Talk:Salvation Islands

South America: French Guiana Low‑importance

	Latin America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to South America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject South AmericaTemplate:WikiProject South AmericaSouth America articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the French Guiana work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Islands

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

IlesDuSalut.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:06, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 September 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (non-admin closure) Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:22, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salvation's Islands → Salvation Islands – The inclusion of the possessive 's in the translation of Îles du Salut flies in the face of normal English usage. I can't think of a similar case. Many credible sources omit the possessive. I do not think that counting Google returns (3 times as many instances with the possessive) is determinant, as this may be due precisely to the existence of this badly-named Wikipedia article. TobyJ (talk) 04:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.