User talk:RJFF

/Archive

Disruptive editors on Coalition of the Radical Left

You should check that page out. Some person put that on there. It stated that SYRIZA(Coalition of the Radical Left) is Communist, Marxist, Anti-Greek, Islamist which is not and he has no proof. The editor didn't have any username but I was able to find an ip address which is: 193.92.139.24 Thank You.

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Golden Dawn (Greece)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 7 September 2012.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 16:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Buenos Aires elections, 2011

Template:Buenos Aires elections, 2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Robofish (talk) 22:43, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editors on Golden Dawn (Greece)

Did you see it? Now User:Surlyduff50 is now questioning whether the nazi party should be classified as "far right" at all and is saying we don't have enough sources that document it as such. The guy is NOT acting in good faith. Also, I would be EXTREMELY wary of Greek Wikipedians; the Greek version of Wikipedia is infested with Golden Dawn sympathizers and tries to avoid displeasing nationalist and nazi factions. Moderatelyaverage (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

I see various ppl try to add "disputed" to the "Nazism" bit in the infobox, altho the nazi idenntity of Golden Dawn is confirmed & verified through numerous sources. You might want to keepthis in check. And be wary of editors from Greece,cuz the internet in Greece is full of racists & hardline nationalists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.131.135.9 (talk) 12:54, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Third Way article move

Hi. I know you previously expressed support for a move of the Third Way (centrism) article to Third Way. I've started a discussion on the talk page and it would be good if you could support or weigh in on the proposal. Thanks. --Peter ^{Talk to me} 15:58, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Justice and Development Party (Turkey)

A pro-AKP-troll is removing content in this article and adding non-sourced information about the ideology. He has been doing it several times per day since a week. Could you watch and fix this problem, please?--84.57.23.79 (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

The same for here: Template:Syrian political parties.--Chauahuasachca (talk) 12:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Can you help me to solve this problem please?--Chauahuasachca (talk) 13:43, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

please revert per Wikipedia:AC/DS#Affected_areas

AFAICT, the article on East Germany is subject to the ArbCom sanctions, and repeated revrts may result in any admin blocking the person doing such reverts. The language had been stable, and I ask you to avoid any ArbCom Enforcement possiblility as a matter of courtesy. Cheers. Collect (talk) 18:18, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

prime minister of thai

if you mean about prime minister of thai in thai people article

in term thai people looks like Spanish people with
Castilian people
Catalan people
Andalusian people
Aragonese people
Asturian people
Canarian people
Cantabrian people
Extremaduran people
Galician people
Leonese people
Valencian people sub ethnic

in thai culture is not census to define because want to merge into all thai, except Plaek Phibunsongkhram's era census as thai or chinese only
but in perform siamese quite mocking isan people without a Nasal bone

if you try to remove about prime minister with thai origin you should write new article to spread sub ethnic in thai (siamese) (isan laotian) and (lanna) people articles

in modern day Demographics of Thailand quite is hardly to definite their origin because country side move into town

so in thai people article i mean combine of siamese laotains and lanna, you see about thai origin i write quite definite who are siamese laotian lanna people

what do you think? --โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 08:59, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I removed the list of Prime ministers, because it didn't cite any sources for the ethnicity of the listed politicians (WP:RS), and because Thai ethnicity (combined central, northern and Isan Thai) are the majority ethnicity (75%) in Thailand. So, a Prime Minister of Thai ethnicity is nothing special. Most Thai citizens are of Thai descent and so are most prime ministers, it's pretty standard. --RJFF (talk) 10:17, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

so you should written more about sub ethnic like spainish people--โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 10:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Golden Dawn (Greece), to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:AGK (talk) 11:39, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Wikify

Hi, just to let you know that the Template:Wikify tag has now been deprecated. Please use Template:underlinked or Template:dead end from now on, cheers. Del_♉sion23 (talk) 11:05, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Begalangoram

