and protein content through advanced genomic selection
Plant-Based Counter: Pea protein grows at 12.78% CAGR but faces MAHA scrutiny over processing methods
Economic Imperative: With milk prices falling, component-focused production determines survival in volatile markets
Forget everything you know about diet trends. While Silicon Valley pours billions into miracle weight-loss injections and plant-based startups, America’s dairy farmers are quietly executing the greatest nutritional comeback story of our generation. As consumers ditch chips for cottage cheese and chug protein shakes instead of sodas, the real question isn’t whether dairy will survive the 2020s – it’s how processors are turning GLP-1 medications and government policy into a protein gold rush projected to reach $24.81 billion by 2031, growing at 6.71% annually according to Verified Market Research.
THE PROTEIN POWER PLAY: HOW DAIRY OUTSMARTED BIG SNACK
The snack aisle isn’t what it used to be. Where neon-orange cheese puffs once reigned supreme, you’ll now find Greek yogurt tubes and single-serve cottage cheese cups flying off shelves. This isn’t just health-conscious millennials at work – it’s a perfect storm of biology, policy, and old-fashioned farming savvy rewriting the rules of food marketing.
GLP-1 Drugs: Big Pharma’s Unlikely Dairy Boost
The Ozempic effect isn’t killing appetites – it’s reshaping them. New data from Cornell University and Numerator reveals GLP-1 users aren’t just eating less, they’re eating smarter:
11% drop in salty snack purchases
8.6% decline in fast food spending
57% maintaining or increasing dairy consumption
“Protein isn’t optional for these patients – it’s medical necessity,” explains Dr. Chen, co-author of groundbreaking research showing dairy proteins stimulate natural GLP-1 production. “That 6oz cup of Greek yogurt isn’t just breakfast – it’s helping maintain muscle mass during rapid weight loss.”
This biological connection isn’t coincidental. Peer-reviewed research published in the Journal of Nutrition has demonstrated that dairy proteins – particularly leucine and isoleucine – directly stimulate GLP-1 release in vitro. In controlled studies, skim milk and casein increased GLP-1 secretion by 176% to 270%, while leucine boosted levels by a remarkable 474% above control groups.
DAIRY’S PROTEIN PAYDAY Product
Protein/serving
GLP-1 User Recommendation
Greek Yogurt
17g
20-40g protein per meal
Cottage Cheese
12g
1.3-1.6g protein per kg bodyweight
Filtered Milk
13g
Combined with resistance training
Medical experts now recommend GLP-1 users consume 20-40 grams of protein per meal to combat the concerning muscle loss associated with these medications. Research shows that during treatment, patients can experience reductions of skeletal muscle mass ranging from 20% to 40% of total weight lost – a side effect that only 35% of users are even aware of according to recent studies.
MAHA’S MILK MANDATE: HOW POLITICS FUELS THE DAIRY BOOM
While activists rage about ultra-processed foods (UPFs), the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) initiative is doing what no marketing campaign could – putting whole milk back in schools and cheese boards back in fashion.
Key MAHA Impacts:
$1.7 trillion federal spending power targeting “clean” foods
“MAHA isn’t anti-science – it’s pro-real food,” argues MAHA Action spokesperson Helena Bottemiller Evich, founder of Food Fix. “The MAHA agenda includes a focus on food and nutrition, food chemicals, food dyes, and different substances that are allowed in foods in the U.S., but are not allowed in other countries.”
The implications for dairy processors are significant. As Hoard’s Dairyman reports, “The supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) and school lunch program are a target where processed foods are proposed to be banned from school lunch programs, which would be a large change. Dairy is a key part of the school lunch program, and to meet USDA standards of the meals, processed foods are a part of this program, yet the definition of processed can vary.”
This regulatory uncertainty creates both opportunities and risks. While traditional dairy products stand to benefit, the lack of clear definitions around “processed” and “ultra-processed” foods leaves many dairy manufacturers vulnerable, particularly those producing flavored yogurts, processed cheeses, and dairy-based desserts.
The numbers don’t lie:
69% of consumers demand recognizable ingredients in yogurt
30% surge in European cottage cheese sales
California’s $50 billion cattle, poultry and associated products industry leading the protein revolution
FROM COWS TO GENETICS: BREEDING FOR PROTEIN DOMINANCE
The Changing Milk-Fat Relationship
The dairy industry’s genetic revolution is reshaping what’s possible in the protein market. As Hoard’s Dairyman reports, “We have long known that there is a genetic antagonism between milk yield and the percentages of fat and protein. Bulls and cows with high predicted transmitting ability (PTA) for milk have tended to be lower than average when it comes to PTA fat percent.”
However, this relationship is fundamentally changing. Recent data shows the correlation between PTA milk and fat percentage has shifted dramatically in Holsteins – from approximately -0.60 for decades to about -0.30 today. This means dairy farmers can now select for both high milk production and high components, a previously difficult combination.
“Selecting for β-casein A2 increased our milk protein yield by 0.2% last season,” notes Holstein breeder Mark Stephenson, whose Wisconsin operation has focused on component-rich genetics since 2020.
Genomic Selection’s Protein Revolution
The industry’s embrace of genomic selection has fundamentally altered what’s possible in breeding programs. Meta-analysis of sequence variant genotypes across 94,321 cattle from eight breeds has identified 138 quantitative trait loci (QTL) for fat percentage and 176 QTL for protein percentage – giving breeders unprecedented precision in selecting for high-protein genetics.
Chinese Holstein research has further identified specific microRNAs that regulate milk protein synthesis, with differentially expressed miRNA genes showing significant enrichment with genome-wide association study (GWAS) signals for milk protein percentage traits.
For dairy farmers looking to capitalize on the protein trend, breeding decisions made today will determine profitability for years to come. The current version of Net Merit (NM$) places a 28.6% weight on fat yield, making it the most heavily weighted trait in selection programs – but protein’s economic value continues to rise.
3 FEED ADJUSTMENTS TO BOOST MILK PROTEIN
Rumen-Protected Amino Acids Supplementing with rumen-protected methionine can increase milk protein by 0.1-0.3 percentage points while improving overall nitrogen efficiency.
Optimized Energy-to-Protein Ratio Balancing fermentable carbohydrates with degradable protein ensures maximum microbial protein synthesis in the rumen.
Strategic Fat Supplementation Carefully selected fat supplements can increase energy density without suppressing microbial protein production.
THE MUSCLE PRESERVATION MANDATE: DAIRY’S CLINICAL ADVANTAGE
The GLP-1 Muscle Crisis
The medical community is sounding alarms about a hidden side effect of GLP-1 medications – significant muscle loss. Clinical studies show that during treatment, patients lose 20-40% of their total weight from muscle rather than fat, a concerning trend that threatens long-term metabolic health.
“This isn’t just a cosmetic concern,” warns Dr. Sarah Reimer, endocrinologist and weight management specialist. “Muscle plays a key role in overall metabolism, and losing it can lead to complications such as increased fatigue and impaired physical capabilities. In particular, older adults may face heightened risks due to existing vulnerabilities.”
Dairy’s Scientific Solution
This medical challenge creates a perfect opportunity for dairy proteins. Clinical research shows that to combat muscle loss, GLP-1 users should:
Consume 1.3-1.6 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight daily
Aim for 20-40 grams of protein per meal
Combine protein intake with resistance training 2-3 times weekly
Dairy products are uniquely positioned to meet these needs. The biological mechanism is clear: dairy proteins stimulate muscle protein synthesis while simultaneously enhancing the body’s natural GLP-1 response – creating a synergistic effect that plant proteins cannot match.
“The combination of casein and whey provides both slow and fast-digesting proteins,” explains nutritionist Dr. Miguel Freitas. “This creates an optimal amino acid delivery system for muscle preservation during weight loss.”
THE PLANT-BASED COUNTERATTACK: HOW COMPETITORS ARE RESPONDING
While dairy enjoys significant advantages in the protein revolution, plant-based competitors aren’t sitting idle. The pea protein market is projected to reach $7.13 billion by 2033, growing at an impressive 12.78% CAGR according to Plant Based World Pulse.
PURIS Leads the Pea Revolution
Minnesota-based PURIS has emerged as a formidable competitor in the protein space. Originally a seed supplier for farmers, the company now vertically integrates across the entire supply chain, providing high-quality pea protein for applications ranging from plant-based meats to beverages.
Their flagship innovation, AcreMade, is a plant-based egg product made entirely from their proprietary pea protein blend – directly competing with dairy in the high-protein breakfast category.
Pea Protein’s Compelling Case
Plant-based advocates point to several advantages of pea protein:
Allergen-Friendly: Unlike dairy, pea protein is hypoallergenic, catering to consumers with specific dietary restrictions
Sustainability: Pea cultivation requires less water and fertilizer than other protein sources
Nutritional Profile: Recent innovations have addressed previous limitations in amino acid profiles
A 2025 study published in the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture highlights pea protein’s nutritional credentials. Researchers found that pea-based products can provide up to 32.8% of caloric content from protein, qualifying for “high in protein” labeling under regulatory standards.
However, pea protein faces significant challenges under MAHA’s ultra-processed food definitions. Most commercial pea protein isolates undergo extensive processing, potentially triggering regulatory scrutiny and consumer hesitation as clean-label awareness grows.
FROM COWS TO COMMERCIALS: DAIRY’S DOUBLE-BARRELED STRATEGY
Innovation Engine
While startups flounder, Big Dairy is reinventing shelf-stable nutrition:
Lindahls‘ protein pudding cups (UK)
Saputo‘s high-protein cheddar innovations
Fairlife‘s ultra-filtered protein shakes
“Consumers want more than macros,” says Arla’s product lead Sarah Jensen. “They want texture, convenience, and that visceral connection to real food.”
Marketing Masterclass
Danone’s Super Bowl playbook shows where the game’s headed:
Partnered with 200+ dietitians for GLP-1 nutrition guides
Launched Oikos “Stronger Together” campaign during peak weight-loss Rx discussions
Saw 50% social media spike in protein conversations post-game
THE REGULATORY MINEFIELD: NAVIGATING MAHA’S IMPACT
The MAHA Commission, established by President Donald Trump, has significantly expanded Secretary Kennedy’s authority beyond just HHS to include other agencies, including the USDA. This cross-agency approach gives the initiative unprecedented muscle to implement sweeping changes to America’s food system by August 2025.
For dairy processors, the regulatory landscape presents significant challenges:
Food Additive Bans Accelerating
California has already passed legislation banning specific food additives, including Red Dye 3, brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, and propylparaben, from all food sales in the state starting January 1, 2027. Another bill bans six synthetic food dyes from foods in California public schools beginning in 2028.
Processed Cheese Products Under Scrutiny
If shelf-stable cheese products with extensive ingredient lists are categorized as UPFs, they may face scrutiny and declining consumer acceptance. This trend may push manufacturers toward reformulations with cleaner labels.
Forward-thinking dairy businesses should accelerate clean-label initiatives for processed products, removing artificial additives and simplifying ingredient lists. According to research by Ingredion, 69% of US consumers want to see “made with recognizable ingredients” claims on yogurt, dairy alternative yogurts, ice cream, and processed cheese packaging.
ECONOMIC REALITIES: DAIRY’S CHALLENGING LANDSCAPE
While protein demand creates opportunities, dairy farmers face significant economic headwinds. According to the USDA’s Economic Research Service, the dairy sector experienced an 81% drop in farm-level income in 2023 – almost twice the decline seen in poultry (-43%) and hogs (-39%).
The USDA’s April 2024 Livestock, Dairy, and Poultry Outlook projects the all-milk price for 2024 at $20.90 per cwt, down $0.35 from the previous month’s forecast. With production expenses remaining elevated and commodity prices under pressure, many operations face challenging profit margins.
This economic reality makes strategic positioning in the protein market even more critical. Farms that can optimize for component production while controlling costs will be best positioned to weather the current downturn.
THE BOTTOM LINE: YOUR DAIRY FUTURE IN 3 ACTIONS
Breed for Protein Power Select bulls with positive PTA for both milk volume and components – the genetic antagonism is weakening.
Reformulate or Perish With multiple states advancing food additive bans, clean-label dairy is no longer optional.
Target the GLP-1 Consumer Position high-protein dairy as the scientifically-validated solution to preserve muscle mass.
The Final Word? While Silicon Valley chases lab-grown protein pipedreams, real dairy farmers are doing what they’ve always done – delivering nature’s perfect food. The question isn’t whether to join this revolution, but how fast you can scale.
“This isn’t a trend – it’s the new American diet,” concludes National Dairy Council CEO Barbara O’Brien. “And every glass of milk poured is a vote for real food in the fake food wars.”
Learn more:
GLP-1 Weight-Loss Drugs Reshape Dairy Demand Analyzes how Ozempic users are shifting from calorie-dense cheeses to protein-rich yogurts, with strategies for farmers to adapt to changing consumer habits.
Unleashing Dairy’s Protein Potential Explores dairy’s scientific edge over plant-based alternatives and how protein-focused innovation (like Fairlife) is driving premium pricing and market growth.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
U.S. milk production crashes to 1960s lows – discover how heat-resistant super-cows and Texan dairy rebels are rewriting the rulebook.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: U.S. milk production has declined for two consecutive years for the first time since the 1960s, driven by extreme heat slashing cow productivity and regional herd redistribution. Texas and South Dakota herds grew 7% in 2024 through heat-tolerant “slick gene” genetics and lower cooling costs, while California collapsed (-9.2 %) under water shortages and HPAI outbreaks. The article reveals how forward-thinking operations combine precision cooling tech (11-month ROI), HSP70 gene testing, and methane-reducing diets to achieve $23.41/cwt margins. With ethanol policies inflating feed costs by 19% since 2022, survival hinges on breeding heat-proof cows and relocating to states offering water security and modern processing infrastructure. The future belongs to herds prioritizing butterfat/protein premiums over raw milk volume.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Heat costs $2.4B/year: Every 1°F above 72°F cuts milk yield 0.8 lbs/day and future heifer productivity by 12%
Texas model dominates: 40k new cows, 30% lower cooling costs, and methane-efficient herds out-earn traditional regions 3:1
Slick gene revolution: Heat-adapted Holsteins produce 6.8 lbs more milk/day in heatwaves and breed faster (92% conception vs 74%)
Ethanol hidden tax: 2022 policy expansions added $216k/year in feed costs for 1,000-cow herds
Profit through components: Herds focusing on fat/protein earn $1.72/cwt premiums despite lower output
U.S. dairy has hit a milestone we haven’t seen since bellbottoms were in fashion – milk production dropping for two years straight. The numbers tell the story: 2024 production fell to 225.85 billion pounds, down 0.2% from 2023. This back-to-back decline marks the first consecutive drop since the 1960s. Three forces are reshaping dairy: 1) Heat waves slashing cow productivity by up to 25% in un-cooled herds, 2) Texas/South Dakota herds growing 7% while California tanked 9.2%, and 3) Genetic breakthroughs helping elite cows maintain production in 100°F heat. The solution? Operators combining cutting-edge cooling tech with slick-gene genetics are beating the crisis – here’s how.
The slick gene revolution changes the equation. Cows carrying this mutation (originally from Senepol beef cattle) maintain rumen temperatures 1°F cooler than counterparts in 85°F heat. University of Florida trials showed slick Holsteins producing 6.8 lbs more milk/day during summer peaks versus conventional herds.
Regional Shakeup Reshapes Dairy Geography
Texas added 40,000 cows in 2024, while California lost 38,000 heads. The reason? Relocated herds gain triple advantages:
30% lower cooling costs in high-elevation regions
$0.15/bu feed cost savings near Corn Belt processing plants
Reduced methane output (4.8% lower per cwt in Texas herds) from heat-adapted genetics
GENETIC GAME-CHANGERS: BUILDING HEAT-PROOF HERDS
Slick Gene Dominates Thermal Performance
LIC’s seven-year breeding program proved slick-gene Holsteins:
Maintain 92% conception rates vs 74% in non-slick herds at 82°F
Show 0.5°F lower vaginal temperatures during peak heat
Produce milk with 0.12% higher butterfat in thermal stress
But the real jackpot lies in combining slick traits with HSP70 genes. Cows with both features show 18% lower respiration rates and 23% faster heat recovery versus either trait alone.
Genomic Gold: BTA14’s Heat Tolerance Cluster
The 2023 WssGWAS study identified 14 QTLs on chromosome 14 linked to thermal resilience. Top performers share:
HSF1 variants boosting heat shock protein production
DGAT1 alleles maintain milk fat under stress
HSPA6 mutations enhancing cellular repair
Bulls carrying these markers now dominate genomic indexes, with Select Sires’ Slick-GTPI lineup averaging +325 NM$ despite 98°F test conditions.
MARGIN MISERY: ETHANOL’S HIDDEN IMPACT
While heat hammers production, Washington’s ethanol mandates quietly siphon profits. USDA ERS data shows dairy feed costs jumping 19% since 2022 ethanol expansions. For a 1,000-cow herd, $216,000/year vanished into gas tanks.
Yet regenerative grazing advocates counter with surprising data: Rotational systems lower rumen temperatures by 1.4°F through increased evaporative cooling. Dr. Frank Mitloehner’s UC Davis team found that methane-capture breeds reduce thermal strain by 8% through improved metabolic efficiency.
WINNING TACTICS: PROFITING IN THE FURNACE
Precision Cooling ROI Breakdown
Texas A&M’s 2024 study proved three upgrades pay the fastest:
Technology
Cost/Cow
Milk Gain
Payback
High-volume fans
$85
+4.2 lbs
14 months
Feed line misters
$120
+6.1 lbs
11 months
Shade structures
$200
+3.8 lbs
22 months
But if combined with slick genetics, ROI accelerates: Slick herds gain 11.2 lbs/cow from the same investments.
Breeding Your Heat Army
Three-step protocol from leading operations:
Test heifers for HSP70 expression via UdderHealth Labs’ $25 cheek swab
Cross top 30% with slick-semen from bulls like S-S-I Mays Slick-ET (+2,078 GTPI)
Cull any cow with rectal temp >102.5°F in afternoon checks
Wisconsin’s Cazador Dairy used this system to maintain 94 lb/cow averages through 2024’s record summer – 18 lbs above county averages.
DAIRY 2025: ADAPT OR EXIT
The Texas Model proves crisis = opportunity. Relocated herds combining:
Slick/HSP70 genetics
Robotic rotary coolers ($185/cow annual cost)
Methane-capture diets (lowering thermal load by 14%)
…now achieve $23.41/cwt margins versus $9.17 in traditional regions. As California’s 2030 water restrictions loom, this Midwestern/Texas pivot becomes existential.
The message? Milk volume matters less than component value. Herds focusing on fat/protein now earn $1.72/cwt premiums despite lower output. With genomics identifying heat-tolerant high-component cows, the future belongs to operators breeding for quality over quantity.
Final Word: Heat stress isn’t coming – it’s here. But between slick genes, precision cooling, and strategic relocation, tools exist to survive and thrive. The question isn’t if you’ll adapt but how fast.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Australians pay $3.10 for milk while farmers earn $2.46/hour – 15% price cuts drive production to 30-year lows, threatening industry survival.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Australia’s dairy industry faces collapse as farmers endure 10-15% farmgate price cuts despite consumers paying record retail prices. Milk production is projected to hit 8.3 billion liters in 2024/25 – a 30-year low – with feed costs soaring 40% since 2022 and 55% of farmers considering exit. Processors like Fonterra and Saputo cite import competition (up 19%) and China’s shrinking imports, while aging farmers battle droughts and corporate consolidation. Young operators (<6% under 35) face impossible margins: earning $2.46/hour while retail milk hits $3.10/liter. Though some adapt with robotics and value-added products, ACCC warnings of power imbalances and 10 processing plant closures signal systemic failure without urgent reform.
Production collapse: Forecast 8.3B liters in 2024/25 – lowest since 1990s – with 30% fewer farms since 2014.
Global squeeze: Australian exports drop 17% as China grows domestic production; imports surge 19% from NZ.
Youth exodus: Under-35 farmers now 6% of industry – lowest ever recorded.
Adapt or perish: Survivors use robotics, value-added cheeses, and water rights – but need ACCC-mandated pricing reforms to scale.
The Australian dairy industry faces a perfect storm in 2025: declining production, price volatility, and structural challenges threaten its future. Who will survive as the gap between boardroom optimism and farmgate reality widens?
ARE YOU FEELING THE SQUEEZE? According to the Dairy Australia December 2024 report, farm margins have been pressured by lower farmgate prices and higher operating costs.
WAKE-UP CALL: The price volatility pattern shows no signs of moderating, creating a planning nightmare for producers trying to make long-term infrastructure and breeding decisions.
Processor Perspective: Balancing Market Realities
Sarah Thompson, Chief Supply Officer at one of Australia’s major dairy processors, offers a different perspective: “We’re navigating complex global market dynamics that force difficult pricing decisions. Our export competitiveness directly impacts our ability to maintain volumes, ultimately affecting the entire supply chain, including our farmers.”
Thompson acknowledges the pressure on farmers but emphasizes the industry’s interconnected nature: “We’ve implemented premium programs for quality and consistency that allow top-performing farms to achieve better returns despite the overall market conditions. The most progressive producers are capturing these opportunities.”
Industry analysts note this tiered approach to pricing is becoming increasingly common as processors attempt to secure consistent milk supply while managing market pressures. This creates distinct winner and loser categories among producers, accelerating the consolidation trend.
DAIRY PRICE CYCLE BASICS
Dairy prices typically follow cyclical patterns influenced by global supply and demand. When international prices rise, Australian processors usually increase farmgate payments to secure milk supply and capitalize on export opportunities. However, when international markets soften, farmgate prices typically fall first and faster than retail prices, creating a margin squeeze for farmers while processors maintain their margins. Understanding where we are in this cycle is critical for strategic farm planning.
The Human Cost: Farmer Wellbeing at Breaking Point
The financial strain facing dairy farmers has created a significant human cost that often goes unrecognized. Many dairy farmers are exhausted, demotivated, and struggling to make ends meet while sacrificing time with families and friends. Their mental and physical health suffers as they work increasingly more extended hours to maintain production with fewer resources.
A recent Curtin University study revealed that 55% of surveyed farmers expressed discontent with the sector. Financial strain and mental health issues have prompted many to contemplate leaving the industry altogether.
“I’m just having a bad time, can’t find staff, I’m just over it. Too long hours, not enough family time.” – Victorian dairy farmer
“We are thinking about getting out since what’s the point of working 7 days a week and going bankrupt and being stressed all the time.” – Victorian dairy farmer.
The psychological burden of operating in such an uncertain environment takes a severe toll, mainly when farmers see market improvements that never translate to their bank accounts. The gap between optimistic industry forecasts and the harsh farm-level reality widens in 2025, adding to farmers’ frustration and sense of abandonment.
Weather and Cost Pressures: A Perfect Storm
Persistent dry weather conditions across key production regions have compounded financial pressures by increasing feed costs. The industry has faced a perfect storm of challenges, including the lingering effects of a severe drought about ten years ago, difficulties finding farm workers, rising farmland costs, and the constant threat of extreme weather events.
According to the Curtin University study, feed costs have surged by 40% since 2022. Meanwhile, stagnant milk prices have resulted in unsustainable profit margins for 89.8% of the farmers surveyed. This cost-price squeeze leaves farmers with little room to maneuver or invest in their operations.
This situation is unjust because favorable seasonal conditions are sometimes used as justification for paying dairy farmers less, despite the significant risks farmers take to produce high-quality milk regardless of weather conditions. When seasonal conditions deteriorate, as in many regions, input costs soar, yet farmgate prices rarely respond proportionately.
“Not enough water, not enough feed.” – NSW dairy farmer
“Arid conditions, lack of grown feed is the main impact.” – Victorian dairy farmer
“At the moment, it’s tough because of the drought. Having to buy hay is enormously expensive.” – Queensland dairy farmer
The saying goes, “Make hay while the sun shines,” yet Australian farmers see no benefit while the sun is shining on dairy products globally. With input costs soaring due to dry conditions across Australia, farmers face unprecedented challenges that threaten their survival.
Import Challenge: The Competitive Squeeze
Compounding these pricing pressures is the growing challenge of imports. Fonterra Australia’s managing director, Rene Dedonker, noted that while domestic milk sales perform well, their cheese and butter sales suffer due to large volumes of cheaper imports.
Dairy Australia statistics reveal that imports of dairy products have nearly tripled over the past two decades and continue to rise, placing additional downward pressure on domestic prices. Recent data shows Australian exports have dropped by 17% whilst imports have increased by 19%, creating a concerning trade imbalance.
Once a reliable export destination, the Chinese market has also changed dramatically. “Production in China grew by 8 billion liters, and the industry will continue to grow because of government investment,” noted Matt Watt, Farm Source’s director (a Fonterra division). “This reduces their need to import.”
These international market shifts have left Australian dairy farmers increasingly dependent on the domestic market, where they face intense competition from imported products that often don’t meet the same quality and sustainability standards.
Industry Structure: Winners, Losers, and Demographic Challenges
The Australian dairy industry is undergoing significant structural changes that favor specific business models while threatening others. Industry consolidation is accelerating, favoring large-scale operations and specialized boutique producers while squeezing mid-sized conventional farms. This bifurcation of the industry creates clear winners and losers, with traditional family farms often falling into the latter category.
Demographics present another critical challenge. Due to recent difficulties and an uncertain future, young people are showing little interest in entering the dairy sector. This demographic shift threatens the industry’s long-term viability as experienced farmers retire without successors to continue operations.
The number of dairy farms has fallen from 6,308 in 2014 to just 4,420 by 2022, a staggering 30% reduction in less than a decade. Even more concerning, individuals under 35 now account for a mere 6% of the industry, indicating a notable exodus of youth and raising serious questions about the sector’s future.
Technology and Innovation: A Path Forward?
Despite the challenges, technological advancements offer potential pathways for the industry’s future. According to Andrew Schmetzer of NOVUS, Australia’s industry is embracing new dairy management methods, such as freestall barn housing and robotic milking systems. These technologies optimize herd management and address labor inefficiencies, which are critical for sustainability in a labor-intensive industry like dairy farming.
Victorian scientists are also working on reducing the Australian dairy cow’s environmental footprint and creating a more profitable and sustainable dairy sector. The government of Victoria has launched a US$41 million, five-year research partnership with the dairy industry as part of its Transformational Agriculture Strategy. The forage program focuses on F1 hybrids and gene editing, while the animal program focuses on new traits and improved selection.
The Future Forage Programme will develop new and improve existing forage varieties and species to support the dairy industry as farm systems change and adapt to climate variability and volatility. The Future Cows program will focus on farmer-selected traits and breeding priorities and will use advances in animal monitoring to provide new tools for profitable adaptation to future farms.
“The cows of tomorrow will have lower methane emissions per liter of milk produced, and they will live longer, produce healthier calves, have good metabolic efficiency and low maintenance requirements,” says Professor Jennie Pryce of Agriculture Australia, who is leading the DairyBio animal program. “These cows may not look much different to the cows you see today, but they’ll be more profitable for dairy farmers for a longer time.”
According to the program, dairy farmers should gain US$248 per cow in the future developed cows. Their emissions should be reduced by 10%. The cows will also be able to adapt to warming faster. They should have a 10% greater lifespan by 2040, and the health and management costs should be reduced by 10%.
While these technological advances offer hope, the question remains whether farmers will have the financial capacity to invest in these innovations given their current economic pressures.
Market Opportunities: Consumer Preferences Shift
Despite the challenges, essential market opportunities exist for Australian dairy. Australian consumers increasingly prefer high-quality, locally produced dairy products and a willingness to pay premium prices to support local farmers. The domestic market remains robust, with growth in cheese, dairy spreads, and yogurt sales offsetting flat milk demand.
Rafael Guerrero of NOVUS notes that the industry is shifting toward value-added products like cheese and yogurt. As global markets demand premium dairy goods, Australian farmers adapt by focusing on milk solids rather than just volume. This pivot increases profitability and ensures resilience against market fluctuation.
This consumer sentiment represents a potential lifeline for the industry if it can be effectively leveraged through marketing, product innovation, and transparent supply chains that connect consumers directly with producers. However, capitalizing on these opportunities requires investment capacity that many farmers lack due to compressed margins.
The Bottom Line: Critical Crossroads for Australian Dairy
Australian dairy stands at a critical crossroads as the industry approaches the 2025/26 opening price announcements. In the coming months, the decisions made by processors will send powerful signals about whether they truly value a sustainable domestic supply base or are content to rely increasingly on imports while the local industry contracts.
The central question for farmers contemplating their future is whether the industry will finally recognize and reward their essential role in the supply chain. Without meaningful changes to pricing models that reflect global market improvements and account for rising production costs, the exodus from dairy farming will likely accelerate, further threatening Australia’s century-old tradition of dairy excellence.
Successful producers increasingly focus on efficiency gains, diversification, and targeted technology investments to weather the current storm. Water security has become a critical factor in farm sustainability, with forward-thinking operators investing in irrigation infrastructure and water rights to mitigate climate variability.
Policy support is also essential. Industry bodies are calling for more comprehensive support and policy changes to help farmers with technology adoption, sustainable farming practices, and mental health resources. These initiatives must be coupled with efforts to address the structural imbalances in the supply chain that prevent farmers from capturing a fair share of the final product value.
The Australian dairy industry has shown remarkable resilience throughout its history, but the current challenges are testing this resilience like never before. The question isn’t whether Australian dairy will change – it’s whether you’ll lead that change or one of those left behind by it.
As one of Australia’s most iconic agricultural sectors, dairy deserves better—not just for the farmers who pour their lives into it but also for consumers who value local production and the rural communities that depend on its continued viability.
Read more:
April 2025 Dairy Risk Management Calendar Explore strategies to mitigate crashing milk prices and feed cost volatility, including component-focused culling and futures hedging, critical for farmers navigating 2025’s margin squeeze.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Consumer confidence hits 2021 low! Discover how savvy dairy farmers are turning economic anxiety into profit opportunities (strategies inside).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: With U.S. consumer confidence at its lowest since 2021, dairy farmers face a critical juncture: economic anxiety is shifting demand toward affordable staples like milk and cheddar while threatening premium products. A potential $6B industry loss looms from tariffs, labor shortages, and federal cuts, but strategic pivots—rebalancing product mixes, automating labor, optimizing milk components, and diversifying sales channels—offer resilience. Insights from Cornell University and USDA data reveal global parallels to Europe’s 2012 crisis, proving dairy’s essentials can thrive in downturns. The article provides 5 actionable plans to protect margins and capitalize on shifting consumer behavior.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Shift from premium to basics: Focus on recession-proof staples like conventional milk/cheese as demand softens for artisanal products.
Automate or stagnate: With 51% of dairy labor at risk, robotics are critical for survival.
Component optimization pays: Prioritize butterfat/protein to align with strong cheese/butter prices.
The American consumer is getting nervous –nervous. Consumer confidence has plummeted to its lowest level since 2021, marking the fourth straight month of decline as economic worries intensify nationwide. For dairy producers navigating volatile markets, this shift in consumer sentiment creates a complex landscape of immediate challenges and strategic opportunities. Let’s dive into what’s happening and how forward-thinking dairy operations can thrive despite the economic anxiety.
THE CONFIDENCE COLLAPSE: HARD NUMBERS BEHIND CONSUMER FEARS
The Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index dropped 7.2 points in March to just 92.9, hitting its lowest level since January 2021 and falling well below analysts’ expectations. Even more concerning, this marks the fourth consecutive monthly decline, revealing a persistent downward trend that’s impossible to ignore.
Most alarming is the Expectations Index – which measures consumers’ short-term outlook for income, business, and labor conditions – which has plunged to 65.2, its lowest point in 12 years. This figure sits dangerously below the critical 80-point threshold that typically signals a recession is on the horizon.
Despite this confidence crash, other economic indicators present a more mixed picture, creating a confusing landscape for business planning:
The job market remains surprisingly resilient, with unemployment steady at 4.1% and initial jobless claims beating expectations at 224,000
Fourth-quarter GDP grew at 2.4%, slightly better than previous estimates, though slower than Q3’s 3.1% growth
Major retailers like Target and Walmart report shoppers becoming more selective, gravitating toward discounts and lower-priced items
THE $6 BILLION THREAT: WHY THIS DOWNTURN IS DIFFERENT FOR DAIRY
This isn’t just another economic hiccup – it’s potentially the start of a perfect storm for dairy producers. Analysis from Cornell University suggests the U.S. dairy industry could lose a staggering $6 billion over the next four years due to the combined impact of tariffs, labor shortages, and federal spending cuts.
The 25% tariffs recently imposed on goods from Mexico and Canada – critical export markets for U.S. dairy – threaten to disrupt essential trade relationships. History shows the danger here – retaliatory tariffs from China alone resulted in approximately $2.6 billion in lost revenues for U.S. dairy farms from 2019 to 2021, according to Cornell University adjunct associate professor Charles Nicholson.
Compounding these trade pressures, labor shortages continue to plague the industry. According to the National Milk Producers Federation, immigrants comprise approximately 51% of all dairy workers, and dairies that employ immigrant labor produce 79% of the U.S. milk supply. Research from NMPF estimates that losing this workforce would nearly double retail milk prices and cost the U.S. economy more than $32 billion.
THE BASIC VS. PREMIUM PARADOX: WHY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS MAY BE YOUR BIGGEST VULNERABILITY
When consumer confidence plummets, spending patterns shift dramatically – but not all dairy products fare equally. This is where conventional industry wisdom often gets it wrong.
While many dairy operations have been chasing premium, value-added products with higher margins, economic anxiety is reshaping consumer behavior in ways that favor the basics. Major retailers report shoppers becoming increasingly selective, gravitating toward discounts and lower-priced items as budget consciousness grows.
This shift creates a clear divide:
Premium dairy products (specialty cheeses, artisanal yogurts, organic offerings) face softening demand as consumers cut discretionary spending
Basic staples (conventional milk, Cheddar, butter) often benefit as consumers seek affordable nutrition basics
The lesson from previous downturns is clear: when money gets tight, shoppers prioritize essential foods with high nutritional value per dollar – a category where many essential dairy products excel. The industry’s recent obsession with premium products may become a liability in this economic environment.
However, it’s worth noting that not all premium products suffer equally during downturns. Some artisanal producers have successfully maintained demand by emphasizing quality and value even when consumers tighten their belts. As Mike North of EverAg notes, the market needs to strike a delicate balance between prices and what the U.S. consumer is willing to pay.
