User talk:Baby come

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikidata, Baby come!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

• Introduction – An introduction to the project.
• Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
• Community portal – The portal for community members.
• User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
• Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
• Project chat – Discussions about the project.
• Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards!

Prahlad (tell me all about it / private venue) (Please {{ping}} me) 00:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Stop nominating good content for deletion

Are you going to be nominating Milan Stevanovich (Q92157950) for deletion every three months from now on? You were already told the last time you did that to consider its references. You're not helping by nominating items that are linked to other items. There's a link in the left sidebar menu that shows you what those are. 1Veertje (talk) 08:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Milan Stevanovich (Q92157950) is not notable for wikidata. You did use more advertising reference. I think you doing promotional data create. So stop advertising, promotional data create. Baby come (talk) 17:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

It's customary to reply to messages in the location you got them so that other people can follow the conversation. A signature at the end of a statement is created when you leave ~~~~ at the end of a statement, which can be done with the signature button in the toolbar. {Q|92157950}} is notable enough for Wikidata, a consensus on this was reached last time you nominated the item for deletion that the multiple newspaper articles about him prove this very adequately. You are the one being disruptive in again nominating it and others for deletion before coming to an understanding what Wikidata is. You would have seen that the item had already been nominated for deletion had you looked at the "what links here" page. The other items you nominated have on these pages visible that these people are linked to movie described on Wikipedia, they're the directors of them. Please stop nominating items for deletion until you understand what this project is for. --1Veertje (talk) 18:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

His news source is paid and advertising. That not proof notability. So you should stop create advertising and promotional wikidata Item.

All three news articles feature a byline, so what you're saying could be interpreted as slander towards those journalists since you're baselessly accusing them of undisclosed conflicts of interest. If a person being reported on isn't proof of notability than we might as well turn off the lights and go home since then nobody is. Learn how to use talk pages by signing statements with --~~~~--1Veertje (talk) 07:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I know how to use talk page. You doing insult me. You should leave not notable person item create. Otherwise i will request for not notable person or company item remove.Because wikidata not advertising and marketing place. Baby come (talk) 09:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for finally signing your statement. In future, you should leave replies under the message you're replying to. You are the one making baseless accusations here. Describing notable people isn't actually advertisement. Entrepreneurs can actually fall under this category. --1Veertje (talk) 09:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I just came to leave a similar message - please double check whether items are notable before nominating them for deletion. Specifically, items that fulfill a structural need (like directors of notable films) qualify as notable. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Please reflect on the fact that your second DR of Milan Stevanovich (Q92157950) has been turned down because they do meet notability guidelines, as well as your nominations for Arianne Hinz (Q80403662), Youssef Chebbi (Q105044619), Karen Cinorre (Q105044711) and Jonathan Ogilvie (Q105044112) because, as you could have seen under the "what links here" in the left sidebar, they are the directors of notable films and are therefore part of the greater structure that is Wikidata. -1Veertje (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

• I also came with the same message, from what I see all you deletion request are bad. Please read Wikidata notability rule WD:N first. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 09:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Stop nominating good content for deletion 2: Electric Boogaloo

You have nominated:

• a short story that has been made into a major Hollywood movie with Edward Norton and I forgot who else
• a guy who made one of the 'de facto' standard tools for software defined radio experimentation
• a university professor with more publications and external references to his name than I have pieces of cutlery in my kitchen,
• a Catholic priest with a fairly wide range of writings (whether you like them or not) in various third party journals and
• a guy with a PhD (documented) who is very popular in the computer vision community.

None of these are remotely not notable.

Tacking on the allegations that this is somehow me 'advertising' anything, __then__ requesting a block, is a little over the top. I think you may wish to reflect on the comments above, too. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 10:15, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Ari T. Benchaim, You did add website and social media as advertising. Baby come (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

1. You're making an allegation of specific intent here. I have told you that this allegation is not correct. You are, essentially, alleging I have an undisclosed conflict of interest, a breach of the Wikimedia rules [1]. Present proof, or stop making allegations you cannot substantiate.

2. Adding someone's website or social media is not advertising.

3. Regardless of the above, you functionally misunderstand WD:N. Advertising is not, on its own, prohibited. Nor is it, on its own, conclusive proof that an item is not notable. You could, hypothetically, create an article for, say, Microsoft that lists all their social media accounts, among others. What would make this acceptable, and what would not make the same acceptable for a non-notable company or person, is that Microsoft is independently notable. I have provided evidence on RfDs for why each of the items fall under WD:N.

4. "Yes you did" is not an argument, or an effective refutation of one.

5. Your behaviour borders on vandalism. There are around 400 RfDs in the queue at any given time. The previous discussion (top of this page) should have given you all the incentive to re-read and digest WD:N. Creating RfDs without understanding WD:N and making such requests without an honest check of notability is immensely disrespectful of the admins' limited time and energy.

Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 18:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Ps. for clarification, I would appreciate if you could show me what in WD:N or any other rule prohibits adding social media or web links of an otherwise notable entity. Ari T. Benchaim ^(talk) 18:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Imagine: two people who speak different languages write an article about a person on their respective Wikipedia versions. They each create a Wikidata item to go with it. They add the relevant social media accounts and the second person to create this item gets a flag: there already is an item with that social media account! Now it's quickly realized these two Wikidata items need to be merged and the two language versions of Wikipedia now correctly link to each other. This is what makes including social media accounts in Wikidata items very usefull and not advertizing. --1Veertje (talk) 09:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Poor editor skills

Based on the comments left on your talk page, it is clear that you are a poor choice for serving as Wikidata editor.

-Multiple poor DR nominations made by you have been turned down, and then you re-nominating the same entities after a few months. -You have been banned from other Wiki's -You seem to perform zero research when creating a DR request.

Stop wasting other people's time and get yourself familiar with Notability first. Idiot.

User:Wickedwiki2 You will make promoting, advertising intam in wikidata then why i will not request for remove? Remember: Wikidata not marketing place and also wikidata not accept advertising itam. So don't try to make advertising itam. You should make itam for notable subject. You should stop your idiot itam that brock wikidata notability policy WD:N. Baby come (talk) 04:04, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

it's impressive how incapable you are to reflect on how insular you are in your stance. 1Veertje (talk) 21:37, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Blocked from RFD

As a result of your continued nomination of notable items at Wikidata:Requests for deletions despite repeated warnings and requests to stop, and after a discussion at Wikidata:Administrators' noticeboard where no good alternatives were suggested, I have imposed an indefinite partial block against you editing Wikidata:Requests for deletions, which will prevent you from nominating more items for deletion. While the block is indeed technically forever, that does not mean it cannot be removed in the future if you demonstrate that you have changed and understand the concerns that led to this. I suggest spending some time creating items instead of focusing entirely on deletion. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2021 (UTC)