Thanks for doing some of the cleanup there, though I suspect more will be necessary. WP gets these single-purpose accounts every so often that are dedicated to labeling both rich businessman/bankers and Communists as Jewish. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Research Outputs by Country

I noticed you have reverted some edits on the page. However the move is appreciated. It was a new and Infant article. If you please you may help me review the article with the new references and citations which I have provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregorykarn (talk • contribs) 16:07, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Islamophobia

Apologies, I reverted some edits by you on Islamophobia page. Kindly review what I have posted here. The edits by Gregorykarn state the opinions of academic jonathan turley who is a famous person "Champion of Rule of Law" and editor for several magazines. Kindly see the article. I would advice you to make relevant edits so that controversial aspects may be rooted out and correct views come out. FYI : http://jonathanturley.org/2009/10/19/just-say-no-to-blasphemy-u-s-supports-eygpt-in-limiting-anti-religious-speech/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adityasaxena.corp (talk • contribs) 16:39, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Your 3RR report

You and JasonnF have both been at AN3 before about this very dispute. The article was fully protected for a week last time around, in lieu of blocking both of you. Please join the discussion at WP:AN3#User:JasonnF reported by User:RJFF (Result: ) and agree to wait for consensus before reverting again. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

My mistake. Though the dispute was at AN3 before, you were not named in the last complaint. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 12:32, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Please see the closure at Wikipedia:AN3#User:JasonnF reported by User:RJFF (Result: Warned). Though the warning was to JasonnF, if you continue to revert as well it will be harder for future admins to be sympathetic to you in case blocks are considered. It turns out that you have reverted about as much as he has at List of libertarian political parties since September 1. Opening an RfC is one option you might consider. Another is to just leave it alone and use the talk page, in hopes that others will take care of it if the trouble restarts. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:22, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Infoboxes of Búfalo Barreto situation

This is Búfalo Barreto talking. Thank you for your comments. I will try to adjust my edits to Wikipedia policies. I would like you, however, to please review my edits to Peruvian President Alberto Fujimori (for example) and explain to me why these edits, which make the page look much better, are held to be against Wikipedia policies. I work hard in my free time in order to improve these pages. As a Peruvian high school student, I take these pages about our presidents seriously. With my thanks and best regards, Búfalo Barreto — Preceding unsigned comment added by Búfalo Barreto (talk • contribs) 02:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Second message of Búfalo Barreto

Mr. RJFF, why does the peruvian presidents infoboxes have to be a summary?, the US Presidents have a lot of details. Why shouldn't these have details?. Best Regards, Búfalo Barreto

P.S.: I spend a lot of time in giving a better image to these pages by editing their infoboxes. Why do you keep it simple? Búfalo Barreto (talk

What do you mean? I cannot see any seal or insignia in Barack Obama's or George W. Bush's infobox. It just says "44th President of the United States", not "44th President of the United States of America", so it's as short and simple as possible. Or compare Ed Miliband: it just says "Leader of the Opposition", not "Leader of Her Majesty's Most Loyal Opposition in the United Kingdom" (which is the official title). See: we always use the short title, not the official title. Or Elizabeth II: she sure is a very honorable person and rules over many countries, but there is no coat of arms or other insignia in the infobox. And it just says "Queen of the Commonwealth realms", not "Her Majesty Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and of Her other Realms and Territories, Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith" or any other of her many titles. There is no difference between the infobox style for English-speaking rulers and the one of Peruvians. --RJFF (talk) 13:41, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Third Message of Búfalo Barreto

Thank You for understanding my point of view. Of course, I will delete the seals or insignias. Also, for example, in the biography of Alberto Fujimori, he isn't the 90th President of Peru. You see, I've reviewed all of the Peruvian Presidents, and there is a difference, the Constitutional Presidents and the Interim Presidents. The Interim ones are not counted with a number, only the Constitutional ones. For example:

42nd. Fernando Belaúnde Terry-(1963-1968): Constitutional President (Elected)

-. Juan Velasco Alvarado-(1968-1975): President of the Revolutionary Government-(He made a coup d'etat to Belaúnde's Government)

-. Francisco Morales Bermúdez-(1975-1980): President of the Revolutionary Government-(Velasco's successor)

43rd. Fernando Belaúnde Terry-(1980-1985): Constitutional President (Elected)

44th. Alan García Pérez-(1985-1990): Constitutional President (Elected)

45th. Alberto Fujimori-(1990-1992): Constitutional President (Elected for a 5 year term, but made a self-coup to his government in 1992, dissolving many public institutions, creating a new Constitution)

-. Alberto Fujimori-(1992-1995): President of the Emergency Government and National Reconstruction (During this short period, he signed a new constitution)

46th. Alberto Fujimori-(1995-2000): Constitutional President (Elected)

47th. Alberto Fujimori-(2000-2000): Constitutional President (Elected, but a few months later, Congress revealed videos in which his adviser gave money to the opposition (Corruption))

-. Valentín Paniagua-(2000-2001): Transitional President (After Fujimori resigned, the two VP's resigned also. In the line of succession there was the President of Congress Paniagua, who organized new elections for the next year)

48th. Alejandro Toledo-(2001-2006): Constitutional President (Elected)

49th. Alan García Pérez-(2006-2011): Constitutional President (Elected)

50th. Ollanta Humala-(2011-Present): Constitutional President (Elected)

You see, only the Constitutional ones have numbers, the others don't, because they were not elected. Since Peru became an independent country, there were Presidents who lasted 2 days, a week, a month, or even hours. I've counted the Constitutional ones, and in total there are 50. Of course, if you sum all of them there 94. That's the problem, in the United States there is more order than Peru.

The official counting is the one found in a documentary called "Historia de la República del Perú" in which lists the official an non official Presidents

Thank you for your Comprehension RJFF

P.S.: Also I don't know how to sign my messages in Wikipedia. You already told me, but I don't understand.

Best Regards, Búfalo Barreto (talk) 16:28, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Búfalo Barreto

Fourth message of Búfalo Barreto

I'm very sorry, I won't revert the pages again. I'm very very sorry for making you waste your time.

Best Regards

Búfalo Barreto

5th message

Hello RJFF, I completely understand. But view history of the page List of Presidents of Peru and in 2008, some of them weren't Constitutional ones. Also, please just don't write President of Peru, write President of the Republic of Peru. The name Republic of Peru is the official name of the country. Check the spanish version of those Presidents that I've mentioned.

Best Regards, Búfalo Barreto (talk) 16:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Búfalo Barreto

P.S.: Please don't call me Búfalo Barreto, my name is Víctor. The BB nickname was for a peruvian politician. I wish to become a politician in Peru

Hello again, please give me an answer about the APRA-NEC merger. I already added references. Best Regards Búfalo Barreto (talk) 23:03, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

True Finns

As you know, user Mocctur has recently been pushing the far-right label on pretty much all parties critical of the European Union. His action in the True Finns article isn't any more justifiable than in the EFD article or the UKIP article. In the True Finns article he has given two references on the far-right label: one of them is 9 years old and thus dated considering how much the party has grown in that time. The other reference is a treatise officially sanctioned by the EU. I checked that out and the primary label used of the party is populist (the term far-right is mentioned only in passing, whereas the term populist is repeated). Compared to this I have referenced six credible Finnish researchers who all say that the party's social views are conservative (you would agree with me that conservatism is centre-right) or explicitly say that the party is not right-wing. Tuomas Ylä-Anttila calls the party a "centre-left conservative party"[1]. Ville Pernaa says that the party's ideology is based on "moral conservatism"[2]. Laura Parkkinen says that the party is based on "traditional rural conservatism" and warns against simplistic comparisons with other countries.[3] Juha Ahvio says that the party has profiled itself as a defender of social conservatism.[4] Rauli Mickelsson calls the party socially conservative without calling it far-right in his book, which is referenced in the article. Erkka Railo says that the party is populist but not far-right, or at least that the far-right element is marginal. In addition Juho Rahkonen says that it is wrong to call the party right-wing populist, describing it instead as a centre-left party[5] and says that of all Finnish parties it is closest to the political centre[6]. From all this we can see that the consensus mainstream opinion of the Finnish political researchers is that the party's social views are conservative, not far-right. One or two foreign sources may call the party far-right, but according to the WP:UNDUE policy, the minority opinion should not usurp the mainstream consensus. --89.27.36.41 (talk) 15:17, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Urgent message from Búfalo Barreto