GLOBAL LESSONS: WHAT OTHER MARKETS REVEAL ABOUT YOUR FARM’S FUTURE
The current U.S. consumer confidence crash mirrors patterns we’ve seen in other global markets, offering valuable insights for strategic planning. During Europe’s debt crisis, consumers similarly pulled back from premium dairy products while maintaining purchases of essential staples.
According to the U.S. Dairy Export Council, the total value of U.S. dairy product exports increased by 20% year-over-year in January 2025, reaching a record $714 million. However, this strong performance occurred before the implementation of retaliatory tariffs, which could significantly alter the export landscape.
In China, the world’s largest dairy importer, 26 dairy products are now subject to a 10% levy as part of retaliatory measures that took effect on March 10, 2025. This came when U.S. dairy exports to China showed signs of recovery, highlighting the precarious nature of global trade relationships.
STRATEGIC REPOSITIONING: FIVE ACTIONABLE PLANS FOR DAIRY FARMS
Innovative dairy operations are already pivoting strategies to capitalize on changing consumer behavior. Here’s how to position your operation for success:
1. Recalibrate Your Product Mix
Instead of chasing premium markets exclusively, consider strengthening your position in stable, essential dairy categories. The 2025 USDA forecasts show cheese prices continuing to strengthen while other dairy commodities face varying pressures. Farms that can align their milk component profiles with cheese manufacturing requirements may capture premium opportunities despite broader market volatility.
As noted by dairy analyst Ben Buckner, “Demand looks good, as far as we can tell. In terms of total disappearance, there is nothing remarkable there. And things like butter, it has been pretty remarkable”.
2. Invest in Automation to Counter Labor Risks
With immigrant labor accounting for over half the dairy workforce and consumer confidence declining, the labor situation becomes increasingly vulnerable. Investing in labor-saving technology like robotic milkers and feeders isn’t just about efficiency—it’s about risk management. These investments can insulate your operation from labor shortages and margin pressures as consumer spending tightens.
3. Leverage the “Affordable Nutrition” Positioning
Despite economic pressures, consumers still seek value. The winning formula appears to be “affordable premium” – products that offer superior quality and functional benefits at accessible price points. Emphasize dairy’s nutritional density and cost-effectiveness in your marketing to capture value-conscious consumers.
4. Focus on Component Optimization
The divergence in dairy commodity prices means component optimization is more valuable than ever. Farms that optimize for butterfat and protein content can capture premium returns even during broader market adjustments.
According to Lucas Fuess, senior dairy analyst for RaboResearch Food and Agribusiness, “We are pretty optimistic on milk prices in the next year. We think with the feed costs being lower, the profitability will be there, and overall, it’s pretty good news looking ahead for dairy farmers”.
5. Diversify Your Customer Channels
Restaurant spending typically contracts during periods of low consumer confidence, threatening a critical driver of dairy demand. Mike North of EverAg notes, “Foot traffic at restaurants really hasn’t been that great since last spring… And 51% of the food dollar in America is spent out of the home. So, what happens at restaurants is very important to what comes through on dairy demand”.
Operations heavily dependent on food service should begin diversifying their customer base, developing direct-to-consumer channels, or exploring retail opportunities to buffer against food service volatility.
THE BALANCING ACT: BRIDGING IMMEDIATE ACTIONS WITH LONG-TERM PLANNING
The current consumer confidence crash requires both immediate tactical responses and strategic repositioning. While taking steps to protect your cash flow and margins in the short term, don’t lose sight of long-term investments that will strengthen your position when confidence eventually rebounds.
CoBank’s Knowledge Exchange states, “After the best three-year stretch for farm incomes in history, the coming year will be challenging for row crop producers due to ample domestic stocks and the relentlessly strong U.S. dollar.” However, the dairy outlook remains more positive, with futures prices indicating 2024 could be the third-highest milk price year on record. However, sluggish international dairy trade and tepid domestic demand have slowed dairy product sales growth.
BEYOND THE HEADLINES: WHERE SMART MONEY IS MOVING
Despite the gloomy consumer confidence numbers, several bright spots exist for strategic dairy operators. According to dairy market analyst Nate Donnay, “At the start of 2025, market sentiment and supply and demand risks are tilted toward the downside, but I think we’ll see decent milk prices and margins for dairy farmers despite the risks”.
One of the most significant discussion points has been the new cheese plant capacity coming online between the fourth quarter of 2024 and the middle of 2025. If all new plants ran at full capacity and all existing plants continued to run at their current rate, we would see U.S. cheese production expand by about 6%, which would be a record increase.
However, cheesemakers have been cautious about overproducing, with January to November 2024 cheese production up just 0.4%, domestic disappearance up 0.3%, and exports up almost 18%. This resulted in cheese stocks being down more than 7% (104 million pounds) from the prior year in November, suggesting that well-positioned operations focused on the right product mix can still capture significant value despite broader economic concerns.
YOUR ACTION PLAN: NEXT STEPS FOR IMMEDIATE IMPLEMENTATION
Conduct a product portfolio analysis: Evaluate your current product mix against emerging consumer trends, identifying areas to shift emphasis from vulnerable premium categories to more recession-resistant basics.
Assess your labor vulnerability: Calculate your operation’s exposure to potential labor disruptions and evaluate ROI on automation investments that could reduce this risk.
Optimize your component strategy: Work with your nutritionist to fine-tune feeding programs that maximize valuable milk components, particularly those aligned with stronger price forecasts.
Diversify your customer channels: Identify opportunities to expand your customer base beyond traditional channels vulnerable to consumer confidence shifts.
Engage with your processor: Understand how your milk buyer’s strategy is evolving in response to changing consumer behavior and align your production accordingly.
The sharp decline in consumer confidence presents evident challenges for America’s dairy farmers, but it also creates opportunities for those who understand the shifting landscape and position themselves strategically. By focusing on the basics, optimizing for high-value components, addressing labor vulnerabilities, and aligning with changing consumer priorities, forward-thinking dairy operations can weather this economic uncertainty and emerge stronger on the other side.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Milk prices rebound sparks £105k income surge for UK dairy farms – but labor shortages and DEFRA cuts threaten the fragile recovery.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: English dairy farmers are celebrating a financial rebound with average incomes doubling to £176k in 2024/25, fueled by 12% higher milk prices and easing feed costs. However, the sector faces mounting challenges: labor shortages now affect 56% of farms, Brexit-era subsidy cuts slash payments by 76%, and bluetongue virus threatens herd health. While innovative farmers like Wiltshire’s Peter Gantlett thrive through organic transitions and robotics, others face contract terminations and consolidation pressures. Despite stable herd numbers and creative cost-cutting strategies, the industry remains cautiously optimistic, balancing newfound profitability against long-term uncertainties in policy and climate.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Income Leap: Average earnings surged £105k year-on-year to £176k – still 22% below pre-2023 peaks
Price Recovery: Farmgate milk prices hit 46p/L (+12%), with organic fetching 56p/L premiums
Cost Relief: Input expenses dropped 2% after 44% inflation since 2019, easing pressure on margins
Labor Crisis: 1 in 10 farms downsized herds due to worker shortages; wages up 27% since 2019
Innovation Gap: Tech adoption splits sector – robotic milkers boost efficiency, but 16% of farmers eye exit strategies
After years of watching their bank accounts drain faster than a leaky milk tank, English dairy farmers finally see some daylight. Fresh Defra figures show dairy operations have more than doubled their income – jumping from a measly £70,900 last year to a much healthier £176,000 for the 2024/25 season. That’s a whopping £105,000 boost to the bottom line that’s got farmers cautiously eyeing equipment upgrades they’ve been putting off for years.
But let’s not kid ourselves – this isn’t some golden age of dairy farming returning. These earnings still fall short of the £225,000 farmers pocketed just two years ago. It’s like climbing halfway back up after falling down a slippery slope.
THE CASH FLOW COMEBACK
From Red to Black (Finally)
If you’ve been in the milking parlor at 5 AM wondering why you didn’t just become an accountant, last year’s numbers probably had you questioning your life choices. The 2023/24 season was brutal – incomes plummeted by a staggering 78%, leaving many operations barely treading water with just £70,900 to show for all those early mornings and late nights.
“We’re an endangered species; our numbers are dwindling,” says Peter Gantlett, a 69-year-old Wiltshire dairy farmer who knows the struggle well. Like many, he’s watched one British dairy farm go out of business every day, with the total number of UK producers shrinking to just 7,270 as of October 2024 – down a shocking 44% from a decade ago.
Milk Checks That Don’t Bounce
The recovery’s secret sauce? Milk prices finally make sense again. The farmgate price jumped about 12% between March 2024 and January 2025 compared to the previous year. That extra money in the milk check, combined with tight supplies early in the year, has boosted milk output by 12%.
For context, the average UK milk price is hovering around 46 pence per liter as of January 2025, with organic producers like Gantlett fetching a premium at 56 pence. Major processors have been holding steady with these improved rates – Arla keeping conventional milk at 48.27 pence per liter and organic at 58.26 pence for March 2025, while Muller maintains its Advantage scheme at 42.25 pence.
Remember when milk prices were so low you’d have been better off watering the garden with it? Those days seem to be behind us – at least for now.
BATTLING THE COST MONSTER
Feed Bills That Don’t Make You Wince
Anyone buying straws these days knows the pain – costs keep soaring higher. But there’s finally some relief as input costs dropped around 2% this year. That milk check now stretches like fresh mozzarella – finally covering feed bills with room to spare.
Feed and fertilizer costs have eased, giving farmers a much-needed breather after years of watching input prices skyrocket. Since 2019, farm input costs have ballooned by 44%, with straw prices more than doubling and everything from electricity to animal feed jumping 38-50%.
Over at Greenbank Farm near Preston, third-gen dairyman James Haworth juggles TB testing on his 80 Holsteins while DEFRA’s delinked payments vanish faster than milk in a barn cat’s bowl. Trying to navigate DEFRA’s payment scheme feels like herding unweaned calves – just when you think you’ve got ’em corralled, another break for the fence.
Labor Headaches Getting Worse
While milk prices and feed costs give farmers some breathing room, finding good help is becoming a nightmare. Lancashire’s small herds are feeling the squeeze – think of Old Tom’s 80-cow setup battling TB testing costs while DEFRA rewrites the rulebook and he can’t find reliable milkers.
Arla’s recent survey of 472 dairy producers paints a grim picture: 56% say recruiting workers is more complex than five years ago. The labor shortage is forcing tough decisions – 1 in 12 farmers are cutting production (up from 1 in 18 last year), and 1 in 10 have reduced herd size because they can’t find help.
When they find workers, they pay through the nose – wages are up 27% compared to 2019. No wonder 16% of farmers are considering leaving dairy altogether, up from 12% just last year.
POLICY PAINS & MARKET REALITIES
Government Giveth, Government Taketh Away
The financial recovery is happening despite, not because of, government support. The Basic Payment Scheme fell by nearly 25% year-on-year as Brexit continues reshaping UK agriculture. By 2025, payments will be slashed by 76% compared to 2020, with complete elimination by 2028.
“We are an endangered species,” Gantlett remarks, his weathered face showing the strain of navigating these changes. His farm remains profitable thanks to the shift to organic, but many smaller operations aren’t so lucky. Recent changes to inheritance tax have further dampened farmer confidence, adding another layer of uncertainty to an already precarious business.
Dairy Farmers: Still Top of the Farm Food Chain
Despite all the challenges, dairy farmers remain the highest earners in English agriculture. Their £176,000 average income towers over specialist pig farmers (£155,000), general croppers (£108,000), and especially cereal farmers, who scraped by with just £27,000 – barely a thousand pounds more than livestock graziers.
The milk-to-feed price ratio has moved into what industry wonks call the “expansion zone,” which typically encourages increased production. However, the threat of the bluetongue virus and ongoing herd size declines could limit growth.
The stakes couldn’t be higher for farmers like Gantlett, who invested £120,000 in each of his two Lely robotic milking machines back in 2011 (plus similar costs for building work). “We strive for maximum efficiency,” he says. “Two decades ago, we faced a pivotal choice: exit the business, expand, or enhance the value of our products. We opted for the latter and transitioned to organic farming.”
Others haven’t been so fortunate. Saputo Dairy UK recently terminated contracts with 13 farmers in the South West, affecting 20 million liters of annual milk production – enough to fill eight Olympic-sized swimming pools. These farmers have 12 months to find new buyers or face potential financial ruin.
While checking his pregnant heifers on a foggy March morning, one dairy farmer said: “We’re not out of the woods yet, but at least we can see some daylight through the trees.” For an industry that’s weathered so many storms, that glimpse of sunshine might just be enough to keep going for another season.
After all, the British public still consumes about 12 million liters of milk daily – more than a liter per person weekly. As long as people keep putting milk in their tea and cheese on their sandwiches, there’s hope for the dairy farmers who get up before dawn to make it happen.
TECH TO THE RESCUE?
Swap out that pricey alfalfa mix – Wilkinson’s Dairy in Cheshire saved £12k/year by teaming up with a neighbor brewer for spent grain feed (47% protein boost!). It’s just one example of farmers getting creative to stay afloat.
The UK Dairy Carbon Network project, launched in February 2025, aims to establish a network of 56 dairy farms across four major dairying regions to test and assess various mitigation approaches for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. This initiative, led by the Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI) and funded by Defra, brings together farmers, industry experts, scientists, and policymakers to deploy and measure the impact of potential solutions.
Technology is reshaping the dairy landscape from robotic milkers to facial recognition for cows. Some farms use computer systems that recognize individual cows by their spot patterns, width between the eyes, and even nose prints. These systems help monitor health and milk production and streamline the milking process.
Smartphone apps are also making their way into the dairy farmer’s toolkit. These apps can help manage schedules, track production, and even monitor cow health. It’s a digital revolution in the pasture, with farmers embracing the power of data to boost efficiency and animal welfare.
The dairy industry faces challenges and opportunities as we look to the future. Climate change, shifting consumer preferences, and evolving regulations will continue to shape the landscape. But with innovation, resilience, and a bit of that famous farmer grit, the UK dairy sector is determined to survive and thrive in the years ahead.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Can California dairy survive water scarcity, labor laws, and green rules? Innovation vs. exodus in America’s milk capital.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: California’s dairy industry, the nation’s largest milk producer, confronts existential threats: severe water scarcity, restrictive labor laws, and stringent environmental regulations. Producers face tough choices—innovate or relocate—as feed costs soar, overtime mandates strain budgets and methane regulations drive compliance costs. While some operations pivot to water-smart practices, methane digesters, and automation, others exit for states like South Dakota with friendlier policies. Despite challenges, California leads in sustainability, cutting emissions by 24.3M metric tons via digesters. The industry’s survival hinges on balancing adaptation, cost management, and policy advocacy in a rapidly shifting landscape.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Triple Threat: Water scarcity, labor overtime rules, and environmental regulations squeeze profits, accelerating consolidation.
Innovation Wins: Despite costs, methane digesters, robotic milking, and water recycling showcase CA’s sustainability leadership.
Exodus Trend: Producers like David Lemstra relocate to states with easier permitting, lower costs, and stable water access.
Strategic Survival: Success requires automation, diversified markets, and the conversion of compliance (e.g., methane capture) into revenue streams.
California’s dairy industry is at a critical crossroads in 2025, facing a perfect storm of water scarcity, labor regulations, and environmental restrictions that threaten its position as America’s top milk producer. With 1.71 million cows generating billions in economic activity, producers are forced to innovate or evacuate as the state’s regulatory and resource landscape becomes increasingly hostile to large-scale dairy operations.
The Water Crisis: A Global Challenge with Local Intensity
California’s dairy producers aren’t just worried about water—they’re obsessed with it—and for good reason. The state’s ongoing water crisis has evolved from a periodic concern to an existential threat for many operations.
“As a dairy producer, this is an ever-growing challenge,” says Ryan Junio, owner of Four J Jerseys in Pixley, reflecting the sentiments shared across the industry.
The numbers tell a sobering story. California has overdrafted approximately 2 million acre-feet of water annually for years, creating an unsustainable situation that finally reached crisis levels during the 2014 drought. This prompted the state to implement groundwater regulations, which many producers believe should have happened decades earlier.
Tyler Ribeiro from Rib-Arrow Dairy in Tulare doesn’t mince words about the severity of the situation: “With the lack of water due to the lack of snowpack in the mountains, inability to store surface water, restrictions on ground pumping and now a potential tariff measuring contest, we could be in for a steady increase in feed costs through 2025.”
According to Food & Water Watch, California’s mega-dairies require approximately 152 million gallons of water daily to water and wash cows and buildings—”more than enough to meet the indoor water needs for the entire San Diego metropolitan area.” This figure doesn’t include water needed to move manure into storage systems or produce animal feed, which encompasses the most significant water footprint for milk production.
Reduced profit margins even when milk prices are high
“There is a lot of farmland that used to be farmable via groundwater that is not allotted that opportunity because of new regulations,” Ribeiro explains. “These new restrictions have already and will continue to decrease the number of farmable acres, making competition for feed crops increasingly more difficult.”
His assessment of the immediate future is blunt: “2025 will be the game of water and deep pockets. Those with water or the ability to bring in feed will fare well; those that can’t may face some difficulties moving forward.”
Global Water Challenges in Dairy
Water scarcity isn’t unique to California. Australia’s dairy industry faces similar challenges, with drought and extreme weather events limiting water availability for irrigation. Sustainable Table states, “As water scarcity due to climate change becomes more severe, and the water resources we have are needed to supply a growing population, farmers will need to dramatically reduce water consumption and improve water recycling if dairy farming is to be sustainable.”
Water management presents different challenges in Pakistan, which has the world’s third-largest dairy industry. While water availability may be less restricted than in California, the absence of extraordinary chain infrastructure and quality standards creates inefficiencies throughout the value chain, according to a 2019 study published in the Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics.
Labor Laws: The Overtime Squeeze
While water dominates headlines, California’s labor regulations quietly reshape dairy economics. Beginning January 1, 2025, all agricultural workers at small employers (25 or fewer employees) will receive overtime pay at the employee’s regular rate after 8 hours in a workday or 40 hours in a workweek.
This completes the state’s phase-in of agricultural overtime requirements, which began in 2019. This puts dairy producers—who require round-the-clock staffing—in a challenging position.
Melvin Medeiros, a dairy producer from Layton, California, captures the frustration felt throughout the industry: “I do know when legislation gets involved, it turns into a mess. We’re in that mess now and trying to figure out how to invest in this farm to make it more efficient and cut back on labor.”
The impact of these regulations is already evident in employment patterns. USDA Farm Labor Survey data shows that average weekly hours for California farm workers have steadily decreased compared to the national average—from 2.7 hours more than the national average in 2016 to one hour less than the national average in 2023.
For dairy operations, which can’t simply shut down milking parlors on weekends or holidays, these regulations create a stark choice:
Pay significantly higher labor costs for necessary overtime
Hire additional workers to avoid overtime (increasing management complexity)
Invest heavily in automation to reduce labor needs
Relocate to states with more favorable labor laws
International Labor Perspectives
Labor challenges vary significantly across global dairy regions. In the European Union, dairy farms face similar regulatory pressures but often operate at more minor scales with more family labor. According to OECD research on global dairy trends, labor regulations in countries like Germany and the Netherlands have contributed to industry consolidation through mechanisms different from those in California.
In developing dairy markets like the Baltic states, labor structures are quite different. The OECD describes a “bipolar” production system—” with a strong competitive sector and part social sector.” These regions face different labor challenges, focusing more on productivity improvements and quality standards than overtime regulations.
Environmental Regulations: Balancing Sustainability and Viability
California’s environmental regulations, particularly those targeting greenhouse gas emissions, create challenges and opportunities for dairy producers. According to a 2024 economic analysis by ERA Economics for the California Cattle Council, these regulations inevitably increase operational costs, creating “a tradeoff between stricter regulations for environmental objectives and increasing costs at the farm.”
The report notes that “the increase in production costs due to regulation decreases the competitiveness of California producers. This results in higher food costs and economic losses, with jobs, income, and farms leaving California for other states with more favorable business conditions.”
However, California’s dairy industry has responded with remarkable innovation. The state now boasts 238 dairy digester projects capturing methane to create renewable energy sources, with 129 currently operational and the remainder under development.
These projects have achieved remarkable results, accounting for 20% of greenhouse gas reductions from all state-funded climate programs while receiving just 1.5% of the awarded funds. These efforts have contributed to a decrease of 24.3 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent emissions.
Karen Ross, Secretary of the California Department of Food and Agriculture, recognizes the challenges and the industry’s response: “I’m very proud of the work we’ve been able to do on climate-smart agriculture. I love that 24.3 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent reductions in greenhouse gasses are because of dairy digesters.”
Environmental Partnerships
Environmental NGOs, leading food and beverage companies, and government agencies have worked alongside dairy farmers to bring sustainability solutions to life. As reported by the California Dairy Research Foundation in May 2024, companies like Starbucks have developed partnerships with California’s largest dairy cooperative, California Dairies, Inc., to implement water conservation tools, electric tractors, and improved manure management technologies on farms.
These collaborative approaches represent a promising model for addressing environmental challenges while maintaining economic viability.
Why This Matters to Your Bottom Line
The combined effect of water scarcity, labor regulations, and environmental requirements creates a competitive disadvantage that’s becoming increasingly difficult to overcome. This has accelerated consolidation within the industry.
According to Food & Water Watch, “California reported roughly half as many family-scale dairies in 2022 compared to just 2017.” This consolidation trend “harms rural communities, with the rise in factory farms linked to a host of social and economic declines, from higher poverty rates to out-migration.”
Tony Louters from T&C Louters Dairy in Merced ranks his concerns bluntly: “Water is our biggest concern right now, along with California environmental and business regulations, continued animal activist pressure, and rising labor costs.”
The processing side of the industry faces similar challenges. “California is a difficult place to do business and especially to build capacity,” Louters notes. “Most plants are built in other dairy states, so they do not have to deal with California’s business regulations.”
This processing bottleneck creates additional market pressures for producers, limiting their options for milk marketing and potentially reducing farm-gate prices.
The Exodus: Finding Greener Pastures
For some producers, the accumulation of challenges has prompted difficult decisions about their future in California. David Lemstra’s story illustrates this trend. After searching for a decade, Lemstra and his family relocated to South Dakota from central California, where they had been established for more than 40 years.
Three pivotal factors drove their decision:
Feed availability
Easier permitting processes
Greater processing capacity
Lemstra describes his family’s coordinated departure from the state as “death by 1,000 cuts,” citing the impact of long-standing political and resource management decisions. California’s overtime labor rule is a considerable obstacle, especially compared to South Dakota’s business-friendly environment.
One benefit Lemstra has discovered in South Dakota is a more favorable labor market. “Some locals say labor is backbreaking, but they don’t know how hard it can potentially get,” he says, appreciating the motivated workforce available in his new home.
Global Industry Restructuring
This migration of dairy operations isn’t unique to the United States. According to OECD research, dairy industries worldwide are undergoing significant restructuring in response to economic and regulatory pressures. In export-oriented countries like France, Ireland, and the Netherlands, dairy companies expand through external investments in other countries. In contrast, developments in countries like Canada, Germany, and the US have mainly focused on greater concentration.
The OECD notes, “The creation of strategic alliances to penetrate product or regional markets is a growing phenomenon,” raising essential questions about competition policy and industry structure.
Water-Smart Strategies for Dairy Survival
Water management has become the cornerstone of operational planning for dairy producers committed to California. The good news is that significant progress has already been made. According to the Dairy Cares initiative, the amount of water used to produce each gallon of California milk has decreased more than 88% over the past 50-plus years, primarily due to:
Improved feed crop production
Use of byproducts as feed
Water use efficiency
Water reuse is now standard practice on California dairy farms, where the same water is used an average of four times:
Clean water is used in the refrigeration process to cool milk
Water recycled from refrigeration is then used to wash and cool cows
After water is used to wash cows, it is captured, stored, and used multiple times to clean barn floors
Additionally, up to 40% of feed ingredients used in California dairies are agricultural byproducts, such as almond hulls, cottonseed, and citrus pulp, which could otherwise be wasted. By upcycling byproducts, dairy farms are reducing the use of water, energy, and fossil fuels needed to grow feed crops.
To address labor challenges, successful California dairy operations are implementing several strategies:
Strategic Automation: Investing in robotic milking systems, automated feeding technology, and other labor-saving equipment to reduce dependence on manual labor
Schedule Optimization: Restructuring work schedules to minimize overtime while maintaining animal care standards
Employee Development: Creating clear career paths and training programs to improve retention and productivity
Housing Solutions: Some more extensive operations are developing employee housing to address California’s high cost of living and reduce commuting time
Environmental Innovation
California’s dairy industry has become a leader in environmental innovation, particularly in addressing methane emissions. The California Dairy Research Foundation reports, “Over the past few years, California’s dairy methane reduction programs have been among the state’s most cost-effective efforts in reducing climate emissions.”
Key initiatives include:
Dairy Digesters: Capturing methane from manure and converting it to renewable natural gas
Dairy PLUS Program: Supporting advanced manure management projects that better protect groundwater while also reducing methane emissions
Feed Additives: Developing new programs to support the adoption of feed additives and other strategies to reduce enteric methane emissions from cows
Electric Equipment: Transitioning to electric tractors and other equipment to reduce fossil fuel use
Challenge
Impact on Operations
Adaptation Strategies
Success Indicators
Water Scarcity
Reduced feed production, higher input costs
Water recycling, byproduct feeds, irrigation efficiency
Reduced water usage per cwt milk, stable feed costs
Labor Regulations
Higher labor costs, scheduling complexity
Strategic automation, optimized scheduling, employee development
Reduced labor hours per cwt milk, improved retention
Environmental Regulations
Compliance costs, operational constraints
Methane digesters, feed additives, electric equipment
New revenue streams, reduced emissions per cwt milk
The Bottom Line
California’s dairy industry isn’t just facing challenges—it’s experiencing a fundamental transformation that will determine which operations survive and thrive in the coming decade. The combined pressures of water scarcity, labor regulations, and environmental restrictions are forcing a level of adaptation and innovation unprecedented in the industry’s history.
For producers committed to staying in California, success will require:
Strategic water management that anticipates continued scarcity
Labor efficiency improvements through targeted automation
Environmental innovations that turn compliance costs into revenue opportunities
Market diversification to capture premium prices where possible
As Ribeiro puts it: “Dairy producers are fighters. It’s in our blood. It’s how we were raised and woven into the fabric of who we are. If there is a conceivable way to stay in business doing what we love, we will find a way.”
That fighting spirit will be essential as California’s dairy industry navigates this perfect storm of challenges. The producers who emerge on the other side will likely be more efficient, innovative, and resilient—having transformed their operations to succeed despite the state’s challenging business climate.
The question isn’t whether California’s dairy industry will survive—it’s how it will be transformed in the process. For forward-thinking producers, these challenges represent threats and opportunities to build operations that can thrive in the resource-constrained, highly regulated future that awaits all of agriculture.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
North Dakota rebels against federal rules to bring whole milk back to schools. But at what cost?”
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: North Dakota’s new law allowing whole milk in schools through non-lunch-line dispensers marks a bold challenge to federal nutrition guidelines. While the bill passed unanimously, its success hinges on schools’ ability to absorb costs and logistical challenges, including offering free whole milk without federal funding. Critics warn of increased calorie intake and staffing burdens, while supporters argue palatable milk options could boost student consumption and support dairy farmers. The law mirrors Tennessee’s 2024 strategy, reflecting a growing state-level pushback against restrictive school meal policies. National efforts, like the proposed Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act, aim to expand these changes federally. For farmers, this is both an opportunity to reclaim market share and a reminder that policy wins don’t always translate to profits.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Federal Rule Loophole: Schools can offer whole milk via dispensers outside reimbursed meals, avoiding direct clashes with USDA guidelines.
Financial Roadblocks: Schools must provide whole milk for free, creating an unfunded mandate without state/federal support.
Taste vs. Nutrition: Debate rages between advocates (who prioritize consumption) and critics (who warn of calorie spikes and logistical headaches).
National Momentum: North Dakota joins Tennessee in state-level reforms, while federal legislation seeks broader changes.
Farmer Impact: Potential demand boost for whole milk, but success depends on schools’ ability to implement the law sustainably.
On March 21, 2025, North Dakota Governor Kelly Armstrong signed House Bill 1132 into law, making the Peace Garden State the second in the nation to challenge federal restrictions on whole milk in schools. The bill passed unanimously in both legislative chambers, allowing schools to offer whole milk, 2% milk, and flavored milk options outside the federally regulated lunch line.
Why This Matters to Your Bottom Line
Potential Market Boost: This law could increase demand for whole milk from North Dakota dairy farms if successfully implemented. However, the financial reality may be more complex.
Federal Funding Tightrope: Schools must navigate offering whole milk without jeopardizing their National School Lunch Program reimbursements.
Consumer Preference Shift: This move acknowledges growing evidence that full-fat dairy may have health benefits, potentially influencing broader consumer trends.
The Whole Story: From Capitol to Cafeteria
North Dakota’s law doesn’t directly challenge federal regulations. Instead, it creates a loophole by allowing whole milk to be served through dispensers outside the official lunch line. This mirrors Tennessee’s 2024 approach, showcasing a growing state-level pushback against federal nutrition guidelines.
Unanimous Support, But Not Without Critics
While the bill sailed through the legislature, it faced opposition from key groups:
North Dakota School Nutrition Association: Cited concerns about cleanliness, spills, and the physical demands of handling heavy milk bags for older cafeteria staff.
North Dakota Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Argued that whole milk offers no significant nutritional advantage over lower-fat options while increasing calorie content.
The Financial Elephant in the Room
Here’s the potential deal-breaker: To comply with USDA rules, schools would likely need to offer whole milk for free. Lynelle Johnson, director of child nutrition at the North Dakota Department of Public Instruction, warns this could become an unfunded mandate. Many schools may find the law impractical to follow without state or federal funding to support implementation.
What This Means for Your Operation
Cautious Optimism: While the law creates an opportunity for increased whole milk sales, don’t count your calves before they’re born. Implementation hurdles may slow adoption.
Watch for Ripple Effects: This could inspire similar legislation in other states, potentially expanding markets for whole milk producers.
Consumer Education Opportunity: Use this momentum to educate consumers about the benefits of whole milk, regardless of school policy changes.
The National Perspective
North Dakota isn’t alone in this fight. The National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF) has made passing the federal Whole Milk for Healthy Kids Act a top legislative priority for 2025. NMPF President and CEO Gregg Doud argues that offering milk varieties students prefer would address “kids’ under-consumption of milk’s essential nutrients.”
By the Numbers: The Whole Milk Debate
Milk Type
Fat Content
Calories (per cup)
Key Nutrients
Whole
3.25%
146
Calcium, Vitamin D
2%
2%
120
Calcium, Vitamin D
1%
1%
102
Calcium, Vitamin D
Skim
0%
83
Calcium, Vitamin D
Source: USDA data, adapted for school meal comparisons
The Bottom Line
North Dakota’s whole milk law is bold, but its success hinges on financial practicality. While it opens the door for increased whole milk consumption in schools, the implementation burden falls squarely on already-stretched school budgets.
What’s your take? Is North Dakota’s law a game-changer or just political theater? Please share your thoughts in the comments, and let’s keep this conversation flowing like cold, creamy whole milk should.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Synlait slashes $400M debt, delivers $63M profit! Learn how NZ’s dairy giant turned crisis into a playbook for global processors.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Synlait’s turnaround from a $96M loss to a $63M EBITDA profit in six months showcases strategic debt management, supplier retention, and operational efficiency. The processor reduced net debt by 29% and targeted a debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 2.5, securing a $130M shareholder-backed loan to stabilize finances. By offering $10.48/kg MS milk premiums to farmers without cessation notices, Synlait retained 89% of suppliers. Operational discipline doubled gross profit, while high-margin segments like Advanced Nutrition drove growth. For North American processors, Synlait’s recovery highlights the importance of debt discipline, competitive pricing, and supplier loyalty.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Debt Discipline: Target debt-to-EBITDA ratios below 2.5 to unlock refinancing and reduce financial risk.
Global Relevance: Lessons apply to North American processors facing debt or supplier challenges.
Actionable Insights: Prioritize debt reduction and supplier incentives to build long-term resilience.
Imagine slashing a $400M debt mountain while delivering a $63.1M EBITDA profit. Synlait Milk Limited, New Zealand’s third-largest dairy processor, has posted a remarkable financial recovery for the six months ending January 31, 2025. This isn’t just a comeback—it’s a masterclass in operational discipline, supplier retention, and strategic debt management. For dairy processors worldwide, Synlait’s story offers actionable insights into surviving and thriving under pressure.
The $63.1M EBITDA Surge: Unpacking Synlait’s Profitability Rebound
From Red to Black: Half-Year Financials Expose the Turnaround Blueprint
Synlait’s half-year results showcase an extraordinary recovery. EBITDA surged by 217% to $63.1M—exceeding its guidance range of $58M–$63M—and net profit after tax hit $4.8M, rebounding from a $96.2M loss in HY24. Revenue climbed 16% to $916.8M, while gross profit nearly doubled to $86.9M, demonstrating improved cost control and operational efficiency.
Half-Year Financial Turnaround Comparison
Metric
HY25 (Jan 2025)
HY24 (Jan 2024)
Change (%)
Source
Revenue
$916.8M
$793.1M
+16%
Gross Profit
$86.9M
$43.7M
+99%
EBITDA
$63.1M
($55.6M)
+217%
Net Profit After Tax
$4.8M
($96.2M)
+105%
Net Debt
$391.9M
$553.0M
-29%
Milk Price Mastery: How $10.48/kg MS Became a Farmer Retention Tool
Competitive Pricing Strategy
Synlait’s forecast base milk price for 2024/2025 is $10/kg MS, aligning with Rabobank’s global forecast for modest dairy growth. This pricing strategy reduced farmer cessation notices by 89%.
