Jump to content

Spaghettification: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Opposite effect: Proper citation and remove overdue part as off-topic in this article. And copyright violation anyway
Opposite effect: Remove unrelated stuff. As for the last part: this is a non-gravity related effect, and has nothing to do with the physical phenomenon. Only what remains qualifies.
Line 53: Line 53:


== Opposite effect ==
== Opposite effect ==
The effect opposite to spaghettification is called ''pancaking'' and is experienced by bodies positioned on a surface that is in a gravitational field but is not falling into the latter (''e.g.'', people walking on the surface of the Earth are ''pancaked'' by the downgoing stream of space flowing through their bodies towards the centre of the Earth), or, due do the [[equivalence principle]], by bodies positioned on a surface that is being accelerated towards them (''e.g.'', the passengers of an airplane accelerating before its take-off become ''pancaked'' in their seats by the oncoming flow of space). Space is superfluid<ref name=VacuumFlow>Volovik, G. E. [http://www.issp.ac.ru/ebooks/books/open/The_Universe_in_a_Helium_Droplet.pdf The Universe in a Helium Droplet] OUP, 2003, p. 60. "The non-viscous flow of the vacuum should be potential (irrotational)."</ref> and exerts a drag on the objects through which it is flowing either when the motion is accelerated or when its velocity is constant but is near the critical velocity known as the velocity of light.<ref>Davies, Paul. [https://web.archive.org/web/20011116161613/http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/quantum/quantum.jsp?id=23154400 Liquid space] ''New Scientist'', 2001&nbsp;11&nbsp;03. "Put bluntly, your drink slops when an aircraft lurches because the quantum vacuum pushes against the accelerating atoms."</ref> That is why protons moving at 99.99995 percent of ''c'' become pancaked by a factor of 1/1000 by the drag of the space through which they are passing.<ref>{{cite book |title=Symmetry and the Beautiful Universe |author1=Leon M. Lederman |author2=Christopher T. Hill |edition= |publisher=Prometheus Books |year=2011 |isbn=978-1-61592-041-9 |page=157 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e9AQ5zH13qQC}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=e9AQ5zH13qQC&pg=PA157 Extract of page 157]</ref>
The effect opposite to spaghettification is called ''pancaking'' and is experienced by bodies positioned on a surface that is in a gravitational field but is not falling into the latter (''e.g.'', people walking on the surface of the Earth are ''pancaked'' by the downgoing stream of space flowing through their bodies towards the centre of the Earth), or, due do the [[equivalence principle]], by bodies positioned on a surface that is being accelerated towards them (''e.g.'', the passengers of an airplane accelerating before its take-off become ''pancaked'' in their seats by the oncoming flow of space).


==Notes==
==Notes==

Revision as of 21:39, 12 September 2024

An astronaut entrained into a flow of space that is being sucked into the wormhole at the centre of a black hole.[1]
Tidal forces acting on a spherical body in a non-homogeneous gravitational field. In this diagram, the gravitational force originates from a source to the right. It shows both the tidal field (thick red arrows) and the gravity field (thin blue arrows) exerted on the body's surface and center (label O) by a source (label S).

In general relativity, spaghettification (sometimes referred to as the noodle effect)[2] is the vertical stretching and horizontal contraction of objects entrained into a flow of space called a gravitational field.[1]

Stephen Hawking described the flight of a fictional astronaut who, passing within a black hole's event horizon, is "stretched like spaghetti" by the gravitational gradient (difference in gravitational force) from head to toe.[3] The reason this happens would be that the gravitational force exerted by the singularity would be much stronger at one end of the body than the other. If one were to fall into a black hole feet first, the gravity at their feet would be much stronger than at their head, causing the person to be vertically stretched. Along with that, the right side of the body will be pulled to the left, and the left side of the body will be pulled to the right, horizontally compressing the person.[4] However, the term spaghettification was established well before this.[5] Spaghettification of a star was imaged for the first time in 2018 by researchers observing a pair of colliding galaxies approximately 150 million light-years from Earth.[6]

A simple example

The spaghettification of four objects falling towards a planet

In this example, four separate objects are in the space above a planet, positioned in a diamond formation. The four objects follow the lines of the gravitoelectric field,[7] directed towards the celestial body's centre. In accordance with the inverse-square law, the lowest of the four objects experiences the biggest gravitational acceleration, so that the whole formation becomes stretched into a line.

These four objects are connected parts of a larger object. A rigid body will resist distortion, and internal elastic forces develop as the body distorts to balance the tidal forces, so attaining mechanical equilibrium. If the tidal forces are too large, the body may yield and flow plastically before the tidal forces can be balanced, or fracture, producing either a filament or a vertical line of broken pieces.

Examples of weak and strong tidal forces

In the gravity field due to a point mass or spherical mass, for a uniform rod oriented in the direction of gravity, the tensile force at the center is found by integration of the tidal force from the center to one of the ends. This gives F = μ l m/4r3, where μ is the standard gravitational parameter of the massive body, l is the length of the rod, m is rod's mass, and r is the distance to the massive body. For non-uniform objects the tensile force is smaller if more mass is near the center, and up to twice as large if more mass is at the ends. In addition, there is a horizontal compression force toward the center.

For massive bodies with a surface, the tensile force is largest near the surface, and this maximum value is only dependent on the object and the average density of the massive body (as long as the object is small relative to the massive body). For example, for a rod with a mass of 1 kg and a length of 1 m, and a massive body with the average density of the Earth, this maximum tensile force due to the tidal force is only 0.4 μN.

