Jump to content

Dimensionless quantity: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Frau Holle (talk | contribs)
Buckingham π theorem: plenty of references are in linked article. No need for references here.
Tag: Reverted
m List: Fixed typo
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App section source
 
(41 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2022|cs1-dates=y}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2022|cs1-dates=y}}
{{More citations needed|date=March 2017}}
{{More citations needed|date=March 2017}}
A '''dimensionless quantity''' (also known as a '''bare quantity''', '''pure quantity''' as well as '''quantity of dimension one''')<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.iso.org/sites/JCGM/VIM/JCGM_200e_FILES/MAIN_JCGM_200e/01_e.html#L_1_8 |title='''1.8''' (1.6) '''quantity of dimension one''' dimensionless quantity |work=International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) |publisher=[[International Organization for Standardization|ISO]] |date=2008 |access-date=2011-03-22}}</ref> is a [[quantity]] to which no [[Dimension (physics)|physical dimension]] is assigned.
Dimensionless quantities are widely used in many fields, such as [[mathematics]], [[physics]], [[chemistry]], [[engineering]], and [[economics]]. Dimensionless quantities are distinct from quantities that have associated dimensions, such as [[time]] (measured in [[second]]s).


The corresponding [[unit of measurement]] is '''one''' (symbol '''1'''),<ref name="SI Brochure">{{cite web |url=https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/ |title=SI Brochure: The International System of Units, 9th Edition |publisher=[[International Bureau of Weights and Measures|BIPM]]}} ISBN 978-92-822-2272-0.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author-last1=Mohr |author-first1=Peter J. |author-last2=Phillips |author-first2=William Daniel |author-link2=William Daniel Phillips |date=2015-06-01 |title=Dimensionless units in the SI |url=https://www.nist.gov/publications/dimensionless-units-si |journal=[[Metrologia]] |language=en |volume=52}}</ref> which is not explicitly shown.
'''Dimensionless quantities''', or quantities of dimension one,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.iso.org/sites/JCGM/VIM/JCGM_200e_FILES/MAIN_JCGM_200e/01_e.html#L_1_8 |title='''1.8''' (1.6) '''quantity of dimension one''' dimensionless quantity |work=International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM) |publisher=[[International Organization for Standardization|ISO]] |date=2008 |access-date=2011-03-22}}</ref> are quantities [[implicitly defined]] in a manner that prevents their aggregation into [[unit of measurement|units of measurement]].<ref name="SI Brochure">{{cite web |url=https://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/ |title=SI Brochure: The International System of Units, 9th Edition |publisher=[[International Bureau of Weights and Measures|BIPM]]}} ISBN 978-92-822-2272-0.</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author-last1=Mohr |author-first1=Peter J. |author-last2=Phillips |author-first2=William Daniel |author-link2=William Daniel Phillips |date=2015-06-01 |title=Dimensionless units in the SI |url=https://www.nist.gov/publications/dimensionless-units-si |journal=[[Metrologia]] |language=en |volume=52}}</ref> Typically expressed as [[Ratio|ratios]] that align with another system, these quantities do not necessitate explicitly defined [[Unit of measurement|units]]. For instance, [[alcohol by volume]] (ABV) represents a [[volumetric ratio]]; its value remains independent of the specific [[Unit of volume|units of volume]] used, such as in [[milliliter]]s per milliliter (mL/mL).

For any [[system of units]], the [[number one]] is considered a [[base unit]].<ref name="ISO 80000-1">{{cite web |title=ISO 80000-1:2009(en) Quantities and units — Part 1: General |website=iso.org | url=https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:80000:-1:ed-1:v1:en | access-date=2023-05-12}}</ref>
The [[1|number one]] is recognized as a dimensionless [[Base unit of measurement|base quantity]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Mills |first=I. M. |date=May 1995 |title=Unity as a Unit |url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/31/6/013 |journal=Metrologia |language=en |volume=31 |issue=6 |pages=537–541 |doi=10.1088/0026-1394/31/6/013 |bibcode=1995Metro..31..537M |issn=0026-1394}}</ref> [[Radian|Radians]] serve as dimensionless units for [[Angle|angular measurements]], derived from the universal ratio of 2π times the [[radius]] of a circle being equal to its circumference.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Zebrowski |first=Ernest |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2twRfiUwkxYC&dq=universal+ratio+of+2%CF%80+times+the+radius+of+a+circle+being+equal+to+its+circumference&pg=PR9 |title=A History of the Circle: Mathematical Reasoning and the Physical Universe |date=1999 |publisher=Rutgers University Press |isbn=978-0-8135-2898-4 |language=en}}</ref>
'''Dimensionless units''' are special names that serve as [[units of measurement]] for expressing other dimensionless quantities. For example, in the [[International System of Units|SI]], [[radians]] (rad) and [[steradians]] (sr) are dimensionless units for [[plane angle]]s and [[solid angle]]s, respectively.<ref name="SI Brochure"/> For example, [[optical extent]] is defined as having units of metres multiplied by steradians.<ref name="e-ILV">{{Cite web|title=17-21-048: optical extent |url=https://cie.co.at/eilvterm/17-21-048|access-date=2023-02-20|website=CIE S 017:2020 ILV: International Lighting Vocabulary, 2nd edition |publisher=[[International Commission on Illumination]]}}</ref>