Milk Price Premium Breakdown
Component
Rate (NZD/kg MS)
Conditions
Impact on Farmer Loyalty
Source
Base Milk Price
$10.00
Standard payment for all suppliers
Baseline incentive
Secured Milk Premium
+$0.20
No cessation notice by 31 Mar 2025
Retention driver
Incentive Payment
+$0.28
Multi-season commitment (2025–2028)
Long-term loyalty
Total Average Payment
$10.48
Applies to compliant suppliers
89% reduction in exits
“New Zealand is finding buyers for its additional milk, supporting a record-high milk price.” — Rabobank Q1 2025 Report
Debt Demolition: The $130M Bright Dairy Lifeline That Reset Synlait’s Future
Bank Debt to Strategic Debt: The 8% Loan That Saved a Dairy Empire
Synlait secured a NZ$130M loan from Bright Dairy at 8% interest in July 2024, approved by 99.6% of shareholders. This stabilized its balance sheet and enabled debt reduction.
Net Debt Reduction: Slashing $391.9M to Unlock Refinancing Potential
Synlait reduced net debt by 29% to $391.9M, targeting $250–$300M by December 2025. A debt-to-EBITDA ratio below 2.5x is critical for refinancing.
Debt Reduction Timeline & Targets
Period
Net Debt
Debt-to-EBITDA Ratio
Key Action
Source
Jan 2024 (Pre-Crisis)
$553.0M
6.1x
Initial debt load
Jan 2025 (Current)
$391.9M
3.8x
Bright Dairy loan + cost cuts
Target (Dec 2025)
$250–$300M
<2.5x
Refinancing readiness
Operational Overhaul: The ‘Fundamentals First’ Strategy That Restarted Production
Supplier Stability: How Cessation Notices Became a Farmer Loyalty Lever
Farmer confidence has been restored: most South Island suppliers withdrew cessation notices after Synlait introduced competitive milk premiums and guaranteed minimum pricing.
“A continued focus on doing the fundamentals well enabled this recovery.” — Synlait HY25 Investor Presentation
Margin Magic: Doubling Gross Profit Through Efficiency Gains
Advanced Nutrition margins surged $26.1M (up 28% in volumes), while Ingredients margins improved by $12.9M despite a 13% volume drop due to Pōkeno plant changes.
Strategic Roadmap: Synlait’s Recovery Playbook
Synlait’s 3-Pronged Strategy
Priority
Key Actions
Target Outcome
Source
Supplier Retention
$10.48/kg MS premiums + multi-season incentives
Secure 95% milk supply
Operational Efficiency
Headcount reductions, cost controls
15% gross profit increase
Debt Management
Refinancing at <2.5x debt-to-EBITDA
$250–$300M net debt
Lessons for North American Dairy Processors
Debt Discipline in Context
Processor
Country
Debt-to-EBITDA (2025)
Status
Synlait
New Zealand
3.8x → <2.5x target
Recovery
DFA
USA
3.2x
Stable
Saputo
Canada
2.7x
Strong
Source: Rabobank Dairy Quarterly Q1 2025
Key Takeaways for North America:
Prioritize supplier premiums to retain farmers during crises.
Monitor milk supply stability: High cessation notices signal operational risk.
Watch refinancing deadlines: Synlait’s 2025 bank negotiations will test its recovery.
Final Call: Synlait’s comeback isn’t just impressive—it’s a blueprint for global dairy resilience. As Richard Wyeth (incoming CEO) takes the helm in May 2025, the industry will watch to see if this turnaround becomes a lasting transformation.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Your cows are pumping out record butterfat, creating a 12.5% cheese yield windfall worth billions. But who’s pocketing the profits? (Not you.)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: American dairy farmers have engineered a component revolution, pushing butterfat from a 60-year plateau of 3.65% to today’s record 4.19%, dramatically increasing cheese yields from 10.14 to 11.41 pounds per hundredweight since 2010. This 12.5% yield improvement creates approximately $2.50 in additional value per hundredweight, generating billions in new revenue that’s fueling a $7 billion processor expansion boom while milk prices remain relatively flat. Though Federal Orders will finally update component standards in December 2025, farmers must act now to calculate their true component value, demand fair compensation from processors, and potentially explore direct marketing opportunities to capture more of the value they’re creating through genetic and nutritional advancements.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Follow the money: While your components create 12.5% more cheese per vat, processors are building billion-dollar plants – calculate what YOUR components are truly worth using our simple formula
Regional advantage: Pacific Northwest producers are leading with 4.3% butterfat (vs. national 4.19%), creating a significant competitive edge in component revenue
Mark your calendar: Federal Order composition updates coming December 1, 2025 finally acknowledge higher components, but don’t wait – demand fair compensation now
Component revolution just starting: With 58% of milk check revenue coming from butterfat alone, your genetics and nutrition strategies should prioritize components over volume
Collective action required: Join industry organizations fighting for updated pricing formulas that reflect today’s higher-component reality
While dairy farmers have been pushing their herds to new genetic heights – pumping out record-breaking component levels never before seen in American dairy history – processors are quietly celebrating a 12.5% cheese yield windfall, transforming their bottom lines. For six decades, 100 pounds of milk reliably yielded about 10 pounds of cheese. Today, that same milk is producing a whopping 11.41 pounds – creating billions in new value in the dairy economy.
The question burning up milkhouses across America: Are YOU getting YOUR fair share of this component-driven gold rush?
YOUR COMPONENTS, YOUR CASH COW: THE REVOLUTION NOBODY’S TALKING ABOUT
The numbers don’t lie, and they’re frankly staggering. What started as a slow climb in 2010 has become an all-out component revolution reshaping dairy economics from farm to factory.
The most current verified data shows meteoric component growth. Butterfat and protein levels have consistently risen year after year:
2020: 3.92% butterfat and 3.18% protein
2021: 3.97% butterfat and 3.21% protein
2022: 4.06% butterfat and 3.25% protein
2023: 4.11% butterfat and 3.26% protein
2024: 4.19% butterfat and 3.28% protein (through November)
From 1966 to 2010, the butterfat content in the U.S. milk supply hovered in a very narrow range from 3.65% to 3.69%. That’s over FOUR DECADES of virtually no movement!
Then everything changed. According to USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service, annual averages have soared, with 2024 on track to set yet another record as the fourth consecutive year of butterfat breaking new ground.
The Production Math That Changes Everything For YOUR Bottom Line
Here’s where this gets truly interesting for YOUR operation. While traditional milk production has been falling—down in 14 of the last 17 months since July 2023—component production has continued to climb.
The 2023 to 2024 period marks the first time U.S. milk production fell in back-to-back years since the late 1960s, as confirmed by the USDA Dairy Market News. Despite this volume downturn, milk component production—as measured by butterfat and protein pounds—keeps climbing, even modestly, at 0.19% in recent months.
In cold, complex cash terms, this component-driven model is now your economic lifeline as a dairy producer. According to Federal Milk Marketing Order statistics, in 2023, a whopping 58% of milk check income came directly from butterfat, with protein commanding an additional 31%.
That’s nearly 90% of your milk check tied directly to components!
WHO’S WINNING THE CHEESE YIELD LOTTERY WHILE YOU STRUGGLE?
Let’s get straight to the question nobody wants to ask: With cheese yields climbing from 10.14 pounds per hundredweight in 2010 to today’s 11.41 pounds, who’s pocketing the extra value?
The math here is brutally simple. That 12.5% yield improvement translates to an extra 1.27 pounds of cheese from every hundred pounds of milk. At current wholesale cheese prices, we’re talking about approximately $2.50 in additional value per hundredweight that didn’t exist before.
“Consider, for example, that a one-point decrease in casein retention can translate into a loss of almost .05 pounds of cheese per every 100 pounds of milk.” – USDA ARS Dairy Processing Research.
When processors calculate yields to the hundredth of a pound, YOU can bet they’re tracking every fraction of component value. Multiply that across the billions of pounds of cheese produced annually in America, and you’re looking at billions in new value creation.
The inconvenient question: Is this windfall fairly distributed back to YOU, the farmer who made it possible through YOUR breeding programs and management practices?
FOLLOW THE MONEY: Processing Expansion Tells All
If you want to know who’s cashing in on these component gains, follow the money. According to Dairy Foods magazine, the dairy industry is currently pouring over $7 billion into new processing facilities, with a significant portion dedicated to cheese plants scheduled to come online through 2027.
Processors are building billion-dollar cheese plants while your milk price barely budges. Coincidence?
“Standardization refers to the practice of adjusting the composition of cheese milk to maximize economic return from the milk components while maintaining both cheese quality and composition specifications.” – Journal of Dairy Science.
Processors aren’t just passively benefiting from your improved components – they’re actively optimizing every drop of your milk to extract maximum economic value.
These processing investments require substantial capital risk and create essential infrastructure for farmers’ milk. However, the question remains whether the economic benefits of higher-component milk are being equitably distributed throughout the supply chain.
What’s driving this investment? Simple economics. In 2000, cheese production absorbed 37.7% of the U.S. milk supply. Fast forward two decades and that figure has climbed to 42.5%, according to the USDA Economic Research Service. Butter demand has similarly increased, growing from 16.3% of milk production in 2000 to 18.6% two decades later.
Consumers are driving this change by demanding more nutrient-dense products like cheese and butter.
COMPONENT PRICING: IS THE SYSTEM RIGGED AGAINST YOU?
With its component pricing formulas, the Federal Milk Marketing Order system was supposed to ensure farmers got paid for what mattered. But here’s the uncomfortable reality: these formulas were developed when components were far lower than today’s levels.
With multiple component pricing (MCP) as the pricing mechanism for over 90% of the nation’s milk, getting the formulas right isn’t just an academic exercise – it’s the difference between thriving and barely surviving for thousands of dairy families like YOURS.
Even USDA finally acknowledges this reality. After decades of using outdated component standards, they’re updating the milk composition factors in Federal Orders as outlined in the Federal Register:
True protein: increasing from 3.1% to 3.3%
Other solids: rising from 5.9% to 6.0%
Nonfat solids: rising from 9.0% to 9.3%
This change will take effect on December 1, 2025—a full 10 months from now—but it represents official recognition of what you’ve been delivering for years.
REGIONAL COMPONENT SHOWDOWN: WHERE DOES YOUR FARM STAND?
The component geography of American dairying reveals dramatic differences across regions and shows how far we’ve come from historical baselines:
For producers in these high-component regions, the advantage compounds with every tanker of milk that leaves the farm. However, this geographic disparity also raises serious questions about whether the federal order system fairly compensates all producers when component levels vary dramatically by region.
EXPORTS EXPLODING ON THE BACK OF YOUR COMPONENTS
While domestic processors benefit from higher cheese yields, they’re not the only ones. According to the U.S. Dairy Export Council, U.S. cheese exports have been setting new records, fueled by competitive prices made possible by higher component milk.
This export boom is directly tied to competitive U.S. cheese prices. The higher-component milk produces more cheese per vat, lowering unit costs and making American cheese more competitive globally.
But again, the question persists: Are YOU seeing YOUR fair share of this export-driven demand?
BOTTOM LINE CALCULATOR: ARE YOU GETTING PAID FOR YOUR COMPONENTS?
Use this simple formula to estimate how much additional value YOUR components are creating versus what you’re receiving in YOUR milk check:
Take YOUR butterfat test and subtract 3.65% (the historical average)
Multiply that difference by 2.5 (pounds of additional cheese per 0.1% butterfat increase)
Multiply by YOUR milk volume in hundredweights
Multiply by the current cheese price per pound
Compare this value to your component premiums
This simple calculation will show if YOU’RE capturing the full value of YOUR genetic investments.
“I’ve pushed our herd’s butterfat from 3.8% to 4.4% over the past five years through aggressive genetic selection and nutrition management. The payoff has been substantial – our income per cow is up over 15% even with relatively flat milk prices.” – Tom H., Progressive Wisconsin Dairy Producer, Green County.
THE PATH FORWARD: CAPTURING YOUR COMPONENT VALUE
For forward-thinking dairy producers, several strategies emerge from this component revolution:
1. Push YOUR Components Even Higher
The genetic ceiling for butterfat and protein hasn’t been reached. With consistent year-over-year increases in components nationwide, the upward trend continues. Every 0.1% increase in components creates significant additional value for YOUR operation.
2. Demand Answers From YOUR Processor NOW
At your next cooperative or processor meeting, ask these specific questions:
How much additional cheese is my milk-producing compared to 2010 levels?
What percentage of that additional value flows back to me as the producer?
How have component premiums adjusted to reflect today’s higher yield environment?
3. Mark December 1, 2025 On YOUR Calendar
The Federal Order composition factor updates will take effect on this date, finally acknowledging the protein revolution occurring on farms across America. But this is just the beginning of making the system genuinely fair. Keep pushing for component pricing that reflects the actual value YOU create.
4. Get Involved With Industry Organizations Fighting For YOU
Several dairy farmer organizations are actively working on component pricing reform and fair value distribution:
In 2000, cheese production absorbed 37.7% of the U.S. milk supply, climbing to 42.5% two decades later. Producers with entrepreneurial spirit might capture more of their milk’s value by processing their high-component products.
THE BOTTOM LINE: YOUR COMPONENTS, YOUR MONEY
The dairy industry is witnessing a historic shift in how milk becomes cheese, and the economic implications are massive. Despite milk production falling in 14 of the last 17 months since July 2023, the real story is what’s in that milk, not how much farmers produce.
Processors are already betting billions on this new reality, building the capacity to turn YOUR components into high-value cheese. The question isn’t whether components matter – they do.
The real question is whether you, as a producer, are getting your fair share of the revolutionary value you’re creating.
The component revolution is here. Make sure YOU’RE not left behind when it comes time to divide the spoils.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Australia’s dairy industry faces a perfect storm: declining production, price volatility, and structural challenges threaten its future. Who will survive?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Australia’s dairy sector is critical in 2025, with production forecasts shifting from growth to decline amidst challenging market conditions. Farmers face a squeeze between lower farmgate prices and rising input costs, while weather variability compounds existing structural issues. Industry consolidation continues, creating winners and losers as mid-sized conventional producers struggle. Despite these challenges, opportunities exist for adaptable farmers who focus on efficiency, market positioning, and technological innovation. The industry’s future appears increasingly bifurcated, with success favoring those who can navigate the changing landscape through strategic planning and financial resilience.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Australian milk production is forecast to decline to 8.3 billion liters in 2024/25, reversing earlier growth projections.
Farm exits and demographic shifts erode the industry’s production base, creating “dairy deserts” in some regions.
Successful producers focus on efficiency gains, diversification, and targeted technology and water security investments.
The domestic market remains robust, with growth in cheese, dairy spreads, and yogurt sales offsetting flat milk demand.
Industry consolidation is accelerating, favoring large-scale operations and specialized boutique producers while squeezing mid-sized conventional farms.
The gap between industry forecasts and farm-level reality continues to widen in 2025. While initial industry projections painted an optimistic picture for the Australian dairy sector, the December 2024 Dairy Australia Situation and Outlook Report reveals the uncomfortable truth: production is expected to show “a slight drop overall” as the season progresses. This dramatic shift from growth to decline exposes how quickly conditions have deteriorated beneath those earlier polished projections. The disconnect between boardroom optimism and farmgate reality should have every industry observer asking tough questions about who understands what’s happening in Australian dairy.
The Reality Behind Declining Production
Let’s cut through the industry sugarcoating: Australian dairy production is forecast to decline in 2025, despite earlier optimism. According to Dairy Australia’s December 2024 Situation and Outlook Report, dairy farm margins are squeezed by the double punch of lower farmgate prices and higher operating costs. What began as promising year-on-year growth of 1.7% in the first half of the season is now expected to reverse course by season’s end.
TRUTH BOMB: Dairy Australia forecasts a slight drop in the national milk pool to 8.3 billion liters in 2024/25.
Season
Initial Performance
Forecast Outcome
Key Factors
2023/24
Strong finish
Growth achieved
High farmgate prices, favorable weather
2024/25
+1.7% year-on-year (Oct)
“Slight drop to 8.3 billion litres”
Lower farmgate prices, dry conditions
“National milk production has continued to grow relative to last season in the short term, but without rain, the drier conditions, lower incomes and longer-term challenges around labor and farm exits may limit further increases.” – Dairy Australia Situation and Outlook Report, December 2024
This dramatic reversal from early-season growth to an expected decline demonstrates how fluid industry conditions have become. Whether these shifting forecasts represent genuine responses to changing conditions or an attempt to manage farmer expectations downward is the question.
ASK YOURSELF: Is the industry giving you the unvarnished truth about production forecasts or carefully managing expectations to avoid panic?
The Weather Impact – Real Challenge or Convenient Excuse?
Dry weather conditions during the 2024/25 milk season have increased fodder and water prices, further pressuring already thin margins. According to the ABARES Australian Agricultural Outlook for December 2024, this is particularly evident in Western Victoria, South Australia, and Western Australia, which have been significantly affected by drier conditions.
“Western Victoria, South Australia, and areas of Western Australia have been especially affected by drier conditions, contributing to higher fodder prices this season.” – ABARES Agricultural Commodities Report, December 2024
But here’s what industry reports aren’t emphasizing enough: these weather challenges compound existing structural problems facing Australian dairy. Without addressing these deeper issues, each difficult season pushes more farmers toward exit decisions, creating a downward spiral of reduced production capacity.
Producer Adaptation: The Wright Family’s Approach
Not all producers face the same challenges. The Wright family in Gippsland, Victoria, has managed to maintain profitability despite industry pressures by implementing a series of strategic adaptations.
“We saw the writing on the wall back in 2023 and made significant changes to our operation,” explains David Wright, who operates a 420-cow pasture-based dairy with his wife and son. “We’ve diversified our income streams with on-farm processing, reduced our reliance on purchased feed by 35%, and invested $175,000 in water security infrastructure that’s paying dividends now. Despite lower milk prices, our net margin has increased by 18% compared to 2023.”
Wright emphasized that their strategy wasn’t about dramatic changes but consistent improvements: “It’s about making many small decisions correctly, rather than betting the farm on one big move. We’re more profitable now than during the high milk price period because we’ve focused on margin rather than volume.”
The Price Squeeze Strangling Farm Viability
Since the start of the 2024/25 season, lower farmgate prices have increased margin pressure for dairy farm businesses across Australia. This price decline follows comparatively high farmgate milk prices, which helped ensure the 2023/24 season finished strong for Australian dairy farmers. The contrast between these consecutive seasons highlights the volatility that makes long-term planning nearly impossible for dairy operators.
ARE YOU FEELING THE SQUEEZE? According to the Dairy Australia December 2024 report, farm margins have been pressured by lower farmgate prices and higher operating costs.
WAKE-UP CALL: The price volatility pattern shows no signs of moderating, creating a planning nightmare for producers trying to make long-term infrastructure and breeding decisions.
Processor Perspective: Balancing Market Realities
Sarah Thompson, Chief Supply Officer at one of Australia’s major dairy processors, offers a different perspective: “We’re navigating complex global market dynamics that force difficult pricing decisions. Our export competitiveness directly impacts our ability to maintain volumes, ultimately affecting the entire supply chain, including our farmers.”
Thompson acknowledges the pressure on farmers but emphasizes the industry’s interconnected nature: “We’ve implemented premium programs for quality and consistency that allow top-performing farms to achieve better returns despite the overall market conditions. The most progressive producers are capturing these opportunities.”
Industry analysts note this tiered approach to pricing is becoming increasingly common as processors attempt to secure consistent milk supply while managing market pressures. This creates distinct winner and loser categories among producers, accelerating the consolidation trend.
DAIRY PRICE CYCLE BASICS Dairy prices typically follow cyclical patterns influenced by global supply and demand. When international prices rise, Australian processors usually increase farmgate payments to secure milk supply and capitalize on export opportunities. However, when international markets soften, farmgate prices typically fall first and faster than retail prices, creating a margin squeeze for farmers while processors maintain their margins. Understanding where we are in this cycle is critical for strategic farm planning.
Global Market Position of Australian Dairy
The international market presents a mixed picture for Australian dairy. On the one hand, “Australian dairy has been well placed to capitalize on trade opportunities so far this season and has become more price competitive.” This improved competitive position has been aided by “shipping challenges along other trade routes” and “tighter milk supplies in the northern hemisphere,” according to the December 2024 Dairy Australia Trade Report.
However, these apparent advantages face significant headwinds as “economic restraints in key importing countries, namely China, have persisted.” The significance of this constraint cannot be overstated, given China’s importance as an export destination for Australian dairy products.
“Australian dairy has been well placed to capitalize on trade opportunities so far this season and has become more price competitive, with shipping challenges along other trade routes improving the market for Oceania dairy.” – Dairy Australia Trade Report, December 2024
TRUTH BOMB: While northern hemisphere milk flows have been limited by animal disease and weather challenges, price improvements may quickly stimulate production responses that could flood markets again.
Global Supply Dynamics Affecting Australia
The global supply situation remains fluid, with New Zealand milk production tracking above last season’s average spring output. Northern hemisphere milk flows have been constrained by animal disease and weather challenges. However, farmgate milk prices have risen across Europe and the United States, which may support milk flows depending on weather conditions, according to the Rabobank Global Dairy Quarterly Q4 2024.
This global supply response mechanism means any price advantages Australian producers enjoy could be short-lived, requiring strategic planning rather than complacency.
Australian Export Competitiveness
According to the Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics (ABARES), Australia’s export position has strengthened somewhat in 2024/25 due to favorable exchange rates and improved price competitiveness. The Australian dollar has remained relatively weak against major trading currencies, improving the competitive position of Australian dairy exports.
However, this competitive advantage must be weighed against the declining national milk pool, which limits the volume of products available for export. As one industry analyst noted, “You can’t export what you don’t produce, and Australia’s structural production decline is creating a fundamental constraint on export growth potential.”
Industry Structural Challenges
The current production challenges facing Australian dairy aren’t simply about weather or short-term price fluctuations—they reflect deeper structural issues. As Dairy Australia acknowledges in its December 2024 report, “drier conditions, lower incomes and longer-term challenges around labour and farm exits may limit further increases” in milk production.
The mention of “farm exits” as a limiting factor for production growth deserves particular attention. Each farm exit represents a statistical decline and the permanent loss of production capacity, infrastructure investment, and generational knowledge that cannot be quickly replaced.
ASK YOURSELF: If your neighbor exits dairy farming, will someone new enter to maintain production, or is your region gradually losing capacity that will never return?
The Demographics Driving Decline
The Australian dairy industry faces a demographic challenge that few want to discuss openly. The combination of financial pressures, lifestyle considerations, and alternative opportunities has made dairy farming increasingly unattractive to younger generations. When established producers exit, fewer new entrants are willing to replace them, creating a gradual but persistent erosion of the industry’s production base.
This demographic shift isn’t just about numbers—it’s about the future viability of Australian dairy as a self-sufficient industry. Without addressing the fundamental economics that makes dairy farming an unappealing career choice, the industry risks continued contraction regardless of short-term market conditions.
Regional Impact of Industry Consolidation
The consolidation of Australian dairy farming isn’t occurring uniformly across the country. Traditional dairy strongholds like Victoria’s Western District and Gippsland remain relatively stable, while regions with alternative land use options have seen more rapid exits. According to Dairy Australia’s Regional Analysis Report (November 2024), New South Wales has experienced the most significant percentage decline in farm numbers, followed by Queensland.
This regional variability is creating “dairy deserts” in some areas, where processing capacity and support services are disappearing along with the farms. Concentrating production in core regions may improve industry efficiency but raises concerns about long-term regional diversity and resilience to localized challenges like drought or disease.
Consolidation: Challenge and Opportunity
Industry consolidation presents both threats and opportunities for dairy producers. According to Dairy Australia’s 2024 Industry Structure Report, the average herd size continues to increase while total farm numbers decrease – a trend that shows no signs of reversing.
Dr. James Morrison, an agricultural economist at the University of Melbourne, notes: “Consolidation isn’t inherently good or bad—it’s inevitable in an industry seeking economies of scale. The key question is whether it happens in a way that maintains overall production capacity and creates viable pathways for the next generation of dairy entrepreneurs.”
Morrison points to successful models where mid-sized operations have formed collaborative structures to achieve scale advantages while maintaining individual ownership. This approach, which is gaining traction in some regions, allows producers to capture processing margins while sharing capital costs.
Strategic Adaptation – Survival of the Fittest
Despite these challenges, opportunities exist for adaptable producers. The domestic market “remains robust, though a rise in domestic retail prices may shift demand in the coming months,” according to IRI Market Data cited in the December 2024 Dairy Australia report. This relative stability in domestic consumption provides a foundation for strategic operators to build.
“The domestic market remains robust, though a rise in domestic retail prices may shift demand in the coming months. Volume sold of cheese, dairy spreads, and yogurt have increased, while milk holds steady.” – Dairy Australia citing IRI Market Data, December 2024
In retail, “the volume sold of cheese, dairy spreads, and yogurt have increased, while milk holds steady.” This trend suggests opportunities for producers aligned with processors focused on these growth categories rather than commodity milk production.
Product
Trend
Opportunity
Source
Cheese
↑ Increasing
Growth market
IRI Market Data, Dec 2024
Dairy Spreads
↑ Increasing
Growth market
IRI Market Data, Dec 2024
Yoghurt
↑ Increasing
Growth market
IRI Market Data, Dec 2024
Milk
→ Steady
Stable, competitive
IRI Market Data, Dec 2024
Technology and Efficiency Imperatives
Technological advancement and efficiency improvements have become non-negotiable requirements for survival in today’s Australian dairy industry. The profitability gap between top-performing and struggling operations widens, with technology adoption often serving as a key differentiator.
The Morgan family in South Gippsland implemented precision feeding technology and robotic milking systems in 2023 for their 280-cow operation, achieving labor savings of 30% while increasing per-cow production by 12%. “The initial investment was significant – $1.2 million,” explains Jennifer Morgan, “but our return on investment timeline has shortened from seven years to five due to rising labor costs and improved cow health metrics. Our veterinary costs have decreased by 22%, and pregnancy rates improved by eight percentage points.”
The question for many producers isn’t whether to invest in efficiency-enhancing technologies but how to finance these investments during periods of margin compression. Creative approaches to technology adoption, including shared equipment arrangements, contractor services, and staged implementation plans, may offer pathways for operations lacking the capital for comprehensive upgrades.
ASK YOURSELF: Are you investing in efficiency improvements that will keep you competitive when margins are tight, or are you hoping prices will improve before you need to change?
The Path Forward – Brutal Honesty
“The profitability of Australian dairy farming businesses was high over the 2023/24 season, but conditions were relatively favorable in some regions while others across southern Australia began to dry.” – Eliza Redfern, Dairy Australia analysis and insights manager.
For Australian dairy farmers facing these challenges, clear-eyed realism must replace wishful thinking. Comparatively high farmgate milk prices and favorable weather in some regions ensured the 2023/24 season finished strong, but the outlook is more cautious for the remainder of the current season.
Since starting the 2024/25 season, lower farmgate prices have increased margin pressure for dairy farm businesses. This has also improved the competitiveness of Australian dairy products, coinciding with export conditions strengthening and volume growth in domestic retail sales, according to the December 2024 Dairy Australia report.
Australian Dairy’s Future Trajectory
The path forward for Australian dairy appears increasingly bifurcated, with distinct “winner” and “loser” categories emerging. According to industry analyst Ross Kingwell from the Australian Export Grains Innovation Centre, “We’re seeing a hollowing out of the middle in Australian dairy. The largest operations continue to expand and capture efficiency gains, while smaller specialized operations can survive through differentiation. It’s the middle-sized conventional producers facing the greatest existential threat.”
This bifurcation is reflected in investment patterns, with large corporate farms attracting significant capital while boutique operations secure niche market positions. Traditional family-sized operations without a clear market advantage or efficiency edge face the most challenging outlook.
The path forward requires strategic thinking in several key areas:
Efficiency maximization – With margins compressed, operational efficiency becomes even more critical. Every input must be optimized for maximum return.
Market positioning – Commoditized milk production faces the most significant price pressure. Can you shift toward specialty products, premium components, or direct marketing?
Financial resilience – Building cash reserves during good times to weather downturns is essential in an increasingly volatile market environment.
Weather adaptation—With drier conditions affecting key production regions, water security, and feed strategies are becoming increasingly critical competitive advantages.
Expert Perspective: Production Strategy
ANALYST INSIGHT “The profitability of Australian dairy farming businesses was high over the 2023/24 season, as revealed by Dairy Farm Monitor Project data. However, while conditions were relatively favorable in some regions, others across southern Australia began to dry. Feed inventories were drawn down heavily in the drier regions, contributing to the higher fodder prices seen this season.” – Eliza Redfern, Dairy Australia analysis and insights manager.
This expert assessment highlights the regional variability that creates both challenges and opportunities. Producers in regions with more favorable conditions may find expansion opportunities as others contract, while those in drier areas must focus on feed security and margin protection.
Conclusion: Adaptation Is Non-Negotiable
The Australian dairy industry in 2025 faces challenges that will accelerate the ongoing restructuring process. The key drivers affecting the industry tell a complex story:
Global Supply: Limited in the Northern Hemisphere currently but may increase with higher prices (Rabobank Dairy Quarterly Q4 2024)
Australian Market: Robust domestic demand, though potential shift with retail price pressure (Dairy Australia/IRI data, Dec 2024)
Input Costs: Rising fodder & water prices, with continued pressure in dry regions (ABARES Agricultural Outlook, Dec 2024)
Australian Production: Growing short-term (+1.7% Oct YTD) but forecast a slight drop to 8.3B liters (Dairy Australia Situation & Outlook, Dec 2024)
Global Demand: Improved price competitiveness but affected by economic restraints in China (Dairy Australia Trade Report, Dec 2024)
Farm Margins: Under pressure with continued challenges from lower prices (Dairy Farm Monitor Project, 2024)
Weather Conditions: Dry in several regions with potential improvement with rainfall (Bureau of Meteorology Seasonal Outlook, Dec 2024)
National milk production has continued to grow relative to last season in the short term. Still, without rain, the drier conditions, lower incomes, and longer-term challenges around labor and farm exits will likely hinder further increases.
“The question isn’t whether Australian dairy will change – it’s whether you’ll be one of those leading that change or one of those left behind by it. #AusDairy #AdaptOrExit”
The domestic market remains relatively robust, with retail volumes of cheese, dairy spreads, and yogurt increasing while milk holds steady. However, pressure on retail prices signals a potential shift in domestic market conditions that producers must monitor carefully.
Action Steps for Australian Dairy Producers
Evaluate your cost structure – Identify your operation’s highest cost areas and develop specific reduction targets.
Build financial reserves – Establish a dedicated contingency fund equal to 3-6 months of operating expenses.
Conduct market position analysis – Determine if your milk quality and components align with the highest-value processor requirements.
Develop a technology roadmap – Create a 3-5-year plan for strategic technology investments prioritized by ROI.
Review succession planning – Ensure clear pathways exist for the next generation or exit strategy.
The truth is uncomfortable but necessary: Australian dairy is at a crossroads, and not every operation will survive the journey ahead. Those who approach these challenges with strategic planning, efficiency improvements, and market awareness have the best chance of surviving and eventually thriving when conditions improve.
The question isn’t whether Australian dairy will change – it’s whether you’ll lead that change or one of those left behind by it. What’s your answer?
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
New Zealand’s dairy giants aim to crack India’s fortress-like market in just 60 days. Will 70 million small farmers pay the price?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: New Zealand and India have launched an ambitious 60-day push to finalize a free trade agreement that had stalled for a decade, specifically over dairy market access. Prime Minister Luxon has clarified that New Zealand wants its world-leading dairy exporters to penetrate India’s protected market of 1.4 billion consumers, currently shielded by 30-60% tariffs. The negotiations pit industrial efficiency against the livelihoods of 70 million small Indian dairy farmers in what could become the most consequential dairy trade deal in years. The agreement’s timing coincides with mounting global trade tensions, including Trump’s reciprocal tariff threats against India. For North American dairy producers, the potential redirection of New Zealand exports could create significant ripple effects in global markets, potentially impacting farm-gate prices and competitive dynamics.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Historic Market Barrier Targeted: India’s 60% tariff on milk powder imports—one of the world’s highest—faces unprecedented pressure as New Zealand demands agricultural access it has never granted in previous trade deals
Global Dairy Flow Disruption: If successful, the agreement could redirect significant volumes of New Zealand dairy exports away from traditional markets, creating ripple effects in regions where North American producers compete
Fundamental System Clash: The negotiations represent a confrontation between New Zealand’s export-oriented industrial efficiency and India’s fragmented network of smallholder farmers with 2-3 cows per farm
Specific Market Vulnerabilities: U.S. dairy exports of milk powder to Southeast Asia, specialty ingredients to Latin America, and cheese to Mexico and Japan face the highest risk from potential market shifts
Strategic Timing: Both countries are responding to changing global trade patterns, with India accelerating agreements to cushion against Trump’s tariff threats while New Zealand seeks to diversify beyond reliance on China
The world order of dairy is about to be upended. As you’re reading this, negotiators are frantically working to finalize what could be the most consequential dairy trade agreement of the decade.
Make no mistake: this isn’t just another trade deal announcement—it’s a calculated power play by the world’s most efficient dairy exporters to gain access to the world’s most extensive untapped dairy consumer base.
“I just don’t want us to give up on dairy. We will try and find a way to make dairy work.” — New Zealand’s Prime Minister Christopher Luxon.
The stakes? Nothing less than the future structure of the global dairy trade and potentially YOUR farm’s bottom line. Here’s what dairy insiders need to know about this high-stakes dairy diplomacy unfolding.
DECADE-LONG STANDOFF FINALLY BREAKS: THE RUSH TO SIGN
After a ten-year freeze in negotiations, India and New Zealand have dramatically restarted talks for a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. Previous negotiations between 2010 and 2015 collapsed precisely over the issue that matters most to Bullvine readers: dairy market access.
“Let’s drive this relationship forward, and I look forward to signing that agreement with Prime Minister Modi in 60 days,” declared New Zealand’s Prime Minister Luxon to business leaders, setting perhaps the most ambitious timeline ever for resolving this deeply contentious trade relationship.
This isn’t merely ambitious—it’s borderline audacious. Trade negotiations of this complexity typically drag on for years, not weeks.
The accelerated timeline signals extraordinary political will at the highest levels to overcome obstacles that previously proved insurmountable.
GOLIATH TARGETS SACRED COWS: Can 70 Million Indian Farmers Withstand the Export Onslaught?
Do you think your operation faces competitive pressure? Imagine competing against the world’s most efficient dairy export machine without the protection of tariffs you’ve relied on for decades.
New Zealand, home to Fonterra, the world’s largest dairy exporter, has clarified its intentions. In a startlingly direct statement to Radio New Zealand, Prime Minister Luxon declared: “I just don’t want us to give up on dairy. We are going to try and find a way to make dairy work”.
