Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kumioko: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:43, 23 November 2016

Kumioko

Kumioko (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kumioko/Archive.

23 November 2016

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets

Mr. Nosferatu (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
Editor interaction utility

User created on 2 October 2016, first edit was creation of User:Mr. Nosferatu with text "I am User:Mr. Nosferatu, back from the dead!". By his seventh edit, a few days later, he is suddenly defending Kumioko at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States [1] with impressive knowledge of what happened (from the oft-repeated POV of Kumioko, that is). Editor claims there not to be Kumioko, but that's not the first time he tried that either. Among his so far 20 mainspace edits are three edits to Medal of Honor recipients[2][3][4]. Medal of Honor, together with Wikiproject US, were the main areas of interest for Kumioko. Fram (talk) 14:16, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: it's no big deal, but a checkuser isn't just for comparison with known older accounts, but also to check for sleeper accounts / other socks. Kumioko (if this is Kumioko of course) has employed many socks, often multiple at the same time, so a checkuser seems useful even when older accounts are stale. Fram (talk) 15:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

@Bbb23: User:Sunny Side Up is a non-stale puppet. Sro23 (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

As far as I can see, all the accounts are Stale. CU declined.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sro23: Thanks! I've reinstated the CU request.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ===23 November 2016===
-{{SPI case status|CUdeclined}}
+{{SPI case status|CUrequest}}
 ====Suspected sockpuppets====
@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 ====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>====
 As far as I  can see, all the accounts are {{IPstale}}. CU declined.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 15:35, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
+:{{re|Sro23}} Thanks! I've reinstated the CU request.--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 15:43, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
 ----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->