Due to the high density, the tidal force near the surface of a white dwarf is much stronger, causing in the example a maximum tensile force of up to 0.24 N. Near a neutron star, the tidal forces are again much stronger: if the rod has a tensile strength of 10,000 N and falls vertically to a neutron star of 2.1 solar masses, setting aside that it would melt, it would break at a distance of 190 km from the center, well above the surface (a neutron star typically has a radius of only about 12 km).[note 1]

In the previous case, objects would actually be destroyed and people killed by the heat, not the tidal forces - but near a black hole (assuming that there is no nearby matter), objects would actually be destroyed and people killed by the tidal forces because there is no radiation (outside of theoretical Hawking radiation). Moreover, a black hole has no surface to stop a fall. Thus, the infalling object is stretched into a thin strip of matter.

Inside or outside the event horizon

Spaghettification of a star by a supermassive black hole[8]

The point at which tidal forces destroy an object or kill a person will depend on the black hole's size. For a supermassive black hole, such as those found at a galaxy's center, this point lies within the event horizon, so an astronaut may cross the event horizon without noticing any squashing and pulling, although it remains only a matter of time, as once inside an event horizon, falling towards the center is inevitable.[9] For small black holes whose Schwarzschild radius is much closer to the singularity, the tidal forces would kill even before the astronaut reaches the event horizon.[10][11] For example, for a black hole of 10 Sun masses[note 2] the above-mentioned rod breaks at a distance of 320 km, well outside the Schwarzschild radius of 30 km. For a supermassive black hole of 10,000 Sun masses, it will break at a distance of 3,200 km, well inside the Schwarzschild radius of 30,000 

Opposite effect

The effect opposite to spaghettification is called pancaking and is experienced by bodies positioned on a surface that is in a gravitational field but is not falling into the latter (e.g., people walking on the surface of the Earth are pancaked by the downgoing stream of space flowing through their bodies towards the centre of the Earth), or, due do the equivalence principle, by bodies positioned on a surface that is being accelerated towards them (e.g., the passengers of an airplane accelerating before its take-off become pancaked in their seats by the oncoming flow of space).

Notes

  1. ^ An 8-meter rod of the same strength, with a mass of 8 kg, breaks at a distance 4 times as high.[citation needed]
  2. ^ The smallest non-primordial black hole that can be formed by natural processes has an estimated mass of 3–4 times that of the Sun.[12]

References

Inline citations
  1. ^ a b Sen, Paul. Einstein's Fridge: How the Difference Between Hot and Cold Explains the Universe Simon and Schuster, 2022, p. 228. "The drain hole sucking water toward it is equivalent to the singularity at the center of a black hole sucking space toward it."
  2. ^ Wheeler, J. Craig (2007). Cosmic catastrophes: exploding stars, black holes, and mapping the universe (2nd ed.). Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. p. 182. ISBN 978-0-521-85714-7. OCLC 73954922.
  3. ^ Hawking, Stephen (1988). A Brief History of Time. Bantam Dell Publishing Group. p. 256. ISBN 978-0-553-10953-5.
  4. ^ Fraknoi, Andrew; Morrison, David; C. Wolff, SIdney (2016). Astronomy. OpenStax. p. 862. ISBN 9781938168284.
  5. ^ Calder, Nigel (1977). The Key to the Universe: A Report on the New Physics. Viking Press. p. 143. ISBN 978-0-67041270-9. Retrieved July 10, 2022. Published as a companion to the BBC TV documentary The Key to the Universe.
  6. ^ "Astronomers See Distant Eruption as Black Hole Destroys Star" (Press release). National Radio Astronomy Observatory. Phys.org. June 14, 2018. Retrieved June 15, 2018.
  7. ^ Thorne, Kip S. (1988). "Gravitomagnetism, Jets in Quasars, and the Stanford Gyroscope Experiment" (PDF). In Fairbank, J. D.; Deaver, Jr., B. S.; Everitt, C. F.; Micelson, P. F. (eds.). Near Zero: New Frontiers of Physics. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company. pp. 3, 4 (575, 576). From our electrodynamical experience we can infer immediately that any rotating spherical body (e.g., the sun or the earth) will be surrounded by a radial gravitoelectric (Newtonian) field g and a dipolar gravitomagnetic field H. The gravitoelectric monopole moment is the body's mass M; the gravitomagnetic dipole moment is its spin angular momentum S.
  8. ^ Price, Daniel J.; Liptai, David; Mandel, Ilya; Shepherd, Joanna; Lodato, Giuseppe; Levin, Yuri (2024). "Eddington Envelopes: The Fate of Stars on Parabolic Orbits Tidally Disrupted by Supermassive Black Holes". The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 971 (2): L46. arXiv:2404.09381. Bibcode:2024ApJ...971L..46P. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6862.
  9. ^ Hawley, John Frederick; Holcomb, Katherine A. (2005). Foundations of modern cosmology (2nd ed.). Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press. p. 253. ISBN 978-0-19-853096-1.
  10. ^ Hobson, Michael Paul; Efstathiou, Georges; Lasenby, Anthony N. (2006). General relativity: an introduction for physicists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 265. ISBN 978-0-521-82951-9.
  11. ^ Kutner, Marc L. (2003). Astronomy: a physical perspective (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 150. ISBN 978-0-521-52927-3.
  12. ^ Thompson, T. A.; Kochanek, C. S.; Stanek, K. Z.; et al. (2019). "A noninteracting low-mass black hole–giant star binary system". Science. 366 (6465): 637–640. arXiv:1806.02751. Bibcode:2019Sci...366..637T. doi:10.1126/science.aau4005. PMID 31672898. S2CID 207815062.
General references