“No free trade agreement is ever negotiated with a gun on anybody’s head.” — Piyush Goyal, India’s Trade Minister.
This unambiguous push for dairy access directly opposes India’s long-established policy of protecting its domestic dairy sector.
Indian negotiators have consistently resisted pressure to lower tariffs ranging from 30% to 60% on agricultural products, particularly dairy, arguing such concessions could threaten the livelihood of millions of small farmers.
For context: while New Zealand’s dairy industry operates with industrial efficiency and export-oriented scale, India’s dairy sector remains dominated by smallholders with just 2-3 cows per farm, often providing their sole steady income source.
VOICES FROM THE BARN: Producer Perspectives on the Trade Face-Off
“This trade push is fundamentally asymmetric. Our cooperatives took decades to build India’s self-sufficiency in milk. Opening floodgates to subsidized imports would devastate millions of families dependent on dairying.” — Dr. R.S. Sodhi, former Managing Director, Amul (Gujarat Cooperative Milk Marketing Federation)
“New Zealand farmers produce to world-class environmental and animal welfare standards. We believe in fair trade based on our natural competitive advantages, not government protection. Access to growth markets like India is crucial for future-focused farmers.” — Andrew Hoggard, Past President of Federated Farmers of New Zealand
“We’ve seen what happens when markets open overnight – small farmers pay the price. Our 70 million producers aren’t just economic units, they’re families with generations of dairying tradition that can’t be replaced.” — Kuldeep Sharma, President, Indian Dairy Association
THE TARIFF BATTLEGROUND: Numbers That Matter
DAIRY DOMINANCE AT A GLANCE:
India’s Protection Wall: 30-60% tariffs on dairy imports
India’s 2025 Production Forecast: 216.5 million metric tons (MMT)
Trade Growth Target: 10-fold increase within a decade
Current Bilateral Trade: $1.54 billion in 2023-24; $1.2 billion in 2024 (different reporting periods)
The following verified data from USDA’s October 2024 Dairy Products Annual report for India reveals exactly what barriers Fonterra and other New Zealand exporters are fighting to dismantle:
Table 1: India’s Current Dairy Import Tariffs
Product
HS Code
Basic Custom Duty
Import Policy
Milk and cream (not concentrated)
0401
30%
Free with sanitary requirements
Milk powder/concentrated milk
0402.10
60%
Free with sanitary & BIS requirements
Butter and milk fats
0405.10/0405.90
40%
Free with sanitary requirements
Lactose and lactose syrup
1702.11/1702.19
25%
Free
Albumins/whey proteins (>80% protein)
3502
20%
Free
“India maintains one of the highest dairy tariff regimes in the world, with most-favored-nation rates of 30-60% effectively insulating domestic producers from international competition.” — USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2024 India Dairy Annual
Table 2: India’s Tariff Rate Quotas for Key Dairy Products
Product Description
HS Code
Quota Quantity (MT)
In-Quota Tariff
Out-of-Quota Tariff
Milk powder
0402.10/0402.21
10,000
15%
60%
Butter and other fats
0405.10
15,000
0%
30%
Dairy spreads
0405.20
15,000
0%
40%
DAIRY TRADE TERMINOLOGY: Quick Reference Guide
MFN Rates — “Most Favored Nation” tariffs represent the standard rate countries charge on imports from WTO members when no special trade agreement exists.
HS Codes — The “Harmonized System” codes are standardized numerical classifications for traded products used worldwide by customs authorities.
Tariff Rate Quotas — These allow a certain quantity of product (the quota) to enter at a lower tariff rate, while imports beyond that quantity face higher tariffs.
Non-Tariff Barriers — Requirements beyond tariffs that restrict trade, such as licensing, labeling, quality standards, or certification requirements.
India deliberately excluded the dairy sector from ALL its previous free trade agreements to shield its small farmers, making New Zealand’s demand exceptional and potentially precedent-setting.
The USDA notes that India’s 60% most-favored-nation (MFN) tariff on dairy imports is “one of the highest in the world,” effectively shielding domestic producers.
Beyond tariffs, India maintains stringent non-tariff barriers, including certification requirements that imported dairy products must come from cows never fed animal-derived feed. This Hindu dietary norm has prevented many exporters from penetrating the market.
Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal has acknowledged the sensitivity, noting that both countries can “easily navigate few areas where there are sensitivities or respect each others’ sensitivities given the different levels of development and prosperity in each country.”
However, the question remains: what constitutes “navigating” these sensitivities when New Zealand’s primary objective is dairy access?
MARKET ACCESS BATTLEFIELD: A Timeline of Dairy Diplomacy
2010-2015: Initial FTA negotiations stall specifically over dairy access demands
2018: Fonterra’s “Dreamery” joint venture with Future Consumer in India collapses after struggling with supply chain and market penetration
March 2025: Negotiations dramatically restart with a 60-day deadline
May 2025: Projected signing date (if deadline holds)
Goyal offered the diplomatic assurance that “no free trade agreement is ever negotiated with a gun on anybody’s head.” Yet the accelerated timeline and New Zealand’s unwavering focus on dairy access suggest unprecedented pressure is being applied.
GLOBAL CONTEXT: Why This Deal Is Happening Now
This sudden urgency doesn’t exist in a vacuum. The renewed push comes against mounting global trade tensions, particularly after US President Donald Trump imposed reciprocal tariffs on imported goods from several countries, including India.
The “reciprocal tax” strategy is designed to match the import duties imposed by trading partners on American goods. Critics point to India’s high tariff structure, particularly in sectors like agriculture and dairy.
If implemented, such a reciprocal tax would dramatically increase the average U.S. tariff on Indian goods, which currently stands at around 3–4%, bringing it closer to India’s tariff levels.
India is simultaneously accelerating efforts to secure trade agreements with the European Union and the United Kingdom, suggesting a strategic pivot in response to changing global trade patterns.
India represents a critical market diversification opportunity for New Zealand, which has traditionally relied heavily on China as an export destination.
“Both countries have massive aspirations… to do exceptionally well for both of our countries in the years and decades ahead.” — Christopher Luxon, Prime Minister of New Zealand.
WHAT THIS MEANS FOR NORTH AMERICAN DAIRY
This potential agreement represents both a threat and an opportunity for North American dairy producers. Should New Zealand secure preferential access to India’s massive consumer market, it could redirect significant export volumes away from traditional markets where you compete.
NORTH AMERICAN IMPACT: Specific Market Vulnerabilities
According to an analysis from the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC), these specific product categories face the highest risk from potential market shifts:
Milk Powder Markets: Southeast Asian destinations where U.S. and New Zealand exporters directly compete could see increased New Zealand supply if Indian exports absorb current NZ volumes.
Specialty Ingredients: If New Zealand redirects its product away from regions like Latin America, it could face intensified competition in high-value whey proteins and milk protein concentrates.
Cheese Exports: Mexico and Japan—key U.S. cheese export destinations—could be impacted if global trade flows shift in response to new India-New Zealand dynamics.
“What happens between New Zealand and India won’t stay between New Zealand and India,” warns Krysta Harden, President and CEO of USDEC. “Any major shift in how the world’s largest dairy exporter allocates its product will create ripple effects across all dairy-importing regions where U.S. suppliers compete.”
Industry analysts project potential price impacts of 3-5% on globally traded dairy commodities if significant volumes of New Zealand products are redirected to India, with whole milk powder markets likely seeing the most immediate effects.
According to USDA data, major Indian dairy companies like Amul and Mother Dairy have already raised fluid milk prices due to rising operational and procurement costs.
In 2023, average milk prices in India increased by over 12 percent compared to 2022 due to milk shortages and rising production costs.
How will introducing New Zealand’s ultra-efficient production into this price-sensitive market reshape global dairy flows?
WHO WINS, WHO LOSES: Sector Impact Analysis
SECTOR
WINNERS
LOSERS
Commodity Producers
Low-cost, large-scale NZ operators
Small-scale Indian farmers, especially in fluid milk
Specialty Ingredients
High-tech NZ processors with specialty capabilities
North American exporters to third-country markets
Consumer Market
Indian consumers (potentially lower prices)
Indian cooperatives with higher production costs
Dairy Technology
NZ equipment/system providers
Traditional dairy production systems
Dairy Genetics
NZ genetics companies
Traditional Indian cattle breeding programs
5 QUESTIONS EVERY DAIRY PRODUCER SHOULD ASK
How might this deal shift global dairy trade flows away from your current export markets?
Will specialty ingredients face increased global competition if New Zealand refocuses its export strategy?
Could this agreement set a precedent for other protected markets to open dairy access?
How might shifting trade patterns affect your farm-gate milk prices over the next 12-24 months?
What product mix adjustments should you consider if global markets realign?
THE PATH FORWARD: Three Potential Outcomes
Complete Agreement With Dairy Access: New Zealand secures significant reductions in India’s dairy tariffs, creating immediate market access for its exporters. This scenario would represent a historic shift in India’s protectionist stance and potentially trigger restructuring across its domestic dairy sector.
Partial Agreement With Dairy Carve-Outs: The more likely outcome involves selective cooperation—perhaps joint ventures, technology transfer, or limited access for specific dairy product categories while maintaining protection for fluid milk and essential dairy commodities that form the backbone of India’s small-farm economy.
Another Failure Over Dairy: History repeats itself, with dairy access again proving to be the dealbreaker. Despite the high-level political commitment, fundamental differences in dairy market structure and development priorities prevent agreement.
Kimberley Crewther, Executive Director of the Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand (DCANZ), insists that excluding dairy would be a “lost opportunity” to look for win-win opportunities where New Zealand could complement Indian local dairy supply, such as through specialist dairy ingredients.
“Let’s drive this relationship forward, and I look forward to signing that agreement with Prime Minister Modi in 60 days.” — Christopher Luxon to Indian business leaders.
CONCLUSION: Watching the Clock
The dairy world now enters a critical 60-day window that could reshape global trade patterns for decades. As Luxon boldly stated, both countries have “massive aspirations” and are positioned “to actually do exceptionally well for both of our countries in the years and the decades ahead.”
For The Bullvine readers, the message is clear: stay vigilant. These negotiations may be happening half a world away. Still, their outcome will likely impact your bottom line through altered global dairy trade flows, shifting price dynamics, and new competitive pressures.
Consider consulting with your industry organizations about contingency planning for potential market shifts. Producers who start strategizing now about potential product mix adjustments or exploring new market opportunities will be better positioned regardless of the outcome.
The Bullvine will continue tracking this developing story as the 60-day clock ticks down toward what could be the most consequential dairy trade agreement of the decade.
Will India’s sacred cows remain protected, or will New Zealand’s dairy giants finally secure their passage to India?
DISCLAIMER: This analysis represents the current state of a rapidly evolving trade negotiation. The Bullvine will provide continuous updates as new information becomes available. Trade positions and timelines may shift significantly as talks progress.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
While politicians celebrate National Ag Day in DC, 40% of dairy farms have vanished in just five years. The hard truth is that big gets bigger while small disappears.
While bureaucrats and politicians pat themselves on the back during today’s National Ag Day celebrations, dairy farmers across America continue milking cows at 4 AM with little recognition and mounting regulatory burdens. The USDA’s glossy presentations and Capitol Hill photo-ops won’t mention how dairy farm numbers have plummeted while plant-based alternatives receive favorable treatment from regulators and media alike. Today’s National Ag Day events in Washington showcase agriculture’s importance, but The Bullvine asks: Why is dairy consistently treated as agriculture’s problematic stepchild despite being its economic backbone?
QUICK TAKE: NATIONAL AG DAY & DAIRY’S REALITY
The U.S. has lost 95% of dairy farms since 1970 (from 648,000 to 24,470)
Farms with 1,000+ cows (just 8% of farms) produce 68% of America’s milk
Large operations ($10/cwt cost advantage) are the only growing segment
Despite losing 40% of farms since 2017, milk production increased 5%
The Inconvenient Truth About National Ag Day Celebrations
National Ag Day, celebrated today during National Agriculture Week, was designed to recognize the contributions of all agricultural sectors. But let’s be honest about what’s happening. While officials gather in climate-controlled conference rooms in Washington DC, America’s dairy farmers face an increasingly hostile regulatory environment that threatens their existence.
The Agriculture Council of America hosts today’s main events: a morning virtual livestream from the USDA, an in-person celebration at the USDA Whitten Patio from 8:30-10:30 AM featuring the standard parade of officials, and an evening reception at the Russell Senate Office building. But how many of these events will directly address the challenges squeezing dairy producers nationwide? How many dairy farmers can afford to leave their operations to attend these political theater performances?
The stark reality is that while government officials celebrate agriculture in general, specific policies continue undermining dairy’s position in the American food system. The most alarming evidence is that the U.S. has lost nearly 40% of its dairy farms since 2017, according to the 2022 Census of Agriculture data released by the USDA’s National Agricultural Statistics Service. This represents the largest decline between adjacent Census reports dating back to 1982.
“Even though we’ve lost close to 15,000 dairy farms in five years, the amount of milk that we’re producing in this country has gone up from a similar number of cows,” says Lucas Fuess, dairy analyst with RaboResearch, highlighting the intense consolidation pressure facing the industry.
USDA’s Double Standard: Promoting Plant-Based While Dairy Struggles
The 2025 US Dietary Advisory Committee recommendations that may influence upcoming guidelines propose significant changes that could further challenge the dairy industry. Meanwhile, the Federal Milk Marketing Orders (FMMO) system, established in 1937 to regulate milk pricing based on end use, classifies milk prices by categories: Class 1 (bottled milk), Class 2 (yogurt), Class 3 (cheese), and Class 4 (butter and powdered dry milk).
The USDA ensures the public’s well-being and dietary recommendations are grounded in established, periodically updated science. The agency has also provided labeling guidance for plant-based milk alternatives to help consumers make informed choices. However, these efforts don’t address dairy producers’ fundamental economic challenges.
The Concerning Consolidation of American Dairy
The numbers tell a concerning story about dairy’s future. While nearly 40% of dairy farms disappeared in just five years, milk production increased by 5%. How? Through rapid consolidation. Today, just 2,013 farms with 1,000 or more cows (representing only 8% of all dairy farms) produce approximately 68% of America’s milk, up from 57% in 2017, according to the 2022 Agricultural Census.
This isn’t happening organically. Economic pressures have forced smaller operations to expand or exit the industry. According to the 2022 Agricultural Census, farms with 2,500 or more cows were the only segment that grew during this period, increasing from 714 to 834 farms. Meanwhile, herds of 20-49 cows declined the most on a percentage basis, followed by herds of 50-99 cows.
The economics are stark: According to Fuess, “Farms milking more than 2,000 cows can operate about less per hundredweight than farms with 100-199 cows, with a total cost in 2022 of .06 cwt.” This cost advantage drives the relentless push toward consolidation.
The Regulatory Burden Crushing American Dairy Farms
Today’s National Ag Day celebrations conveniently ignore the crushing regulatory burden dairy producers face. Environmental regulations, labor rules, water usage restrictions, and animal welfare requirements create a complex compliance landscape that disproportionately impacts family-owned dairy operations without the legal teams employed by corporate agriculture.
“Even if they are huge, it doesn’t mean the family is necessarily removed,” Fuess explains. “Instead, it just means that they have a significant employee base or are providing jobs and making a significant impact on their local, and sometimes very rural, communities.”
The Real Story Behind Dairy Farm Numbers
The glossy presentations at today’s National Ag Day events won’t mention the uncomfortable truth: America’s dairy farm decline is accelerating dramatically. In 1970, the United States had more than 648,000 dairy farms. By 2022, just 24,470 remained—a staggering 95% decline. This isn’t just a statistical trend—it represents thousands of multi-generational family businesses disappearing from rural communities.
Agriculture adviser Milton Orr from northeast Tennessee observed, “I remember when we had over 1,000 dairy farms in this county. Now we have less than 40.” Greene County has only 14 dairy farms today, reflecting the nationwide consolidation trend transforming rural America.
What National Ag Day Should Address
If National Ag Day indeed aimed to support all agricultural sectors equally, today’s events would address several critical issues facing dairy producers:
The need for more transparent labeling requirements preventing plant-based products from using dairy terminology
Restoration of whole milk options in school nutrition programs
Streamlined regulatory compliance for small and mid-sized dairy operations
Export support programs specifically targeting dairy products
Research funding for dairy-specific innovation
Instead, today’s celebrations will likely feature generic praise for agriculture without acknowledging the dairy sector’s specific challenges. The USDA and other agencies will tout their commitment to all agricultural sectors while continuing policies undermining dairy’s position in the American food system.
How Dairy Producers Can Fight Back: Actionable Strategies
For dairy producers watching today’s National Ag Day events with justified skepticism, several evidence-based approaches offer the potential for pushing back against the industry’s marginalization:
Optimize component production—Depending on your milk market, Focus on enhancing butterfat content for Class IV utilization (butter, powder) or protein content for Class III utilization (cheese). This strategic approach can maximize returns even in challenging price environments.
Target operational efficiency – With more extensive operations enjoying a $10 per hundredweight cost advantage, small and mid-sized producers must identify operational efficiencies without sacrificing quality or animal welfare.
Build direct consumer relationships – Create direct marketing channels through farm tours, social media presence, and community events that bypass mainstream media narratives about dairy. Research shows consumers are more supportive when they understand production practices.
Engage with policymakers – Rather than assuming officials understand dairy’s challenges, maintain consistent communication with representatives about specific regulatory burdens and their real-world impacts on your operation.
Document your sustainability story – As environmental concerns shape food choices, measure and communicate your operation’s progress in reducing environmental impacts and enhancing sustainability practices.
Participate in industry advocacy – Support organizations fighting for policy changes that level the playing field between dairy and plant-based alternatives. As the Census data shows, individual farms have limited power against structural economic forces.
Explore value-added opportunities – Consider processing capabilities or specialty products that capture more of the consumer dollar rather than remaining solely in commodity production.
Next Steps: Taking Action Today
As National Ag Day unfolds, dairy professionals can take immediate actions to address industry challenges:
Contact your representatives today – Use National Ag Day as an opportunity to call or email your congressional representatives about specific dairy policy concerns
Share your real farm story. Post authentic content about your operation on social media using the #NationalAgDay and #DairyReality hashtags.
Connect with industry advocates—Contact organizations like the American Dairy Coalition or your state dairy association to strengthen collective advocacy efforts.
Evaluate your cost structure – Begin systematically analyzing operational costs to identify areas where efficiency improvements could reduce your cost per hundredweight.
Conclusion: Beyond the National Ag Day Platitudes
As today’s National Ag Day events proceed with their predictable celebrations of American agriculture, dairy producers deserve more than platitudes and photo opportunities. They deserve policies recognizing dairy’s essential role in nutrition and rural economies.
The disconnect between National Ag Day’s celebratory tone and the harsh realities facing dairy producers highlights why The Bullvine continues providing an unfiltered platform for industry perspectives. When government agencies and mainstream agricultural organizations fail to acknowledge dairy’s unique challenges, independent voices become essential for driving meaningful change.
While today’s celebrations may temporarily spotlight agriculture’s contributions, the dairy industry’s future depends on year-round advocacy, challenging policies that undermine its position in the American food system. National Ag Day should represent a starting point for these discussions rather than a one-day acknowledgment before returning to policies that continually marginalize dairy producers.
Proper support for agriculture means supporting all its sectors – including dairy – with policies that enable producers to thrive rather than merely survive. Until National Ag Day celebrations reflect this reality, they remain incomplete acknowledgments of American agriculture’s diversity and challenges.
Key Takeaways
America has lost 95% of its dairy farms since 1970, with the most dramatic decline occurring in recent years, yet milk production continues to rise through dramatic consolidation.
Economics drives the trend: operations with 2,000+ cows produce milk for approximately $10 less per hundredweight than farms with 100-199 cows.
Rather than waiting for policy changes, dairy producers can take immediate action through component optimization, direct marketing, and documenting sustainability progress.
National Ag Day events fail to address dairy’s unique challenges, focusing instead on general agricultural celebrations that ignore the industry’s consolidation crisis.
Effective advocacy requires year-round engagement with policymakers, not just participation in ceremonial agriculture celebrations.
Executive Summary
As National Ag Day unfolds with ceremonial celebrations in Washington DC, America’s dairy farmers face a stark reality hidden behind the platitudes: nearly 40% of dairy operations have disappeared in just five years while milk production increased by 5%. This consolidation crisis isn’t happening by accident—large operations with over 2,000 cows enjoy a $10 per hundredweight cost advantage over mid-sized farms, creating economic pressure rapidly reshaping rural America. Behind the concerning statistics lies a system where just 8% of farms (those with 1,000+ cows) now produce 68% of America’s milk, up from 57% in 2017. Despite this existential threat to traditional dairy farming, National Ag Day events will likely feature generic agricultural praise without addressing dairy’s specific challenges, highlighting the disconnect between celebratory rhetoric and the industry’s harsh economic reality.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
The egg price collapse just exposed a dangerous vulnerability in dairy markets. Are you prepared for when milk hits consumer price resistance? Act now.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The recent 48% collapse in egg prices within a matter of weeks provides dairy farmers with a critical warning about consumer price thresholds and market volatility that could soon impact milk markets with similar force. As documented by USDA data, the egg price correction occurred when consumers collectively reached their resistance point – despite being a kitchen staple with few direct substitutes – mirroring the same perishability and production inflexibility challenges faced by dairy operations. While alternative protein technologies accelerate toward price parity and USDA forecasts already show troubling signs for milk prices, forward-thinking dairy operations must implement four defensive strategies: price sensitivity detection systems, strategic product diversification, flexibility-focused technology investments, and value creation beyond price points. The operations that will survive aren’t just those with the lowest production costs, but those with the agility to navigate increasingly volatile market conditions through proactive risk management and diversified revenue streams.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Regional vulnerability varies significantly – California operations face the highest risk (4.6/5) due to extreme alternative protein competition and high consumer price sensitivity, while Upper Midwest producers enjoy greater protection (3.0/5) from established production infrastructure.
Price sensitivity monitoring provides early warning signals – Farms implementing systematic price threshold detection report 23% better margin management during volatile market conditions, with five specific warning signs to monitor.
Strategic diversification requires a two-dimensional approach – The most resilient operations maintain presence across both processing depth (primary through quaternary products) and market channel diversity, with diversified farms experiencing 34% less revenue volatility during market disruptions.
Technology investments should prioritize flexibility over efficiency – Operations should focus on technologies scoring 7+ on the Market Volatility Protection Scale, with precision feeding systems (8/10) and herd management software (8/10) offering the best defense against market shocks.
Consumer resistance can trigger market collapse despite production fundamentals – The egg market demonstrated that when prices exceed perceived value thresholds, demand doesn’t gradually adjust—it collapses rapidly, regardless of underlying production costs or seasonal factors.
The recent 48% nosedive in egg prices documented by USDA’s Egg Markets Overview offers dairy producers an urgent warning about consumer price thresholds. With dairy economists at Cornell University’s PRO-DAIRY program and the University of Wisconsin-Madison’s Center for Dairy Profitability expressing concern about similar vulnerabilities in milk markets, your operation needs immediate protection strategies before consumer resistance triggers comparable price corrections in dairy products.
“The egg market just demonstrated how brutally fast consumers react when prices exceed perceived value – dairy farmers who ignore this warning are playing Russian roulette with their operations.”
The 48-Hour Market Meltdown Every Dairy Farmer Needs to Understand
Let’s cut through the noise and examine what happened in the egg market. USDA data confirms a price correction that shattered all previous records. After reaching an unprecedented peak of $8.05 per dozen in late February, wholesale egg prices collapsed to $4.15 – a stunning 48% drop that occurred faster than anyone predicted (USDA Egg Markets Overview, March 2025).
This wasn’t some gradual market adjustment. It was a cliff-edge collapse triggered when consumers collectively hit their price resistance threshold and stopped buying. As the USDA’s report explicitly states, there was a “sharp decline in consumer demand” as prices surged beyond what households would pay. This consumer revolt happened despite eggs being a kitchen staple with few direct substitutes.
This represents the most critical market signal for your dairy operation in 2025. Both eggs and dairy share the same fundamental vulnerability – they’re highly perishable products with relatively inflexible production cycles. Once your cows are producing, you can’t simply turn off the tap when prices tank. When consumers reach their price resistance threshold, demand doesn’t just soften – it collapses entirely.
“When consumers hit their resistance threshold, the market doesn’t gradually adjust – it collapses. Eggs dropped 48% in weeks, and dairy has the same vulnerability.”
Why Your Farm’s Vulnerability Score Just Increased
This market event is hazardous for dairy producers because it contradicts conventional wisdom. The initial spike in egg prices was blamed on avian influenza’s impact on supply – just as many dairy price increases have been attributed to feed costs, labor shortages, or energy prices. Yet the USDA analysis makes clear that while supply challenges initiated the price rise, consumer resistance ultimately forced the correction, regardless of production costs.
It’s worth noting that not all dairy economists share the same level of concern. Dr. Mark Stephenson from the University of Wisconsin Center for Dairy Profitability points out that “dairy products have historically demonstrated somewhat different price elasticity patterns than eggs” (Dairy Herd Management, February 2025). While acknowledging the warning signs, he suggests dairy’s diverse product portfolio provides some buffer against a singular price collapse.
The egg price collapse timeline offers critical intelligence about how quickly markets can turn:
Late February 2025: Egg prices peak at $8.05 wholesale
Early March: USDA reports “sharp decline in consumer demand” as shoppers reject high prices
March 12: Trading Economics reports a 33% price drop to $5.51
March 17: USDA confirms further drops to $4.15 wholesale
Particularly concerning is that this collapse occurred despite the approaching high-demand holidays – Easter and Passover. The traditional seasonal uplift in demand wasn’t enough to counteract consumer resistance.
“Easter demand couldn’t save egg producers once consumers changed buying habits. Seasonal patterns won’t protect your dairy operation either.”
The Alternative Protein Acceleration Is Happening Now
While the egg price crash offers an immediate warning, dairy farmers must simultaneously confront the accelerating timeline for alternative protein technologies. Research from Boston Consulting Group and Blue Horizon Corporation published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry provides a clear roadmap for approaching competitive threats:
Plant-based alternatives (including dairy substitutes): Price parity by 2023 or sooner
Microorganism-derived proteins (fungi, yeast, algae): Price parity by 2025
Cultured proteins (precision fermentation): Price parity by 2032
This timeline has profound implications for your operation. Consumer price sensitivity creates vulnerability exactly when alternative products are becoming cost-competitive. When traditional dairy products exceed price thresholds, consumers don’t just complain – they permanently change their purchasing behavior.
“Precision fermentation isn’t creating imitations – it’s producing identical dairy proteins without cows. This isn’t a distant threat; it’s arriving now.”
Why This Technology Shift Is Different From Previous Alternatives
The most significant revelation from recent research published in the International Dairy Journal is that precision fermentation isn’t creating mere imitations – it’s producing identical dairy proteins without cows. As documented in a 2024 study in the Journal of Dairy Science, companies can now produce pure single proteins like β-lactoglobulin (the major whey protein) or specific types of casein with functionality indistinguishable from conventional dairy proteins.
This marks a fundamental shift from previous plant-based alternatives that struggled to match dairy’s functional properties. The precision fermentation approach doesn’t just approximate dairy – it recreates its essential components molecule by molecule. This technical reality challenges the assumption that alternatives will always be inferior substitutes.
However, it’s important to note that the American Dairy Science Association’s position paper on alternative proteins (March 2024) highlights several advantages traditional dairy still maintains: “The complex nutritional profile of milk, containing hundreds of bioactive components beyond just proteins, remains difficult to replicate through precision fermentation approaches.” This suggests dairy’s complete nutritional package may continue providing competitive advantages even as protein alternatives advance.
Regional Vulnerability Analysis: Is Your Operation in the Danger Zone?
Not all dairy operations face equal risk from these converging market forces. Based on a comprehensive analysis of production systems, market proximity, and alternative protein penetration, here’s a detailed regional assessment of which operations face the most significant risk:
U.S. Regional Vulnerability Index
Region
Price Sensitivity Risk
Alternative Protein Competition
Input Cost Pressure
Overall Vulnerability Score
California
Very High (4.7/5)
Extreme (4.9/5)
High (4.2/5)
4.6/5
Wisconsin
Moderate (3.2/5)
Medium (3.0/5)
Moderate (3.1/5)
3.1/5
Northeast
High (4.3/5)
High (4.1/5)
Very High (4.5/5)
4.3/5
Upper Midwest
Moderate (3.3/5)
Low-Medium (2.8/5)
Moderate (3.0/5)
3.0/5
Southeast
Medium-High (3.7/5)
Medium (3.2/5)
High (4.0/5)
3.6/5
Southwest
High (4.0/5)
Medium-High (3.6/5)
Very High (4.6/5)
4.1/5
Source: Analysis based on USDA dairy production data, regional consumer price elasticity studies (Cornell University), and alternative protein market penetration data (Journal of Dairy Science, 2024)
This regional analysis reveals that California operations face the highest combined risk due to proximity to alternative protein innovation hubs and extremely price-sensitive urban markets. Producers in the Upper Midwest enjoy the most excellent protection thanks to established domestic production infrastructure and relatively lower exposure to alternative protein competition.
Dairy Markets Are Already Showing Warning Signs
If you think this market vulnerability is merely theoretical, the USDA’s forecasts tell a different story:
This downward revision comes despite continued production cost pressures – mirroring precisely what happened in the egg market before its collapse. When combined with the latest USDA Dairy Product Price Forecast changes, the pattern becomes even more concerning:
Dairy Product
January 2025 Forecast
February 2025 Forecast
Change
Cheese (per lb)
$1.8000
$1.8650
+$0.0650
Butter (per lb)
$2.6850
$2.6950
+$0.0100
Nonfat Dry Milk (per lb)
$1.3000
$1.3400
+$0.0400
Dry Whey (per lb)
$0.5950
$0.6400
+$0.0450
All Milk Price (per cwt)
$22.55
$23.05
+$0.50
Source: USDA Dairy Market News, Agricultural Marketing Service (February 2025)
The volatility in these forecasts—several significant upward revisions followed by a sudden downward adjustment—suggests a market approaching its price resistance threshold. The question isn’t if dairy will experience consumer pushback but when and how severely.
Vulnerability Self-Assessment Tool: How Exposed Is Your Operation?
Take this quick assessment to gauge your operation’s vulnerability to market volatility:
What percentage of your milk goes to a single product category?
0-25%: Low Risk (1 point)
26-50%: Moderate Risk (2 points)
51-75%: High Risk (3 points)
76-100%: Very High Risk (4 points)
How many distinct market channels does your milk reach?
4+ channels: Low Risk (1 point)
3 channels: Moderate Risk (2 points)
2 channels: High Risk (3 points)
1 channel: Very High Risk (4 points)
What’s your current debt-to-asset ratio?
Under 30%: Low Risk (1 point)
30-40%: Moderate Risk (2 points)
40-50%: High Risk (3 points)
Over 50%: Very High Risk (4 points)
How much have your production costs increased in the past 12 months?
0-5%: Low Risk (1 point)
6-10%: Moderate Risk (2 points)
11-15%: High Risk (3 points)
Over 15%: Very High Risk (4 points)
What percentage of your income comes from value-added or premium products?
Your Farm’s Survival Guide: Four Defense Strategies
The egg price collapse and accelerating alternative protein timeline demand immediate action. Here are concrete steps that incorporate both immediate and long-term protections, developed in consultation with dairy economists from Cornell University and agricultural economists at the University of Wisconsin-Madison:
1. Implement a Price Sensitivity Detection System
Don’t wait for a market collapse to learn your customers’ price thresholds. Establish a systematic approach:
For Direct-Market Farms:
Test different price points across your product range simultaneously
Introduce limited-time price increases on specific products and track volume changes
Survey customers directly about price sensitivity using specific dollar thresholds
Track substitution patterns when prices increase (which products do customers switch to?)
For Wholesale Producers:
Request retail velocity data from processor partners at different price points
Analyze seasonal price variations against volume to identify resistance thresholds
Collaborate with processors on consumer research specific to your regional market
Monitor alternative product pricing and sales in your key markets
Research from Penn State Extension’s dairy marketing program validates this approach, showing that “farms with established price sensitivity monitoring report 23% better margin management during volatile market conditions” (Penn State Dairy Outlook, January 2025).
2. Diversify Beyond Traditional Product Lines
Strategic diversification requires more than just making different dairy products. Cornell University’s PRO-DAIRY program recommends evaluating opportunities across these categories:
Processing Depth:
Primary (fluid milk, cream)
Secondary (yogurt, fresh cheese)
Tertiary (aged cheese, specialty butter)
Quaternary (value-added specialty products)
Market Channel Diversity:
Commodity wholesale
Specialty wholesale
Direct-to-consumer
Foodservice partnerships
Export markets
The most resilient operations maintain a presence in at least three categories from each dimension, creating a diversification grid that spreads risk across multiple product types and market channels. According to a 2024 Journal of Dairy Science study, “operations with diversified product portfolios experienced 34% less revenue volatility during market disruptions than single-product enterprises.”
3. Prioritize Technology That Creates Market Flexibility
“Not all technology investments deliver equal protection against market volatility. The farms that survive will strategically prioritize flexibility over mere efficiency.”
Technology Type
Initial Cost
Implementation Time
Cost Reduction Potential
Flexibility Value
Market Volatility Protection Score
Precision feeding systems
Moderate
Short
High
High
8/10
Robotic milking
Very High
Long
Moderate
Moderate
5/10
Milk processing equipment
High
Moderate
Varies
High
7/10
Herd management software
Low
Short
Moderate
High
8/10
Renewable energy systems
High
Moderate
High
Low
6/10
Source: University of Wisconsin-Madison Dairy Innovation Hub, Technology Assessment Report (2024)
The Market Volatility Protection Score weighs these factors to identify technologies that create maximum flexibility with reasonable implementation timelines. Research from the Journal of Dairy Science indicates farms should prioritize investments that score seven or higher to build resilience against market shocks.
It’s worth noting that the National Milk Producers Federation takes a somewhat different view, emphasizing that “while technology adoption is important, market coordination and policy frameworks ultimately provide more stable protection against extreme volatility” (NMPF Market Report, January 2025). This perspective suggests a balanced approach combining operational flexibility with industry-level coordination.
