Jump to content

Moons of Pluto: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Resonances: Clarification needed
Line 114: Line 114:
| access-date = 12 July 2012}}</ref> It may be that these orbits originated as forced resonances when Charon was tidally boosted into its current synchronous orbit, and then released from resonance as Charon's orbital eccentricity was tidally damped. The Pluto–Charon pair creates strong tidal forces, with the gravitational field at the outer moons varying by 15% peak to peak.{{Citation needed|date=June 2015}}
| access-date = 12 July 2012}}</ref> It may be that these orbits originated as forced resonances when Charon was tidally boosted into its current synchronous orbit, and then released from resonance as Charon's orbital eccentricity was tidally damped. The Pluto–Charon pair creates strong tidal forces, with the gravitational field at the outer moons varying by 15% peak to peak.{{Citation needed|date=June 2015}}


However, it was calculated that a resonance with Charon could boost either Nix or Hydra into its current orbit, but not both: boosting Hydra would have required a near-zero Charonian eccentricity of 0.024, whereas boosting Nix would have required a larger eccentricity of at least 0.05. This suggests that Nix and Hydra were instead captured material, formed around Pluto–Charon, and migrated inward until they were trapped in resonance with Charon.<ref>{{cite arXiv|eprint=0802.2951|class=astro-ph|last=Lithwick|first=Y.|author2=Y. Wu|title=On the Origin of Pluto's Minor Moons, Nix and Hydra|year=2008}}</ref> The existence of Kerberos and Styx may support this idea.
However, it was calculated that a resonance with Charon could boost either Nix or Hydra into its current orbit, but not both: boosting Hydra would have required a near-zero Charonian eccentricity of 0.024, whereas boosting Nix would have required a larger eccentricity of at least 0.05. This suggests that Nix and Hydra were instead captured material, formed around Pluto–Charon, and migrated inward until they were trapped in resonance with Charon.<ref>{{cite arXiv|eprint=0802.2951|class=astro-ph|last=Lithwick|first=Y.|author2=Y. Wu|title=On the Origin of Pluto's Minor Moons, Nix and Hydra|year=2008}}</ref> The existence of Kerberos and Styx may support this idea.{{clarification needed|date=March 2024}}


{{Annotated image
{{Annotated image

Revision as of 00:37, 1 April 2024

(Images not to scale)

The dwarf planet Pluto has five natural satellites.[1] In order of distance from Pluto, they are Charon, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra.[2] Charon, the largest, is mutually tidally locked with Pluto, and is massive enough that Pluto and Charon are sometimes considered a binary dwarf planet.[3]

History

The innermost and largest moon, Charon, was discovered by James Christy on 22 June 1978, nearly half a century after Pluto was discovered. This led to a substantial revision in estimates of Pluto's size, which had previously assumed that the observed mass and reflected light of the system were all attributable to Pluto alone.

Two additional moons were imaged by astronomers of the Pluto Companion Search Team preparing for the New Horizons mission and working with the Hubble Space Telescope on 15 May 2005, which received the provisional designations S/2005 P 1 and S/2005 P 2. The International Astronomical Union officially named these moons Nix (or Pluto II, the inner of the two moons, formerly P 2) and Hydra (Pluto III, the outer moon, formerly P 1), on 21 June 2006.[4] Kerberos, announced on 20 July 2011, was discovered while searching for Plutonian rings. The discovery of Styx was announced on 7 July 2012 while looking for potential hazards for New Horizons.[5]

The small moons to approximate scale, compared to Charon.

Charon

Charon and Pluto, to scale. Photo taken by New Horizons on approach.
Main article: Charon (moon)

Charon is about half the diameter of Pluto and is massive enough (nearly one eighth of the mass of Pluto) that the system's barycenter lies between them, approximately 960 km above Pluto's surface.[6][a] Charon and Pluto are also tidally locked, so that they always present the same face toward each other. The IAU General Assembly in August 2006 considered a proposal that Pluto and Charon be reclassified as a double planet, but the proposal was abandoned.[7] Like Pluto, Charon is a perfect sphere to within measurement uncertainty.[8]

Small moons

Animation of moons of Pluto around the barycenter of Pluto - Ecliptic plane
Front view
Side view
   Pluto ·    Charon ·    Styx ·    Nix ·    Kerberos ·    Hydra
The Hubble discovery image of Nix and Hydra
Discovery image of Styx, overlaid with orbits of the satellite system

Pluto's four small circumbinary moons orbit Pluto at two to four times the distance of Charon, ranging from Styx at 42,700 kilometres to Hydra at 64,800 kilometres from the barycenter of the system. They have nearly circular prograde orbits in the same orbital plane as Charon.

