Talk:Abhorsen: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*'''Alternative''' - While I support your idea, I do not support it as it is currently proposed. It would be a good thing to have an article on the bloodline''s'' within the series, but not a good thing to have seperate articles on each of the bloodlines, since there is not enough information contained within the books to create full distinct articles. A "bloodlines" article is one I support, but not individual ones! Individual ones can be used as redirects - we can put a link "''This article is about the book. For the bloodline...''" Thanks. [[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]] 16:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Alternative''' - While I support your idea, I do not support it as it is currently proposed. It would be a good thing to have an article on the bloodline''s'' within the series, but not a good thing to have seperate articles on each of the bloodlines, since there is not enough information contained within the books to create full distinct articles. A "bloodlines" article is one I support, but not individual ones! Individual ones can be used as redirects - we can put a link "''This article is about the book. For the bloodline...''" Thanks. [[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]] 16:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
*:I'd tend to agree with that. What do you think, Orannis? —[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] <sup>[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referenda|''Seen this already?'']]</sup> 08:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC) |
*:I'd tend to agree with that. What do you think, Orannis? —[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">Nightst</span>]]<font color="green">[[User:Nightstallion/esperanza|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">a</span>]]</font>[[User:Nightstallion|<span style="font-variant:small-caps">llion</span>]] [[User talk:Nightstallion|''(?)'']] <sup>[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referenda|''Seen this already?'']]</sup> 08:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
:Well, after a further comment from Nihiltres (see [[User talk:Nihiltres#Abhorsen Move|his talk page]]), I guess that his idea sounds reasonable: to expand on and maybe reconstruct the [[Five Great Charters]] article to accommodate new information. I'll wait for a while and see if this option gets agreement from a few more people. Thanks again, Nihiltres, for the suggestion. |
|||
:The coolest guy you know - [[User:Orannis|The Ninth Bright Shiner]] 19:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC) |
|||
===Discussion=== |
===Discussion=== |
Revision as of 19:43, 30 March 2006
Novels Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Requested Move
- Talk:Abhorsen — Abhorsen → Abhorsen (Book) – I'm trying to start a new article about the Ahborsen bloodline, and not just the book. — The Destroyer 04:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
- Alternative - While I support your idea, I do not support it as it is currently proposed. It would be a good thing to have an article on the bloodlines within the series, but not a good thing to have seperate articles on each of the bloodlines, since there is not enough information contained within the books to create full distinct articles. A "bloodlines" article is one I support, but not individual ones! Individual ones can be used as redirects - we can put a link "This article is about the book. For the bloodline..." Thanks. Nihiltres 16:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- I'd tend to agree with that. What do you think, Orannis? —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 08:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well, after a further comment from Nihiltres (see his talk page), I guess that his idea sounds reasonable: to expand on and maybe reconstruct the Five Great Charters article to accommodate new information. I'll wait for a while and see if this option gets agreement from a few more people. Thanks again, Nihiltres, for the suggestion.
- The coolest guy you know - The Ninth Bright Shiner 19:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Discussion
- Add any additional comments
Pronunciation
how do you pronuce this title. A-B-H-O-R-S-E-N
its "abb-horse-in" - Abhorsen123
I say it Abb- horse - unn