4. Build Value Beyond Price Points
The Canadian dairy system offers important lessons about creating value that transcends price sensitivity. U.S. producers can extract valuable insights without adopting their entire regulatory framework:
Elements Worth Implementing:
Consistent quality standards that exceed minimum requirements
Producer coordination on supply management (where legally permissible)
Value-added product development with protected market positioning
Brand development that creates consumer loyalty beyond the price
Pitfalls to Avoid:
Resisting innovation and market evolution
Allowing protected status to create complacency
Over-reliance on regulatory protection rather than market responsiveness
Failure to communicate value proposition to consumers
Five Warning Signs Your Milk Price Is Approaching Consumer Resistance
Increasing Retail-to-Farm Price Spread – When processors and retailers take larger margins, it often indicates they absorb price resistance before it reaches producers.
Rising Inventory Levels – Unexplained increases in cheese or butter inventories may signal slowing consumer purchases.
Private Label Market Share Growth – Consumers shifting to store brands indicates price sensitivity
Declining Purchase Frequency – When consumers stretch time between purchases, they signal price resistance.
Substitution Within Dairy Categories – Movement from specialty cheeses to commodity options or from organic to conventional signals consumers are reaching price limits
Source: Cornell University PRO-DAIRY, Consumer Behavior Analysis (2024)
Case Study: Resilience Through Diversification
Maplewood Dairy in Vermont demonstrates how effective diversification can buffer against market volatility. After experiencing severe financial pressure during the 2020 pandemic milk price collapse, the 180-cow operation implemented a three-phase diversification strategy:
Initial Processing Pivot: Invested in small-scale on-farm processing to produce farmstead cheese using 25% of milk production
Market Channel Expansion: Established relationships with three regional food cooperatives and developed direct-to-consumer online presence
Brand Differentiation: Created premium positioning through pasture-raised certification and transparent sustainability practices
According to Progressive Dairy’s profile of the operation (January 2025), “When conventional milk prices declined 17% in fall 2024, Maplewood’s diversified revenue streams limited their overall revenue impact to just 6%.” The operation’s owner reports that “price sensitivity monitoring across different channels provides early warning signals that allow us to adjust procurement and production plans before market corrections fully materialize.”
The Bottom Line
The egg market collapse isn’t just a cautionary tale – it’s a preview of dynamics that could soon impact your dairy operation with even greater force. The data is unequivocal: wholesale egg prices plummeted 48% when consumers hit their resistance threshold despite upcoming seasonal demand drivers.
Simultaneously, the alternative protein sector is accelerating faster than previously projected. With plant-based alternatives already reaching price parity and precision fermentation technologies advancing rapidly, the competitive landscape is shifting beneath our feet. The farms that will thrive through this transformation will be those that proactively implement price sensitivity intelligence, strategic diversification, and technology investments focused on flexibility.
The writing is on the wall. The question isn’t whether dairy markets will face similar pressures that collapsed egg prices – it’s whether your operation has implemented the necessary protocols to weather the coming storm. The time to act isn’t when prices are falling – it’s now while there’s still room to maneuver.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
FMD spreads in Europe, China’s production collapses, and tariff wars explode. Is your dairy operation prepared for the perfect storm of 2025?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The global dairy industry faces an unprecedented convergence of threats in 2025 that will fundamentally reshape the market landscape and eliminate unprepared producers. European foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in both Germany and Hungary have disrupted export capabilities. At the same time, China’s domestic milk production is projected to plummet by 2.6%, creating a high-stakes competition for import market share. Meanwhile, escalating trade tensions between the US and Canada—with threatened 250% tariffs on dairy products—risk disrupting $1.14 billion in established export relationships. These challenges, combined with extreme price volatility (dairy prices outpacing nearly all other agricultural commodities), create extinction-level risks for traditional operations and strategic opportunities for producers who implement the four critical survival strategies outlined in the article.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Disease Outbreak Risk: Recent FMD cases in Europe demonstrate how quickly disease can spread and devastate export markets, with previous outbreaks causing billions in economic damage.
China’s Market Transformation: The projected 2.6% decline in Chinese production with 15% lower farmgate prices creates opportunity and intense competition among exporters.
Trade War Vulnerability: The threatened 250% US tariff on Canadian dairy illustrates how quickly political forces can disrupt established trade relationships worth billions.
Survival Requires Four Key Strategies: To navigate the volatile landscape ahead, forward-thinking producers must implement disease contingency planning, trade war resilience measures, product mix flexibility, and aggressive input cost hedging.
Market Volatility Creates Opportunity: While many producers will exit the industry, those who adapt through strategic innovation can thrive amid the market disruption.
In March 2025, the global dairy industry stands at a critical crossroads, facing a convergence of threats that demand immediate attention from producers worldwide.
While mainstream dairy publications cautiously report on “market adjustments,” The Bullvine is sounding the alarm: the combination of foot-and-mouth disease confirmed in Hungary, unprecedented tariff escalation between the US and Canada, volatile commodity markets, and China’s collapsing domestic production is creating extinction-level risk for dairy operations still operating with outdated mindsets.
The facts are clear—producers who don’t radically adapt to these new realities may struggle to survive in an increasingly hostile market environment.
FMD THREAT: EUROPE’S TICKING TIME BOMB THREATENS GLOBAL EXPORTS
European FMD Outbreak Map showing Hungary-Slovakia border case with quarantine zones
While early viral sequencing suggests this outbreak isn’t connected to previous cases, the emergence of FMD in the heart of European dairy production should terrify anyone with a stake in the industry. Hungary and Slovakia represent just 1.6% of EU27+UK production, but the implications stretch beyond these borders.
Mainstream analysts won’t tell you how unprepared Europe’s disease management infrastructure is for managing this outbreak amid current trade tensions. Hungary has lost its FMD-free status, significantly impacting its ability to export animals, meat, and dairy products to specific markets.
“Exports of meat, dairy products, hides, and other animal-based goods are now ‘hardly possible.’ Germany’s loss of FMD-free status under WOAH standards means that veterinary certificates required for exports to non-EU countries cannot be issued.” – German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture
With the European Union forecasting a 0.5% increase in milk deliveries for 2025, this growth depends entirely on “effective disease outbreak management” – yet the evidence suggests containment challenges remain substantial.
THE DEVASTATING ECONOMIC IMPACT OF FMD OUTBREAKS
The financial consequences of FMD outbreaks are staggering. The 2001 UK outbreak resulted in the culling of 6 million animals and cost the British economy an estimated £8 billion ($10.2 billion). Export losses alone accounted for £3.1 billion ($4 billion) as 95 countries imposed import restrictions on British livestock products, according to the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
More recently, the 2010-2011 South Korean FMD outbreak led to:
33% of the national swine herd was destroyed
Dairy exports were halted for 12 months
Over $2.8 billion in direct losses
Approximately $1.9 billion in indirect economic damage
The complacency surrounding this outbreak is staggering. Every dairy producer worldwide should be asking:
If FMD can suddenly appear in Hungary, where will it surface next?
What happens to global dairy markets if a significant producing region experiences an outbreak?
The economic consequences would be catastrophic, yet few producers have contingency plans.
“Germany’s agricultural sector is grappling with the confirmation of its first foot-and-mouth disease outbreak in nearly 40 years. The January 2025 outbreak detected in a herd of water buffalo near Berlin prompted swift containment measures and severe restrictions on Germany’s meat and dairy exports outside the European Union.” – OIE World Organisation for Animal Health.
History provides a stark warning about FMD’s devastating potential. In 2022, South Africa battled 56 outbreak cases across five provinces (Free State, KwaZulu-Natal, Limpopo, North West, and Gauteng) caused by illegal movements of animals out of FMD-controlled zones.
Despite stringent quarantine measures and movement restrictions, the country struggled to regain its FMD-free status, which it lost in January 2019.
Most concerning was how quickly the disease spread across regions. The South African outbreaks involved multiple virus serotypes, with the SAT 3 virus in Limpopo spread to three additional provinces and a separate SAT 2 strain in KwaZulu Natal.
This cross-regional transmission occurred despite government warnings about illegal animal movements, demonstrating how challenging containment becomes once FMD gains a foothold.
CHINA’S DAIRY COLLAPSE: 2.6% PRODUCTION PLUNGE RESHAPES GLOBAL MARKETS
Chart showing China’s dairy production decline of 2.6% for 2025
While dairy analysts focus on modest growth projections, they’re missing the seismic shift occurring in the industry’s largest growth market. According to Rabobank’s latest forecast, China’s domestic milk production is projected to plummet by a staggering 2.6% in 2025.
This collapse in domestic production is driven by low prices, with farmgate milk prices 15% lower year-over-year in February, forcing producers to abandon the industry altogether – a cautionary tale for dairy farmers everywhere about how quickly market conditions can deteriorate.
President Xi’s rare meeting with dairy industry executives suggests potential stimulus measures may be coming. Still, the immediate reality is apparent: China’s production collapse will create a roughly 2% increase in dairy imports as demand shows signs of partial recovery.
This creates high-stakes competition among exporting nations for access to this critical market. American producers who assume they’ll automatically benefit from this import growth are setting themselves up for failure, especially with European exporters increasingly desperate to offset potential market losses from disease-related trade restrictions.
Only producers who strategically position themselves to meet China’s specific quality and pricing requirements will capture this growth opportunity. Everyone else will be left fighting for scraps in increasingly saturated domestic markets.
TRADE WAR INSANITY: TRUMP’S 250% CANADIAN DAIRY TARIFF THREATENS $1.14B US EXPORTS
The escalating trade war between the United States and Canada has reached absurd new heights with Trump’s March 7th threat to impose a staggering 250% tariff on Canadian dairy products.
This comes after a dizzying sequence of tariff actions that began on February 1st when Trump signed an executive order implementing 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, which officially commenced on March 4th after a brief postponement.
Canadian exports to the US consist primarily of premium Quebec cheeses and specialty products, representing a tiny fraction of the $17.4 billion Canadian dairy industry.
The most critical fact being overlooked is that these tariffs won’t be paid by Canada—they’ll be paid by American importers and ultimately passed on to American consumers, creating inflationary pressure and potentially limiting access to specialty products.
This is pure economic self-sabotage masquerading as tough negotiation. American dairy producers who cheered these moves will soon discover they’ve shot themselves in the foot, mainly if Canada implements reciprocal measures targeting the $1.14 billion in U.S. dairy exports.
PRICE ROLLERCOASTER: DAIRY VOLATILITY OUTPACES ALL AGRICULTURAL SECTORS
The dairy price landscape has become virtually unrecognizable compared to historical patterns. The latest FAO Dairy Price Index jumped 4% to 148.7 in February 2025, reaching its highest level since October 2022.
As shown in the table below, dairy’s increase outpaced nearly all other major agricultural commodities except sugar, highlighting the exceptional volatility dairy producers must navigate compared to other agricultural sectors.
Commodity Price Index
Latest (Feb 2025)
Previous Month
Change
Dairy Price Index
148.70
143.00
+4.0%
FAO Food Price Index
127.10
125.10
+1.6%
Cereals Price Index
112.60
111.80
+0.7%
Meat Price Index
118.00
118.00
0.0%
Oils Price Index
156.00
153.00
+2.0%
Sugar Price Index
118.50
111.20
+6.6%
Particularly concerning is how different dairy commodities are moving in opposite directions simultaneously.
While EU butter prices have followed what market analysts describe as a “two steps down, one step up” pattern since January, gradually declining from €7,200 to around €6,800, European cheese markets have maintained relative stability.
Meanwhile, CME spot non-fat dry milk prices have stabilized around $1.16 per pound ($2,550 per metric ton), positioning U.S. exports competitively against European alternatives, according to USDA Dairy Market News.
This divergence creates a minefield for producers trying to optimize their product mix, with potentially catastrophic consequences for those who bet on the wrong commodity trends.
“We’re forecasting a modest 0.8% growth in the Big 7 dairy export regions for 2025, with slower growth (0.5%) in Q1 and slightly higher growth (0.9%) in the second half,” explains Michael Harvey, Senior Analyst at Rabobank. “But these averages mask extreme regional variations that create threats and opportunities.”
SURVIVAL BLUEPRINT: FOUR CRITICAL STRATEGIES TO STAY AFLOAT IN 2025
The convergence of disease threats, China’s production collapse, trade war escalation, and extreme price volatility create an environment where only the most adaptive producers will survive. Those continuing with business-as-usual approaches are effectively gambling with their operations’ futures.
1. DISEASE OUTBREAK CONTINGENCY PLANNING
No longer optional. Every operation should establish protocols for responding if foot-and-mouth or other reportable diseases appear in their region.
This includes identifying alternative revenue streams if export markets suddenly close and ensuring maximum biosecurity measures are already in place. Waiting until an outbreak occurs in your area guarantees financial devastation.
According to Dr. James Thompson, a veterinary epidemiologist at Colorado State University, “Well-prepared operations typically spend 0.5-1% of annual revenue on robust biosecurity measures, but these investments can preserve 100% of revenue if disease strikes nearby facilities.”
2. TRADE WAR RESILIENCE MEASURES
With Trump threatening to escalate tariffs on multiple fronts, producers must understand their vulnerability to direct tariffs and the secondary effects on input costs.
Cheese exports to Mexico jumped 30% year-over-year in 2024, while China accounted for 42% of US whey exports. According to U.S. Dairy Export Council data, these trade relationships are now at risk, requiring immediate contingency planning.
3. PRODUCT MIX FLEXIBILITY DEVELOPMENT
With divergent price trends across different dairy commodities, the ability to rapidly shift production focus has never been more valuable.
Even at a high cost, investing in this flexibility now may be the difference between prosperity and bankruptcy within 18 months.
4. AGGRESSIVE INPUT COST HEDGING
With increased production forecast for the second half of 2025, producers who fail to lock in feed and energy costs will be squeezed between rising input expenses and prices pressured by increasing global supply.
“The producers surviving in this environment are locking in margins rather than trying to time the market,” notes Emma Higgins, Senior Analyst at Rabobank. “They’re using risk management tools to create certainty in an increasingly uncertain market.”
THE STARK REALITY: ADAPT OR PERISH IN DAIRY’S NEW WORLD ORDER
The dairy industry has entered a new era with unprecedented risks, but so are the opportunities for those prepared to capitalize on market disruptions.
While some analysts predict 2025 will be a “sustainable growth” year with “favorable conditions,” this optimistic forecast masks the extreme volatility and regional disparities that will define the industry landscape.
The truth is that global dairy is experiencing the early stages of a massive restructuring. Operations tied to outdated business models will join the growing ranks of producers exiting the industry, as we’re already witnessing in China.
Those who recognize these challenges as innovation opportunities will survive and potentially thrive amid the chaos.
The foot-and-mouth disease outbreaks in Germany and Hungary should serve as a wake-up call to the entire industry. They reveal the fragility of our global dairy system and the devastating speed with which market conditions can change.
The clock is ticking, and the time for half-measures and cautious adjustments has passed. Based on a clear-eyed assessment of these rapidly evolving risks, Bold action is the only path forward for dairy producers who intend to remain in business beyond 2025.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Texas dairy’s 190% surge rewrites the rulebook. From desert to dominance, they’re milking success dry. Is your state next on their hit list?
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Texas has revolutionized the U.S. dairy industry, skyrocketing from sixth to third place in milk production with a staggering 190% growth since 2001. This transformation, driven by massive investments in processing capacity and innovative water management in the semi-arid Panhandle, has reshaped the national dairy landscape. Despite challenges like Ogallala Aquifer depletion, Texas dairies are leveraging cutting-edge technology and economies of scale to outpace competitors in efficiency and productivity. Their aggressive growth strategy, coupled with strategic positioning in global markets, signals a potential threat to Wisconsin’s long-held second-place ranking. As Texas continues to push boundaries in dairy production, sustainability, and value chain integration, it’s forcing a global rethinking of modern dairy scalability and resource management.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Texas achieved 190% growth in milk production since 2001, leapfrogging to 3rd place nationally.
Massive investments in cheese processing plants are driving demand and fueling continued expansion.
Innovative water management and methane monetization are turning environmental challenges into competitive advantages.
Texas dairies are outperforming in productivity, reaching 25,932 pounds of milk per cow annually.
The state’s growth trajectory and global market positioning suggest potential to challenge Wisconsin’s #2 spot in the future.
Texas isn’t just producing milk—it’s bulldozing through the national rankings and shaking up global dairy markets. The latest USDA figures confirm what forward-thinking producers have witnessed: Texas has muscled Idaho out of America’s #3 dairy spot. And they didn’t just edge them out—they shoved them aside with production figures with traditional dairy powerhouses sweating bullets.
While California and Wisconsin cling to their historic crowns, Texas has rocketed from sixth place to third in less than a decade. The question keeping dairy executives up at night is: Who’s next on Texas’s hit list?
GROWTH ON STEROIDS: The Numbers That Make Competitors Dizzy
Let that sink in: Texas cows went from backup singers to headliners, pumping out 190% more milk since Y2K had us scared of computer crashes.
Need fresh proof? When 2022 numbers dropped, Texas had climbed another 6.7% in volume, enough to kick Idaho to the curb and claim that bronze medal position. And they haven’t taken their foot off the gas.
Between 2015 and 2022 alone, Texas dumped another 6.2 billion pounds of milk onto the market—a 60.5% growth spurt that makes the competition look fossilized. The USDA’s latest numbers show Texas added another 15,000 cows this year while other states are begging producers to stay in business.
Remember when Texas was barely on the dairy map? They were stuck in sixth place a decade back behind California, Wisconsin, New York, Idaho, and Pennsylvania. Now they’re breathing down Wisconsin’s neck with only California (41.8 billion pounds) and Wisconsin (31 billion pounds) still ahead. The question isn’t if Texas will keep climbing—it’s what the traditional dairy belt plans to do about it.
THE GLOBAL DAIRY SPEEDWAY: How Growth Rates Stack Up Worldwide
THE BIG LEAGUE SHOWDOWN: America’s Dairy Map Redrawn
State
Annual Production (billions lbs)
Change Since 2015
California
41.8
-2.4%
Wisconsin
31.0
+5.8%
Texas
16.5
+60.5%
Idaho
16.6
+17.7%
Source: USDA Milk Production Reports (2022)
PROCESSING POWERPLAY: The Cheese Factory Explosion Driving Texas’s Boom
What’s fueling this meteoric rise? It isn’t just more cows—cheese plants sprouting up faster than oil derricks in a Texas boom town.
Texas dairy producers aren’t just pumping out milk—they’re orchestrating a full-scale value chain takeover. Processors aren’t politely asking for milk—they’re fighting for tanker loads and signing long-term contracts that make bankers smile, and loan officers approve expansion plans without blinking.
The Panhandle has transformed into America’s newest cheese corridor almost overnight. Cacique LLC fired up their Mexican-style cheese factory in Amarillo in 2022, and they’re already struggling to secure milk supplies. Fifty miles north in Dumas, another processing giant is gulping down tanker loads daily.
Meanwhile, dairy heavyweight Leprino Foods is dumping serious cash—billions—into a massive mozzarella and whey protein complex in Lubbock. Set to start churning out cheese by 2026, this plant alone will change the game for Texas producers.
The processing boom spills beyond state lines but feeds Texas’s dairy machine. When it comes online in 2024, Hilmar Cheese Company’s mega-plant in Dodge City, Kansas, will be swallowing Texas milk by the tanker load.
As Darren Turley from the Texas Association of Dairymen puts it, these plants will create demand for “over 200 loads of additional milk sales per day” when fully operational. That’s not just a market—a milk vacuum with producers expanding herds with confidence. Why? Because they know their milk has somewhere to go—and that somewhere is paying premium prices.
TOUGH QUESTIONS: The Water Time Bomb Under Texas Dairy
While Texas pats itself on the back, Nebraska ranchers ask: “At what cost?” The Ogallala Aquifer—the lifeblood for eight states—is dropping 1-2 feet yearly in many areas. Texas dairies now tap a significant portion of its flow in dairy-heavy counties. Sustainable? Or a time bomb?
The hard facts: The USGS confirms that the Ogallala Aquifer has declined more than 300 feet in some parts of the Texas Panhandle since pumping began. Unlike surface water, which replenishes yearly, the Ogallala recharges at glacial rates—sometimes less than an inch annually against extraction measured in feet.
“Water isn’t renewable in our region in human timeframes,” explains Venki Uddameri, the Water Resources Center director at Texas Tech. “Once it’s gone, it’s effectively gone.”
Closed-loop waste systems capturing 65-80% of water from manure streams for reuse
Targeted irrigation delivering precisely measured water directly to crop root zones
Drought-resistant forage varieties reduce water needs by up to 30%
BY THE NUMBERS: Texas’s Quarterly March to Dominance
Quarter
Milk Cows (1,000 head)
Milk Production (billion pounds)
Change (vs. previous year)
Q1 2022
634
4.0+
+5%
Q1 2021
617
3.8 (est.)
N/A
Source: Texas Farm Bureau (2022)
WATER WIZARDRY: Making Desert Dust Into Dairy Gold
Picture this: 12-18 inches of rain annually. That’s less water than falls in parts of Iraq. Does it sound like a bad joke about dairy farming? Not for Texas producers—they’re turning desert dust into dairy gold.
The most jaw-dropping part of Texas’s dairy revolution isn’t just the growth—it’s where it’s happening. The Panhandle gets less annual rainfall than parts of Arizona, yet they’re milking 675,000 cows in what amounts to a semi-desert.
“The Panhandle is a semi-desert,” Piñeiro explains with classic Texas understatement. “We are in a severe drought right now.”
So, how are they pulling off this magic trick? Texas producers aren’t just using water—they’re stretching every drop like liquid gold. They’re deploying cutting-edge irrigation tech, drought-resistant forage varieties, and management strategies that would make a water conservation expert weep joyfully.
Here’s the kicker: Texas dairies are outbidding traditional crop farmers for water rights because they’re getting more bang per drop. A gallon of water pumped through a dairy cow generates more revenue than a gallon sprayed on cotton or corn. It’s simple economics, and Texas producers are masters at turning constraints into competitive advantages.
THE METHANE MONEY MACHINE: Environmental Challenge Becomes Profit Center
Texas dairies aren’t just managing their methane emissions but turning them into serious revenue streams. The debate around methane digesters reveals three distinct perspectives shaping the future of dairy sustainability:
Producers see dollar signs. Del Rio Dairy’s digester now fuels 200-300 semi-trucks annually through renewable natural gas conversion, adding $20-30 per cow in annual revenue. When scaled across a 5,000-cow dairy, that’s $100,000-150,000 in additional income.
Environmental scientists see potential but warn of leakage issues. Cornell University research shows poorly maintained digesters can leak 3-5% of methane, potentially negating climate benefits. “It’s not a silver bullet without proper management,” notes Dr. Peter Wright, dairy waste management specialist.
Policy experts question long-term viability. “These 15-year contracts could become anchors if carbon markets crash post-2035,” cautions the Texas Association of Dairymen. California’s shifting regulatory landscape demonstrates how quickly profitable environmental programs can change.
The difference between Texas and other regions is that they’re not waiting for perfect solutions—they’re monetizing methane while others debate theory.
PRODUCTIVITY POWERHOUSE: Super Cows Pumping Super Volumes
Texas isn’t just adding cows—it’s building super cows. Their dairy herds are pumping out milk like high-performance sports cars, not the family sedans of yesteryear.
Fresh USDA data shows Texas has leapfrogged Colorado in milk per cow, hitting a staggering 25,932 pounds per animal annually. That’s not just good genetics—cutting-edge nutrition, cow comfort systems that would make a five-star hotel jealous, and milking technology that maximizes every drop.
Texas now sits in the bronze medal position nationally for both cows per herd and milk per herd. Their operations aren’t just getting bigger—they’re getting brutally efficient. While traditional dairy states cling to smaller herd models, Texas is scaling up faster than Silicon Valley startups, leveraging economies of scale that make their water-acquisition costs look like rounding errors.
Wisconsin’s 1.27 million cows still dwarf Texas’s 675,000 head, but the productivity gap is shrinking faster than ice cream on a Texas summer day. With Texas producers adopting technology that turns good cows into milk machines, the pounds-per-cow race is tightening every quarter.
THE WISCONSIN QUESTION: Can The Lone Star Take The Silver Medal?
Could Texas dethrone America’s Dairyland? Industry experts are skeptical, but they never saw Texas climbing from sixth to third place in a single decade.
With Wisconsin churning 31 billion pounds annually against Texas’s 16.5 billion, the gap remains more expansive than the Rio Grande. Piñeiro admits, “It’s unlikely that Texas will ever produce more milk than California or Wisconsin.”
But here’s a fact that should keep Wisconsin farmers awake at night: Their production grew just 5.8% over five years, while Texas exploded by 60.5%. At those growth rates, simple math suggests the impossible becomes possible within a decade.
The distance between Texas and Wisconsin in terms of both cow numbers and milk volume seems insurmountable today. But remember—nobody predicted Texas would climb three spots in the national rankings faster than you can say, “Don’t mess with Texas.”
Is Wisconsin truly untouchable, or just the next target on Texas’s hit list? What seemed impossible five years ago is today’s reality. What seems impossible today might be tomorrow’s headline.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS: Texas Dairy Expansion
Q: How much water does a Texas dairy cow use daily? A: According to USDA water-use metrics, a dairy cow in the Texas Panhandle requires approximately 30-35 gallons daily for drinking and an additional 70-100 gallons per day in associated production activities, including cleaning and cooling. That’s roughly 36,500 gallons annually per cow.
Q: Are Texas dairies sustainable with Ogallala Aquifer depletion? A: The sustainability question remains unresolved. While extraction rates exceed natural recharge by significant margins, technological innovations in water recycling and conservation are rapidly improving efficiency. The Texas Water Development Board projects most Panhandle counties have 25-50 years of water remaining at current use rates.
Q: How do Texas dairies compare globally in terms of growth rates? A: At 6.7% annual growth, Texas outpaces most established dairy regions worldwide but trails emerging markets like Inner Mongolia (9.4%) and Gujarat, India (8.1%). However, Texas demonstrates superior infrastructure development and technological adoption compared to these faster-growing regions.
THE FUTURE FRONTIER: Texas-Sized Ambitions Meet Global Competition
As Texas cements its #3 position, the real question isn’t about domestic rankings but positioning in global markets. Can the industry overcome its most significant challenge—water—while competing with subsidized producers in China and low-cost operations in emerging markets?
Water remains the Achilles’ heel that could bring this dairy juggernaut to its knees. But betting against Texan ingenuity has been a losing proposition for two decades. Will Texas producers pioneer water recycling systems that make today’s conservation efforts look primitive? Or will the Ogallala Aquifer finally say “enough”?
The processing capacity explosion provides a rock-solid foundation for continued expansion. With three major cheese plants under development, Texas isn’t just producing milk—it’s capturing more of the value chain. Will it transition from commodity players to branded dairy powerhouses? The smart money says yes.
What’s crystal clear is that Texas hasn’t just changed America’s dairy map—they’ve ripped it up and redrawn it. From dairy afterthought to industry disruptor in two decades, the Lone Star State has demonstrated that vision, technology, and sheer Texas-sized determination can move mountains—or, in this case, create dairy empires where logic said none should exist.
California and Wisconsin may hold their historical crowns for now, but Texas isn’t playing for bronze anymore—they’re hunting bigger game. And if history is any guide, they usually get what they’re after.
THE BULLVINE BOTTOM LINE:
Texas didn’t politely ask Idaho to step aside—they bulldozed past them with a 190% production explosion, redefining what’s possible in American dairy. With cheese plants sprouting like Texas bluebonnets after spring rain and producers making milk where cacti should be the only thing growing, the Lone Star State is teaching the entire industry what happens when you combine ambition with cutting-edge technology.
Their Achilles’ heel? Water. Their superpower? Turning limitations into innovations. Betting against Texas dairy has cost skeptics money for twenty years, and there’s no sign they’re slowing down. Wisconsin might still have breathing room, but they’d be fools not to look over their shoulders.
Texas isn’t just climbing rankings—it’s forcing a global reckoning with how modern dairies scale. Will your operation adapt or get bulldozed? That’s the question innovative producers are asking themselves tonight.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Fonterra’s $2B bombshell: Consumer brands spin-off shakes global dairy. Will Mainland Group reshape YOUR market? Exclusive analysis inside.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Fonterra’s strategic divestment of its consumer business, branded as Mainland Group, signals a seismic shift in the global dairy industry. With a potential $1-2 billion valuation, this move could redefine how cooperatives operate worldwide. Fonterra’s dual-track approach, exploring both IPO and trade sale options, aims to maximize returns for its 8,000+ farmer-shareholders. The newly independent Mainland Group, housing iconic brands like Anchor and Western Star, is poised to become a formidable competitor in international markets. This restructuring has far-reaching implications for milk pricing, capital flows, and competitive dynamics across the dairy value chain, from farm gates to retail shelves.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Fonterra’s consumer business spin-off, valued at $1-2 billion, could reshape global dairy markets and cooperative structures.
Mainland Group’s strong financial performance, even amid high milk prices, makes it an attractive investment and formidable competitor.
The divestment could lead to significant capital returns for Fonterra’s farmer-shareholders, potentially influencing farm investments and debt strategies.
This move may trigger similar restructurings among other dairy cooperatives, impacting milk pricing and market dynamics worldwide.
Dairy farmers and processors globally should prepare for potential shifts in competitive landscapes, especially in Asia-Pacific markets.
Fonterra’s consumer business is hitting the road in what could be a $1-2 billion game-changer for dairy markets worldwide. The New Zealand dairy giant kicked off investor roadshow meetings on March 10, 2025, showcasing its consumer business package under the newly-branded “Mainland Group” banner. This bold move signals a significant shakeup at one of the world’s dairy powerhouses, with massive implications for milk producers and processors across the globe.
BREAKING NEWS: FONTERRA UNVEILS MAINLAND GROUP TO GLOBAL INVESTORS
Fonterra’s strategic shift is now in high gear, with investor presentations led by Mainland Group CEO-elect René Dedoncker and CFO-elect Paul Victor. These roadshows mark a critical phase in the cooperative’s dual-track strategy, as the cooperative tests both IPO and trade sale options for its global Consumer business package.
CEO Miles Hurrell isn’t mincing words about why Fonterra’s making this move: “We are clear on our strategy and have a pathway to grow further value for farmer shareholders and the New Zealand economy through our innovative Foodservice and Ingredients businesses.”
But Hurrell also knows these aren’t just ordinary dairy brands being put on the block: “We recognize the responsibility we have to find the right steward for iconic brands such as Anchor™, Mainland™ and Western Star™ and an ownership structure that allows these businesses to continue to grow.”
Why should this matter to YOUR operation? This massive restructuring could reshape everything from global dairy pricing to how cooperatives worldwide organize their businesses. Are YOU prepared for the ripple effects?
The Mainland Group name is a brilliant branding choice that instantly connects with dairy farmers and consumers alike. It taps into New Zealand’s deep dairy heritage while creating immediate brand recognition across international markets.
FINANCIAL FIREPOWER: MAINLAND GROUP SHOWS MUSCLE AMID SOARING MILK PRICES
Talk about perfect timing – Fonterra bumped its full-year earnings forecast from 40-60 cents per share to 55-75 cents per share. This significant upgrade creates serious momentum for Fonterra’s consumer business divestment and shows the strength of the operations now being shopped to investors.
“Our consumer channel has shown good volume and margin growth while recovering the higher Farmgate Milk Price this season,” Hurrell pointed out. It is impressive when you consider most consumer brands take a beating when milk prices climb.
The numbers tell the story of a consumer powerhouse that’s defying industry trends:
Fonterra’s Consumer Business Performance
Latest Figures
Industry Average
Full-Year Earnings Forecast
↑ 55-75 NZ cents per share
Static or declining
Gross Margin (Southeast Asia)
36%
28%
Farmgate Milk Price
NZ$10.00 per kgMS
NZ$8.50 historical average
Consumer Division Revenue
NZ$4.9 billion
N/A
This kind of resilience is a big selling point for investors. Most dairy consumer businesses struggle when farmgate prices surge. Still, Mainland Group has shown it can maintain profits even when paying farmers top dollar for milk – precisely the kind of business that excited investors.
How does YOUR consumer business perform when milk prices spike? Mainland Group’s margin protection might be setting a new industry benchmark.
BRAND POWERHOUSE: MAINLAND GROUP’S DAIRY BRAND ARSENAL PACKS A PUNCH
Mainland Group isn’t coming to market with unknown brands – it’s bringing dairy royalty. We’re talking household names that command premium shelf space and enjoy massive consumer loyalty across multiple markets.
These aren’t just brands – they’re market movers that give Mainland Group serious clout with retailers:
Mainland Group’s Star Brands
Market Position
Growth Potential
Anchor™
Powerhouse across multiple dairy categories
High expansion potential in SE Asia
Mainland™
Premium cheese with strong NZ heritage
Growing specialty cheese segment
Western Star™
Australia’s go-to butter brand
Rising butter consumption trend
Kapiti™
Specialty cheese and ice cream for discerning consumers
Premium/artisanal growth
Anlene™
Leading adult nutrition products across Asia
Aging population demographics
Perfect Italiano™
Go-to Italian cheese for home cooks
Growing home cooking trend
Mainland Group’s brand firepower spans markets from Australia to New Zealand, Southeast Asia, and Sri Lanka, and distribution networks stretch into the Middle East and Africa. This protects the business against regional economic downturns while offering multiple growth paths for future expansion.
Could YOUR business benefit from a similar focus on brand portfolio diversification? What markets are YOU targeting for 2026?
LEADERSHIP DREAM TEAM: INDUSTRY VETERANS READY TO DRIVE MAINLAND GROUP FORWARD
Who’s going to steer this massive dairy business? René Dedoncker is stepping up as CEO-elect – and he’s the perfect fit. Dedoncker currently runs Fonterra’s Global Markets Consumer and Foodservice division, so he already knows these businesses inside and out.
Paul Victor joined him as CFO-elect, bringing valuable public company experience from his time at ASX-listed Incitec Pivot Limited. This background will be crucial if Mainland Group takes the IPO route.
This leadership duo is now front and center in roadshow meetings, showing investors how Mainland Group’s consumer businesses could take off with independent ownership, dedicated growth capital, and laser-focused strategic direction.
Fonterra isn’t just selling its consumer business – it’s creating a bidding war for it. By exploring trade sale and IPO options simultaneously, the cooperative forces potential buyers to compete against public market valuations.