All are much smaller than Charon. Nix and Hydra, the two larger, are roughly 42 and 55 kilometers on their longest axis respectively,[9] and Styx and Kerberos are 7 and 12 kilometers respectively.[10][11] All four are irregularly shaped.

Characteristics

The Pluto system is highly compact and largely empty: prograde moons could stably orbit Pluto out to 53% of the Hill radius (the gravitational zone of Pluto's influence) of 6 million km, or out to 69% for retrograde moons.[12] However, only the inner 3% of the region where prograde orbits would be stable is occupied by satellites,[13] and the region from Styx to Hydra is packed so tightly that there is little room for further moons with stable orbits within this region.[14] An intense search conducted by New Horizons confirmed that no moons larger than 4.5 km in diameter exist out to distances up to 180,000 km from Pluto (6% of the stable region for prograde moons), assuming Charon-like albedoes of 0.38 (for smaller distances, this threshold is still smaller).[15]

The relative masses of Pluto's moons. Charon dominates the system. Nix and Hydra are barely visible and Styx and Kerberos are invisible at this scale.
An oblique schematic view of the Pluto–Charon system showing that Pluto orbits a point outside itself. Also visible is the mutual tidal locking between the two bodies.

The orbits of the moons are confirmed to be circular and coplanar, with inclinations differing less than 0.4° and eccentricities less than 0.005.[16]

The discovery of Nix and Hydra suggested that Pluto could have a ring system. Small-body impacts could eject debris off of the small moons which can form into a ring system. However, data from a deep-optical survey by the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope, by occultation studies,[17] and later by New Horizons, suggest that no ring system is present.

Resonances

Styx, Nix, and Hydra are thought to be in a 3-body Laplace orbital resonance with orbital periods in a ratio of 18:22:33.[18][19] The ratios should be exact when orbital precession is taken into account. Nix and Hydra are in a simple 2:3 resonance.[b][18][20] Styx and Nix are in an 9:11 resonance, while the resonance between Styx and Hydra has a ratio of 6:11.[c] The Laplace resonance also means that ratios of synodic periods are then such that there are 5 Styx–Hydra conjunctions and 3 Nix–Hydra conjunctions for every 2 conjunctions of Styx and Nix.[d][18] If denotes the mean longitude and the libration angle, then the resonance can be formulated as . As with the Laplace resonance of the Galilean satellites of Jupiter, triple conjunctions never occur. librates about 180° with an amplitude of at least 10°.[18]

All of the outer circumbinary moons are also close to mean motion resonance with the Charon–Pluto orbital period. Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra are in a 1:3:4:5:6 sequence of near resonances, with Styx approximately 5.4% from its resonance, Nix approximately 2.7%, Kerberos approximately 0.6%, and Hydra approximately 0.3%.[21] It may be that these orbits originated as forced resonances when Charon was tidally boosted into its current synchronous orbit, and then released from resonance as Charon's orbital eccentricity was tidally damped. The Pluto–Charon pair creates strong tidal forces, with the gravitational field at the outer moons varying by 15% peak to peak.[citation needed]

However, it was calculated that a resonance with Charon could boost either Nix or Hydra into its current orbit, but not both: boosting Hydra would have required a near-zero Charonian eccentricity of 0.024, whereas boosting Nix would have required a larger eccentricity of at least 0.05. This suggests that Nix and Hydra were instead captured material, formed around Pluto–Charon, and migrated inward until they were trapped in resonance with Charon.[22] The existence of Kerberos and Styx may support this idea.[clarification needed]

Configurations of Hydra (blue), Nix (red) and Styx (black) over one quarter of the cycle of their mutual orbital resonance. Movements are counterclockwise and orbits completed are tallied at upper right of diagrams (click on image to see the complete cycle).