Dimensionless quantities play a crucial role serving as [[Parameter|parameters]] in [[Differential equation|differential equations]] in various technical disciplines. In [[calculus]], concepts like the unitless ratios in [[Limits of integration|limits]] or [[derivative]]s often involve dimensionless quantities. In [[differential geometry]], the use of dimensionless parameters is evident in geometric relationships and transformations. Physics relies on dimensionless numbers like the [[Reynolds number]] in [[fluid dynamics]],<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Cengel |first1=Yunus |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LIZvEAAAQBAJ&dq=calculus,+concepts+like+the+unitless+ratios+in+limits+or+derivatives+often+involve+dimensionless+quantities&pg=PP1 |title=EBOOK: Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications (SI units) |last2=Cimbala |first2=John |date=2013-10-16 |publisher=McGraw Hill |isbn=978-0-07-717359-3 |language=en}}</ref> the [[fine-structure constant]] in [[quantum mechanics]],<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Webb |first1=J. K. |last2=King |first2=J. A. |last3=Murphy |first3=M. T. |last4=Flambaum |first4=V. V. |last5=Carswell |first5=R. F. |last6=Bainbridge |first6=M. B. |date=2011-10-31 |title=Indications of a Spatial Variation of the Fine Structure Constant |url=https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.191101 |journal=Physical Review Letters |volume=107 |issue=19 |pages=191101 |doi=10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.191101|pmid=22181590 |arxiv=1008.3907 |bibcode=2011PhRvL.107s1101W }}</ref> and the [[Lorentz factor]] in [[Relativity: The Special and the General Theory|relativity]].<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Einstein |first=A. |date=2005-02-23 |title=Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [AdP 17, 891 (1905)] |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.200590006 |journal=Annalen der Physik |language=en |volume=14 |issue=S1 |pages=194–224 |doi=10.1002/andp.200590006}}</ref> In [[chemistry]], [[Equation of state|state properties]] and ratios such as [[Mole fraction|mole fractions]] [[Concentration ratio|concentration ratios]] are dimensionless.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Ghosh |first1=Soumyadeep |last2=Johns |first2=Russell T. |date=2016-09-06 |title=Dimensionless Equation of State to Predict Microemulsion Phase Behavior |url=https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02666 |journal=Langmuir |language=en |volume=32 |issue=35 |pages=8969–8979 |doi=10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02666 |pmid=27504666 |issn=0743-7463}}</ref>


== History ==
== History ==
{{See also|Dimensional analysis#History}}
{{See also|Dimensional analysis#History}}
Quantities having dimension one, ''dimensionless quantities'', regularly occur in sciences, and are formally treated within the field of [[dimensional analysis]]. In the nineteenth century, French mathematician [[Joseph Fourier]] and Scottish physicist [[James Clerk Maxwell]] led significant developments in the modern concepts of [[dimension]] and [[Unit (measurement)|unit]]. Later work by British physicists [[Osborne Reynolds]] and [[Lord Rayleigh]] contributed to the understanding of dimensionless numbers in physics. Building on Rayleigh's method of dimensional analysis, [[Edgar Buckingham]] proved the [[Buckingham π theorem|{{pi}} theorem]] (independently of French mathematician [[Joseph Bertrand]]'s previous work) to formalize the nature of these quantities.<ref>{{cite journal |author-last=Buckingham |author-first=Edgar |author-link=Edgar Buckingham |date=1914 |title=On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations |journal=[[Physical Review]] |volume=4 |issue=4 |pages=345–376 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.4.345 |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.31210014450082&view=1up&seq=905 |bibcode=1914PhRv....4..345B |hdl=10338.dmlcz/101743 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>
Quantities having dimension one, ''dimensionless quantities'', regularly occur in sciences, and are formally treated within the field of [[dimensional analysis]]. In the 19th century, French mathematician [[Joseph Fourier]] and Scottish physicist [[James Clerk Maxwell]] led significant developments in the modern concepts of [[dimension]] and [[Unit (measurement)|unit]]. Later work by British physicists [[Osborne Reynolds]] and [[Lord Rayleigh]] contributed to the understanding of dimensionless numbers in physics. Building on Rayleigh's method of dimensional analysis, [[Edgar Buckingham]] proved the [[Buckingham π theorem|{{pi}} theorem]] (independently of French mathematician [[Joseph Bertrand]]'s previous work) to formalize the nature of these quantities.<ref>{{cite journal |author-last=Buckingham |author-first=Edgar |author-link=Edgar Buckingham |date=1914 |title=On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations |journal=[[Physical Review]] |volume=4 |issue=4 |pages=345–376 |doi=10.1103/PhysRev.4.345 |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.31210014450082&view=1up&seq=905 |bibcode=1914PhRv....4..345B |hdl=10338.dmlcz/101743 |hdl-access=free}}</ref>


Numerous dimensionless numbers, mostly ratios, were coined in the early 1900s, particularly in the areas of [[fluid mechanics]] and [[heat transfer]]. Measuring logarithm of ratios as [[level quantity|''levels'']] in the (derived) unit [[decibel]] (dB) finds widespread use nowadays.
Numerous dimensionless numbers, mostly ratios, were coined in the early 1900s, particularly in the areas of [[fluid mechanics]] and [[heat transfer]]. Measuring logarithm of ratios as [[level quantity|''levels'']] in the (derived) unit [[decibel]] (dB) finds widespread use nowadays.