This dual-track strategy is a textbook move to drive up valuation, showing Fonterra’s commitment to squeezing maximum value for its 8,000+ farmer shareholders.
And those farmers get the final say – any deal needs their approval through a shareholder vote.
The cooperative has promised farmers a “significant capital return” after the divestment goes through. That cash injection would hit farm accounts at the perfect time, giving producers capital to invest in sustainability upgrades or operational improvements during market volatility.
What’s brilliant is Fonterra’s refusal to rush the process. The company has repeatedly stated it won’t be “bound to a timeline” – a clear signal to potential buyers that they’ll need to bring their best offers.
Critics argue spin-offs dilute farmer control over the value chain, but does centralized ownership serve producers in the long term? The cooperative model excels at collecting and processing milk, but consumer brands might flourish better with access to growth capital and nimble decision-making outside the cooperative structure.
POLL: Will Mainland Group’s IPO reshape your 2026 strategy?
[ ] Yes – Preparing for market volatility
[ ] No – Focused on local markets
[ ] Undecided – Waiting to see valuation details
GLOBAL RIPPLE EFFECTS: HOW MAINLAND GROUP WILL RESHAPE DAIRY MARKETS WORLDWIDE
When Mainland Group emerges as a standalone dairy giant, expect shockwaves across global dairy markets. European processors like Lactalis and Arla and South American players targeting Asia-Pacific markets will suddenly face a more agile, better-funded competitor with premium brands and established market positions.
Fonterra’s strategic shift offers a masterclass in industry evolution for other dairy companies watching from the sidelines. The cooperative model works brilliantly for collecting and processing milk, but consumer-branded businesses might thrive better under different ownership structures with access to growth capital.
The potential -2 billion transaction will instantly create a new dairy powerhouse focused entirely on consumer markets. Without the constraints of a cooperative structure, Mainland Group could accelerate product innovation, ramp up marketing investment, and pursue acquisitions that Fonterra might have bypassed.
This move signals essential structural changes in the industry’s organization for dairy farmers worldwide. Innovative producers will watch how Fonterra’s approach influences milk pricing mechanisms and capital flows throughout the dairy supply chain.
WHAT’S NEXT: MILESTONE WATCH IN THE MAINLAND GROUP LAUNCH
As Fonterra’s consumer business roadshow continues through March, dairy industry insiders closely watch investor reactions. The next big date to circle on your calendar is March 20, 2025, when Fonterra releases its FY25 interim results, potentially offering fresh insights into how the consumer business is performing.
The cooperative is running a detailed evaluation of both sale options before making a final recommendation to its farmer shareholders. This thorough process ensures maximum value while finding the right future owner for beloved dairy brands representing significant New Zealand heritage.
Fonterra’s final choice between IPO and trade sale options will send necessary signals throughout the dairy industry. If financial investors outbid strategic players, it suggests strong confidence in standalone dairy consumer businesses. If a strategic buyer prevails, it points to underlying synergy values that financial markets aren’t fully capturing.
Either way, the decision will provide crucial market intelligence about dairy asset valuations, which will impact producers, processors, and investors worldwide.
THE BOTTOM LINE: 3 WAYS THIS SHAKES YOUR BUSINESS
Fonterra’s Mainland Group divestment represents a turning point for the global dairy industry. The robust financial performance of both Fonterra’s core ingredients business and its consumer operations makes this strategic transformation perfect timing.
Here’s how this massive shift could impact YOUR operation:
Capital Tsunami: Fonterra farmers could see cash injections by late 2025 – will YOU reinvest or reduce debt? This capital influx could reset productivity benchmarks across the industry.
Brand Wars: Mainland Group’s marketing muscle may drown out smaller Asian exporters. Are YOUR export strategies positioned to compete with a newly energized Mainland Group?
Policy Ripples: Success here could push other cooperatives to spin off consumer arms. Is YOUR cooperative considering similar structural changes?
The dairy world is watching New Zealand closely as this massive transaction unfolds. Fonterra’s decisions create ripple effects throughout the interconnected global dairy ecosystem, affecting everything from farmgate milk prices to retail dairy product innovation.
If Mainland Group emerges as an independent entity, it will instantly become a formidable player with heritage brands and financial resources to reshape competitive dynamics for years.
For dairy farmers from Wisconsin to Waikato, Fonterra’s bold move offers critical lessons about industry structure and how different segments of the dairy value chain thrive under different ownership models. As this process continues through 2025, competent market participants will watch developments closely, knowing the outcome will influence dairy markets across multiple product categories and geographies for years.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Northeast dairy is booming with new processing plants, FMMO reforms, and cautious optimism. Learn how producers are balancing growth and challenges.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Northeast dairy industry 2025 is poised for growth, driven by new processing capacity in New York and Pennsylvania, favorable Federal Milk Marketing Order (FMMO) reforms, and a focus on maximizing milk components per cow. Producers are cautiously optimistic as improved margins from 2024 create expansion opportunities, but rising input costs and political uncertainties temper enthusiasm. New processing facilities in New York and West Virginia create fresh market opportunities, while Pennsylvania sees smaller-scale investments. Producers also closely monitor biosecurity due to the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) threat. With tight labor shortages and heifer supplies, farmers are focusing on efficiency and strategic planning to navigate 2025’s challenges and capitalize on its opportunities.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
FMMO Reforms: Changes taking effect in June 2025 favor Northeast producers due to high Class I utilization, boosting profitability potential.
Processing Expansion: New facilities in New York and Pennsylvania create market opportunities, while investments in West Virginia expand regional capacity.
Profitability Focus: Increasing milk components per cow remains the most reliable strategy for maximizing farm margins amid rising input costs.
Biosecurity Concerns: HPAI remains a looming threat; proactive biosecurity measures are essential to protect herds and maintain production.
Strategic Caution: Tight labor markets, limited heifer supplies, and political uncertainties require producers to balance growth with operational efficiency.
Northeast Dairy stands at a critical crossroads: New milk pricing rules, processing expansion, and disease challenges combine to create unprecedented opportunities and serious threats for forward-thinking producers.
The Northeast dairy landscape is transforming in 2025, with significant policy shifts, processing expansions, and bird flu concerns reshaping the industry’s future. While many New York and Pennsylvania producers are strategically positioning for growth thanks to improved margins, they’re balancing optimism with hardheaded realism as rising input costs and disease concerns demand attention.
For Northeast producers, the coming months bring a potent mix of game-changing opportunities and persistent challenges that demand clear-eyed analysis and decisive action.
JUNE 1 PRICING REVOLUTION: WHY NORTHEAST PRODUCERS STAND TO WIN BIG
Mark your calendars for June 1, 2025 – that’s when the most significant dairy pricing overhaul in decades takes effect across every Federal Milk Marketing Order in the country.
These aren’t minor tweaks but fundamental changes that will reshape regional profitability patterns nationwide. The reforms touch every aspect of FMMO pricing: the surveyed commodity products, Class III and IV formula factors, base Class I Skim Milk Price, and Class I differentials.
Critical implementation detail: while most changes activate on June 1, the new milk composition factors won’t take effect until December 1, 2025. This staggered implementation creates a complex transition period requiring careful financial planning.
What does this mean for your farm? The FMMO amendments include updating skim milk composition factors to 3.3% true protein, 6.0% other solids, and 9.3% nonfat solids, removing 500-pound barrel cheddar cheese prices from pricing calculations, updating manufacturing allowances, and returning to the “higher-of” advanced Class III or IV skim milk prices for determining the base Class I skim milk price.
Northeast Advantage Alert: These changes won’t impact all regions equally. Looking back over the past decade, had these new formulas been in place, the Class III price would have been about 16 cents lower while the Class IV would have been down about 47 cents. With their higher Class I utilization, Northeast producers may fare better than those in regions like the Upper Midwest.
FMMO Change
Implementation Date
Impact on Northeast Producers
Return to “higher-of” Class I pricing formula
June 1, 2025
Potentially positive due to higher Class I utilization in Northeast
Updated manufacturing allowances for Class III and IV
June 1, 2025
Class III price approximately 16¢ lower, Class IV approximately 47¢ lower based on historical analysis
Removal of 500-pound barrel cheddar from pricing calculations
June 1, 2025
Potential impact on cheese prices and Class III formula
New skim milk composition factors (3.3% true protein, 6.0% other solids, 9.3% nonfat solids)
December 1, 2025
Delayed implementation creates transitional period requiring careful planning
While Western processors struggle with milk shortages, the Northeast sees the opposite – significant processing investment that creates absolute market security for growth-minded farms.
In a major power play, the Maryland & Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative Association (MDVA) has purchased the HP Hood facility in Northeast Philadelphia. This acquisition isn’t just changing ownership – it’s creating expansion opportunities that will nearly double the facility’s processing capacity from about 12 million gallons to approximately 25 million gallons annually by 2026.
The deal comes with serious financial backing: the commonwealth provided an incentive package totaling $10 million in grants and loans. The package includes $7.25 million through a Pennsylvania Industrial Development Authority loan, $2.5 million in Redevelopment Assistance Capital Program funding, and a $300,000 workforce development grant.
Strategic product focus: The Northeast Philadelphia facility produces coffee creamer, half-and-half, and other extended-shelf-life dairy products. MDVA’s Maola Local Dairies will operate the extended shelf-life ultra-high temperature dairy processing factory, bringing the cooperative’s processing footprint into Pennsylvania for the first time.
“(It’s) been suggested to me that we change that name and add Pennsylvania to it because Pennsylvania is our largest state as far as members are concerned,” noted Jay Bryant, CEO of MDVA. “We have plants in North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland, and finally having a plant in Pennsylvania is so exciting.”
Beyond this specific acquisition, Kelly Reynolds from Reyncrest Farm confirms the broader processing growth trend: “In our area, milk processing capacity is increasing, and that’s very exciting to see as an operation that would like to grow. New plants are opening, and older plants in our area are taking steps to modernize their facilities. We are very excited about these opportunities.”
Processing Facility
Location
Investment
Capacity Changes
Completion Timeline
MDVA (former HP Hood facility)
Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Part of $10 million incentive package
Expanding from 12 million to 25 million gallons annually
By 2026
Various facilities
New York and surrounding areas
Not specified
New plants opening and modernization of existing facilities
Ongoing through 2025
BIRD FLU THREAT INTENSIFIES: TWO VIRAL GENOTYPES NOW HITTING U.S. DAIRY
The Northeast dodged the initial dairy bird flu outbreak, but recent poultry cases in Pennsylvania and New York signal the virus is circling closer. Are you prepared?
The threat of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 continues to loom large over the Northeast agricultural sector. While dairy producers remain vigilant, the poultry industry in the region has already experienced significant impacts. In Pennsylvania, a massive layer farm with nearly 2 million birds was recently affected, along with a broiler facility in Cumberland County housing 30,000 birds.
Viral evolution alert: The virus has demonstrated its ability to mutate and spread across species. In Nevada, two different genotypes of H5N1 have been detected in dairy cattle: the B3.13 genotype found in an earlier December case in Nye County and the D1.1 genotype discovered in the more recent Churchill County cases. This evolution presents a moving target for biosecurity efforts.
According to Nevada officials, the symptoms in cows infected with the D1.1 genotype are similar to those sick with the B3.13 genotype. These typically include sudden decreases in lactation, thicker milk, and reduced feed consumption. This similarity in symptoms makes clinical identification challenging without laboratory confirmation.
Urban outbreak danger: The rapid spread across multiple agricultural sectors highlights the interconnected nature of disease transmission. The virus has been confirmed in New York at two live bird markets, one in Queens County and another in Bronx County. This urban presence creates additional transmission pathways that could affect dairy operations through equipment, vehicles, or personnel moving between facilities.
While Northeast dairy producers haven’t faced widespread outbreaks yet, the experience in other regions demonstrates the importance of implementing comprehensive biosecurity measures immediately. These include limiting farm access, maintaining visitor logs, using protective equipment, and preventing contact between cattle and wild birds, particularly waterfowl.
POLITICAL UNCERTAINTY MEETS FARM REALITY: NAVIGATING 2025’S POLICY MINEFIELD
With a new administration settling in, Northeast Dairy faces complex regulatory questions affecting your bottom line.
The regulatory environment continues to exert a massive influence on Northeast dairy operations. With a new presidential administration taking office, dairy producers are closely monitoring potential policy shifts that could affect their bottom line.
“The current volatility that comes with any new administration and the general uncertainty of a few key areas, such as labor and trade, are a few primary concerns right now,” explains Kelly Reynolds. These uncertainties complicate long-term planning and investment decisions, contributing to many producers’ measured approach despite improved financial positions.
Policy tripwires to watch: Several specific policy areas command particular attention from Northeast dairy farmers. Rebecca Ferry of Dreamroad Jerseys LLC identifies key concerns: “The new farm bill is a great concern, as is immigration reform and the fluctuations in the government employment situations and tariffs.” The pending farm bill negotiations will establish the agricultural policy framework for coming years, directly affecting risk management tools and market support mechanisms.
At the state level, Pennsylvania’s regulatory framework creates unique challenges. “Permitting laws also continue to affect our farms, with Pennsylvania’s permitting laws sometimes hindering the ability of our farms to expand as quickly as in other neighboring states,” notes Jayne Sebright of the Center for Dairy Excellence. Additionally, Pennsylvania continues evaluating potential changes to how milk premiums benefit farms through the Pennsylvania Milk Board.
THE NORTHEAST GROWTH EQUATION: SOLVING FOR MAXIMUM PROFITABILITY
The Northeast dairy sector in early 2025 stands at a genuine inflection point. The question isn’t whether you should grow but how and when.
The processing capacity expansion creates tangible growth opportunities just as FMMO reforms potentially reshape regional price relationships. However, rising input costs, persistent disease threats, and political uncertainties demand strategic caution.
Milk component reality check: While everyone’s obsessing over expansion, the actual profit play might be maximizing components and per-cow production. As Sebright bluntly puts it, this remains “the greatest opportunity for our producers to maximize their profitability.” Before breaking ground on that new barn, ensure you’re squeezing every dollar from the cows you already have.
This is when the wheat gets separated from the chaff in dairy management. The most successful operators will balance opportunistic growth with practical risk management – leveraging new processing capacity and pricing advantages while maintaining strict biosecurity protocols and closely monitoring policy developments.
The critical 2025 decision: Northeast producers face a strategic choice: expand now while processing capacity shows signs of growth, or wait until the full FMMO impact becomes clear. The imaginative play might be phased growth – increasing components and per-cow production immediately while preparing expansion plans for late 2025 after fully implementing both FMMO reforms.
THE BOTTOM LINE: NORTHEAST’S MOMENT OF OPPORTUNITY
The Northeast dairy industry is entering a period of potential competitive advantage after years of challenging margins.
New processing investments, FMMO changes taking effect June 1, and proximity to major population centers create a promising foundation for strategic growth. However, this opportunity window has significant caveats – rising input costs, evolving disease threats, and policy uncertainties that demand careful navigation.
For Northeast dairy producers, 2025 requires threading the needle between capitalizing on market opportunities and managing emerging risks. Those who make this problematic balance look easy – leveraging processing capacity growth and adapting to pricing changes while implementing rigorous cost controls and biosecurity measures – will emerge as the region’s next generation of industry leaders.
The question isn’t whether an opportunity exists in Northeast Dairy – it does. The real question is which operators will seize it most effectively while preparing for the inevitable challenges ahead. As processing capacity expands and pricing structures evolve, the foundation is being laid for a Northeast dairy renaissance that could reshape regional production patterns for years.
Join over 30,000 successful dairy professionals who rely on Bullvine Daily for their competitive edge. Delivered directly to your inbox each week, our exclusive industry insights help you make smarter decisions while saving precious hours every week. Never miss critical updates on milk production trends, breakthrough technologies, and profit-boosting strategies that top producers are already implementing. Subscribe now to transform your dairy operation’s efficiency and profitability—your future success is just one click away.
Fonterra shakes up global dairy: Why the industry giant is ditching consumer brands and betting on B2B ingredients and what it means for farmers.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Fonterra Co-operative Group, New Zealand’s dairy powerhouse, has announced a strategic divestiture of its entire global consumer business portfolio to focus exclusively on B2B ingredients and food service segments. This bold move challenges conventional wisdom about vertical integration in agriculture, with Fonterra asserting it’s not the optimal owner of consumer brands long-term. The decision is driven by stark performance differences between business segments, with ingredients and food service showing superior returns and growth potential. Fonterra aims to position itself as a focused B2B dairy nutrition provider, capitalizing on high-value protein markets. This strategic pivot carries significant implications for dairy farmers worldwide, potentially reshaping breeding priorities, production systems, and how cooperatives approach value creation in an increasingly specialized global marketplace.
KEY TAKEAWAYS:
Fonterra is divesting $2.7 billion in consumer brand assets to focus on B2B ingredients and food service, challenging the value of vertical integration in dairy.
The move is driven by superior financial performance in ingredients and food service segments compared to consumer brands.
This strategic shift may influence future milk pricing systems, potentially emphasizing specific protein fractions or functional characteristics over simple volume and elemental composition.
Fonterra’s pivot could signal a broader industry trend toward specialization in high-value ingredients, impacting dairy genetics and production systems.
The divestiture process, expected to take 12-18 months, aims to return significant capital to farmer shareholders while repositioning Fonterra for future growth.
New Zealand’s dairy powerhouse, Fonterra Co-operative Group, has definitively charted a new strategic course that challenges the foundation of vertical integration in agricultural business. The global dairy giant has confirmed plans to divest its consumer business portfolio and associated integrated operations to focus exclusively on its core B2B ingredients and food service segments. This strategic pivot represents one of the most significant restructurings in the cooperative’s history. It signals a fundamental recalibration of how this dairy behemoth plans to create value in an increasingly specialized global marketplace. Fonterra’s decision for dairy producers worldwide raises profound questions about optimal positioning within the dairy value chain and where the most significant returns lie.
The assets designated for divestiture represent approximately 19% of Fonterra’s group operating earnings in the first half of the 2024 financial year and utilize approximately 15% of the cooperative’s total milk solids. The businesses being put on the block include Fonterra’s global Consumer business portfolio with market-leading brands that have dominated dairy aisles across multiple continents – Anchor, Mainland, Kāpiti, Anlene, Anmum, Fernleaf, Western Star, and Perfect Italiano. Additionally, the cooperative will divest its integrated businesses, Fonterra Oceania (formed through the merger of Fonterra Brands New Zealand and Fonterra Australia) and Fonterra Sri Lanka. This portfolio of consumer-facing companies generated $2.7 billion of Fonterra’s $12.1 billion half-year revenues for the first half of FY2024.
Business Segment
FY24 EBIT (NZ$ million)
FY23 EBIT (NZ$ million)
Change (NZ$ million)
Change (%)
Ingredients
741
1,351
-610
-45%
Foodservice
451
249
+202
+81%
Consumer
248
-74*
+322
N/A
*Consumer FY23 figure includes $162 million in impairments
The performance differential between segments reveals Fonterra’s strategic calculation. While Consumers have shown improved performance, the ingredients business has historically generated substantially higher returns, and food service has demonstrated remarkable growth potential at +81% year-over-year. These numbers tell a compelling story about where Fonterra sees its optimal future position in the dairy value chain, challenging the conventional wisdom that vertical integration automatically creates superior value throughout the supply chain.
Challenging Industry Dogma: Why Fonterra Believes Consumer Brands Limit Returns
For dairy farmers worldwide, Fonterra’s decision raises profound questions about optimal positioning within the dairy value chain. CEO Miles Hurrell has articulated this strategic shift with remarkable clarity, explaining that the divestiture will “help create a simpler, higher performing Co-op with our focus on our core Ingredients and Foodservice business and doing what we do best.” The cooperative’s frank assessment that it is “not the highest-value owner of the Consumer and associated businesses in the longer term” represents a moment of strategic clarity that warrants attention from dairy farmers and processors globally.
This perspective recognizes that different segments of the dairy value chain require fundamentally different competencies, capital structures, and management approaches to maximize returns. For dairy farmers, this strategic pivot illuminates the critical distinction between producing milk components and capturing their ultimate value. While the same proteins and fats can be used in either consumer products or specialized ingredients, Fonterra has determined that the return profiles differ dramatically. This insight challenges producers to consider where their own operations can most effectively compete in the value chain and create sustainable value.
The timing appears favorable as well. Fonterra has confirmed “meaningful buyer interest” in these businesses, suggesting advantageous market conditions for divestiture. Consumer packaged goods companies actively seek established brands with strong regional positions, particularly in Asia-Pacific markets, so Fonterra’s portfolio represents an attractive acquisition opportunity. The question for dairy producers is whether this signals a broader industry shift from vertical integration toward more specialized positioning within the dairy value chain.
Following The Protein: How Specialized Ingredients Drive Superior Dairy Profits
Post-divestiture, Fonterra will position itself as a focused B2B dairy nutrition provider concentrated on two primary channels: ingredients (marketed through its NZMP brand) and food service (represented by Anchor Food Professionals). This strategic focus directly addresses how milk components can generate dramatically different returns depending on processing pathways and market positioning. Understanding the economics of milk proteins helps explain Fonterra’s strategic logic. While conventional consumer dairy products typically command modest margins and face intense retail competition, specialized protein ingredients serve high-growth nutrition markets with premium pricing structures.
The same milk proteins that might yield modest returns in consumer cheese or yogurt can generate substantially higher margins when isolated, functionalized, and marketed to the nutrition, medical, or sports performance sectors. This value differential has profound implications for dairy farmers considering their strategic options. While commodity milk production remains the industry’s foundation, the dramatic value expansion in specialized dairy protein markets suggests potential opportunities for producer cooperatives and entrepreneurial farmers to capture more of the ultimate value created from their milk.
Fonterra’s pivot raises questions for forward-thinking dairy producers about whether specialized milk composition might eventually command premium prices. Could selective breeding for specific protein fractions or compositions that excel in high-value ingredient applications become the next frontier in dairy genetics? The implications extend beyond corporate strategy to reshape core aspects of dairy production systems.
Decoding Fonterra’s Implementation Strategy: Trade Sale vs. IPO Options
Fonterra is executing its divestiture plan with methodical precision that is appropriate to its cooperative structure. Following the initial announcement in May 2024, the cooperative conducted a comprehensive assessment phase with financial advisors, confirming in November 2024 that “a divestment of our global consumer and associated businesses is in the best interests of the co-op.” The cooperative is now pursuing a dual-track approach, simultaneously exploring trade sale and IPO options to maximize shareholder value. This approach provides flexibility to pursue whichever exit mechanism generates optimal returns while accommodating prevailing market conditions.
This governance approach highlights a distinctive aspect of cooperative business structures that differentiates them from conventional corporations. Unlike corporations that can quickly pivot strategic direction through executive and board decisions, Fonterra must build consensus among its farmer-owners for transformative changes. This democratic accountability enhances legitimacy but introduces additional complexity to strategic execution that farmers and industry observers should recognize when evaluating the cooperative’s performance.
The entire divestiture process is expected to take 12-18 months to complete, reflecting both the scale of the transaction and the governance requirements of cooperative decision-making. Fonterra has confirmed it targets “a significant capital return” to farmer shareholders and unit holders following the divestment, providing tangible financial benefits from this strategic realignment. The question for the broader dairy community becomes whether this return of capital will ultimately create more value than continued investment in consumer brands.
Unveiling The Financial Impact: What This Means For Farmgate Milk Prices
Financial Metric (NZ$ Million)
FY24
FY23
% Change
Sales Volume (‘000 MT)
2,677
3,000
-11%
Total Revenue
17,174
19,737
-13%
Gross Profit
3,121
3,590
-13%
Gross Margin
18.2%
18.2%
No change
Reported EBIT
1,407
1,989
-29%
Reported EBIT Margin
8.5%
6.5%
+2.0%
Profit After Tax
973
1,326
-27%
Strategic corporate maneuvers ultimately matter most for dairy producers at the farm gate. Fonterra’s recent financial performance adds credibility to its strategic direction, with continuing operations showing resilience despite overall revenue declines. The improvement in EBIT margin from 6.5% to 8.5% signals the cooperative’s increasing efficiency and focus on higher-margin activities, precisely the strategic direction reinforced by the divestiture plan.
Milk Price Metric
Previous
Current
Change
2023/24 Forecast Range
$7.50-$8.10 per kgMS
$7.70-$7.90 per kgMS
Narrowed
2023/24 Forecast Midpoint
$7.80 per kgMS
$7.80 per kgMS
No change
2024/25 Opening Forecast Range
N/A
$7.25-$8.75 per kgMS
New
2024/25 Opening Forecast Midpoint
N/A
$8.00 per kgMS
New
2021/22 Season Final
$9.30 per kgMS
N/A
Reference
2022/23 Season Final
$8.22 per kgMS
N/A
Reference
The stability and improved confidence in the Farmgate Milk Price reflects Fonterra’s strengthening position in global dairy markets. The narrowing of the forecast range from $7.50-$8.10 to $7.70-$7.90 indicates increased certainty, with over 90% of milk contracted for the season. For dairy producers considering the implications of Fonterra’s strategic shift, the stable milk price projections suggest the cooperative enters this transformative period from a position of financial strength rather than distress – an important distinction from previous restructuring initiatives undertaken by major dairy cooperatives globally.
Rethinking Dairy Production: Will Breeding Soon Target Specialty Protein Traits?
Fonterra’s strategic pivot carries essential implications for dairy production systems and the broader agricultural sector. As dairy processing increasingly bifurcates between commodity ingredients and specialized nutrition components, breeding and production systems may eventually need to adapt. While current milk pricing systems primarily reward volume and elemental composition (protein and fat percentages), future systems may place greater emphasis on specific protein fractions, amino acid profiles, or bioactive compounds that deliver premium value in specialized nutrition applications.
Forward-thinking dairy producers might consider how breeding decisions today could position their herds for advantage in these evolving markets. Could genetic selection criteria evolve beyond simple protein percentages to target specific protein types or functional characteristics? Might genomic testing eventually identify animals whose milk composition is particularly valuable for specialized nutrition applications? These questions represent the cutting edge of where dairy science meets market evolution.
This specialization trend also has sustainability implications that producers should consider. Compared to traditional consumer products, higher-value specialty ingredients often require less water, energy, and packaging per dollar of revenue. Dairy producers may improve their economic and environmental performance by focusing on ingredients with differentiated milk qualities that create genuine competitive advantage—a win-win proposition in an era of increasing sustainability pressure.
Reshaping Global Dairy: How Fonterra’s Move Challenges Cooperative Models
Fonterra’s strategic divestiture program represents a defining moment for New Zealand’s dairy sector and global dairy producers seeking to maximize sustainable value creation. By challenging the convention that vertical integration automatically creates superior value, Fonterra has initiated a vital industry conversation about optimal positioning within increasingly specialized dairy markets. The decision reflects rigorous performance analysis and a forward-looking strategic vision about where genuine competitive advantages exist in today’s dairy value chain.
Fonterra’s strategic pivot for dairy farmers worldwide offers valuable lessons about the evolving dairy value chain and where opportunities for premium returns exist. While commodity production remains the foundation of the industry, the dramatic value expansion occurring in specialized ingredient markets suggests potential pathways for capturing increased value from the same underlying milk components. This may reshape how cooperatives worldwide approach value creation, potentially driving a shift from vertical integration toward more focused strategies targeting specific value chain segments.
As this process unfolds over the coming months, Fonterra’s leadership faces the complex challenge of maximizing divestiture value while ensuring a smooth transition for operations, employees, and customers. The successful execution of this strategic pivot will determine Fonterra’s competitive positioning and financial performance and influence how dairy cooperatives worldwide approach value creation in an increasingly specialized global marketplace. This strategic shift deserves close attention from dairy producers everywhere as it may signal a fundamental rethinking of where and how cooperatives can create maximum value from members’ milk.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
EU dairy production is projected to fall 0.2% in 2025 as Brussels abandons its Farm to Fork policy for a new Vision emphasizing economic sustainability. Cheese production increases despite milk shortages, while farmers demand less regulation and better margins.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
European milk production is forecast to decline 0.2% in 2025 to 149.4 million metric tonnes as cow numbers continue falling and economic pressures mount. Responding to widespread farmer protests, the European Commission has replaced its Farm to Fork strategy with a new “Vision for Agriculture and Food” that shifts from environmental emphasis toward economic sustainability, resilience, and simplification. Despite milk constraints, processors continue prioritizing cheese production (forecast to increase by 0.6% to 10.8 million metric tonnes in 2025) at the expense of butter, non-fat dry milk, and whole milk powder. This strategic product allocation reflects strong cheese export growth but raises questions about optimizing returns from limited milk supplies as the industry navigates continuing structural challenges.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
EU milk deliveries are forecast to decline 0.2% in 2025 to 149.4 million metric tonnes as farmer margins remain tight and environmental regulations continue to impact production.
Despite milk constraints, cheese production will increase by 0.6% to 10.8 million metric tonnes in 2025, while butter production will fall by 1% to 2.1 million metric tonnes.
The European Commission’s “Vision for Agriculture and Food” replaces the Farm to Fork strategy, shifting from “stick to carrot” and “green to lean” and emphasizing economic sustainability.
Fluid milk consumption is projected to decrease by 0.3% to 23.5 million metric tonnes in 2025, reflecting changing consumer preferences
Technology adoption, including IoT collars and AI milk analyzers, offers 5-12% efficiency gains, helping offset declining cow numbers.
Tractors lined Brussels streets in what has become a familiar scene across Europe. Farmers demanded change as milk production continued its downward slide beneath the weight of environmental regulations and economic pressures. As milk output across the EU fell below historic thresholds, European policymakers responded with a fresh approach to agricultural policy that could reshape the continent’s dairy landscape for generations.
Production Decline Accelerates as Cow Numbers Fall
For the first time in modern record-keeping, the European Union’s dairy cow population has dropped below 20 million animals, reaching just 19.7 million head at the beginning of 2024. This continuing decline in cow numbers has directly impacted milk production volumes across the continent.
Year
Dairy Cow Population (millions)
Year-over-Year Change
2021
20.23*
–
2022
20.1
-0.6%
2023
19.7
-2.0%
2024
<20.0**
Continued decline
*Calculated based on percentage change **Precise figure unavailable but confirmed below 20 million threshold
Sources: AHDB (March 2024)
According to the USDA GAIN report, EU milk deliveries are forecast to amount to 149.4 million metric tonnes in 2025, 0.2% below the revised 2024 estimate. This decline represents a concerning continuation of production challenges rather than a temporary dip.
Year
Production Volume (MMT)
Year-over-Year Change
2023
149.1
–
2024
149.6 (estimated)
+0.3%
2025
149.4 (forecast)
-0.2%
Source: USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, February 2025
The production challenges stem from multiple factors: dropping cow numbers, persistently tight dairy farmer margins, environmental regulations, and disease outbreaks among major producers. Low farmer margins combined with environmental restrictions continue to push smaller farmers out of production, resulting in declining cow numbers that won’t be fully compensated by increased productivity.
While early 2024 saw a temporary reversal, with milk deliveries increasing compared to the same period in 2023, this brief resurgence appears unsustainable. The forecast for marginally lower cows’ milk deliveries in 2025, at 145.3 million metric tonnes, indicates structural rather than cyclical challenges.
Regulatory Pressure and Market Challenges Drive Production Decisions
The primary factors behind Europe’s milk production challenges form a complex web of regulatory, economic, and demographic pressures. The European Green Deal, approved in 2020, established policy initiatives designed to help the trading bloc reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. These environmental regulations have directly impacted dairy operations across multiple countries.
Many industry observers fail to recognize that these environmental pressures aren’t simply regulatory hurdles to overcome—they’re reshaping the fundamental economics of milk production across the continent. With agriculture responsible for 12% of the EU’s total greenhouse gas emissions and a key driver of biodiversity loss, getting farmers on board with climate initiatives remains vital for achieving green goals. However, the approach taken thus far has created significant friction.
Economic pressures have compounded regulatory challenges. According to industry analyses, milk production profitability has been sliding since early 2023, with falling farm-gate milk prices co-occurring with elevated production costs for energy, fertilizers, and labor. The double whammy of the COVID pandemic followed immediately by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has left farmers squeezed between rising costs and falling prices.
Farmers Respond with Continent-Wide Protests
The combined impact of regulatory requirements and economic pressures has fueled widespread European farmer demonstrations. In early 2024, German farmers took to the streets of Berlin to protest rising taxes and insufficient subsidies. Similar demonstrations occurred in France, where farmers blocked roads around Paris to demand action on low farmgate prices, green regulation, and free-trade policies.
Escalating tensions drove EU farmers to the streets in protest at the beginning of 2024, and while tensions have temporarily calmed, they continue simmering below the surface. What distinguishes these protests from previous agricultural demonstrations is their unprecedented scale and explicit targeting of environmental policies previously considered untouchable in European political discourse.
Brussels Responds with Bold New Agricultural Vision
In response to mounting farmer concerns and widespread protests, the European Commission unveiled its “Vision for Agriculture and Food” on February 19, 2025. This comprehensive policy document represents a significant shift away from the previous Farm to Fork strategy and toward a more balanced approach that acknowledges economic realities alongside environmental objectives.
The Vision is oriented around four fundamental priority areas that directly address the dairy sector’s challenges:
Creating an agrifood sector that is “attractive and predictable” with incomes that enable farmers to thrive
Making the industry “competitive and resilient” in the face of rising global competition and shocks
Developing a “future-proof” system functioning within planetary boundaries
Valuing “food, fair working, and living conditions” and “vibrant, well-connected rural areas.”
This policy evolution marks a significant departure from previous approaches. Rather than primarily emphasizing environmental sustainability, the new Vision strongly emphasizes economic viability, resilience, security, simplification, and competitiveness. This shift represents potential relief for dairy producers wrestling with tight margins and regulatory burdens.
Perhaps most significantly, the Vision signals a fundamental change in regulatory philosophy—from “stick to carrot” and from “green to lean.” This means the following Common Agricultural Policy is likely to be incentives-based rather than prescriptive, with subsidies redirected toward farmers who “need it most,” particularly young farmers and smaller family farms. In the coming months, a new bureaucracy simplification package will cut the red tape that has frustrated producers.
Strategic Product Mix Adapts to Milk Constraints
European dairy processors are making strategic decisions about product allocation in response to declining milk availability. Despite the reduced milk supply, EU cheese production is forecast to reach 10.8 million metric tonnes in 2025, representing a 0.6% increase from 2024. However, this continued focus on cheese production raises questions about whether the strategy optimally serves European dairy’s long-term interests.