Rotation

Rotations of the small moons of Pluto
(animation; 01:00; released 10 November 2015)

Prior to the New Horizons mission, Nix, Hydra, Styx, and Kerberos were predicted to rotate chaotically or tumble.[18] [23]

However, New Horizons imaging found that they had not tidally spun down to near a spin synchronous state where chaotic rotation or tumbling would be expected.[24] [25] New Horizons imaging found that all 4 moons were at high obliquity.[24] Either they were born that way, or they were tipped by a spin precession resonance. [25] Styx may be experiencing intermittent and chaotic obliquity variations.

Mark R. Showalter had speculated that, "Nix can flip its entire pole. It could actually be possible to spend a day on Nix in which the sun rises in the east and sets in the north. It is almost random-looking in the way it rotates."[26] Only one other moon, Saturn's moon Hyperion, is known to tumble,[27] though it is likely that Haumea's moons do so as well.[28]

Origin

Formation of Pluto's moons. 1: a Kuiper belt object approaches Pluto; 2: it collides with Pluto; 3: a dust ring forms around Pluto; 4: the debris aggregates to form Charon; 5: Pluto and Charon relax into spherical bodies.

It is suspected that Pluto's satellite system was created by a massive collision, similar to the Theia impact thought to have created the Moon.[29][30] In both cases, the high angular momenta of the moons can only be explained by such a scenario. The nearly circular orbits of the smaller moons suggests that they were also formed in this collision, rather than being captured Kuiper Belt objects. This and their near orbital resonances with Charon (see below) suggest that they formed closer to Pluto than they are at present and migrated outward as Charon reached its current orbit. Their grey color is different from that of Pluto, one of the reddest bodies in the Solar System. This is thought to be due to a loss of volatiles during the impact or subsequent coalescence, leaving the surfaces of the moons dominated by water ice. However, such an impact should have created additional debris (more moons), yet no moons or rings were discovered by New Horizons, ruling out any more moons of significant size orbiting Pluto.[1]

List

Pluto's moons are listed here by orbital period, from shortest to longest. Charon, which is massive enough to have collapsed into a spheroid at some point in its history, is highlighted in light purple. Pluto has been added for comparison.[18][31] All elements are with respect to the Pluto-Charon barycenter.[18] The mean separation distance between the centers of Pluto and Charon is 19,596 km.[32] Template:Import style

Label
[e] 		Name
(pronunciation) 		Named after[34] Image Diameter
(km) 		Mass (×1019 kg)[35] Semi-major
axis (km) 		Orbital period
(days) 		Orbital resonance
(relative to Charon) 		Eccentricity Inclination (°)
(to Pluto's equator) 		Visual
magnitude (mean) 		Discovery
year
Pluto /ˈpluːtoʊ/ Pluto, Roman god of the underworld
2376.6±3.2 1305±7 2035[32] 6.38723 1 : 1 0.0022[f] 0.001 15.1 1930
I Charon /ˈʃærən/,[g]
/ˈkɛərən/		 Charon, ferryman of the underworld in Greek mythology
1212±1 158.7±1.5 17536±3 6.38723 1 : 1 0.0022[f] 0.080 16.8 1978
V Styx /ˈstɪks/ The mythical river Styx and its eponymous goddess 16 × 9 × 8[36] 0.00075 42656±78 20.16155 1 : 3.16 0.00579 0.81±0.16 27 2012
II Nix /ˈnɪks/ Egyptian spelling of Nyx, goddess of the night in Greek mythology 49.8 × 33.2 × 31.1 [37] 0.005±0.004 48694±3 24.85463 1 : 3.89 0.00204 0.133±0.008 23.7 2005
IV Kerberos /ˈkɜːrbərəs, -ɒs/ Greek spelling of Cerberus, the many-headed dog who guards the Greek underworld 19 × 10 × 9[36] 0.0016±0.0009 57783±19 32.16756 1 : 5.04 0.00328 0.389±0.037 26 2011
III Hydra /ˈhaɪdrə/ The Hydra, the many-headed serpent who guards the Greek underworld
50.9 × 36.1 × 30.9 [37] 0.005±0.004 64738±3 38.20177 1 : 5.98 0.00586 0.242±0.005 23.3 2005

Scale model of the Pluto system

  • Pluto and its five moons, including the location of the system's barycenter. Sizes and distances of the bodies are to scale.
    Pluto and its five moons, including the location of the system's barycenter. Sizes and distances of the bodies are to scale.