There have been periodic proposals to "patch" the SI system to reduce confusion regarding physical dimensions. For example, a 2017 [[op-ed]] in [[Nature (journal)|Nature]]<ref name="nature_2017">{{cite journal |title=Lost dimension: A flaw in the SI system leaves physicists grappling with ambiguous units - SI units need reform to avoid confusion |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=2017-08-10 |volume=548 |issue=7666 |page=135 |doi=10.1038/548135b |pmid=28796224 |bibcode=2017Natur.548R.135. |s2cid=4444368 |language=en |department=This Week: Editorials |issn=1476-4687 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/548135b.pdf?error=cookies_not_supported&code=87d78113-7ea0-47c0-a0ac-cd3da87c16ba |access-date=2022-12-21 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221221120517/https://www.nature.com/articles/548135b.pdf?error=cookies_not_supported&code=87d78113-7ea0-47c0-a0ac-cd3da87c16ba |archive-date=2022-12-21}} (1 page)</ref> argued for formalizing the [[radian]] as a physical unit. The idea was rebutted<ref name="wendl_2017">{{cite journal |author-last=Wendl |author-first=Michael Christopher |author-link=Michael Christopher Wendl |title=Don't tamper with SI-unit consistency |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=September 2017 |volume=549 |issue=7671 |pages=160 |doi=10.1038/549160d |pmid=28905893 |s2cid=52806576 |language=en |issn=1476-4687|doi-access=free }}</ref> on the grounds that such a change would raise inconsistencies for both established dimensionless groups, like the [[Strouhal number]], and for mathematically distinct entities that happen to have the same units, like [[torque]] (a [[Cross product|vector product]]) versus energy (a [[Dot product|scalar product]]). In another instance in the early 2000s, the [[International Committee for Weights and Measures]] discussed naming the unit of 1 as the "[[Uno (unit)|uno]]", but the idea of just introducing a new SI name for 1 was dropped.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU15.pdf |title=BIPM Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), 15th Meeting |date=17–18 April 2003 |access-date=2010-01-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061130201238/http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU15.pdf |archive-date=2006-11-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |title=BIPM Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), 16th Meeting |access-date=2010-01-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061130200835/http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |archive-date=2006-11-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author-last=Dybkær |author-first=René |author-link=René Dybkær |title=An ontology on property for physical, chemical, and biological systems |journal=APMIS Suppl. |issue=117 |pages=1–210 |date=2004 |pmid=15588029 |url=http://www.iupac.org/publications/ci/2005/2703/bw1_dybkaer.html}}</ref>
There have been periodic proposals to "patch" the SI system to reduce confusion regarding physical dimensions. For example, a 2017 [[op-ed]] in [[Nature (journal)|Nature]]<ref name="nature_2017">{{cite journal |title=Lost dimension: A flaw in the SI system leaves physicists grappling with ambiguous units - SI units need reform to avoid confusion |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=2017-08-10 |volume=548 |issue=7666 |page=135 |doi=10.1038/548135b |pmid=28796224 |bibcode=2017Natur.548R.135. |s2cid=4444368 |language=en |department=This Week: Editorials |issn=1476-4687 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/548135b.pdf?error=cookies_not_supported&code=87d78113-7ea0-47c0-a0ac-cd3da87c16ba |access-date=2022-12-21 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221221120517/https://www.nature.com/articles/548135b.pdf?error=cookies_not_supported&code=87d78113-7ea0-47c0-a0ac-cd3da87c16ba |archive-date=2022-12-21}} (1 page)</ref> argued for formalizing the [[radian]] as a physical unit. The idea was rebutted<ref name="wendl_2017">{{cite journal |author-last=Wendl |author-first=Michael Christopher |author-link=Michael Christopher Wendl |title=Don't tamper with SI-unit consistency |journal=[[Nature (journal)|Nature]] |date=September 2017 |volume=549 |issue=7671 |pages=160 |doi=10.1038/549160d |pmid=28905893 |s2cid=52806576 |language=en |issn=1476-4687|doi-access=free }}</ref> on the grounds that such a change would raise inconsistencies for both established dimensionless groups, like the [[Strouhal number]], and for mathematically distinct entities that happen to have the same units, like [[torque]] (a [[Cross product|vector product]]) versus energy (a [[Dot product|scalar product]]). In another instance in the early 2000s, the [[International Committee for Weights and Measures]] discussed naming the unit of 1 as the "[[Uno (unit)|uno]]", but the idea of just introducing a new SI name for 1 was dropped.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU15.pdf |title=BIPM Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), 15th Meeting |date=17–18 April 2003 |access-date=2010-01-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061130201238/http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU15.pdf |archive-date=2006-11-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |title=BIPM Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), 16th Meeting |access-date=2010-01-22 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061130200835/http://www.bipm.fr/utils/common/pdf/CCU16.pdf |archive-date=2006-11-30}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |author-last=Dybkær |author-first=René |author-link=René Dybkær |title=An ontology on property for physical, chemical, and biological systems |journal=APMIS Suppl. |issue=117 |pages=1–210 |date=2004 |pmid=15588029 |url=http://www.iupac.org/publications/ci/2005/2703/bw1_dybkaer.html}}</ref>



== Buckingham π theorem ==
== Buckingham π theorem ==
{{main|Buckingham π theorem}}
{{main|Buckingham π theorem}}
{{Unreferenced section|date=April 2022}}
The Buckingham {{pi}} theorem indicates that validity of the laws of physics does not depend on a specific unit system. A statement of this theorem is that any physical law can be expressed as an [[Identity (mathematics)|identity]] involving only dimensionless combinations (ratios or products) of the variables linked by the law (e. g., pressure and volume are linked by [[Boyle's Law]] – they are inversely proportional). If the dimensionless combinations' values changed with the systems of units, then the equation would not be an identity, and Buckingham's theorem would not hold.
The Buckingham {{pi}} theorem <ref>{{ cite journal | title=On Physically Similar Systems; Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional Equations | year=1914 | pages=345–376 | journal=Physical Review | doi=10.1103/physrev.4.345 | volume=4 | issue=4 | url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.4.345 | last1=Buckingham | first1= E. | bibcode=1914PhRv....4..345B }}
</ref> indicates that validity of the laws of physics does not depend on a specific unit system. A statement of this theorem is that any physical law can be expressed as an [[Identity (mathematics)|identity]] involving only dimensionless combinations (ratios or products) of the variables linked by the law (e. g., pressure and volume are linked by [[Boyle's Law]] – they are inversely proportional). If the dimensionless combinations' values changed with the systems of units, then the equation would not be an identity, and Buckingham's theorem would not hold.