Hello again RJFF. I'm very concerned because I've been blocked in my spanish user by a uruguayan editor called Ganímedes, because I created the spanish version of the National Executive Committee of the Peruvian Aprista Party. Months ago, I created that page, and they told me that it was not encyclopedic. I sent a message to that user explaining. It's the same page that you proposed me to merge with another page. Please answer me. Best Regards Búfalo Barreto (talk) 01:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Recent addition to True Finns

Your edit summary: "no ref for "centre-right". What? Did you look at Talk:True_Finns#.22Far-right.22_not_appliable? Please contribute to the talk page instead of removing sourced information; centre-left is what the Finnish political scientists are saying. Foreign media commentators are not scholars. --Pudeo' 13:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

ITN Lincoln Alexander

I've responded to your opposition to posting this as ITN on the candidacy page. It would be great if you could look over my comments. If it results in a change of heart, great; if not, no worries, no hard feelings. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 02:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Javier Alva Orlandini

Hello RJFF

Thank you for your message. In the case of the Javier Alva Orlandini page, I created that page months ago, and I installed the full titles, for example, Barack Obama in his infoboxes says

44th President of the United States

United States Senator From Illinois

Member of the Illinois Senate

You shortened the Javier Alva Orlandini titles, for example, I installed Senator of the Republic of Peru and you just wrote Senator. I've met this politician and I showed him his biography in spanish, but I realized that he didn't have a Biography in English so I created it. In the Spanish Wikipedia, It's the full title, you should check it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Búfalo Barreto (talk • contribs) 13:47, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Stop undoing!

Please, stop it --Danrolo 11:00, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Democratic Popular Party (Spain), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union of the Democratic Centre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion

The article you have previously commented has been nominated for deletion. To comment please visit: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Actors in Negative Roles -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:06, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

RM

I just wanted to inform you that an editor expressed concern that you have been canvassed into discussion. Fell free to comment, if you care about this questionable actions, at the end... If not, no problem, nothing will be different. All best, be well. --WhiteWriter^speaks

Thailand

Hi! Thank you for your notifications. About Thailand intro section, I have just referred from internal wiki site, which is has already been cited.

Also, population, with recent figures rather more accurate.

Do I still have to link-linked those citations again? If it need to, I will. Please let me know again my talk page. Thank you! --okichan 06:00, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Azores regional election

Hello. Can you please indicate where it states that election results are only limited to the top two candidates? As the regional elections of the Azores were fought by the five incumbent parties, their vote and summary statistics are relevant. I will be manually reverting your blanking of the remaining content, unless you can provide a justification from the Infobox parameters or Wikiproject discussion. ^{ruben jc} ZEORYMER (talk) 07:32, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Ukrainian parliamentary election, 2012

Same case scenario. You indicated that infobox should contain major political parties, yet without specifying a number you left only two. That is a political speculation. Ukraine does not have well established major political parties. Currently there are five political parties in the Ukrainian parliament and seven parliamentary factions. There is a 5% threshold for any party to gain pass for the parliament, which will be possible at very least for four parties , while there could be up to six of them. The infobox was showing exactly the major players for the elections. So what is the reason behind your corrections. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

thai people

Hello, RJFF. You have new messages at KLL Joe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Proposed deletion of Opinion polling for the Basque parliamentary election, 2012

