User talk:Feydey: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:20, 11 July 2010

Welcome User, please state your comments after the others. -- Feydey.

Click to leave me a new message

Sign your comments by adding four tildes (~~~~). Messages left on this page will usually lead me to reply on your talk page; however, I may use both for extended discussions. Questions?

Template:Col-1-of-62005

Talk archive 1 2005

Template:Col-2-of-62006

Talk archive 2 Jan. - Apr. 2006
Talk archive 3 Apr. - June 2006
Talk archive 4 June - July 2006
Talk archive 5 July - Sep. 2006
Talk archive 6 Oct. - Dec. 2006

Template:Col-3-of-62007

Talk archive 7 Jan. - Mar. 2007
Talk archive 8 Mar. - May 2007
Talk archive 9 May - Oct. 2007
Talk archive 10 Oct. - Dec. 2007

Template:Col-4-of-62008

Talk archive 11 2008

Template:Col-5-of-62009

Talk archive 12 Jan. - Jun. 2009
Talk archive 13 Jun. - Dec. 2009

Template:Col-5-of-62010

Talk archive 14 Jan. - Jun. 2010

Your deletion of San diego Floorball.

There was no free media. We have our own website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennythebenny (talk • contribs) 09:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Shaista Ikramullah.jpg

I noticed that you removed the recently uploaded image: Shaista Ikramullah.jpg. The image was uploaded with copyrights information: Public Domain of Pakistan

This image is now in the public domain in Pakistan, as one of the following apply:
In the case of photographic works, it was published more than 50 years ago (before January 1st, 1974), or

In the case of other works, the creator died more than 50 years ago (before January 1st, 1974)

PD-Pakistan Public domain in Pakistan //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Feydey

This file is NOT necessarily in the public domain in the United States because a non-simple image can only be in the public domain in the U.S.:

if it entered the public domain in Pakistan prior to 1996, or

when, after that date, its copyright term expires in accordance with U.S. law.

Information about the creation date and creator should be provided.
If the image is not in the public domain in the United States, in addition to the license tag for its status in Pakistan an appropriate fair use license and rationale should be provided, or the image should be proposed for deletion.

If the media is in the public domain in both Pakistan and the United States, it may be transferred to the Wikimedia Commons.
Note: If this image is in the public domain in the U.S., modify the end of the copyright tag from }} to |commons}}.
This will replace the preceding U.S. copyright notification with a nomination for this image to be moved to the Wikimedia Commons.