Another consequence of the theorem is that the [[Function (mathematics)|functional]] dependence between a certain number (say, ''n'') of [[variable (mathematics)|variables]] can be reduced by the number (say, ''k'') of [[independent variable|independent]] [[dimension]]s occurring in those variables to give a set of ''p'' = ''n'' − ''k'' independent, dimensionless [[quantity|quantities]]. For the purposes of the experimenter, different systems that share the same description by dimensionless [[quantity]] are equivalent.
Another consequence of the theorem is that the [[Function (mathematics)|functional]] dependence between a certain number (say, ''n'') of [[variable (mathematics)|variables]] can be reduced by the number (say, ''k'') of [[independent variable|independent]] [[dimension]]s occurring in those variables to give a set of ''p'' = ''n'' − ''k'' independent, dimensionless [[quantity|quantities]]. For the purposes of the experimenter, different systems that share the same description by dimensionless [[quantity]] are equivalent.
Line 43: Line 46:
}}
}}


[[Integer numbers]] may be used to represent discrete dimensionless quantities.
[[Integer numbers]] may represent dimensionless quantities. They can represent discrete quantities, which can also be dimensionless.
More specifically, [[counting numbers]] can be used to express '''countable quantities'''.<ref name="Rothstein2017">{{cite book |author-last=Rothstein |author-first=Susan |author-link=Susan Rothstein |title=Semantics for Counting and Measuring |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |series=Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics |date=2017 |isbn=978-1-107-00127-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yV5UDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA206 |access-date=2021-11-30 |page=206}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author-last1=Berch |author-first1=Daniel B. |author-last2=Geary |author-first2=David Cyril |author-link2=David Cyril Geary |author-last3=Koepke |author-first3=Kathleen Mann |title=Development of Mathematical Cognition: Neural Substrates and Genetic Influences |publisher=[[Elsevier Science]] |date=2015 |isbn=978-0-12-801909-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XS9OBQAAQBAJ&pg=PR13 |access-date=2021-11-30 |page=13}}</ref>
More specifically, [[counting numbers]] can be used to express '''countable quantities'''.<ref name="Rothstein2017">{{cite book |author-last=Rothstein |author-first=Susan |author-link=Susan Rothstein |title=Semantics for Counting and Measuring |publisher=[[Cambridge University Press]] |series=Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics |date=2017 |isbn=978-1-107-00127-5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yV5UDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA206 |access-date=2021-11-30 |page=206}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |author-last1=Berch |author-first1=Daniel B. |author-last2=Geary |author-first2=David Cyril |author-link2=David Cyril Geary |author-last3=Koepke |author-first3=Kathleen Mann |title=Development of Mathematical Cognition: Neural Substrates and Genetic Influences |publisher=[[Elsevier Science]] |date=2015 |isbn=978-0-12-801909-2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XS9OBQAAQBAJ&pg=PR13 |access-date=2021-11-30 |page=13}}</ref>
The concept is formalized as quantity '''number of entities''' (symbol ''N'') in [[ISO 80000-1]].<ref name="ISO 80000-1">{{cite web | title=ISO 80000-1:2022(en) Quantities and units — Part 1: General | website=iso.org | url=https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:80000:-1:ed-2:v1:en | ref={{sfnref | iso.org}} | access-date=2023-07-23}}</ref>
The concept is formalized as quantity '''number of entities''' (symbol ''N'') in [[ISO 80000-1]].<ref name="ISO 80000-1">{{cite web |title=ISO 80000-1:2022(en) Quantities and units — Part 1: General |website=iso.org |url=https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:80000:-1:ed-2:v1:en |ref={{sfnref |iso.org}} |access-date=2023-07-23}}</ref>
Examples include [[number of particles]] and [[population size]]. In mathematics, the "number of elements" in a set is termed ''[[cardinality]]''. ''[[Countable noun]]s'' is a related linguistics concept.
Examples include [[number of particles]] and [[population size]]. In mathematics, the "number of elements" in a set is termed ''[[cardinality]]''. ''[[Countable noun]]s'' is a related linguistics concept.
Counting numbers, such as number of [[bit]]s, can be compounded with units of frequency ([[inverse second]]) to derive units of count rate, such as [[bits per second]].
Counting numbers, such as number of [[bit]]s, can be compounded with units of frequency ([[inverse second]]) to derive units of count rate, such as [[bits per second]].
Line 52: Line 55:


== Ratios, proportions, and angles ==
== Ratios, proportions, and angles ==
Dimensionless quantities are often obtained as ''[[ratio]]s'', the [[quotient]] resulting from the [[division (mathematics)|division]] of [[quantity|quantities]] of the same kind ― that are not dimensionless, but whose dimensions cancel out in the mathematical operation.<ref name="ISO 80000-1"/><ref>http://web.mit.edu/6.055/old/S2008/notes/apr02a.pdf {{Bare URL PDF|date=March 2022}}</ref> Examples of quotients of dimension one include calculating [[slope]]s or some [[Conversion of units|unit conversion factors]]. A more complex example of such a ratio is [[engineering strain]], a measure of physical deformation defined as a change in length divided by the initial length. Another set of examples is [[mass fraction (chemistry)|mass fraction]]s or [[mole fraction]]s, often written using [[parts-per notation]] such as ppm (=&nbsp;10<sup>−6</sup>), ppb (=&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>), and ppt (=&nbsp;10<sup>−12</sup>), or perhaps confusingly as ratios of two identical units ([[kilogram|kg]]/kg or [[mole (unit)|mol]]/mol). For example, [[alcohol by volume]], which characterizes the concentration of [[ethanol]] in an [[alcoholic beverage]], could be written as {{nowrap|mL / 100 mL}}.
Dimensionless quantities can be obtained as [[ratio]]s of quantities that are not dimensionless, but whose dimensions cancel out in the mathematical operation.<ref name="ISO 80000-1" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=7.3 Dimensionless groups |url=http://web.mit.edu/6.055/old/S2008/notes/apr02a.pdf |access-date=3 November 2023 |website=[[Massachusetts Institute of Technology]]}}</ref> Examples of quotients of dimension one include calculating [[slope]]s or some [[Conversion of units|unit conversion factors]]. Another set of examples is [[mass fraction (chemistry)|mass fraction]]s or [[mole fraction]]s, often written using [[parts-per notation]] such as ppm (=&nbsp;10<sup>−6</sup>), ppb (=&nbsp;10<sup>−9</sup>), and ppt (=&nbsp;10<sup>−12</sup>), or perhaps confusingly as ratios of two identical units ([[kilogram|kg]]/kg or [[mole (unit)|mol]]/mol). For example, [[alcohol by volume]], which characterizes the concentration of [[ethanol]] in an [[alcoholic beverage]], could be written as {{nowrap|mL / 100 mL}}.