Ok, since it is just a regional election and it doesn't have enough opinion polls to justify for having an entire article for itself, I agree to have it removed, since the election has been already held and there isn't enough data available to justify for an improvement of relevance (unlike other elections' opinion polls, which may have data for leaders' ratings and such). All data about opinion polls have been moved to the main page, so that it doesn't get lost in the article's deletion. Impru20 (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Malays

I believe that was not me who added the Malays into the content.

But such as theory is very interests. I found some recent scientific research where ethnic malays made up of some population in southern of thailand and malay peninsular. I am waiting to the book mailing on the way. Not until I have read and make sure if the research is reliable source, the present information base on CIA (getting out of date) although still ok. Do you know if I can cited or reference Japanese research into English page? Or if this had to be proved by Thai gov or something?? talk--okichan 17:01, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

I have raised an objection to your proposed deletion of the article "Italian Fascism and German Nazism"

My objection has been raised here: Talk:Italian Fascism and German Nazism--R-41 (talk) 01:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Arab Cold War

The coups led to the removal of first, an original pro-US govermnent by a radical and neutral leaderhsip. The 1966 coup brought to power a pro-Soviet and pro-communist leadership... The Syrian Ba'ath Party played a major role in the Cold War. This is the short explanation --TIAYN (talk) 14:33, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thank you for updating articles related to Lithuanian election. Much appreciated. Here's a beer to wash down a day's worth of honest work. Renata (talk) 22:39, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Cold war ... edit war ...

Hallo RJFF, I see you're doing the same as me (only more so), removing duff entries from the Cold War template. I am afraid that some of them are continually being added back. We ought really to discuss this with the perpetrators, and if need be get admin attention to the subject. Part of the problem is that there's no terribly obvious way to support entries with citations, so people see this as an easy list to cruft. Ideas? all the best Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:40, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi you both - good luck with your efforts in this regard - just FYI, I've returned the template to the article on the March 1949 Syrian coup d'état. I wasn't the one who added it originally, but the template is justified because the two major reasons for the coup, which include the Aramco TAPLINE project and the 1948-9 student demonstrations, were understood by American officials at the time within the context of what we now call the Cold War. There's a huge amount that must be done with this article - I'm sorry I've not done it yet - suffice to say for the moment that Douglas Little is your best source for all this. Cheers, -Darouet (talk) 14:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

ebook move request

Since you contested the move request E-book → ebook, I've started a full move discussion at Talk:E-book#Requested move. --84.44.182.148 (talk) 01:23, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

talk back

Hello, RJFF. You have new messages at KLL Joe's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

error problem

you should see this article, it maybe understand. Thaification --โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 16:04, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

A message from zictor23

Hi RJFF,

Thank you for the kind message. I understand what you're saying about maintaing a neutral point of view and using reliable third party sources on Wikipedia, but I thought that if the official party websites stated that the parties were social liberal (as with the cases of the Australian Democrats, the Brazilian Social Liberal Party, and the Liberal Party of Ukraine) then you could not argue with that, because that is how those parties see themselves. You do see what I mean, don't you, RJFF? I didn't think that had anything to do with breaking neutrality.

Also RJFF, some of those parties that were deleted, such as the Liberal Democrats of Germany and Peru Possible, had third party sources. Those sources were not taken from the official party websites. I'm not sure if you or others had seen that when the edits were made. zictor23 (talk) 20:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

NTV7

Thanks for supporting my move request for ATV Turkey. Now, can you do something on moving ntv7 to NTV7? My recent move request was not successful. JSH-alive/^{talk/cont/mail} 17:57, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Stop it!