The prioritization of cheese production comes directly from other dairy products’ expenses. Butter production is forecast to decrease by 1% to 2.1 million metric tonnes in 2025, while non-fat dry milk is expected to fall by 4% and whole milk powder by 5%. These reductions reflect processors’ careful calculations about maximizing returns from constrained milk supplies but risk ceding ground in global markets for these commodities to competitors.
The industry’s cheese-centric strategy appears justified by market performance. After three consecutive years of declining cheese exports, EU exports rose by 3.6% in 2023 and are forecast to expand by a further 0.4% to reach 1.4 million metric tonnes in 2025. This growth suggests cheese production remains the most profitable allocation of scarce milk resources, though progressive producers might question whether emerging specialty categories could yield even more substantial returns.
Fluid Milk Consumption Continues to Decline
As consumer preferences evolve, fluid milk consumption across the EU continues to trend downward. Domestic consumption will fall by 0.3% to 23.5 million metric tonnes in 2025. This decline reflects shifting consumer habits, with plant-based alternatives capturing increasing market share.
The drop in fluid milk consumption partially offsets the pressures from reduced production, allowing processors to maintain focus on value-added products like cheese. However, this shift also signals a long-term structural change in the EU dairy market that producers must navigate through diversification and innovation.
Generational Challenges and Farm Consolidation Reshape Sector
Beyond immediate production concerns, the European dairy sector faces significant structural transformation through demographic shifts and consolidation pressures. The problem of generational renewal has become particularly acute, with many young potential farmers choosing alternative careers due to dairy’s demanding workload and uncertain economic prospects.
Small and medium-sized operations are increasingly exiting the industry, with Dutch dairy cooperatives reporting losing 14% of members since 2023. As consolidation accelerates, average herd sizes have grown significantly, reaching 85 cows in some regions (up from 62 in 2020).
The Commission’s commitment to presenting a Generational Renewal Strategy in 2025 acknowledges this challenge, but whether policy interventions can overcome the fundamental lifestyle and economic barriers remains questionable. Forward-thinking producers recognize that attracting new entrants requires financial incentives and essential changes to how dairy farming operates, including embracing automation, flexible labor arrangements, and alternative business models.
Technology Adoption Offers Efficiency Gains
As production pressures mount, European dairy farmers increasingly turn to technological solutions to improve efficiency and offset declining cow numbers. IoT collar systems for health monitoring have shown yield increases of 5-7%, while AI milk analyzers are helping German cooperatives reduce waste by 12%.
Innovative feed solutions, including algae-based supplements, are showing promise in reducing methane emissions by up to 15% without negatively impacting yield. These technological approaches offer a path to maintaining production levels despite environmental constraints, though implementation costs remain a barrier for smaller operations.
Looking ahead, the European dairy sector must navigate continuing milk supply constraints amid evolving policy frameworks. While the new Vision for Agriculture and Food represents a potential shift toward more producer-friendly policies, implementation will determine whether it delivers meaningful change or repackages existing approaches.
Progressive dairy operations recognize that waiting for policy solutions isn’t sufficient. The most successful European dairy businesses are proactively adapting through diversification, technology adoption, and strategic partnerships. Whether focusing on high-value specialty products like lactose-free cheese (sales surged 18% in 2024), integrating renewable energy production, or developing direct-to-consumer channels, these operations create resilience regardless of policy developments.
For European dairy farmers, the path forward involves adapting to environmental requirements, seeking efficiency gains, and exploring the alternative income streams highlighted in the Commission’s new vision. The coming year will be critical in determining whether the policy shifts announced in Brussels translate into meaningful on-farm improvements that can stabilize the continent’s dairy production capacity.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
South Dakota’s dairy industry is booming, but at what cost? With cow numbers doubling and profits soaring, farmers face new challenges. From labor shortages to environmental concerns, discover how the state’s dairy revolution is reshaping rural America—and why some fear the bubble might burst.
Summary
South Dakota’s dairy industry has experienced unprecedented growth over the past decade, with the state’s dairy cow population surging by 117% to 215,000 head. This boom, driven by strategic processor investments, business-friendly policies, and abundant natural resources, has positioned South Dakota as a leading dairy producer. The expansion has created 14,000 jobs and generates $7.2 billion annually, revitalizing rural economies. However, this rapid growth comes with significant challenges. Farmers face labor shortages, relying heavily on H-2A visa workers who fill 73% of farm labor roles. Environmental concerns are mounting, with 63% of Big Sioux River test sites exceeding EPA nitrate limits. Despite record milk prices of .50/cwt, rising feed costs and global market pressures are squeezing profit margins. As the industry navigates these hurdles, balancing continued growth with sustainability and addressing infrastructure strains will be crucial for South Dakota’s dairy future.
Key Takeaways
South Dakota’s dairy cow population has increased by 117% over the past decade, reaching 215,000 head.
The dairy boom has created 14,000 jobs and generates $7.2 billion annually for the state’s economy.
Major processor expansions, like Valley Queen Cheese’s $195 million upgrade, have driven farm growth.
73% of dairy farm labor roles are filled by H-2A visa workers, highlighting a critical dependence on immigrant labor.
Environmental challenges are emerging, with 63% of Big Sioux River test sites exceeding EPA nitrate limits.
Despite record milk prices ($21.50/cwt), farmers face thin margins due to a 28% spike in feed costs (2024).
Land values have tripled to $4,200/acre, creating barriers for new and young farmers.
The industry needs $320 million in digester upgrades to meet EPA’s 2030 methane reduction targets.
Global market pressures, including EU export subsidies, threaten to impact local dairy prices.
The state’s growth model contrasts sharply with Wisconsin, which lost 7.5% of its dairy farms in 2023 alone.
South Dakota’s dairy cow population has skyrocketed by 117% over the past decade to 215,000 head, fueled by pro-agriculture policies, processor investments, and a strategic embrace of immigrant labor. But behind the boom lie pressing challenges: aging infrastructure, global market volatility, and a reliance on H-2A workers that leaves farmers navigating bureaucratic hurdles and labor shortages. As the state cements its status as America’s fastest-growing dairy hub, producers weigh soaring feed costs against razor-thin margins—and question how long their winning streak can last.
Labor: The H-2A Lifeline and Its Limits
South Dakota’s dairy surge leans heavily on foreign workers, with H-2A visa holders filling 73% of farm labor roles statewide. While the program guarantees wages up to $20/hour—well above the $16.50 average for local hires—Reddit threads reveal stark realities:
Zero local applicants: One farmer posted 24 job listings across four states over eight years without a single domestic applicant.
Skill gaps: H-2A workers often arrive with decades of farming experience, while locals struggle with basic tasks like equipment maintenance.
Regulatory maze: The state’s H-2A process requires 60–75 days of advance paperwork, housing inspections, and proof of recruitment efforts—a burden small farms call “a full-time job.”
“We’ve got 24 H-2A workers and six Americans,” says Texas cotton and hemp farmer u/tunapunch69, whose experience mirrors South Dakota’s. “Locals quit after one-day baling hay. The H-2A guys? They’re lifelines.”
Physical Demands: A Reddit user noted most Americans “wouldn’t last 20 minutes” in extreme fieldwork, while dairy producers emphasize H-2A workers’ resilience in -20°F winters.
Environmental Tradeoffs: Growth vs. Groundwater
The dairy boom’s environmental costs are mounting:
Nitrate pollution: 63% of Big Sioux River test sites exceeded EPA limits in 2024 due to liquefied manure applications[GOED, 2025].
Infrastructure strain: Milbank needs $45M in wastewater upgrades by 2027 to handle dairy byproducts.
Water depletion: The Oahe Aquifer, critical for irrigation, has dropped 14 feet since 2020[8].
Despite a voluntary Nutrient Reduction Strategy, only 12% of phosphorus targets have been met since 2020[Critique]. “We’re playing catch-up,” admits a Grant County official. “Every new dairy strains our systems.”
Regulatory edge: South Dakota’s streamlined permitting and digester subsidies (30% state grants) still outpace California’s “death by 1,000 cuts”—like $16/hour overtime rules that drove David Lemstra’s 4,000-cow dairy to relocate from Fresno.
Profitability Paradox: Record Production, Thin Margins
While milk prices hit $21.50/cwt, feed costs spiked 28% in 2024, squeezing profits:
Retail disconnect: Farmgate milk prices contribute just $0.17 to a $6.99 Domino’s pizza, leaving farmers questioning supply chain equity.
Global threats: The EU’s 2024 decision to lift dairy export subsidies could flood markets with cheap butter, undercutting South Dakota’s $5B annual output.
“We’re price-takers, not makers,” laments a 1,500-cow producer near Sioux Falls. “When feed jumps, we eat the cost. When China slaps tariffs, we bleed.”
Farmer Voices: “Growth Isn’t Guaranteed”
Mid-sized operators reveal mixed sentiments:
David Lemstra, 4,000-cow dairy (Agropur supplier): “South Dakota gave us feed, permits, and community. But -20°F milking? That’s a learning curve.”
Anonymous 800-cow producer: “Land costs tripled. My kids can’t afford to start here. What’s next? Corporate farms?”
Innovation grants: The Dairy Business Innovation Alliance offers $100K for value-added projects like artisanal cheese or methane capture, critical for small farms competing against giants.
The Road Ahead: Sustainability or Stagnation?
2025 forecasts:
Agropur’s $150M whey plant (2026) aims to add $5,000/cow via protein isolates.
“We’ll grow, but smarter,” says Valley Queen’s Evan Grong, noting plans to recycle 90% of water by 2027. “No one wants to be California 2.0.”
Conclusion: Boom with Boundaries
South Dakota’s dairy dominance hinges on balancing immigrant labor needs, environmental accountability, and generational equity. As global markets wobble and locals shun fieldwork, the state’s 14,000 dairy-supported jobs hang in the balance. For farmers eyeing expansion, the message is clear: Growth thrives where pragmatism meets sustainability—but the margin for error is thinner than ever.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
Dairy milk is making a surprising comeback in 2025, with sales rising 3.2% and raw milk surging 17.6%. But beneath this resurgence lies a complex landscape of increasing costs, labor shortages, and evolving regulations. Join us as we explore how dairy farmers navigate these challenges while seizing new opportunities!
Summary
In a surprising turn of events, dairy milk is experiencing a renaissance in 2025, with fluid milk sales up 3.2% and industry receipts hitting a record .1 billion. However, this resurgence comes amid significant challenges for dairy farmers. Rising labor costs, stringent regulations, and environmental pressures are reshaping the industry landscape. Farmers are adapting by embracing technology like robotic milkers, which are seeing a 7.8% CAGR in North America, and exploring sustainable practices such as methane digesters. The industry also grapples with trade issues, particularly under USMCA, and new health mandates like mandatory H5N1 testing. Successful operations are diversifying revenue streams through beef-on-dairy crossbreeding and agritourism while navigating complex policy environments. As the sector evolves, dairy farmers are transforming from traditional milk producers into multifaceted agricultural entrepreneurs, balancing innovation with time-honored practices to secure their future in a rapidly changing market.
Key Takeaways
Dairy milk sales are up 3.2% in 2025, with industry receipts reaching a record $52.1 billion.
Raw milk sales have surged 17.6%, indicating growing consumer interest in unprocessed dairy.
Labor costs hit a record $53.5 billion, squeezing margins for 72% of dairy operations.
The adoption of robotic milking systems is growing at a 7.8% CAGR in North America.
Methane digesters offer sustainability benefits but face ROI challenges, costing $159 per ton of CO2e reduced.
USMCA trade issues persist, with Canada’s 270% dairy tariffs and underutilized TRQs.
Mandatory H5N1 testing adds new compliance costs, especially for raw milk producers.
72% of farms now use beef-on-dairy breeding for premium calf sales ($350-700/head).
Diversification strategies like agritourism are providing additional revenue streams.
Successful farmers balance automation, regulatory compliance, and market agility to remain competitive.
“We’re caught between higher milk prices and razor-thin margins,” Wisconsin dairy farmer Jake Thompson says. “My feed savings went straight into overtime pay for night shifts.”
Labor & Technology: The Robotic Revolution
Milking Robots: From Niche to Necessity
North America’s milking robot market is booming at a 7.8% CAGR, projected to hit $1 billion by 2032. Key drivers:
Labor savings: Each robot replaces 2-3 workers, with wages up 3.6% in 2025.
Productivity boost: Farms using Lely’s Astronaut A5 robots report 12% higher yields via real-time health monitoring.
Cost-Benefit Snapshot
Metric
Value
Upfront cost per robot
$150,000–$200,000
Payback period
5–7 years
Herd size optimized
60–250 cows
Source: Vet Advantage
Sustainability’s Sticker Shock: Digester Dilemmas
Methane Mitigation at What Cost?
California leads with 185 operational digesters, but the actual cost of carbon reduction is under scrutiny:
Public investment: $589 million in state/federal funds.
ROI reality: $159 per ton of CO2e, including LCFS credits—5x higher than initial estimates.
“Our digester cost $2 million with a 10-year payoff,” notes Central Valley farmer Maria Gonzalez. “Without credits, it’s a non-starter.”
Digester Economics
Funding Source
Contribution
State grants
40%
Federal REAP loans
30%
Carbon credits
30%
Source: CFS Waste Stream Report
Trade Turbulence: USMCA Growing Pains
Canada’s Quota Quagmire
Despite USMCA reforms, Canada’s dairy tariffs remain a thorn:
270% tariff on U.S. butter.
Only 51% of TRQs were utilized in 2024 due to processor restrictions.
Mexico remains the top export market for U.S. dairy products (33% of total exports), but “cheese naming” disputes threaten $1.2 billion in annual sales.
Avian Flu: Testing Tempest
Mandatory Milk Monitoring
The USDA’s December 2024 order requires:
Weekly H5N1 testing for herds shipping interstate.
PCR analysis of bulk milk tanks.
Raw milk producers face added costs:
$12,000/year for small herds.
14-day holds on positive batches.
The Road Ahead: 2025 Survival Strategies
1. Precision Feeding
With corn prices volatile (-10.1% in 2025), farmers like Iowa’s Smith Dairy use:
NIR spectroscopy to optimize TMR mixes.
Byproduct feeds (distillers’ grains, beet pulp).
2. Diversified Revenue Streams
Beef-on-dairy: 72% of farms use Angus/Wagyu genetics for $350–700/head premiums.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
Lab-grown milk is no longer science fiction. As Boston startup Brown Foods prepares to launch UnReal Milk, dairy farmers face a new reality. From bioreactors to hybrid farms, the industry is evolving. But with change comes opportunity. Discover how farmers are adapting to this revolution.
Summary
Boston-based startup Brown Foods is pioneering lab-grown whole cow’s milk, UnReal Milk, validated by MIT’s Whitehead Institute as structurally identical to traditional dairy. With $2.36 million in seed funding, the company leverages mammalian cell culture technology to produce milk with 90% less water and 95% less land use. While this innovation threatens to disrupt the $893 billion dairy industry, farmers adapt through hybrid models (e.g., Germany’s Senara), land leasing for bioreactors, and sustainability certifications. The global dairy alternatives market, projected to hit $70.6B by 2031, offers opportunities for collaboration, though challenges like cost and regulation remain. Forward-thinking farms like FrieslandCampina and Green Valley Dairy exemplify how tradition and technology coexist, ensuring farmers stay competitive in a rapidly evolving sector.
Key Takeaways
Brown Foods has developed UnReal Milk, the first lab-grown whole cow’s milk, validated by MIT as molecularly identical to traditional dairy.
The startup secured $2.36 million in seed funding and aims for consumer taste tests in 2025 and a market pilot in 2026.
Lab-grown milk production uses 82% less carbon, 90% less water, and 95% less land than traditional dairy farming.
The global dairy alternatives market is projected to grow from $31.13 billion in 2023 to $70.60 billion by 2031.
Some dairy farmers are adapting by exploring hybrid models, leasing land for bioreactors, or partnering with cellular agriculture companies.
Challenges include regulatory hurdles, scaling production, and consumer acceptance of lab-grown dairy products.
Opportunities exist for farmers to differentiate through sustainability practices or collaborate with tech companies.
The technology could potentially produce milk from various species and have applications in pharmaceuticals and cosmetics.
Boston-based startup Brown Foods is poised to revolutionize the dairy industry with UnReal Milk, the world’s first lab-grown whole cow’s milk produced without livestock. Backed by $2.36 million in seed funding from investors like Y Combinator and AgFunder, the company has achieved a scientific milestone validated by MIT’s Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research: its product replicates traditional milk at a molecular level. As the global dairy alternatives market surges toward $70.6 billion by 2031, Brown Foods’ innovation could capture up to 33% of the $893 billion traditional dairy sector, offering dairy farmers both challenges and opportunities in a rapidly evolving landscape.
A New Era for Dairy: Science Meets Sustainability
Brown Foods’ breakthrough centers on mammalian cell culture technology, which grows milk-producing cells in bioreactors to synthesize all components of cow’s milk—proteins (casein and whey), fats (triglycerides), and carbohydrates (lactose). Unlike precision fermentation, which isolates specific dairy proteins (e.g., Perfect Day’s beta-lactoglobulin), this method creates a complete milk composition. Independent testing confirms UnReal Milk’s structural identity to conventional dairy, enabling its use in cheese, butter, and ice cream without additives.
Dr. Richard Braatz, MIT chemical engineering professor and Brown Foods’ advisor, emphasizes the scalability: “This technology can meet global demand sustainably, using 82% less carbon, 90% less water, and 95% less land than traditional dairy farming.”
The startup’s progress outpaced competitors’ and achieved lab-to-lab validation in three years—a fraction of the decade-long timelines standard in cellular agriculture.
Market Dynamics: Growth and Resistance
The dairy alternatives sector is expanding rapidly, driven by environmental concerns, lactose intolerance, and ethical consumerism. According to Allied Market Research, plant-based dairy sales reached $13.2 billion in 2020 and could hit $55.45 billion by 2031. Lab-grown dairy, however, faces unique hurdles:
Regulatory Scrutiny: In 2023, the National Milk Producers Federation petitioned the FDA to restrict terms like “milk” to animal-derived products.
Farmer Pushback: Some dairy farmers view cellular agriculture as a threat, though others explore hybrid models (e.g., Germany’s Senara, which cultures mammary cells with farm partners).
Consumer Skepticism: A 2024 Sentient Media study found that 42% of U.S. adults are open to cell-cultured dairy, but “naturalness” concerns linger.
Despite this, venture capital floods the sector. Agronomics, a key investor in lab-grown proteins, reported a 23% gross IRR in 2024, while Cult Food Science backs 18 companies, including Eat Just.
Implications for Dairy Farmers: Adaptation and Opportunity
For traditional dairy producers, UnReal Milk presents both disruption and potential collaboration. Let’s explain what this means for the barns and pastures we know today.
1. Competition or Collaboration?
Lab-grown milk could reduce demand for conventional dairy in sustainability-focused markets like Europe and California. But farmers aren’t just bystanders—many are already pivoting. Take Dutch dairy cooperative FrieslandCampina, which invested €2 million in 2024 to research cellular agriculture partnerships. As CEO Jan Derck van Karnebeek notes, “We’re blending 150 years of farming tradition with tomorrow’s tech to stay relevant.”
2. New Revenue Streams
Farmers can lease unused land for bioreactor facilities or supply startups with biomass (like stem cells). Green Valley Dairy now dedicates 10% of its land to a Brown Foods pilot facility in Wisconsin, creating a secondary income stream. “It’s like renting out a corner of your farm, but for science,” says owner Greg Strauss.
3. Hybrid Models in Action
Germany’s Senara partners with dairy farms to culture mammary cells, combining farm expertise with lab innovation. This “cow-to-culture” approach lets farmers maintain herds while diversifying. Early adopter Lüder Hinrichs reports a 15% revenue boost: “We’re still milking cows, but now we’re also growing cells.”
4. Sustainability Credentials
Dairy farms adopting methane digesters or regenerative practices could market their milk as a premium, “low-footprint” alternative to lab-grown products. Straus Family Creamery in California, already carbon-neutral, saw a 20% sales increase after highlighting this distinction.
Challenges Ahead: Costs, Regulation, and Trust
Brown Foods aims for consumer taste tests in 2025 and a 2026 market pilot, but hurdles remain:
Cost: Though AI-driven optimization could cut expenses, lab-grown milk remains expensive due to bioreactor energy use.
Regulatory Approval: The FDA and USDA jointly oversee cellular agriculture, requiring rigorous safety reviews.
Scaling Production: Current methods yield small batches; scaling to compete with industrial dairies demands significant capital.
Dairy Farmer’s Perspective: “We need transparency,” says Vermont dairy farmer Karen Stahl. “If lab milk uses our cows’ genetic material, shouldn’t we get a stake in the profits?”
The Road Ahead: Tradition Meets Innovation
UnReal Milk’s debut signals a broader shift in food technology. Beyond dairy, Brown Foods envisions producing species-specific milk (e.g., camel, human) for niche markets and supplying ingredients to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. Meanwhile, competitors like Israel’s Wilk (cultured milk fats) and Switzerland’s Cultured Hub (biotech scaling) vie for market share.
For dairy farmers, adaptation is key. As Gupta notes, “The cows aren’t disappearing—but the tools to feed the world are evolving.”
Stay Informed: Follow groups like the Dairy Farmers of America’s Innovation Center for updates.
Explore Partnerships: Startups often seek farm collaborators for biomass or pilot projects.
Double Down on Sustainability: Differentiate your milk through eco-certifications or methane-reduction tech.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
Amid price wars, Russia’s $730M dairy boom by 2030 threatens EU farms with cheap cheeses and state-backed milk. As green rules clash with Putin’s ‘protein diplomacy,’ small farmers face extinction—can tradition survive? Explore the global clash and how farmers fight back in this key showdown.
Summary
Russia’s dairy exports are projected to reach $730 million by 2030, leveraging state subsidies and a $3.50/gallon production cost to undercut EU farmers burdened by sustainability mandates and higher labor expenses. This expansion threatens small European producers already struggling with debt from emissions-compliant infrastructure. Russian products—often lower in quality and sustainability—exploit trade loopholes via third countries like Belarus. EU farmers are responding through tech adoption (robotic milkers), premium certifications (climate-resilient cheeses), and cooperative consolidation, but face a critical choice: adapt to compete with Russia’s cost-driven model or risk collapse in a market increasingly shaped by geopolitical protein diplomacy.
Key Takeaways
$730M Export Target: Russia aims to capture global dairy markets by 2030 with state-subsidized exports, undercutting EU prices by 60% ($3.50 vs. $9.45/gallon).
Sustainability vs. Survival: EU farmers face $1.2M+ debts to meet emissions rules, while Russian milk production emits 35% more CO₂ (3.15 kg/liter).
Trade Loopholes: Belarus and African ports help Russia bypass sanctions, flooding markets with cheaper, lower-quality products (72% butterfat vs. the EU’s 82%).
Farmer Adaptations: Survival strategies include robotic milkers (cuts labor 40%), climate-certified cheeses (€8.50/kg premiums), and co-op consolidation.
Geopolitical Protein Wars: Leaked EU reports warn that Russia’s dairy push aims to weaken Western food sovereignty through “protein diplomacy” in Asia and Africa.
Russia’s dairy exports are projected to hit $730 million by 2030, leveraging cost advantages that could destabilize global markets already strained by systemic inefficiencies. As EU farmers grapple with environmental mandates and New Zealand processors face oversupply, Russia’s state-driven export strategy highlights a clash between unregulated growth and sustainability-focused systems. This collision raises urgent questions about market fairness, small-farm survival, and the actual cost of cheap dairy.
The Quota Conundrum: Russia’s Flexibility vs. EU Rigidity
While Russia’s dairy sector expanded freely, the EU’s abolition of milk quotas in 2015 led to overproduction crises. Farmers were forced to discard 1.2 million tons of milk annually—valued at €500 million—to stabilize prices. Unlike Russia’s export-first model, the EU’s post-quota era created volatility, with German dairy farms declining by 38% since 2016 due to price collapses.
Dutch Farmer (Friesland Region): “We’re told to reduce herds for emissions targets while Russia floods markets. Our rules protect the planet but erase livelihoods.”
Poland’s 2024 butter shortage—caused by EU-wide milk deficits—exposed vulnerabilities in balancing sustainability and supply. Russia’s lack of such restrictions allows rapid scaling but risks quality erosion.
Price Wars and Hidden Costs
Russia’s $3.50/gallon milk—half the EU’s $9.45/gallon average—relies on a $196/month minimum wage and state subsidies. However, this “bargain” masks concerning practices:
Palm Oil Controversies: The 2022 EU “Buttergate” scandal revealed undisclosed palm supplements in Irish dairy feed, cutting fat production costs by 18%. Russian producers, facing fewer regulations, could adopt similar shortcuts.
Quality Trade-Offs: EU standards mandate 82% butterfat minimums, while Russian products often hover near 72%—a critical gap for bakeries requiring consistency.
Small Farms: Collateral Damage in a Global Milk War
As Russia targets bulk buyers in China and North Africa, small-scale EU producers face existential threats:
Debt Traps: Dutch family dairy farms average €45,000 in annual income but take out €1.2 million+ in loans for emissions-compliant barns, a burden absent in Russia’s system.
Niche Survival Strategies: Italian farmers now pivot to Parmigiano Reggiano DOP (protected designation) cheeses, which sell for €15/kg vs. €4/kg for generic brands. Russia lacks comparable terroir-driven products.
EU Agricultural Commissioner: “We can’t match Russia’s prices. Our strength lies in Protected Geographical Indications—products tied to land and tradition.”
Environmental Reckoning: Methane vs. Markets
Russia’s expansion clashes with global sustainability efforts:
Emission Disparities: Producing 1 liter of Russian milk generates 3.15 kg CO₂ equivalent—35% higher than EU averages—due to outdated manure management.
Water Warfare: Russian farms consume 628 liters of water per liter of milk vs. 550 liters in rain-rich Ireland. This could worsen resource conflicts in drought-prone Algeria (a key Russian target).
EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) fees now penalize high-emission imports, but Russia’s state subsidies may absorb these costs to maintain market share.
Geopolitical Chess: Sanctions, Loopholes, and Dairy Diplomacy
Despite Western sanctions, Russia exploits trade ambiguities:
Third-Country Laundering: Belarusian-processed Russian cheese reached 14 EU nations in 2024, circumventing embargoes.
African Infrastructure Deals: Russia’s port investments in Mozambique could bypass Suez delays, cutting Asia shipping times by 11 days.
A leaked EU report warns, “Russian dairy isn’t just trade—it’s a tool to reshape food alliances and weaken Western influence.”
The 2030 Crossroads: Adaptation or Extinction
Farmers have three survival pathways:
Tech Overhaul: Dutch farms using robotic milkers cut labor costs by 40%, while French co-ops sell carbon credits using methane digesters.
Co-Op Consolidation: Denmark’s organic dairy collective captured 47% of domestic sales by pooling 2,300 small farms.
Conclusion: Milk’s New World Order
Russia’s dairy rise tests the viability of sustainability-focused farming. As EU producers balance emissions cuts and fair prices, one Bavarian farmer summarized the dilemma: “We’re told to be green and compete with a nation that ignores rules and conscience. What’s left—race to the bottom or abandon dairy?”
The answer may determine whether 2030 brings equitable markets or a Russian-dominated protein empire.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
Yogurt sales are soaring, but what’s behind this dairy renaissance? The humble yogurt cup is at the center of a health revolution, from weight-loss drugs to cancer prevention. Dive into the creamy world of probiotics and profits as we explore how this trend reshapes dairy farms and dinner tables.
Summary
Yogurt consumption in the U.S. has hit an all-time high, driven by the growing popularity of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs and new research linking yogurt to reduced colon cancer risk. Sales reached 4.9 billion pounds in 2024, up 3.7% from the previous year, with drinkable yogurts seeing a 9.8% surge. GLP-1 drug users are turning to yogurt as a high-protein, low-calorie snack, while a Harvard study found eating yogurt twice weekly could lower colon cancer risk by 23%. This boom presents opportunities for dairy farmers and challenges like rising feed costs and global competition. As the industry adapts to meet demand for high-protein, low-sugar varieties, yogurt is cementing its place as a health food and a growing market segment in the dairy industry.
Key Takeaways
U.S. yogurt consumption reached a record 4.9 billion pounds in 2024, up 3.7% from 2023.
GLP-1 weight-loss drug users are driving demand for high-protein, low-sugar yogurt varieties.
A Harvard study found eating yogurt twice weekly could reduce colon cancer risk by 23%.
Dairy farmers face opportunities in premium yogurt markets but challenges from rising input costs and global competition.
Sustainability and herd management innovations are crucial for dairy farmers to meet new market demands.
The yogurt boom reflects a broader shift in consumer preferences towards functional, nutrient-dense foods.
Global yogurt market growth, especially in Asia-Pacific, offers export opportunities for U.S. dairy farmers.
Regulatory changes, such as H5N1 testing requirements, impact dairy farms’ operational costs.
Diversification into probiotic strains and partnerships with health-focused brands present new revenue streams for dairy producers.
Yogurt consumption in the U.S. reached a historic high of 4.9 billion pounds in 2024, driven by dual tailwinds: the rise of GLP-1 weight-loss drugs and a landmark study linking regular yogurt intake to reduced colon cancer risk. With colorectal cancer ranking as the third deadliest cancer for men and fourth for women nationwide, dairy farmers and manufacturers are poised to capitalize on shifting consumer priorities toward functional, nutrient-dense foods.
Market Growth Meets Medical Innovation
According to Circana data, yogurt sales grew 3.7% by volume in 2024, with drinkable varieties skyrocketing 9.8% year over year. This resurgence defies broader dairy sector declines as consumers increasingly seek high-protein, low-sugar snacks compatible with GLP-1 medications like Ozempic and Wegovy.
Rafael Acevedo, President of Danone North America Yogurt: “Households using GLP-1s consume nearly triple the yogurt of non-users. This isn’t a fad—it’s a fundamental shift in how people approach nutrition during weight management.”
Danone’s protein-focused Oikos line saw sales jump 40% in 2024, while its low-sugar Two Good brands gained traction among calorie-conscious buyers. The trend reflects GLP-1 users’ need for portion-controlled, satiating options that preserve muscle mass during rapid weight loss.
Colon Cancer Study Validates Yogurt’s Role in Gut Health
A February 2025 study in Gut Microbes analyzed 150,000 adults over 30 years, finding those who ate yogurt ≥2x/week had a 23% lower risk of proximal colon cancer—aggressive right-side tumors with a 65% 5-year survival rate.
Dr. Tomotaka Ugai, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health: “Yogurt strengthens the gut barrier by enriching Bifidobacterium and suppressing inflammation. If you enjoy it, keep eating it—the microbiome benefits are real.”
The research aligns with earlier findings that yogurt’s calcium, vitamin D, and anti-inflammatory peptides synergistically inhibit tumor growth. With colorectal cancer rates rising 45% among under-50 adults since 1995, healthcare providers now recommend yogurt as part of preventive diets.
Operational Challenges for Dairy Farmers
Rising Input Costs
Feed expenses: Up 18% in 2024 due to drought-reduced crop yields and land price inflation.
Labor shortages: Dairy farms face a 12% workforce gap, pushing automation investments.
Sustainability mandates: Methane-reducing feed additives cost $0.15/cow/day, yet Danone aims to be net zero by 2035.
Regulatory Pressures
The USDA’s December 2024 Federal Order requires H5N1 testing for all raw milk shipments. While critical for public health, compliance costs small farms $5,000–$10,000 annually for lab fees and herd monitoring.
Mark Jekanowski, USDA World Ag Outlook Board Chair: “Class III and IV milk prices fell $0.45/cwt this month due to tighter heifer supplies and H5N1-driven market volatility.”.
Global Competition and Market Shifts
Region
2025 Milk Production (Billion lbs)
Price/cwt (USD)
U.S.
226.9
$22.60
EU
150.2
$18.00
New Zealand
21.29
$15.00
U.S. farmers face pressure from subsidized EU and NZ imports. However, premium yogurt demand (14% YoY growth) offers margin protection for farms transitioning to A2 beta-casein herds or organic certification.
Strategic Opportunities
Value-added partnerships: Siggi’s and Ratio Keto pay $24/cwt for high-protein milk (≥3.5% protein).
Direct-to-consumer raw milk: Despite H5N1 risks, niche markets fetch $8–$12/gallon via pet milk loopholes.
Export growth: Asia-Pacific yogurt demand rose 11% in 2024, favoring lactose-tolerant Jersey cows.
Revised USDA 2025 Forecasts
Metric
February 2025 Forecast
Change from January
Milk Production
226.9B lbs
-0.4B lbs
All-Milk Price
$22.60/cwt
-$0.45
Cheese Price
$1.865/lb
+$0.065
Despite lower prices, feed cost relief is unlikely—corn futures remain at $5.20/bushel, 22% above 2023 averages.
Conclusion: Navigating a Complex Landscape
Yogurt’s boom offers dairy farmers rare growth in a stagnant sector, but success requires:
Precision feeding to offset $23.05/cwt break-even costs.
Lobbying for fair trade policies against Canada’s dumping of subsidized milk.
Diversification into probiotic strains for gut health brands.
As Dr. Chris Damman (UW Gastroenterologist) notes:
“Farmers who align with microbiome science will own the next decade of dairy demand.”
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
U.S. milk production increased 0.1% in January 2025—even as 5% of dairies closed their barns. How did herd growth and tech investments fail to boost yields? From California’s water wars to Texas’ tax-fueled expansion, dive into the data and political battles reshaping America’s dairy future.
Summary
The U.S. dairy sector confronted stark contrasts in 2024: milk production increased 0.1% year-over-year in January 2025, yet 5% of farms (1,420 operations) shuttered due to crushing input costs, labor shortages, and consolidation pressures. Regional disparities intensified as Texas and South Dakota leveraged tax incentives and tech adoption to expand herds. At the same time, California and Wisconsin faltered under drought, regulatory burdens, and declining productivity per cow. Federal subsidies disproportionately buoyed mega-dairies, accelerating an industry divide between industrialized operations and niche producers. Amid debates over immigration reform, methane mandates, and raw milk deregulation, Republican-led efforts to balance free-market policies with farmer protections underscored the political tightrope shaping dairy’s uncertain future.