Other common proportions are percentages [[%]]&nbsp;(=&nbsp;0.01), &nbsp;[[per mil|‰]]&nbsp;(=&nbsp;0.001). Some angle units such as [[turn (angle)|turn]], [[radian]], and [[steradian]] are defined as ratios of quantities of the same kind. In [[statistics]] the [[coefficient of variation]] is the ratio of the [[standard deviation]] to the [[average|mean]] and is used to measure the [[Statistical dispersion|dispersion]] in the [[statistical data|data]].
Other common proportions are percentages [[%]]&nbsp;(=&nbsp;0.01), &nbsp;[[per mil|‰]]&nbsp;(=&nbsp;0.001). Some angle units such as [[turn (angle)|turn]], [[radian]], and [[steradian]] are defined as ratios of quantities of the same kind. In [[statistics]] the [[coefficient of variation]] is the ratio of the [[standard deviation]] to the [[average|mean]] and is used to measure the [[Statistical dispersion|dispersion]] in the [[statistical data|data]].
Line 61: Line 64:
== Dimensionless physical constants ==
== Dimensionless physical constants ==
{{main|Dimensionless physical constant}}
{{main|Dimensionless physical constant}}

Certain universal dimensioned physical constants, such as the [[speed of light]] in vacuum, the [[universal gravitational constant]], the [[Planck constant]], the [[Coulomb constant]], and the [[Boltzmann constant]] can be normalized to 1 if appropriate units for [[time]], [[length]], [[mass]], [[electric charge|charge]], and [[temperature]] are chosen. The resulting [[system of units]] is known as the [[natural units]], specifically regarding these five constants, [[Planck units]]. However, not all [[physical constant]]s can be normalized in this fashion. For example, the values of the following constants are independent of the system of units, cannot be defined, and can only be determined experimentally:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html |title=How Many Fundamental Constants Are There? |author-last=Baez |author-first=John Carlos |author-link=John Carlos Baez |date=2011-04-22 |access-date=2015-10-07}}</ref>
Certain universal dimensioned physical constants, such as the [[speed of light]] in vacuum, the [[universal gravitational constant]], the [[Planck constant]], the [[Coulomb constant]], and the [[Boltzmann constant]] can be normalized to 1 if appropriate units for [[time]], [[length]], [[mass]], [[electric charge|charge]], and [[temperature]] are chosen. The resulting [[system of units]] is known as the [[natural units]], specifically regarding these five constants, [[Planck units]]. However, not all [[physical constant]]s can be normalized in this fashion. For example, the values of the following constants are independent of the system of units, cannot be defined, and can only be determined experimentally:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html |title=How Many Fundamental Constants Are There? |author-last=Baez |author-first=John Carlos |author-link=John Carlos Baez |date=2011-04-22 |access-date=2015-10-07}}</ref>

* ''α'' ≈ 1/137, the [[fine-structure constant]], which characterizes the magnitude of the [[electromagnetic interaction]] between electrons.
* [[engineering strain]], a measure of physical deformation defined as a change in length divided by the initial length.

* [[fine-structure constant]], ''α'' ≈ 1/137 which characterizes the magnitude of the [[electromagnetic interaction]] between electrons.
* ''β'' (or ''μ'') ≈ 1836, the [[proton-to-electron mass ratio]]. This ratio is the [[rest mass]] of the [[proton]] divided by that of the [[electron]]. An analogous ratio can be defined for any [[elementary particle]];
* ''β'' (or ''μ'') ≈ 1836, the [[proton-to-electron mass ratio]]. This ratio is the [[rest mass]] of the [[proton]] divided by that of the [[electron]]. An analogous ratio can be defined for any [[elementary particle]];
* [[Strong force]] coupling strength ''α''<sub>s</sub> ≈ 1;
* ''α''<sub>s</sub> ≈ 1, a constant characterizing the [[strong force|strong nuclear force]] coupling strength;
* The ratio of the mass of any given elementary particle to the [[Planck mass]], <math display="inline">\sqrt{\hbar c/G}</math>.
* [[Planck mass]] ratio of the mass of any given elementary particle, <math display="inline">\sqrt{\hbar c/G}</math>.


== List ==
== Other quantities produced by nondimensionalization ==
{{Main|List of dimensionless quantities}}
{{Main|List of dimensionless quantities}}

Physics often uses dimensionless [[quantity|quantities]] to simplify the characterization of systems with multiple interacting physical phenomena. These may be found by applying the [[Buckingham π theorem|Buckingham {{pi}} theorem]] or otherwise may emerge from making [[partial differential equations]] unitless by the process of [[nondimensionalization]]. Engineering, economics, and other fields often extend these ideas in [[design]] and analysis of the relevant systems.


