Jump to content

Spahn tax: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Removed incorrect word
Added date
Line 5: Line 5:
==Early history==
==Early history==


The initial idea for a transaction tax specific to currencies is due to [[James Tobin]], a concept now known as a [[Tobin tax]]. [[Paul Bernd Spahn]], in his analysis of the original idea, concluded that the concept was not viable and suggested an alternative solution in 1995 to the problem of managing exchange-rate volatility.<ref name = "Spahn"/>
The initial idea for a transaction tax specific to currencies is due to [[James Tobin]] in 1972<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ideas.repec.org/a/eej/eeconj/v4y1978i3-4p153-159.html |title=A Proposal for International Monetary Reform |author=James Tobin |date=July/October 1978 |work=Eastern Economic Journal|publisher=Eastern Economic Association |pages=153-159|accessdate=2010-01-31}}</ref>, a concept now known as a [[Tobin tax]]. [[Paul Bernd Spahn]], in his analysis of the original idea, concluded that the concept was not viable and suggested an alternative solution in 1995 to the problem of managing exchange-rate volatility.<ref name = "Spahn"/>


==The concept==
==The concept==

Revision as of 00:49, 7 February 2010

A Spahn tax is an eponym describing a type of currency transaction tax that is meant to be used for the purpose of controlling exchange-rate volatility. This idea was proposed by Paul Bernd Spahn in 1995.[1]

Early history

The initial idea for a transaction tax specific to currencies is due to James Tobin in 1972[2], a concept now known as a Tobin tax. Paul Bernd Spahn, in his analysis of the original idea, concluded that the concept was not viable and suggested an alternative solution in 1995 to the problem of managing exchange-rate volatility.[1]

The concept

According to Paul Bernd Spahn, "Analysis has shown that the Tobin tax as originally proposed is not viable and should be laid aside for good." Furthermore, he said "it is virtually impossible to distinguish between normal liquidity trading and speculative "noise" trading. If the tax is generally applied at high rates, it will severely impair financial operations and create international liquidity problems, especially if derivatives are taxed as well. A lower tax rate would reduce the negative impact on financial markets, but not mitigate speculation where expectations of an exchange rate change exceed the tax margin."[1]

In 1995, Spahn suggested an alternative involving "a two-tier rate structure consisting of a low-rate financial transactions tax, plus an exchange surcharge at prohibitive rates as a piggyback. The latter would be dormant in times of normal financial activities, and be activated only in the case of speculative attacks. The mechanism allowing the identification of abnormal trading in world financial markets would make reference to a "crawling peg" with an appropriate exchange rate band. The exchange rate would move freely within this band without transactions being taxed. Only transactions effected at exchange rates outside the permissible range would become subject to tax. This would automatically induce stabilizing behavior on the part of market participants."[1]

Proposals

On June 15, 2004, the Belgian Parliament approved a bill implementing a Spahn tax.[3] According to the legislation, Belgium will introduce the Spahn tax once all countries of the eurozone introduce a similar law.[4]

In November 2004, Belgium submitted this law for an opinion to the European Central Bank. The Bank provided both an economic and legal assessment. The summary of their economic assessment was as follows:

"...the ECB concludes that the economic and monetary usefulness of a tax, such as envisaged by the draft law, is highly questionable, given the uncertainty of its claimed benefits and the likely welfare costs arising from distortions in the working of financial markets. This assessment is reinforced by the difficulties expected with respect to its implementation."[4]

The summary of their legal assessment was:

"...the ECB is of the opinion that the introduction by a euro area Member State of a tax, such as envisaged by the draft law, is incompatible with the Treaty.[4]

In July 2005 former Austrian chancellor Wolfgang Schüssel called for a European Union Tobin tax to base the communities' financial structure on more stable and independent grounds. However, the proposal was rejected by the European Commission.[citation needed]

See also

Template:Multicol

Template:Multicol-break

Template:Multicol-end

References

  1. ^ a b c d Paul Bernd Spahn (June 16, 1995). "International Financial Flows and Transactions Taxes: Survey and Options" (PDF). University of Frankfurt/Main; Paper originally published with the IMF as Working Paper WP/95/60. Retrieved 2010-01-13.
  2. ^ James Tobin (July/October 1978). "A Proposal for International Monetary Reform". Eastern Economic Journal. Eastern Economic Association. pp. 153–159. Retrieved 2010-01-31. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ Marc Quaghebeur (November 29 2004). "Belgium Supports Tobin Tax" (PDF). Tax Notes International. pp. 727–729. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)
  4. ^ a b c ECB (2004). Opinion of the European Central Bank (CON/2004/34)