Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michellee Fox

Michellee Fox

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Michellee Fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Chef who has a podcast. Non-notable. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. scope_creep^Talk 15:23, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:56, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

• Delete. Sources are pretty sketchy, and Google search brings up nothing. Perhaps this chef will become notable at some point, but for now I'm not seeing it. —valereee (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Delete, I don't think it passes GNG. PS - If this article is deleted. I hope it won't be 're-created' & made into a 'redirect' like Carley Shimkus was. GoodDay (talk) 17:48, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
• Keep, Hi - I'm the creator of this article and all of these sources were found on the public internet. Totally understand the comment about that 'chef who has a podcast' does not meet GNC. I agree, but believe this article goes beyond that. I would also note that it is often harder for women to get media attention from the largest outlests, but that does not necessarily mean the sources are not reputable or not significant. Thanks for considering.