=== Physics and engineering ===
=== Physics and engineering ===
* [[Lorentz factor|Lorentz Factor]]<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Einstein |first=A. |date=2005-02-23 |title=Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [AdP 17, 891 (1905)] |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/andp.200590006 |journal=Annalen der Physik |language=en |volume=14 |issue=S1 |pages=194–224 |doi=10.1002/andp.200590006}}</ref> – parameter used in the context of special relativity for time dilation, length contraction, and relativistic effects between observers moving at different velocities
* [[Fresnel number]] – wavenumber over distance
* [[Fresnel number]] – wavenumber (spatial frequency) over distance
* [[Mach number]] – ratio of the speed of an object or flow relative to the speed of sound in the fluid.
* [[Mach number]] – ratio of the speed of an object or flow relative to the speed of sound in the fluid.
{{further|Dimensionless numbers in fluid mechanics}}
{{further|Dimensionless numbers in fluid mechanics}}
Line 82: Line 88:
* [[Sherwood number]] – (also called the mass transfer [[Nusselt number]]) is a dimensionless number used in mass-transfer operation. It represents the ratio of the convective mass transfer to the rate of diffusive mass transport.
* [[Sherwood number]] – (also called the mass transfer [[Nusselt number]]) is a dimensionless number used in mass-transfer operation. It represents the ratio of the convective mass transfer to the rate of diffusive mass transport.
* [[Schmidt number]] – defined as the ratio of momentum diffusivity (kinematic viscosity) and mass diffusivity, and is used to characterize fluid flows in which there are simultaneous momentum and mass diffusion convection processes.
* [[Schmidt number]] – defined as the ratio of momentum diffusivity (kinematic viscosity) and mass diffusivity, and is used to characterize fluid flows in which there are simultaneous momentum and mass diffusion convection processes.
* [[Reynolds number]] is commonly used in fluid mechanics to characterize flow, incorporating both properties of the fluid and the flow. It is interpreted as the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces and can indicate flow regime as well as correlate to frictional heating in application to flow in pipes.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ipp.mpg.de/~dpc/nrl/ |title=NRL Plasma Formulary: Dimensionless Numbers of Fluid Mechanics |author-last=Huba |author-first=Joseph D. |date=2007 |publisher=[[Naval Research Laboratory]] |access-date=2015-10-07 |pages=23–25}}</ref>
* [[Reynolds number]] is commonly used in fluid mechanics to characterize flow, incorporating both properties of the fluid and the flow. It is interpreted as the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces and can indicate flow regime as well as correlate to frictional heating in application to flow in pipes.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.ipp.mpg.de/~dpc/nrl/ |title=NRL Plasma Formulary: Dimensionless Numbers of Fluid Mechanics |author-last=Huba |author-first=Joseph D. |date=2007 |publisher=[[Naval Research Laboratory]] |access-date=2015-10-07 |pages=23–25 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210427225851/http://www.ipp.mpg.de/~dpc/nrl/ |archive-date=2021-04-27}}</ref>
* [[Zukoski number]], usually noted Q*, is the ratio of the heat release rate of a fire to the enthalpy of the gas flow rate circulating through the fire. Accidental and natural fires usually have a Q* of ~1. Flat spread fires such as forest fires have Q*<1. Fires originating from pressured vessels or pipes, with additional momentum caused by pressure, have Q*>>>1.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://authors.library.caltech.edu/21188/1/287_Zukoski_EE_1985.pdf |title=Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Room Fires |author-last=Zukoski |author-first=Edward E. |date=1986 |publisher=Fire Safety Science |access-date=2022-06-13}}</ref>
* Zukoski number, usually noted <math>Q^*</math>, is the ratio of the heat release rate of a fire to the enthalpy of the gas flow rate circulating through the fire. Accidental and natural fires usually have a <math>Q^* \approx 1</math>. Flat spread fires such as forest fires have <math>Q^*<1</math>. Fires originating from pressured vessels or pipes, with additional momentum caused by pressure, have <math>Q^*\gg 1</math>.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://authors.library.caltech.edu/21188/1/287_Zukoski_EE_1985.pdf |title=Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Room Fires |author-last=Zukoski |author-first=Edward E. |date=1986 |publisher=Fire Safety Science |access-date=2022-06-13}}</ref>
* [[Eckert number]]
* [[Biot number]]
* [[Grashof number]]


=== Chemistry ===
=== Chemistry ===
Line 93: Line 102:
* [[Cost of transport]] is the [[efficiency]] in moving from one place to another
* [[Cost of transport]] is the [[efficiency]] in moving from one place to another
* [[Elasticity (economics)|Elasticity]] is the measurement of the proportional change of an economic variable in response to a change in another
* [[Elasticity (economics)|Elasticity]] is the measurement of the proportional change of an economic variable in response to a change in another
* [[Basic reproduction number]] is a dimensionless ratio used in epidemiology to quantify the transmissibility of an infection.


== See also ==
== See also ==

Latest revision as of 22:26, 9 October 2024

Dimensionless quantities, or quantities of dimension one,[1] are quantities implicitly defined in a manner that prevents their aggregation into units of measurement.[2][3] Typically expressed as ratios that align with another system, these quantities do not necessitate explicitly defined units. For instance, alcohol by volume (ABV) represents a volumetric ratio; its value remains independent of the specific units of volume used, such as in milliliters per milliliter (mL/mL).

The number one is recognized as a dimensionless base quantity.[4] Radians serve as dimensionless units for angular measurements, derived from the universal ratio of 2π times the radius of a circle being equal to its circumference.[5]

Dimensionless quantities play a crucial role serving as parameters in differential equations in various technical disciplines. In calculus, concepts like the unitless ratios in limits or derivatives often involve dimensionless quantities. In differential geometry, the use of dimensionless parameters is evident in geometric relationships and transformations. Physics relies on dimensionless numbers like the Reynolds number in fluid dynamics,[6] the fine-structure constant in quantum mechanics,[7] and the Lorentz factor in relativity.[8] In chemistry, state properties and ratios such as mole fractions concentration ratios are dimensionless.[9]

History

[edit]

Quantities having dimension one, dimensionless quantities, regularly occur in sciences, and are formally treated within the field of dimensional analysis. In the 19th century, French mathematician Joseph Fourier and Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell led significant developments in the modern concepts of dimension and unit. Later work by British physicists Osborne Reynolds and Lord Rayleigh contributed to the understanding of dimensionless numbers in physics. Building on Rayleigh's method of dimensional analysis, Edgar Buckingham proved the π theorem (independently of French mathematician Joseph Bertrand's previous work) to formalize the nature of these quantities.[10]

Numerous dimensionless numbers, mostly ratios, were coined in the early 1900s, particularly in the areas of fluid mechanics and heat transfer. Measuring logarithm of ratios as levels in the (derived) unit decibel (dB) finds widespread use nowadays.