Don't undo again, right? --190.22.248.130 (talk) 18:08, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

My mistake

It is a bad habit of mine to put "pp." rather than "p." for single pages. My apologies to you.--R-41 (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Worry not I guess I won't waste my time participate in any "war" here, since the influence of the anti-Soviet factions in en.wiki are too big, and anything which sympathize with the USSR are brutally delete by them. It seems to be that, many en.wiki user forget that wikipedia keeps its neutrality by accept a wide range of points of view, not by delete information. Deleting info does not keep the neutrality of en.wiki. On the contrary, it is CENSORSHIP. Михаил Александрович Шолохов (talk) 09:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

SNC

I'm sorry, I haven't noticed your edit summary, but insted I undo it without watching. Please accept my appology. --Wüstenfuchs 11:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Stereotyping political criticism in Hungary

It is true that there is a great deal of left/right polarization in Hungary, hence often it is the left criticizing the right or the right criticizing the left. But there is also a lot of stereotyping, and this tends to be done more by the right than the left: The right often reflexively classifies any view it does not like (or that does not like it) as "left-liberal." Often this is true, but sometimes traits are called left-liberal that are not, and criticism is labelled as left-liberal that isn't. This is the case with worldwide criticism of some of the new laws that have been adopted by the Hungarian supermajority government, including press control laws and, more recently, the gerrymandering of electoral laws. The criticism is coming from democrats on the left and the right, and so Wikipedia editors should not be allowed to stereotype all criticism of government policy as "left-liberal" (as is done with impunity in Hungary). Wikipedia is international. Much better to face the substance of the criticism head-on rather than to dismiss it as simply being partisan carping by the usual suspects. See the controversy section, where an edit war is going on about the insertion and removal of this descriptor. Stevan Harnad 15:34, 9 December 2012 (UTC)harnad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harnad (talk • contribs)

Stop it!

Stop undoing or I shall report you! --Danrolo 19:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Ah

Or I shall block you! --Danrolo 19:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

RE: Italy

Ah ! that way. Deletion is for other reasons per CSD. Usually a RM is there to move it. ut i understnd it should be uncontroversiall. Perhaps ask an admin to move it. User:Number57 is involved in election articles and can do it quick(Lihaas (talk) 15:26, 10 December 2012 (UTC)).

ITN for Romanian legislative election, 2012

--Spencer^T♦C 00:14, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

sweden democrats

I saw the message on the Swedish Democrats. The fact that a part of the Swedish press defines them as far-right, does not mean they are. I read their political program and I have not found too many elements to suggest that it would be a far-right party. There are parties in Europe more aggressive, with much more radical messages than those of the Swedish Democrats and are not classified as far-right parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.97.134.8 (talk) 00:37, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Italian general election, 2013

Hi, I do not understand why do you add Beppe Grillo at Italian Elections 2013, since he is not running at these elections as a candidate to deputy, nor to President of the goverment, nor is the leader of the 5 Star Movement. As the Movement statues say, he is not the leader but just a speaker of the movement.

Deletion on BJP article

I have noticed that you are unhappy with some reliably referenced info on the BJP article. It would be appreciated if you either posted your concerns on the articl's talk page or if you try to merge your edits ( most of which contributed positively to the article) with those of others

Jemappelleungarcon (talk) 19:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

I was looking over your edit summary and would like to reiterate that first-person and second-person sources aren't always innacurate. In this case, the party knows its own ideology, if it didn't that would be odd!  :)

Jemappelleungarcon (talk) 19:48, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Stop it!

