Legislative office lawyers say Tennessee records laws don’t apply to them in lawsuit over ethics docs

Tennessee Lookout Photo by John Partipilo / Members of the Tennessee House of Representatives greeting each other on opening day of session. Jan. 9. Lawyers for the Tennessee legislative office have argued that lawmakers should not be compelled to release documents related to their investigation into sexual harassment allegations against former Republican state Rep. Scotty Campbell.
Tennessee Lookout Photo by John Partipilo / Members of the Tennessee House of Representatives greeting each other on opening day of session. Jan. 9. Lawyers for the Tennessee legislative office have argued that lawmakers should not be compelled to release documents related to their investigation into sexual harassment allegations against former Republican state Rep. Scotty Campbell.


Lawyers for the Tennessee legislative office believe the state's public records don't apply to the legislative body, and it would violate the separation of government powers for a court to compel legislators to release documents related to their investigation into sexual harassment allegations against former Republican Rep. Scotty Campbell.

Attorneys for the Tennessee Office of Legislative Administration made these statements in a Davidson County Chancery Court filing earlier this month in response to a lawsuit by Brian Manookian, who is seeking a broad array of public records related to the ethics investigations and personal schedules of top House officials.

The case also has the potential to widen the door on what records fall under the deliberative process privilege exemption, which Gov. Bill Lee has used to deny numerous public record requests by journalists.

News organizations around the state are also watching the case as they decide whether to challenge records denials by the legislative office to provide payment records that were part of the Campbell investigation.

State law might allow for the withholding of details about Campbell's victims, but the records of any payments should be subject to public records laws, Deborah Fisher, executive director of Tennessee Coalition for Open Government, said.

Manookian's records request is broad

Manookian filed a public records request for various records, including documentation related to all sexual harassment investigations over the past two years and the calendars of House Speaker Cameron Sexton (R-Crossville), Rep. Jeremy Faison (R-Cosby) and House Ethics Counsel Doug Himes from 2021 to 2023.

Manookian is a Nashville trial lawyer known for his argumentative style and has been at the center of several high-profile lawsuits, but not without controversy. The Tennessee Board of Professional Responsibility previously suspended his law license for improper communication with an opposing lawyer's client.

The records request and the subsequent suit came weeks after Campbell resigned his Mountain City seat when news reports surfaced that he allegedly made vulgar comments and unwanted advances on at least one legislative intern. The state then spent money to relocate a woman.

The House Ethics Subcommittee — which has members from both parties — investigated the complaint against Campbell, finding the allegations true March 29. But, state House rules required the investigation results to be kept secret. Only after a NewsChannel5 report, three weeks later, did Campbell step down.

Manookian's records request was expansive, but the suit could provide insight into the records legislative leaders believe the public shouldn't have access to and reveal the limits of the state's public records law on the legislative body.

House lawyers cited the deliberative process as one of the reasons the records should remain hidden. The deliberative process privilege is a court-allowed exception in the state public records laws to allow high-ranking government officials to block the release of documents related to their decision-making processes.

Lee has used this exemption to deny at least 60 records requests since he took office, according to The Tennessean.

But, the courts have yet to rule whether the deliberative process privilege pertains to other branches of the government.

Read more at TennesseeLookout.com.

Upcoming Events