Please specify how this upload violates copyrights law.
--Muzammil 09:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: Removal of Shaista Ikramullah.jpg
Thank you for your reply.
Indeed I mentioned PD in Pakistan with the image. As you said that it is under URAA and wasn't properly licensed, Cannot we re-upload the image in Wikipedia?
--Muzammil 10:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muzammil786 (talk • contribs)
Deletion of Brenda Barrett picture
How is there no way to prove who is in the image, the source link that I provided says the picture if of Vanessa Marcil. Here is the link the photo: http://ghspoilers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/vanessa_marcil_1280_800_aug052009.jpg and here it the original page I found it on - http://ghspoilers.info/2010/06/08/comings-goings-2/ So what is the problem--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 04:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The image was also used on soapnet and the article says that the photo source is ABC, here is the link - http://sn.soapnet.go.com/news/article/comings-and-goings-brendas-back --Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 04:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
John Soares photo
Actually, I've contacted John Soares, and he said he emailed permission today to WP to use that image under a creative commons license, so they should be getting to fixing the permissions for that themselves shortly. (Personally all of that legalese is just too confusing for me...) --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 10:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
iPhone image
Hi, I saw you deleted an image from iPhone. I cam here to complain when I realized that 1, the deleted image had no fair use rationale and 2, you were kind enough to move up another image to fill the slot. The new image, which I particularly admire because it shows the device being held in a lifelike way, I presume is acceptable because you didn't delete it too. As for the old image, the uploader and I had a discussion yesterday as to how to best crop it and came to a nice compromise, so we've been in touch. If I instruct him how to properly add a fair use rationale, would you object to him re-uploading the photo? HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 22:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Duh!
If you bothered looking at the template on the Jean Colin jpg page, you would find that it is used where the copyright in the EU has expired since the image is over 70 years old. The image come from a British magazine 72 years old, as it is stated there. Is 72 years older than 70 years? I don't want to know about American copyright since it has no relevance here. British magazine. British image. Unknown author. Publicity picture. I removed your deletion notice as you probably don't want others to realise you do not have a clue. Ask someone next time if you are not sure. (Cyberia3 (talk) 17:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]
America does not rule Europe
If something is copyrighted in Europe, that is nothing to do with America, despite what Americans might think. Not a damn thing. If the copyright runs out in Europe, that is nothing to do with America either as America is not part of the Commonwealth since 1776. If an American tried to interfere with British copyright anywhere in the EU, he would be sent packing with a footprint on his backside.
Do you understand that if something is not copyrighted in America, it is not copyrighted in America? Copyright on the 1938 magazine concerned is for England (no actual mention of UK), Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. There is no such thing as retroactive copyright and copyright is only where stated, as in no mention of America.
I doubt that people have to jump through as many hoops to get something published in the 240 year old Encyclopedia Britannica volumes as they have to to add something to the wiki which is a glorified website. If someone complains to the wiki that they do not like the way something they own the copyright on was used, it does not mean a massive recall of encyclopedia volumes to be pulped. It is the work of a minute to delete it. That is if the person themself does not do it. (Cyberia3 (talk) 18:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]
I might be a Wikipedia newbie, but I just don't understand something...
Hello! :)
Firstly, just wanted to say that I'm a complete Wikipedia newbie and I'd genuinely appreciate your input on the changes you made to the page I was writing about Serif DrawPlus
I was just trying to copy the Inkscape page in format and style, but list the features available in Serif DrawPlus, obviously. It's most definitely not meant to be written like an advert, it's meant to be information and factual, so why was it flagged as being written like an advert? Have you any suggestions for terms which particularly read badly that I could change? Why was the object creation category removed? I just tried to list things like Inkscape, but maybe phrased a little more wordily rather than with brevity, lol!
I'm genuinely just interested in making a nice looking, factual page and thought I had, so any comments are welcome as I just want to get it sorted properly and leave it there. I was fed up with looking at a screenshot of DrawPlus 7 whenever I searched Wikipedia for DrawPlus...
EDIT - Actually, why have you said it's the wrong logo? It's the company's new logo - the one on the Serif Europe Wikipedia page is the old logo. Why are the free usage images wrong? They're just screenshots and I thought I'd uploaded them and tagged them as such?
Cheers, Matt —Preceding unsigned comment added by MattP4478 (talk • contribs) 08:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:AL Desktop.JPG (again)
I've seen that my screenshot has been deleted again, despite I've insert adequate elucidation in template intended for same. Why for heaven's sake? Thanks in further notice Alex^discussion 17:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
iPhone 4 Image
Before I get into this, I should mention that I'm probably going to be away from Wikipedia for large amounts of time coming up, so don't count on a quick reply. That out of the way, I wanted to let you know that I take issue with your claim that the image Image:iPhone 4.jpg needs fair use licensing. It's a photo I did completely by myself. Yes, it does happen to capture parts of the UI, but it's not a photo of the UI. If it were an actual screenshot, yes, I could see the need for fair use licensing, but it's not. I realize this is an ongoing debate here on Wikipedia. aido2002talk·userpage 18:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 97: / Line 97: @@
 == [[:File:AL Desktop.JPG]] (again) ==
 I've seen that my screenshot has been deleted again, despite I've insert adequate elucidation in template intended for same. Why for heaven's sake?  Thanks in further notice '''[[User:Aleksa Lukic|<font face="Freestyle Script" color="gray" size="4px">Alex</font>]]'''<sup> [[User talk:Aleksa Lukic|<font face="vedrana" color="blue" size="2px">discussion</font>]]</sup> 17:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
+== iPhone 4 Image ==
+Before I get into this, I should mention that I'm probably going to be away from Wikipedia for large amounts of time coming up, so don't count on a quick reply. That out of the way, I wanted to let you know that I take issue with your claim that the image [[:Image:iPhone 4.jpg]] needs fair use licensing. It's a photo I did completely by myself. Yes, it does happen to capture parts of the UI, but it's not a photo ''of'' the UI. If it were an actual screenshot, yes, I could see the need for fair use licensing, but it's not. I realize this is an ongoing debate here on Wikipedia. '''aido'''2002<small>[[user talk:aido2002|talk]]</small>·<small>[[user:aido2002|userpage]]</small> 18:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)