Mutual events

Simulated view of Charon transiting Pluto on 25 February 1989

Transits occur when one of Pluto's moons passes between Pluto and the Sun. This occurs when one of the satellites' orbital nodes (the points where their orbits cross Pluto's ecliptic) lines up with Pluto and the Sun. This can only occur at two points in Pluto's orbit; coincidentally, these points are near Pluto's perihelion and aphelion. Occultations occur when Pluto passes in front of and blocks one of Pluto's satellites.

Charon has an angular diameter of 4 degrees of arc as seen from the surface of Pluto; the Sun appears much smaller, only 39 to 65 arcseconds. By comparison, the Moon as viewed from Earth has an angular diameter of only 31 minutes of arc, or just over half a degree of arc. Therefore, Charon would appear to have eight times the diameter, or 25 times the area of the Moon; this is due to Charon's proximity to Pluto rather than size, as despite having just over one-third of a Lunar radius, Earth's Moon is 20 times more distant from Earth's surface as Charon is from Pluto's. This proximity further ensures that a large proportion of Pluto's surface can experience an eclipse. Because Pluto always presents the same face towards Charon due to tidal locking, only the Charon-facing hemisphere experiences solar eclipses by Charon.

The smaller moons can cast shadows elsewhere. The angular diameters of the four smaller moons (as seen from Pluto) are uncertain. Nix's is 3–9 minutes of arc and Hydra's is 2–7 minutes. These are much larger than the Sun's angular diameter, so total solar eclipses are caused by these moons.

Eclipses by Styx and Kerberos are more difficult to estimate, as both moons are very irregular, with angular dimensions of 76.9 x 38.5 to 77.8 x 38.9 arcseconds for Styx, and 67.6 x 32.0 to 68.0 x 32.2 for Kerberos. As such, Styx has no annular eclipses, its widest axis being more than 10 arcseconds larger than the Sun at its largest. However, Kerberos, although slightly larger, cannot make total eclipses as its largest minor axis is a mere 32 arcseconds. Eclipses by Kerberos and Styx will entirely consist of partial and hybrid eclipses, with total eclipses being extremely rare.

The next period of mutual events due to Charon will begin in October 2103, peak in 2110, and end in January 2117. During this period, solar eclipses will occur once each Plutonian day, with a maximum duration of 90 minutes.[38][39]

Exploration

The Pluto system was visited by the New Horizons spacecraft in July 2015. Images with resolutions of up to 330 meters per pixel were returned of Nix and up to 1.1 kilometers per pixel of Hydra. Lower-resolution images were returned of Styx and Kerberos.[40]

Notes

  1. ^ "P1P2_motion.avi". Archived from the original (AVI) on 4 November 2005. and barycenter for animations
  2. ^ The ratio of 18:22:33 in the 3-body resonance corresponds to a 2-body resonance with ratio 2:3 between Hydra and Nix.
  3. ^ The ratio of 18:22:33 in the 3-body resonance corresponds to a 2-body resonance with ratio 9:11 between Styx and Nix. In analogy, the ratio of 18:22:33 in the 3-body resonance corresponds to a 2-body resonance with ratio 6:11 between Styx and Hydra.
  4. ^ This is calculated as follows: for every orbit of Hydra there are orbits of Nix and orbits of Styx. The conjunctions then occur at a relative rate of for Styx-Hydra, for Nix-Hydra and for Styx-Nix. Multiplying all three rates by (to make them integers) yields that there are Styx-Hydra conjunctions and Nix-Hydra conjunctions for every Styx-Nix conjunctions.
  5. ^ Label refers to the Roman numerals attributed to each moon in order of their discovery.[33]
  6. ^ a b Orbital eccentricity and inclination of Pluto and Charon are equal because they refer to the same two-body problem (the gravitational influence of the smaller satellites is neglected here).
  7. ^ Many astronomers use this, Christy's pronunciation, rather than the classical /ˈkɛərɒn/, but both are considered to be acceptable.

