‘Twas two nights before Christmas, in the Second Circuit’s hall,
A case was decided, with judges standing tall.
A plaintiff determined, with claims in her hand,
Against her former employer, she took a firm stand. Continue reading
In October, I blogged about the Supreme Court’s decision to weigh in on whether a heightened standard should apply when heterosexual workers, white men, or any employees in a majority group claim discrimination at work. The case has garnered significant attention due to its potential impact on workplace discrimination laws.
Now, the United States government is providing its two cents to the Supreme Court before it decides whether these so-called “reverse discrimination” claims require a plaintiff to present “background circumstances” on top of Title VII’s other requirements to establish that their employer is the “unusual” one who discriminates against the majority. Continue reading
Yesterday, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced the release of a new fact sheet titled “Wearables in the Workplace: The Use of Wearables and Other Monitoring Technology Under Federal Employment Discrimination Laws.” This document is crucial for human resources professionals as it provides guidance on using wearable technologies in compliance with federal employment discrimination laws. Here, I’ll summarize the key points of the fact sheet and offer some essential takeaways for HR professionals.
Yesterday, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently released new information to assist healthcare providers in helping their patients secure pregnancy and childbirth-related accommodations in the workplace under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA). Although healthcare providers are the intended audience, human resources professionals are pivotal in ensuring compliance with employment laws and fostering an inclusive workplace environment.
Here’s what HR professionals need to know about the EEOC’s latest guidance.
In the evolving landscape of remote work, many employees believe they are shielded by the laws of the state they reside in. However, a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey — of all places !!! — reveals a harsh reality: working remotely from another state does not necessarily entitle employees to the protections of that state’s laws. This case serves as a critical reminder of the complexities surrounding jurisdiction in employment law. Continue reading
In a move that will swing the pendulum from union-to-business friendly faster than some expected, the Senate yesterday narrowly voted against advancing President Joe Biden’s nominee, Lauren McFerran, the current Chairman of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), for another term.
Think you can sue your employer for not hiring you because you tested positive for cannabis? Think again. The Third Circuit just made it clear that New Jersey’s recreational marijuana law does not provide job applicants with a private cause of action. Continue reading
It happens when an individual—a job applicant or current employee—is “regarded as having a disability” under the Americans with Disabilities Act.
I’ll give you an example. Continue reading
The Employer Handbook Blog