There have been periodic proposals to "patch" the SI system to reduce confusion regarding physical dimensions. For example, a 2017 op-ed in Nature[11] argued for formalizing the radian as a physical unit. The idea was rebutted[12] on the grounds that such a change would raise inconsistencies for both established dimensionless groups, like the Strouhal number, and for mathematically distinct entities that happen to have the same units, like torque (a vector product) versus energy (a scalar product). In another instance in the early 2000s, the International Committee for Weights and Measures discussed naming the unit of 1 as the "uno", but the idea of just introducing a new SI name for 1 was dropped.[13][14][15]


Buckingham π theorem

[edit]

The Buckingham π theorem [16] indicates that validity of the laws of physics does not depend on a specific unit system. A statement of this theorem is that any physical law can be expressed as an identity involving only dimensionless combinations (ratios or products) of the variables linked by the law (e. g., pressure and volume are linked by Boyle's Law – they are inversely proportional). If the dimensionless combinations' values changed with the systems of units, then the equation would not be an identity, and Buckingham's theorem would not hold.

Another consequence of the theorem is that the functional dependence between a certain number (say, n) of variables can be reduced by the number (say, k) of independent dimensions occurring in those variables to give a set of p = nk independent, dimensionless quantities. For the purposes of the experimenter, different systems that share the same description by dimensionless quantity are equivalent.

Integers

[edit]
Number of entities
Common symbols
N
SI unitUnitless
Dimension1

Integer numbers may represent dimensionless quantities. They can represent discrete quantities, which can also be dimensionless. More specifically, counting numbers can be used to express countable quantities.[17][18] The concept is formalized as quantity number of entities (symbol N) in ISO 80000-1.[19] Examples include number of particles and population size. In mathematics, the "number of elements" in a set is termed cardinality. Countable nouns is a related linguistics concept. Counting numbers, such as number of bits, can be compounded with units of frequency (inverse second) to derive units of count rate, such as bits per second. Count data is a related concept in statistics. The concept may be generalized by allowing non-integer numbers to account for fractions of a full item, e.g., number of turns equal to one half.

Ratios, proportions, and angles

[edit]

Dimensionless quantities can be obtained as ratios of quantities that are not dimensionless, but whose dimensions cancel out in the mathematical operation.[19][20] Examples of quotients of dimension one include calculating slopes or some unit conversion factors. Another set of examples is mass fractions or mole fractions, often written using parts-per notation such as ppm (= 10−6), ppb (= 10−9), and ppt (= 10−12), or perhaps confusingly as ratios of two identical units (kg/kg or mol/mol). For example, alcohol by volume, which characterizes the concentration of ethanol in an alcoholic beverage, could be written as mL / 100 mL.

Other common proportions are percentages % (= 0.01),   (= 0.001). Some angle units such as turn, radian, and steradian are defined as ratios of quantities of the same kind. In statistics the coefficient of variation is the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean and is used to measure the dispersion in the data.

It has been argued that quantities defined as ratios Q = A/B having equal dimensions in numerator and denominator are actually only unitless quantities and still have physical dimension defined as dim Q = dim A × dim B−1.[21] For example, moisture content may be defined as a ratio of volumes (volumetric moisture, m3⋅m−3, dimension L3⋅L−3) or as a ratio of masses (gravimetric moisture, units kg⋅kg−1, dimension M⋅M−1); both would be unitless quantities, but of different dimension.

Dimensionless physical constants

[edit]

Certain universal dimensioned physical constants, such as the speed of light in vacuum, the universal gravitational constant, the Planck constant, the Coulomb constant, and the Boltzmann constant can be normalized to 1 if appropriate units for time, length, mass, charge, and temperature are chosen. The resulting system of units is known as the natural units, specifically regarding these five constants, Planck units. However, not all physical constants can be normalized in this fashion. For example, the values of the following constants are independent of the system of units, cannot be defined, and can only be determined experimentally:[22]

  • engineering strain, a measure of physical deformation defined as a change in length divided by the initial length.

List

[edit]

Physics and engineering

[edit]
  • Lorentz Factor[23] – parameter used in the context of special relativity for time dilation, length contraction, and relativistic effects between observers moving at different velocities
  • Fresnel number – wavenumber (spatial frequency) over distance
  • Mach number – ratio of the speed of an object or flow relative to the speed of sound in the fluid.
  • Beta (plasma physics) – ratio of plasma pressure to magnetic pressure, used in magnetospheric physics as well as fusion plasma physics.
  • Damköhler numbers (Da) – used in chemical engineering to relate the chemical reaction timescale (reaction rate) to the transport phenomena rate occurring in a system.
  • Thiele modulus – describes the relationship between diffusion and reaction rate in porous catalyst pellets with no mass transfer limitations.
  • Numerical aperture – characterizes the range of angles over which the system can accept or emit light.
  • Sherwood number – (also called the mass transfer Nusselt number) is a dimensionless number used in mass-transfer operation. It represents the ratio of the convective mass transfer to the rate of diffusive mass transport.
  • Schmidt number – defined as the ratio of momentum diffusivity (kinematic viscosity) and mass diffusivity, and is used to characterize fluid flows in which there are simultaneous momentum and mass diffusion convection processes.
  • Reynolds number is commonly used in fluid mechanics to characterize flow, incorporating both properties of the fluid and the flow. It is interpreted as the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces and can indicate flow regime as well as correlate to frictional heating in application to flow in pipes.[24]
  • Zukoski number, usually noted , is the ratio of the heat release rate of a fire to the enthalpy of the gas flow rate circulating through the fire. Accidental and natural fires usually have a . Flat spread fires such as forest fires have . Fires originating from pressured vessels or pipes, with additional momentum caused by pressure, have .[25]
  • Eckert number
  • Biot number
  • Grashof number