References

  1. ^ a b Kenyon, Scott J.; Bromley, Benjamin C. (28 January 2019). "A Pluto-Charon Sonata: The Dynamical Architecture of the Circumbinary Satellite System". The Astrophysical Journal. 157 (2): 79. arXiv:1810.01277. Bibcode:2019AJ....157...79K. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aafa72. S2CID 119091388.
  2. ^ "Moons dance around Pluto". Smithsonian Institution. 9 June 2015. Retrieved 9 April 2016.
  3. ^ "Pluto's Moons | Five Satellites of Pluto". Space.com. Retrieved 27 October 2018.
  4. ^ Green, Daniel W. E. (21 June 2006). "Satellites of Pluto". IAU Circular. 8723. Retrieved 26 November 2011. "NASA's Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto". NASA. 20 July 2011. Retrieved 20 July 2011.
  5. ^ "Hubble Discovers a Fifth Moon Orbiting Pluto". hubblesite.org. 29 July 2012. Archived from the original on 17 November 2012. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  6. ^ Staff (30 January 2014). "Barycenter". Education.com. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
  7. ^ "The IAU draft definition of "planet" and "plutons"". International Astronomical Union. 16 August 2006. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
  8. ^ Nimmo, Francis; et al. (2017). "Mean radius and shape of Pluto and Charon from New Horizons images". Icarus. 287: 12–29. arXiv:1603.00821. Bibcode:2017Icar..287...12N. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2016.06.027. S2CID 44935431.
  9. ^ "New Horizons 'Captures' Two of Pluto's Smaller Moons". New Horizons. Retrieved 29 July 2015.
  10. ^ New Horizons Picks Up Styx
  11. ^ Last of Pluto's Moons – Mysterious Kerberos – Revealed by New Horizons
  12. ^ Steffl, A. J.; Mutchler, M. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Stern, S. A.; Durda, D. D.; Terrell, D.; Merline, W. J.; Young, L. A.; Young, E. F.; Buie, M. W.; Spencer, J. R. (2006). "New Constraints on Additional Satellites of the Pluto System". The Astronomical Journal. 132 (2): 614–619. arXiv:astro-ph/0511837. Bibcode:2006AJ....132..614S. doi:10.1086/505424. S2CID 10547358.
  13. ^ Stern, S. Alan; Weaver, Harold A. Jr.; Steffl, Andrew J.; et al. (2005). "Characteristics and Origin of the Quadruple System at Pluto". arXiv:astro-ph/0512599.
  14. ^ Kenyon, S. J. (3 June 2015). "Astronomy: Pluto leads the way in planet formation". Nature. 522 (7554): 40–41. Bibcode:2015Natur.522...40K. doi:10.1038/522040a. PMID 26040888. S2CID 205085254.
  15. ^ Stern, S. A.; Bagenal, F.; Ennico, K.; et al. (2015). "The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons". Science. 350 (6258): aad1815. arXiv:1510.07704. Bibcode:2015Sci...350.1815S. doi:10.1126/science.aad1815. PMID 26472913. S2CID 1220226. (Supplements)
  16. ^ "Orbits of 4 Bodies in Pluto System about Barycenter as Seen from Earth". Hubblesite. Retrieved 21 June 2006.
  17. ^ Pasachoff, Jay M.; Babcock, Bryce A.; Souza, Steven P.; et al. (2006). "A Search for Rings, Moons, or Debris in the Pluto System during the 2006 July 12 Occultation". Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 38 (3): 523. Bibcode:2006DPS....38.2502P.
  18. ^ a b c d e f g Showalter, M. R.; Hamilton, D. P. (3 June 2015). "Resonant interactions and chaotic rotation of Pluto's small moons". Nature. 522 (7554): 45–49. Bibcode:2015Natur.522...45S. doi:10.1038/nature14469. PMID 26040889. S2CID 205243819.
  19. ^ Codex Regius (2016). Pluto & Charon. XinXii. p. 197. ISBN 9781534633520. Retrieved 13 March 2018.
  20. ^ Witze, Alexandra (2015). "Pluto's moons move in synchrony". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17681. S2CID 134519717.
  21. ^ Matson, J. (11 July 2012). "New Moon for Pluto: Hubble Telescope Spots a 5th Plutonian Satellite". Scientific American web site. Retrieved 12 July 2012.
  22. ^ Lithwick, Y.; Y. Wu (2008). "On the Origin of Pluto's Minor Moons, Nix and Hydra". arXiv:0802.2951 [astro-ph].