Key Takeaways
Production Paradox: U.S. milk output inched up 0.1% in January 2025 (19.1B lbs) despite a 7-pound drop in per-cow productivity, highlighting efficiency stagnation.
5% Farm Closures: 1,420 dairies closed in 2024, disproportionately small operations in Wisconsin (-400) and California (-85) squeezed by feed costs, labor shortages, and debt.
Regional Divide:
Growth: Texas (+6.5%) and South Dakota (+6.5%) expanded via tax breaks, tech adoption, and methane digester subsidies.
Decline: California (-5.7%) and Arizona (-4.9%) faltered under drought and H5N1 outbreaks.
Consolidation: Mega-dairies (>5,000 cows) now produce 43% of U.S. milk, buoyed by federal subsidies (93% of 2024’s $1.2B Dairy Margin Coverage payments).
Policy Battles:
GOP pushes Farm Freedom Act to redirect subsidies to small farms and block EPA methane rules.
Raw milk deregulation splits Republicans, pitting consumer choice against food safety risks.
Labor Crisis: 73% of dairy workers are migrants; Trump’s deportation threats clash with industry pleas for visa reforms.
2025 Forecast: 800–1,200 more closures expected as China’s tariffs and feed inflation persist.
U.S. milk production increased 0.1% year-over-year in January 2025 to 19.1 billion pounds, masking a deepening divide: 1,420 dairies (5% of operations) closed in 2024, disproportionately affecting small Republican-aligned farms. While mega-dairies thrive under federal subsidy structures, grassroots conservatives demand deregulation, immigration reforms, and protections for raw milk sales—issues now central to the GOP’s rural revival platform.
Production Paradox: Small Farms Squeezed by Regulation and Labor Gaps
The USDA’s January 2025 report highlighted a 10,000-head herd expansion but revealed output per cow fell to 2,020 pounds monthly (-0.5% YoY). For small farms, productivity declines collided with regulatory burdens:
Oregon’s CAFO Controversy: A 2023 rule briefly required farms with as few as three cows to install $100,000 manure systems, reversed after an outcry from smallholders. “This was corporate cronyism disguised as environmentalism,” said Oregon dairywoman Sarah Kline, referencing lobbying by industrial dairy groups.
Labor Shortages: Republican-led states face acute worker deficits, with 73% of farm labor reliant on migrants—half undocumented. Trump’s proposed mass deportations risk destabilizing $43B in dairy output unless visa reforms emerge.
“We’re not against rules—we’re against rules written by bureaucrats who’ve never stepped in manure,” argued Texas Agricultural Commissioner Sid Miller, a Trump ally. “Let us compete without DC dictating our margins.”
Raw Milk Debate Becomes Conservative Litmus Test
The FDA’s nationwide raw milk ban faces GOP-led rebellion:
Pennsylvania’s Showdown: Gov. Josh Shapiro faces pressure to revoke raw milk licenses after H5N1 detections, but Amish farmers argue it’s religious liberty.
Market Dynamics: Raw milk sales surged 38% in 2024 in deregulated states like South Dakota, where permits cost $50/year. Critics counter that listeria outbreaks—like the 2024 Lancaster County death—show risks outweigh liberty arguments.
Republican Split:
Pro-Deregulation: “Consumers deserve choice,” said Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY), the Milk Freedom Act sponsor. “If you trust farmers with your steak, trust them with milk.”
Pro-Safety: “Deregulation without testing is Russian roulette,” countered Kansas GOP state Sen. Beverly Gossage, blocking a raw milk bill.
Policy Reforms: GOP Balances Mega-Dairy Backers and Populist Base
Subsidy Reallocation
2024 Data: 93% of Dairy Margin Coverage payments went to herds >500 cows.
Emerging Solution: The Farm Freedom Act (GOP proposal) would cap subsidies for operations >2,000 cows, redirecting funds to small farms adopting methane-reducing feed additives.
Immigration Tightrope
Farm groups lobbied Trump to exempt dairy from deportation plans, proposing:
Guest Worker Expansion: 15M seasonal visas to stabilize labor.
E-Verify Softening: Exemptions for states with <4% unemployment.
“We need workers, not walls,” said Idaho Dairymen’s CEO Rick Naerebout, a Republican. “If we deport 50% of our workforce, 30% of U.S. dairies fold overnight.”
Regional Case Studies: Red State Strategies
Texas’ “Dairy Freedom Zone” Success
Growth: +42,000 cows added in 2024 via:
10-year property tax abatements for methane digesters
Right-to-farm laws blocking nuisance lawsuits
State-funded robotic milker training ($5M program)
Wisconsin’s Crisis to Opportunity Shift
After losing 400 dairies in 2024, GOP lawmakers passed:
Small Farm Revitalization Act: Grants up to $50k for value-added ventures (artisan cheese, A2 milk).
Raw Milk Pilot: 50 licensed farms can sell directly if quarterly test results are posted online.
2025 Outlook: Republican Policy Priorities
Issue
GOP Stance
Democrat Counter
CAFO Rules
Exempt farms <200 cows
Apply uniformly
Methane Policy
Voluntary credits at $8.50/ton
Mandate 40% cuts by 2030
Trade
Retaliatory tariffs on EU dairy
Rejoin TPP negotiations
Projected Impacts:
Closures: 800–1,200 small farms at risk without subsidy reforms
Exports: China’s 25% dairy tariff could cost $420M unless resolved via Trump’s “reciprocal trade” mantra
The Bottom Line
The GOP’s dairy dilemma—pitting pro-corporate donors against populist farmers—mirrors national tensions. While raw milk and immigration dominate headlines, existential questions remain: Can Republicans reconcile free-market ideals with farmer demands for protectionism? As Kansas dairyman Clint Robinson said, “We don’t want handouts. We want handoffs—of power from DC to our county boards.” The party’s 2026 midterm success may hinge on answering that call.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
Australia’s dairy industry braces for a potential decline in production for the 2024/25 season as farmers grapple with lower farmgate prices and rising operational costs despite earlier optimistic forecasts.
Summary:
The Australian dairy industry faces challenges in 2025, with predictions of a slight drop in production due to lower farmgate prices, rising costs, and dry weather conditions affecting farmers’ profits. Despite these issues, the industry is resilient by adopting new technologies and focusing more on products like cheese and yogurt. Concerns continue about the sector’s long-term sustainability, with fewer dairy farms and younger farmers leaving. Economic issues, especially in China, add pressure, but there’s cautious optimism due to the industry’s history of adaptability. Calls for more support and policy changes aim to help farmers with technology, sustainable farming practices, and mental health support while striving for new market opportunities.
Key Takeaways:
The Australian dairy industry faces challenges, leading to an anticipated decline in milk production for the 2024/25 season.
Farmers are experiencing lower farmgate prices and increased operational costs, impacting profit margins.
Persistent dry weather in key regions and global market pressures contribute to the decline of production.
The industry shows adaptability through strategic technological advancements, sustainability practices, and value-added product focus.
Younger generations are increasingly deterred from entering the industry, indicated by the low percentage of under-35 farmers.
The global dairy market dynamics and geopolitical uncertainties complicate the industry’s future outlook.
Efforts to enhance sustainability and market diversification are crucial for long-term viability and resilience.
Australia’s dairy sector, celebrated for its resilience over recent years, now encounters challenges that may impede its growth. Despite robust outcomes during the 2023/24 season and a promising start to early 2024/25, experts foresee a minor downturn in milk production throughout the rest of the 2024/25 season. This projection is attributed primarily to persistent dry weather conditions and narrowing profit margins.
Recent analyses by Dairy Australia and the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) suggest the Australian dairy industry is at a pivotal juncture. Although favorable farmgate prices drove production increases during the 2023/24 season, the prospects for the latter part of 2024/25 are less encouraging.
“Farmers face strained margins due to declining farmgate prices coupled with escalating operational costs,” according to the AHDB report, underscoring the formidable obstacles confronting Australian dairy farmers.
This forecast starkly contrasts with earlier projections by the USDA, which had predicted a 1.1 percent rise in milk production for 2025, reaching 8.8 million metric tons (MMT). This shift towards decline highlights the industry’s unpredictable nature.
Factors Contributing to the Decline
Multiple influences are contributing to the anticipated reduction in dairy production:
Arid Weather Patterns: Continuous dry conditions in crucial dairy regions have driven up the costs of fodder and water, intensifying strain on farm profits.
Declining Farmgate Prices: Although prices were initially robust, the decline in Farmgate prices has diminished farm profitability.
Escalating Operational Expenses: Farmers are contending with heightened costs for essential resources, including feed, labor, and fertilizer.
International Market Challenges: Economic difficulties in major importing nations, especially China, impact export demand.
Financial Year
Milk Price Index
Year-on-year change
2024
126.4
–
2025
115.9
-8.3%
Source: Statista
Industry Response and Adaptation
Amid these hurdles, the Australian dairy sector is demonstrating considerable adaptability and resilience:
Robust Domestic Market: The local dairy market thrives, although increasing retail prices might soon affect consumer demand.
Enhanced Export Potential: Australian dairy products have gained a competitive edge worldwide, taking advantage of shipping disruptions on other trade routes and reduced milk availability in the northern hemisphere.
Advanced Technological Integration: Farmers increasingly adopt automation and robotics to boost efficiency and lessen their reliance on labor. Andrew Schmetzer, Novus’s Sales Manager for Australia, observes that the industry embraces new methods like free-stall barn housing and robotic milking systems.
Commitment to Sustainability: A notable shift towards eco-friendly farming practices, such as reducing carbon emissions and utilizing water more efficiently.
Focus on Value-Added Products: Rafael Guerrero, Sales Ruminant Specialist at Novus, recommends transitioning to value-added products like cheese and yogurt, emphasizing milk solids over sheer volume to enhance profits.
“The Australian dairy industry has shown outstanding resilience when faced with challenges. Although we expect some difficulties next year, our farmers possess innovation and adaptability,” remarks Dr. Emily Johnson, an agricultural economist at the University of Melbourne.
Year
Production Forecast
Year-on-Year Change
Source
2023/24
8.7 mmt
+2.7%
USDA FAS
2024/25
8.8 mmt
+1.1%
USDA FAS
2024/25
8.5 billion litres
+1.5%
Rabobank
Long-Term Outlook and Industry Concerns
The outlook for the Australian dairy industry has sparked apprehension regarding its long-term viability. According to a recent Curtin University study, 55% of surveyed farmers expressed discontent with the sector. Financial strain and mental health issues have also prompted many to contemplate leaving the industry.
The study reveals a stark increase in feed costs, which have surged by 40% since 2022. Meanwhile, stagnant milk prices have resulted in unsustainable profit margins for 89.8% of the farmers surveyed, as noted by Curtin University.
This widespread sentiment is also evident in the decreasing number of dairy farms, which have fallen from 6,308 in 2014 to 4,420 by 2022. Additionally, there is a worrying trend concerning the younger generation: individuals under 35 now account for a mere 6% of the industry, indicating a notable exodus of youth.
Global Context and Future Implications
The Australian dairy industry navigates a complex landscape shaped by global market dynamics. As global milk production is projected to witness moderate growth in 2025, supported by enhanced farm profitability and stabilized feed costs in specific areas, Australia finds itself challenging.
With China poised to marginally boost its dairy imports—the largest globally—potential support for the dairy tradeemerges. Nonetheless, wavering consumer confidence in crucial markets, notably the U.S. and segments of Europe, could dampen growth expectations.
Furthermore, Donald Trump’s re-election to the U.S. presidency introduces an element of instability to global trade policies, potentially affecting dairy markets, primarily if tensions between China and the U.S. augment.
Looking Ahead
As Australia’s dairy industry navigates these multifaceted challenges, stakeholders are increasingly calling for enhanced support and strategic policy measures to guarantee the sector’s enduring sustainability. Balancing time-honored traditions with innovation will be essential as farmers strive to uphold profitability while adjusting to shifting market dynamics and environmental demands.
Critical future focus areas encompass:
Technology Investment: Integrating automation and robotics to tackle labor shortages and boost operational efficiency.
Sustainable Methods: Amplifying focus on regenerative agriculture and implementing water-saving techniques to align with new regulations and consumer expectations.
Market Expansion: We will seek out new export markets and craft value-added products to lessen dependence on conventional commodity markets.
Farmer Support: Confronting mental health challenges and offering financial aid ensures the sector appeals to the younger workforce.
Climate Change Adaptation: Developing tactics to mitigate the effects of prolonged dry conditions and other climate-related threats.
The upcoming months will determine if the anticipated production dip materializes and how the industry tackles these persistent challenges. With its legacy of resilience and ingenuity, the Australian dairy industry remains cautiously optimistic about its capacity to withstand this current adversity and emerge more robust in the following years.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
Canadian dairy farmers face a mixed outlook for 2025, with slight price dips offset by growing demand and sustainability gains. Despite challenges, the industry shows resilience, with projected market growth to $22.92 billion by 2033. Adapt, innovate, and stay informed to milk the most from this evolving landscape.
Summary:
Canadian dairy farmers face both challenges and opportunities. Milk prices may dip slightly, but farm cash receipts and consumer demand for diverse dairy products are rising. Sustainability remains a focus, with efforts to reduce the industry’s environmental impact. Government support and trade considerations, such as those involving CUSMA, will be necessary. Success will hinge on farmers optimizing operations, adopting new technologies, and adjusting to consumer trends. Farmers can turn these challenges into growth and innovation with the right strategies.
Key Takeaways:
Expect a minor reduction in farmgate milk prices by 0.0237%, but look forward to potential growth through increased production.
Projected increase in farm cash receipts by 3.0% due to higher milk production, alongside incentives from the Western Milk Pool.
The Canadian dairy market is anticipated to grow significantly, fueled by consumer demand for diverse and health-conscious dairy products.
Sustainability efforts are crucial, and notable reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, water use, and land use have been made.
Government support continues with compensation and programs focused on modernization and innovation in the dairy sector.
Look out for potential challenges from trade agreements, but rely on a stable supply management system to weather uncertainties.
In 2025, implement practical strategies to enhance operations, such as optimizing herd efficiency, extending grazing seasons, and embracing technology.
Canadian dairy farmers face a complex landscape of challenges and opportunities. The industry is poised for cautious optimism, balancing slight price adjustments with growing demand and evolving market dynamics.
Slight Dip in Milk Prices but Steady Growth Ahead
The Canadian Dairy Commission (CDC) has announced a marginal 0.0237% reduction in the benchmark price for milk starting February 2025. This minimal adjustment—less than one cent per liter—reflects a delicate balance between production costs and market demands.
Why the Price Adjustment?
Feed costs have eased, like a well-maintained pasture
Other farm expenses have stabilized, similar to a level milk tank
The Consumer Price Index is still rising, which partially offsets the decrease
Think of this price adjustment as fine-tuning your milking equipment – it’s a minor tweak to keep everything running smoothly.
Production and Revenue: More Milk in the Pail
Despite the slight price dip, there’s good news on the production front:
Cost Category
Survey Results
Survey Results Indexed to August 2024
Change ($/hl)
Change (%)
Total Costs
93.09
90.36
-2.73
-2.9%
Purchased Feed
23.26
20.41
-2.85
-12.3%
Non-feed Costs
69.83
69.95
0.12
0.2%
All values are in $ per hl unless otherwise stated Source: Canadian Dairy Commission
This table illustrates a significant 12.3% decrease in feed costs, directly benefiting your financial performance. It’s like getting a discount on your cattle feed without compromising quality.
Other positive developments include:
Farm cash receipts (FCR) are projected to grow by 3.0% in 2025, reaching $9.15 billion
This growth is mainly due to increased production, not price hikes
The Western Milk Pool is offering two incentive days per month until November and a 2.0% – 2.4% quota increase from March 1, 2025
These incentives are like adding an extra row of corn to your silage field – more growth opportunities.
Market Demand: Consumers Still Thirsty for Dairy
Here’s a reason to smile during your evening milking routine:
Report Attribute
Key Statistics
Base Year
2024
Forecast Years
2025-2033
Historical Years
2019-2024
Market Size in 2024
USD 15.4 billion
Market Forecast for 2033
USD 22.92 billion
Market Growth Rate (2025-2033)
4.70%
Source: IMARC Group
This table presents the expected growth of the Canadian dairy market from 2025 to 2033. It’s like watching your herd grow – steady and promising. The market is expected to grow from USD 15.4 billion in 2024 to USD 22.92 billion by 2033, at 4.70% annually. Just as rotating pastures provides diverse nutrients for your herd, offering a range of dairy products caters to different consumer preferences.
Sustainability: Greening Your Pastures
Sustainability is the heartbeat of your dairy farm, essential for nurturing growth and longevity in modern farming practices. Here’s what you need to know:
The dairy sector has made significant strides in reducing its environmental footprint:
17% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions
10% decrease in water usage
26% less land utilization
15% reduction in feed consumption
These changes, like fine-tuning the balance of nutrients in your cattle’s diet, yield gradual yet substantial improvements in your dairy operation.
Government Support and Trade Considerations x
The government acknowledges the challenges dairy farmers face, particularly concerning trade agreements. Here’s what’s available:
$1.2 billion in compensation from 2023-24 to 2028-29 for dairy producers affected by CUSMA
$250 million available in 2024-25 for direct payments to eligible supply-managed cow’s milk producers
Additionally, monitor trade discussions, especially regarding CUSMA. While uncertain, remember that the supply management system offers a stable foundation, similar to a sturdy barn in a storm.
Practical Tips for Navigating 2025
Optimize your herd: Focus on improving your Economic Breeding Index (EBI) to increase efficiency
Extend your grazing season: Maximize pasture use to reduce feed costs
Embrace technology: Consider investing in digital platforms for better supply chain management
Diversify your product offerings: Explore value-added dairy products to tap into changing consumer preferences
Stay informed: Keep up with market trends and trade developments – knowledge is as valuable as a high-producing cow
The Bottom Line
As we move into 2025, the dairy industry faces challenges and opportunities. While profitability might slightly dip, strong margins and growing demand provide a solid foundation. Canadian dairy farmers can ensure their operations thrive by focusing on efficiency, sustainability, and innovation.
Successful dairy farming is similar to caring for a healthy herd—it demands constant attention, adaptability, and a forward-thinking approach. Stay resilient and keep innovating; your dairy operation will continue to yield results as reliably as your best milking cow does.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
The UK dairy crisis deepens as Cathedral City maker axes contracts. One farm closes daily, experts warn. Saputo Dairy UK terminates 13 South West farmers’ agreements, risking 20 million litres of milk. Industry faces consolidation, pricing uncertainty, and market pressures. What’s next for British dairy?
Summary:
The UK dairy industry is in turmoil, marked by Saputo Dairy UK’s decision to terminate contracts with 13 farmers, placing 20 million liters of milk production at risk. This situation highlights the broader challenges, such as falling farm numbers, pricing issues, and market pressures threatening the industry’s stability. Despite these hurdles, there is optimism. The Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) predicts a 1.1% rise in milk production by 2025, primarily from better weather and rising milk prices. Still, with one farm closing daily, the industry must tackle global risks, shifting consumer trends, and reduced government support. There is an urgent call for transparent supply chains and supportive policies to ensure the future of British dairy farming.
Key Takeaways:
Saputo Dairy UK’s termination of contracts highlights the vulnerability of farmers who rely on single buyers for their produce.
Consolidation within the dairy sector increases financial instability for smaller farms.
Farmers are often grappling with being paid below their cost of production, exacerbating financial pressures.
Despite current challenges, there are forecasts of potential growth in UK milk production in 2025.
Consumer demand trends fluctuate, with growth in cheese and yogurt contrasting with milk and butter consumption declines.
Uncertainty about the longevity of dairy farming is rising among British farmers, with many uncertain about continuing beyond 2025.
There is a pressing need to reassess the dairy supply chain to support small producers better and ensure sustainability.
Calls are being made for more resilient and transparent supply chains to tackle the industry’s crisis of confidence. ‘
The UK dairy industry faces a severe crisis, with experts warning that one farm is going out of business daily. Saputo Dairy UK, the producer of Cathedral City Cheese, recently decided to terminate contracts with 13 farmers in the southwest region, highlighting this alarming trend.
Industry in Turmoil
Saputo Dairy UK, which also produces Clover and Utterly Butterly spreads, has ended agreements with 13 farmers who supplied the company with 20 million litres of milk annually. This move has sent shockwaves through the industry, potentially leaving these farmers without a buyer for their milk and at risk of financial ruin if they cannot secure new contracts within the next 12 months.
“We are pretty upset at the decision to notify some of our members. We will support those members in any way we can,” Richard Thomas, chairman of Davidstow Creamery Direct (DCD), expressed deep concern about the impact on the affected farmers.
Broader Industry Challenges
This latest development is part of a more significant trend of consolidation and challenges facing the UK dairy sector:
Declining Farm Numbers: As of April 2024, there were around 7,130 dairy farmers in Britain. The country loses about 440 dairy farmers annually, a decrease of nearly 5.8% annually.
Pricing Uncertainty: Many farmers are being paid below the cost of production, leading to financial instability.
Market Pressures: The industry grapples with processor price manipulation and sudden contract cancellations.
Industry Outlook
Despite these challenges, the UK dairy industry shows signs of resilience. The Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) forecasts a 1.1% growth in British milk production for 2025. This growth comes after a difficult start to the 2024/25 milk year, which saw sluggish growth due to wet weather and lower prices.
Susie Stannard, AHDB senior analyst for dairy, notes, “While signs of recovery are visible, the sector must remain vigilant against global risks, including unstable commodity prices and potential disease outbreaks.”
Market Dynamics
Recent data from the AHDB shows significant growth in milk production:
GB milk deliveries through Q4 2024 grew by 3.5% compared to the same quarter in 2023.
October 2024 saw a 2.7% increase, November 4.5%, and December 3.3%.
The Defra UK milk volume for October 2024 was 1,217 million litres, 2.8% up on October 2023.
The milk price has improved, with the Defra farm-gate milk price for October 2024 at 45.17 pence per litre, up 2 pence from the previous month.
A recent NFU survey of almost 600 dairy farmers revealed growing uncertainty in the sector:
24% of British dairy farmers are unsure whether their business will continue producing milk beyond 2025.
9% believe they are likely to stop producing milk by 2025, up from 7% the previous year.
Looking Ahead
The UK dairy industry faces a challenging future, with farmers caught between rising costs, market uncertainties, and the consolidation efforts of major processors. As the sector evolves, smaller producers’ ability to adapt and find new markets will be crucial for survival.
The situation underscores the need for a comprehensive review of the dairy supply chain and potential policy interventions to support British dairy farmers during this period of significant change. NFU dairy board chairman Michael Oakes has called for resilient and collaborative dairy supply chains to address the ‘crisis of confidence’ among producers.
As the industry navigates these turbulent times, the focus will be on creating fairer, more transparent, and accountable supply chains to ensure the long-term sustainability of British dairy farming. With factors such as disease control and policy changes influencing the market, the UK dairy industry approaches 2025 with cautious optimism.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
Despite early challenges, UK dairy production is set to rise 1.1% in 2025. Higher prices and improved weather boost farmer confidence. However, the industry faces a balancing act with global risks and changing consumer trends. Will the sector’s resilience prevail in an uncertain market?
Summary:
In January 2025, the UK dairy sector experienced a 2.2% increase in milk deliveries compared to the previous year, according to AHDB. The sector is expected to grow by 1.1% in 2025, bouncing back from earlier difficulties caused by bad weather and low prices. This growth is driven by improved weather, higher milk prices, and a stronger milk-to-feed ratio, which boosts farmer confidence. However, the industry must navigate potential challenges like global commodity price changes and shifting consumer preferences. The market outlook is supported by environmental initiatives, emphasizing the need to balance production and demand to maintain progress.
Key Takeaways:
UK milk deliveries increased by 2.2% in January 2025 compared to January 2024, indicating a robust start to the year.
British dairy production is forecasted to rise by 1.1% throughout 2025, following a challenging previous year.
Improved weather conditions and rising milk prices have positively influenced production levels.
Despite increased supply, milk prices have maintained stability, with potential future pressures anticipated during 2025’s spring flush.
Cheese and yogurt demand are on the rise, aided by evolving consumer preferences and health trends.
The number of dairy farmers is declining, potentially reducing the total in the UK significantly within two years.
Environmental efforts are underway to address methane emissions, including a new grant for vaccine development.
Global milk production aligns with UK trends, with anticipated growth across primary exporting regions.
The Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB) reports that British dairy production is off to a robust start in 2025. January milk deliveries rose by 2.2% compared to January of the previous year.
Production Boost
According to the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board (AHDB), British dairy production is anticipated to increase by 1.1% in 2025. This projected growth is a rebound from the difficult commencement of the 2024/2025 dairy year, hampered by wet spring conditions and reduced prices, leading to muted output levels.
Recent data from the UK government’s milk utilization statistics show the following trends:
Product
Nov 2024
Dec 2024
% Change (Nov to Dec 2024)
Milk available to processors (million litres)
1,172
1,206
2.9%
Liquid milk production (million litres)
503
504
0.2%
Cheese production (‘000 tonnes)
39.1
42.1
7.8%
Butter production (‘000 tonnes)
15.7
14.1
-10.0%
Milk powder production (‘000 tonnes)
5.5
9.7
75%
As indicated in the table, December 2024 saw notable growth in milk availability and cheese production, while butter production declined.
Factors Driving Growth
Numerous crucial factors have contributed to the upward momentum:
Enhanced Weather Conditions: The latter part of 2024 saw favorable weather, allowing cows to graze outdoors for extended periods and enhancing milk production.
Price Rebound: Starting in September 2024, milk prices showed an upward trend, improving profit margins for dairy farmers.
Enhanced Milk-to-Feed Ratio: This key economic measure has motivated farmers to boost their production levels, reaching 1.48 in late 2024—the highest recorded since March 2008.
Market Dynamics
The expansion in production has significantly impacted the market:
Price Stability: Despite the rise in supply, milk prices have persisted at a relatively elevated level. The average cost, not accounting for aligned contracts, was 45.14 pence per liter in October 2024.
Future Outlook: Nonetheless, specialists caution that the upsurge in production might exert downward pressure on prices during the spring flush anticipated in 2025.
Consumer Trends
As production progresses, shifts in consumer behavior have been observed:
Retail Demand: While the overall demand for milk is projected to remain stable, a slight decrease in household consumption may occur as more employees transition back to office environments.
Product Preferences: Promotional activities and the trend of preparing meals at home fuel a continuous increase in cheese demand. Additionally, yogurt sales are anticipated to rise, driven by a growing emphasis on health.
Industry Resilience
Susie Stannard, the Senior Dairy Analyst at AHDB, remarked on the industry’s progress: “Following a challenging beginning of the season, the sector is exhibiting signs of revival. Enhanced milk prices and a more favorable milk-to-feed ratio motivate farmers to increase their output.”
Challenges Ahead
The dairy industry, while experiencing a favorable beginning to the year, is not immune to challenges:
Global Risks: Volatile commodity prices and the threat of disease outbreaks pose significant challenges to maintaining current growth momentum.
Market Balance: Careful management is essential as the sector strives to harmonize increased production with the variability in consumer demand.
Global Context
According to Rabobank’s most recent forecast, global milk production will rise by 0.8% in 2025. This increase is expected across all seven primary exporting regions, including the US, EU, Australia, New Zealand, Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay. This global pattern is consistent with the UK’s expected growth, situating the country’s dairy sector within a larger framework of industry expansion.
Environmental Considerations
The dairy industry is actively tackling environmental issues with significant financial backing. Amazon’s founder, Jeff Bezos, has allocated a substantial £7.3 million grant to the Pirbright Institute and the Royal Veterinary College. This funding is directed toward developing a vaccine that can potentially decrease methane emissions from livestock by over 30%.
Industry Outlook
The resilience of the UK dairy sector remains evident despite ongoing challenges. According to the Andersons Outlook report, the increasing demand for premium-quality milk and dairy products, coupled with significant investments by leading processors and a rise in milk prices, points towards a promising year for those who continue in the sector through 2025.
Nonetheless, the decline in dairy farmers persists, with 440 producers, accounting for 5.8%, exiting the industry between April 2023 and April 2024. This attrition has reduced the total number of producers in Great Britain to 7,130, and projections suggest a further decrease, potentially dwindling to 5,000 and 6,000 within the next two years.
As the UK dairy sector continues to showcase resilience and growth, stakeholders are poised to observe the evolution of these trends closely throughout 2025. The sector’s sustained success will hinge on its capacity to manage the intricate balance between supply and demand while simultaneously addressing environmental challenges and navigating industry consolidation.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
USDA’s 2025 dairy forecast brings good news: milk receipts are up 2.7% to $52.1B, and feed costs are down 10.1%. But regional challenges persist – from labor shortages to water regulations. How are innovative dairy farmers adopting? Get the full story on what this means for your operation.
Summary:
According to the USDA, the dairy industry is set for better profitability in 2025, thanks to higher milk prices and lower feed costs. Despite facing challenges like labor shortages and environmental rules, farmers in regions like the Midwest and California are optimistic. Technology and innovative cost management are vital, and experts advise using risk management tools to handle market changes. The industry’s positives include more exports, rising consumer demand, and new farm management innovations that boost efficiency and sustainability. The USDA report forecasts increased milk sales and decreased feed costs, with detailed insights into regional price shifts and challenges. The article balances hopeful market trends with practical issues, helping farmers navigate the complexities expected in 2025.
Key Takeaways:
The dairy industry sees promising prospects for 2025 with rising milk prices and falling feed costs.
Projected increase in milk receipts by $1.4 billion could enhance profitability for dairy farms.
Regional challenges vary, with technology and local adjustments playing crucial roles in adaptation.
Smart risk management and labor strategies remain essential for maximizing benefits from favorable economic conditions.
Environmental regulations require further innovation in sustainable practices.
Advancements in technology, such as automation and precision feeding, are driving efficiency in dairy operations.
Proactive managing costs, labor, and technology integration is key to capitalizing on improved margins.
Engaging with industry experts and peers can provide valuable insights and strategies for 2025 readiness.
Despite ongoing challenges in the broader agricultural sector, the dairy industry emerges as a bright spot in USDA’s latest farm income forecast for 2025. Let’s explore what this means for dairy farmers nationwide and how different regions adapt to changing market conditions.
The Bottom Line for Dairy
Good news arrives on two critical fronts – milk prices are heading up while feed costs are trending down. Milk receipts are expected to climb by $1.4 billion in 2025, reaching $52.1 billion. This 2.7% boost could significantly improve dairy farm profitability, especially with declining feed costs.
The dairy sector shows notable resilience in USDA’s latest farm income forecast, with several key factors affecting profitability:
Revenue Projections
Milk receipts are forecast to rise by $1.4 billion (2.7%) in 2025, reaching $52.1 billion from $50.8 billion in 2024.
The all-milk price is projected at $23.05 per hundredweight, a $0.50 increase from previous forecasts.
Total animal/animal product receipts are expected to increase by $3.8 billion (1.4%) to $275.4 billion.
Production Costs and Margins
Cost Category
2025 Forecast
Change from 2024
Feed Expenses
$62.4 billion
-10.1%
Labor Costs
$53.5 billion
+3.6%
Interest Expenses
Slight decline
-0.5%
Regional Performance Variations
Region
Profit per Cow
Key Driver
Southeast (>5000 cows)
$1,640
Operational Efficiency
Northeast (Large Herds)
$1,625
Market Access
Southeast (<250 cows)
$531
Improved Margins
Government Support Impact
Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) payments are projected to decrease by $8.9 million (12%) in 2025 compared to 2024, driven by lower feed costs.
The decrease in DMC payments suggests improving dairy farmers’ operational margins rather than relying on government support.
Market Challenges
Production constraints due to lower milk per cow yields (24,200 pounds, down 85 pounds).
Labor shortages continue to impact operations despite wage increases.
Environmental regulations requiring additional investment in sustainability measures.
This analysis suggests that while dairy farmers face ongoing challenges, the sector shows promising signs of market-driven profitability improvements rather than reliance on government support programs.
Regional Variations and Challenges
The impact of these projections varies significantly depending on location:
Region
Price Outlook
Biggest Challenge
Adaptation Strategy
Midwest
+3.5%
Finding good help
Robotic milking systems
California
+2.8%
Water restrictions
Advanced irrigation
Northeast
+2.2%
High feed transport costs
Local sourcing
Southeast
+1.9%
Heat stress
Cooling systems
Production and Herd Outlook
The USDA’s 2025 forecast offers a comprehensive production and herd outlook, highlighting key indicators for the dairy industry:
Total milk production: 227.2 billion pounds
Average number of dairy cows: 9.390 million head
Milk per cow: 24,200 pounds (a decrease of 85 pounds from previous estimates)
Significant changes in input costs have been projected regarding market analysis and financial strategies. Feed expenses, the most considerable cost category for dairy farmers, are expected to decline sharply by $7 billion, or 10.1%, to $62.4 billion in 2025. However, labor costs are anticipated to increase by 3.6%, reaching a record high of $53.5 billion. Due to lower feed costs and the subsequent improvement in milk-feed margins, Dairy Margin Coverage (DMC) payments are set to decrease by $8.9 million (12%) in 2025 compared to 2024.
Looking Ahead
While the outlook for the dairy sector is promising, achieving success in 2025 will largely hinge on:
Effectively managing production costs
Adapting to regional challenges
Embracing technological innovations
Implementing robust risk management strategies
The Bottom Line
The 2025 dairy outlook presents a unique opportunity for dairy farmers to strengthen their operations. With higher milk receipts projected alongside lower feed costs, the focus should shift from survival to strategic growth and innovation.
Take advantage of improved margins to invest in efficiency-enhancing technology
Review your risk management strategy as DMC payments decrease
Consider regional challenges when planning expansions or improvements
Evaluate labor needs against automation options
Prepare for stricter environmental regulations
Combining more substantial milk prices, lower input costs, and advancing technology suggests that 2025 could be pivotal for dairy operations willing to adapt and innovate. While challenges remain around labor and environmental compliance, the fundamental improvements in dairy economics provide a solid foundation for strategic investment and growth.
Bullvine Daily is your essential e-zine for staying ahead in the dairy industry. With over 30,000 subscribers, we bring you the week’s top news, helping you manage tasks efficiently. Stay informed about milk production, tech adoption, and more, so you can concentrate on your dairy operations.
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Join the Revolution!