Chemistry

[edit]

Other fields

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "1.8 (1.6) quantity of dimension one dimensionless quantity". International vocabulary of metrology — Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). ISO. 2008. Retrieved 2011-03-22.
  2. ^ "SI Brochure: The International System of Units, 9th Edition". BIPM. ISBN 978-92-822-2272-0.
  3. ^ Mohr, Peter J.; Phillips, William Daniel (2015-06-01). "Dimensionless units in the SI". Metrologia. 52.
  4. ^ Mills, I. M. (May 1995). "Unity as a Unit". Metrologia. 31 (6): 537–541. Bibcode:1995Metro..31..537M. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/31/6/013. ISSN 0026-1394.
  5. ^ Zebrowski, Ernest (1999). A History of the Circle: Mathematical Reasoning and the Physical Universe. Rutgers University Press. ISBN 978-0-8135-2898-4.
  6. ^ Cengel, Yunus; Cimbala, John (2013-10-16). EBOOK: Fluid Mechanics Fundamentals and Applications (SI units). McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-717359-3.
  7. ^ Webb, J. K.; King, J. A.; Murphy, M. T.; Flambaum, V. V.; Carswell, R. F.; Bainbridge, M. B. (2011-10-31). "Indications of a Spatial Variation of the Fine Structure Constant". Physical Review Letters. 107 (19): 191101. arXiv:1008.3907. Bibcode:2011PhRvL.107s1101W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.191101. PMID 22181590.
  8. ^ Einstein, A. (2005-02-23). "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [AdP 17, 891 (1905)]". Annalen der Physik. 14 (S1): 194–224. doi:10.1002/andp.200590006.
  9. ^ Ghosh, Soumyadeep; Johns, Russell T. (2016-09-06). "Dimensionless Equation of State to Predict Microemulsion Phase Behavior". Langmuir. 32 (35): 8969–8979. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02666. ISSN 0743-7463. PMID 27504666.
  10. ^ Buckingham, Edgar (1914). "On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations". Physical Review. 4 (4): 345–376. Bibcode:1914PhRv....4..345B. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.4.345. hdl:10338.dmlcz/101743.
  11. ^ "Lost dimension: A flaw in the SI system leaves physicists grappling with ambiguous units - SI units need reform to avoid confusion" (PDF). This Week: Editorials. Nature. 548 (7666): 135. 2017-08-10. Bibcode:2017Natur.548R.135.. doi:10.1038/548135b. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 28796224. S2CID 4444368. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-12-21. Retrieved 2022-12-21. (1 page)
  12. ^ Wendl, Michael Christopher (September 2017). "Don't tamper with SI-unit consistency". Nature. 549 (7671): 160. doi:10.1038/549160d. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 28905893. S2CID 52806576.
  13. ^ "BIPM Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), 15th Meeting" (PDF). 17–18 April 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-11-30. Retrieved 2010-01-22.
  14. ^ "BIPM Consultative Committee for Units (CCU), 16th Meeting" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-11-30. Retrieved 2010-01-22.
  15. ^ Dybkær, René (2004). "An ontology on property for physical, chemical, and biological systems". APMIS Suppl. (117): 1–210. PMID 15588029.
  16. ^ Buckingham, E. (1914). "On Physically Similar Systems; Illustrations of the Use of Dimensional Equations". Physical Review. 4 (4): 345–376. Bibcode:1914PhRv....4..345B. doi:10.1103/physrev.4.345.
  17. ^ Rothstein, Susan (2017). Semantics for Counting and Measuring. Key Topics in Semantics and Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. p. 206. ISBN 978-1-107-00127-5. Retrieved 2021-11-30.
  18. ^ Berch, Daniel B.; Geary, David Cyril; Koepke, Kathleen Mann (2015). Development of Mathematical Cognition: Neural Substrates and Genetic Influences. Elsevier Science. p. 13. ISBN 978-0-12-801909-2. Retrieved 2021-11-30.
  19. ^ a b "ISO 80000-1:2022(en) Quantities and units — Part 1: General". iso.org. Retrieved 2023-07-23.
  20. ^ "7.3 Dimensionless groups" (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 2023-11-03.
  21. ^ Johansson, Ingvar (2010). "Metrological thinking needs the notions of parametric quantities, units and dimensions". Metrologia. 47 (3): 219–230. Bibcode:2010Metro..47..219J. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/47/3/012. ISSN 0026-1394. S2CID 122242959.
  22. ^ Baez, John Carlos (2011-04-22). "How Many Fundamental Constants Are There?". Retrieved 2015-10-07.
  23. ^ Einstein, A. (2005-02-23). "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper [AdP 17, 891 (1905)]". Annalen der Physik. 14 (S1): 194–224. doi:10.1002/andp.200590006.
  24. ^ Huba, Joseph D. (2007). "NRL Plasma Formulary: Dimensionless Numbers of Fluid Mechanics". Naval Research Laboratory. pp. 23–25. Archived from the original on 2021-04-27. Retrieved 2015-10-07.
  25. ^ Zukoski, Edward E. (1986). "Fluid Dynamic Aspects of Room Fires" (PDF). Fire Safety Science. Retrieved 2022-06-13.

Further reading

[edit]
[edit]