User talk:IronDuke

Thanks for stopping by. If you want my attention on something, please:

Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Use headlines when starting new talk topics.
Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here. I may move your/our comments to the relevant talk page.
Do not make personal attacks unless they are funny.

That was the year that was: archive of talk from 2005 and 2006

Year II: archive of talk from 2007

Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase

Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

I know wikipedia is not a chatline but...

I'm trying to look up flame war follies and I can't find a good site for it anymore, do you know of any mirrors that are left besides archive.org? Klichka (talk) 19:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh you are not that IronDuke? I had done a ton of research into flame war follies related to Derek Smart and it all links to you pretty much. I asked a while back when it was relevant because he appeared on steam and was going nuts in the forums there. Klichka (talk) 19:38, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leo Frank

Leo Frank has been listed as a Good Article. Well done for playing your part in developing the article from 2006 to 2013.

This user helped promote Leo Frank to good article status.

SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, IronDuke. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:28, 24h30m August 2019 (UTC)

hey

Idk how I happened across this page, but I hope you're well. Just wanted to say hi. nableezy - 17:48, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man! Great to hear from you! Believe it or not, I think about you from time to time. You still editing regularly? IronDuke 14:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]