  23. ^ Correia, A. C. M.; Leleu, A.; Rambaux, N.; Robutel, P. (2015). "Spin-orbit coupling and chaotic rotation for circumbinary bodies. Application to the small satellites of the Pluto-Charon system". Astronomy and Astrophysics. 580: L7. arXiv:1506.06733. Bibcode:2015A&A...580L..14C. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526800. S2CID 119098216.
  24. ^ a b Weaver, H. A. (2016). "The Small Satellites of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons". Science. 351 (6279): 1281. arXiv:1604.05366. Bibcode:2016Sci...351.0030W. doi:10.1126/science.aae0030. PMID 26989256. S2CID 206646188.
  25. ^ a b Quillen, A. C.; Nichols-Fleming, F.; Chen, Y.-Y.; Noyelles, B. (2017). "Obliquity evolution of the minor satellites of Pluto and Charon". Icarus. 293: 94–113. arXiv:1701.05594. Bibcode:2017Icar..293...94Q. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.04.012. S2CID 119408999.
  26. ^ Chang, Kenneth (3 June 2015). "Astronomers Describe the Chaotic Dance of Pluto's Moons". New York Times. Retrieved 4 June 2015.
  27. ^ Wisdom, J.; Peale, S. J.; Mignard, F. (1984). "The chaotic rotation of Hyperion". Icarus. 58 (2): 137–152. Bibcode:1984Icar...58..137W. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.394.2728. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(84)90032-0.
  28. ^ Ragozzine, Darin (17 October 2016). "Rapidly Rotating Regular Satellites and Tides". Planetary Society. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
  29. ^ Canup, R. M. (8 January 2005). "A Giant Impact Origin of Pluto-Charon" (PDF). Science. 307 (5709): 546–550. Bibcode:2005Sci...307..546C. doi:10.1126/science.1106818. PMID 15681378. S2CID 19558835.
  30. ^ Stern, S. A.; Weaver, H. A.; Steff, A. J.; Mutchler, M. J.; Merline, W. J.; Buie, M. W.; Young, E. F.; Young, L. A.; Spencer, J. R. (23 February 2006). "A giant impact origin for Pluto's small moons and satellite multiplicity in the Kuiper belt" (PDF). Nature. 439 (7079): 946–948. Bibcode:2006Natur.439..946S. doi:10.1038/nature04548. PMID 16495992. S2CID 4400037. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 January 2012. Retrieved 20 July 2011.
  31. ^ Orbital elements of small satellites from Showalter and Hamilton, 2015; mass and magnitude from Buie & Grundy, 2006
  32. ^ a b Pluto data from D. R. Williams (7 September 2006). "Pluto Fact Sheet". NASA. Retrieved 24 March 2007..
  33. ^ "Planet and Satellite Names and Discoverers". Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature. USGS Astrogeology. Retrieved 23 June 2022.
  34. ^ "Planetary Names". planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov. Retrieved 6 January 2023.
  35. ^ "(134340) Pluto, Charon, Nix, Hydra, Kerberos, and Styx". www.johnstonsarchive.net. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
  36. ^ a b "Special Session: Planet 9 from Outer Space - Pluto Geology and Geochemistry". YouTube. Lunar and Planetary Institute. 25 March 2016. Archived from the original on 21 December 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  37. ^ a b Verbiscer, A. J.; Porter, S. B.; Buratti, B. J.; Weaver, H. A.; Spencer, J. R.; Showalter, M. R.; Buie, M. W.; Hofgartner, J. D.; Hicks, M. D.; Ennico-Smith, K.; Olkin, C. B.; Stern, S. A.; Young, L. A.; Cheng, A. (2018). "Phase Curves of Nix and Hydra from the New Horizons Imaging Cameras". The Astrophysical Journal. 852 (2): L35. Bibcode:2018ApJ...852L..35V. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaa486.
  38. ^ "Start of Eclipse". JPL Solar System Simulator. 12 December 1987. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 29 July 2014. (Pluto as seen from the Sun during mid-eclipse)
  39. ^ "End of Eclipse". JPL Solar System Simulator. 12 December 1987. Archived from the original on 24 March 2017. Retrieved 29 July 2014.
  40. ^ "New Horizons flyby timeline". Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 25 July 2015.

Sources

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Moons of Pluto.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Moons_of_Pluto&oldid=1216606212"