That's enough! stop undoing and warring or I shall block you! --Danrolo 10:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Merge discussion for List of religious leaders in 2011

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of religious leaders in 2011, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. tahc ^chat 01:20, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Bahrani people

Ashrf1979 (talk) 18:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)This article is about the Bahrani people (ethnic group) in the historic region of Bahrain and the diaspora And not for the Kingdom of Bahrain and its citizens

TB

Hello, RJFF. You have new messages at Talk:All-Ukrainian Union "Svoboda"#Criticism of others in the lead.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 19:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

NFA's ideology

If leader of National Forces Alliance is saying that "Some channels started referring to the National Forces Alliance as liberals – that's not true," and that the NFA is a moderate Islamic movement that recognises the importance of Islam in political life and favours Sharia as the basis of the law and if NFA is eager to play down the "liberal" label then what is the problem ??? why it is not allowed to mention it as an "Moderate Islamist" party ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed 313-326 (talk • contribs) 20:56, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Danrolo

Hi, I've started a topic at WP:AN for help with range blocks in case you want to watch it or contribute to it.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Civic Choice Ideologies Removal

You should be proud of your original contribute on Wikipedia. Congratulations. Regards--Walter J. Rotelmayer (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Islamic democracy table

Hi, The table showing the indices of democracy in islamic countries (on the Islamic democracy page has been removed by Ahmed 313-326. I put it back with a request to discuss changes on the talk page, and he removed it again, and so I've put it back again. I'm not a very experienced wikipedia editor and dont want to get into an edit war, but I think it would be good to have some discussion and get some viewpoints about the table rather than just delete it. If the consensus is to delete it then that's fine, but I don't think one user should just remove so much material without discussion.

I know you've edited this page before and I thought you might have an opinion and possibly get some other non-partisan editors interested. thanks Halon8 (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Kindly refrain from deleting my contributions in their entirety without explanation. I have provided quotable sources. If you have objections to any specific modifications, please amend the specific part of the edit you consider to be incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti.udbas (talk • contribs) 19:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Citations to reliable sources to all my edits have been provided. If you have any specific objections to my edits, please modify accordingly, likewise providing reliable sources for your edits. Please kindly refrain from removing my edits en bloc, and please kindly refrain making unwarranted accusations of libel, which I am not committing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti.udbas (talk • contribs) 19:52, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Gregor Virant

I have responded to your communication on this article's Talk page. I have provided reliable references for all my edits. Please refrain from further reverts of my edits until the issue has been resolved on the Talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anti.udbas (talk • contribs) 18:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

FJP

Hello, Can you please explain why do you think that the cited sources do not explicitly describe the FJP as "Islamic democratic" ? --Ahmed 313-326 (talk) 23:53, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Avoid Vandalism

In articles about Muslim world's politics, word "democracy" dose not necessarily mean "western democracy". democracy is a universal political value. if a party is not democrat by western standard, it dose not mean that party is not democratic by standards of it's own country. so please avoid vandalism and refrain from removing useful information without any strong reason. demanding citation or more reliable citation is better option then removing well established facts. --Ahmed 313-326 (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Help with sources

Hello RJFF, are you a native German-speaker, right? Could you help me to find more sources for "The Freedomites in Carinthia" (currently at Freedom Party in Carinthia) in order to move the article to The Freedomites in Carinthia? --Checco (talk) 13:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Thaification

File:100-Baht Banknote Series 14 Back.jpg is now orphaned. Was that intentional? --Pawyilee (talk) 14:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Can you help me?

In the page Italian general election, 2013 we don't know which images we can use for Pier Luigi Bersani. You are more expert than me in wikipedia so I want ask you if you can find a way to stop this edit warring between me and others users and User:EeuHP (talk... --Nick.mon (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Bersani again

Excuse me, but I think that the conflict is not resolved.

After five days, he suddenly said that my picture could stay. But hours later he suggested I replace it with another photo. I said that the new picture is, in my opinion, not good.

The next day he filed a third photo. I could not answer him, but Danish Expert said that it was a good picture, Nick.moon placed it in the article. It seems that the picture is not licensed. I removed the photo.

Now, he teaches me two new photos (in the last our, three photos). I think that this situation is a "war of attrition".

Besides, I suspect that he is using two sockpuppets. [7] [8] (similar names, newcomers, defending the same photo...).--EeuHP (talk) 18:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)