Talk:Lothar von Trotha

Germany Start‑class Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Was Trotha Jewish?

I'm guessing that he was seeing the names of his wives.

I didn't find anything in my research on this article to verify whether he was Jewish. --Roisterer 02:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It wasn't uncommon for that time, that German men and Jewish women (and, vice-versa, Jewish men and German women) had relationships. As you know, the Jewish people were totally assimilated into the German society. OotHb 5:55 (GMT +1) 18 Dez 2005

Were they??? What kind of assimilation do you have in mind, mister? Assimilation into ashes n Polonia??? 201.19.201.31 01:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He doesn't look German. Even with a tan and a sepia picture a German does NOT look like he does. Maybe he's Czech or Polish?

Well, I didn't know Germans have an average look. A Germaness in their hair, skin color, eye color, etc. If you take in consideration that Germany is one of the most mixed race countries in Europe, you could understand that what you wrote is rubbish. Pick a history book, please!!! 201.19.201.31 01:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you can tell a German from a Czech or a Pole just by glancing at an obscure picture? Not really ...

Just for information: The family of Trotha is an old German noble familiy from - who would have guessed? - Trotha (a small village near Halle on the river Saale). Try www.throta.de. 08. Feb. 06

Herero sparing noncombatants?

I restored the claim that the Herero had spared noncombatants, because it's already clear it needs citation, and I see nothing contradictory on the Herero Genocide page. Also, with this page having attracted vandalism, an anonymous user who has edited nothing else should justify this change a little more :) Greenman 14:11, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added a citation to substantiate this claim from the seminal study by Horst Drechsler.

The incident began with the murdering of 150 or so German civilians, so I can hardly see how the Herero "spared noncombantants". Totally bogus and not at all reflected by established facts, like msot of the lies mr Greenman seems to enjoy writing and protecting from being changed into something factual/truthful Ernham 17:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Outcry in Wilhelmine Germany?

The current article says, "As soon as news of von Trotha's actions reached Germany, there was a public outcry which led Imperial Chancellor Bernhard von Bülow to ask Kaiser Wilhelm II to remove von Trotha from his command." I don't think that is an adequate portrayal of the response. Trotha was given the honor "pour le mérite," after all, and got a full pension. Also, the social democrats are widely held to have lost electoral support in the 1907 elections because they criticized von Trotha's unpardonable annihilation tactics and German imperialism generally (see http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reichstagswahl_1907). A "public outcry" would have looked a bit differently, methinks. Jboy 9 Dec 2006

Another lie-filled anti-German article. Oh fueher, how they envy us, the wonderful Germany blood and soil superboys

Sad, wikipedia, sad.

Thank you for you contributions. To deal with the points individually...

I see no mention in the cited article that Germany, nor any other nation in the world, recognizes these as acts of genocide, and it seems irrelevant given that the German minister was reported as saying that she felt the 'brutal crushing was genocide'. I agree that the word 'official' was not used correctly.

The fact that von Trotha arrived after 5 months, and also initially experienced relative failure, is worth reporting, as it gives context to his change of strategy. I agree that comments about the Herero's supposed 'lack of fear' and perception as being 'savages' don't belong here, at least without more context.

Historians have made the connection between Namibia and later events in Nazi Germany, so that comment should stay. Anyone reading the article can decide for themselves whether its a valid connection. I also left in the comment about good relations between the countries, and the aid packages, but removed the word 'generous', as that's POV and not all parties agree. Greenman 18:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If they have made the connections, CITE THEM, not your BOGUS communist political website either. The German imperial troops took a long time to be mobolized, which is why little was done initially. It is recorded that herero were unorganized and easily routed in battle, but that they would continue to return to areas they had already been pushed out of. Ernham 17:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Communist political website??? Where do you live, sir? Communist is dead, as it is your nazi ideas about Germany past!!! 201.19.201.31 01:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His Belgian Siamese Twin

Did you notice the similarity bewteen this assrat and Leopold II of Belgium??? 01:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

More neutral editors needed - help stop the edit war!

Sigh. This is a call for help to all interested editors to please help monitor the constant removal of cited references, in both this and the Herero and Namaqua Genocide articles, by a particular editor, and general attempts to force his own POV. The editor in question is abusive and not-responsive to constructive criticism, and has simply decided to opt out of discussions, and continually revert. Please see the relevant histories for the full discussions, and record of this users lack of constructive engagement. Greenman 17:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are the one POV pushing. I'm just interested in facts and truth as we know them, not your ridiculous communist websites and perverse interpretation of reality. How can one spare non combatants when one just organized the ehtnic cleaning of over 100 noncombants? You cherry pick sources that are completely BOGUS and have no undertsanding of what you are editing. I don't have time to deal with you, but i won't let you continue to present a wiki that is 90% bogus as not being "disputed" and I won't let you claim something as a "genocide" when it is not recognized as such by any other country. You have chosen this route of edit warring instead of defending your postion. For instance, you could supply at least one country that officially recognizes it as a genocide. You have don nothing of the sort. Ernham 17:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ernham wins the edit war

This just in. In a fantastic display of scholarly integrity, the esteemed Ernham has earned the right to write history. By constantly editing out those niggardly references he didn't like, wittily smashing any editors who dared to disagree, Ernham has been declared the winner. Thanks to his stamina, it's now quite obvious that the Herero genocide has no links with Holocaust,

Actually, though it is obvious you are being sarcastic, there are NO links to the Herero genocide (1904-07) and the Holocaust! I do not recall any Nazis in early 20th century Namibia. If you truly believe the two actions to be related, then you are an idiot.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.234.16.2 (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2007(UTC).

...in spite of some foolish attempts to add references. References? Who needs them? Ernham has shown once and for all that all you need is stamina! In a masterly display, Ernham even removed a reference from a [fictional piece]! Yes, the author had dared to make one of his characters make a comparison between the Herero geno, oops, I mean little skirmish caused by the nasty Herero. In the flick of the mouse, not only history, but fiction has been rewritten! Masterly Ernham, masterly!

It's heart-warming to read how Ernham decided that the German public caused an outcry when they heard about von Trotha's (not really genocide of course) tactics. Thanks to his god work, Ernham has shown that it's quite obvious that the vicious Herero targeted innocent Germans. The cited reference is wrong, Ernham is right. Ernham too demonstrated that the German development aid minister didn't actually say what she's reported to say, and by reverting the insinuation he proved once and for all she didn't say what she said. And if you disagree it's all an Anglo-Saxon plot. By wearing down the annoying detractors with his stamina, Ernham has proved once and for all that He's right! Congratulations Ernham on a fantastic display.

I award you the 'Choose your own adventure' prize for blindly sticking to truth no matter the facts.

In short, this article is pile of sh*te. But no-one else seems to care, so Ernham can write his own version of history, free of references, surrounded by posters of Steffi Graf and Michael Schumacher, free of nasty lying Anglo-Saxon brutes who're behind a plot to rewrite history, (shame wikipedia, shame), nasty 'so-called' Herero daring to claim compensation, and so on. Goodbye. Greenman 19:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations Greenman! You should be awarded for your maturity. Your use of thinly veiled sarcasm and disregard for opposing opinions especially earn you this distinction. Way to go, call Ernham with a Nazi, because that is a truly effective debate tactic! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 192.234.16.2 (talk) 21:30, 20 March 2007(UTC).

Links between Nazi holocaust and Herero genocide

With Ernham banned for his behaviour, hopefully we can avoid sinking to that level again and make some constructive progress on this article (although the anonymous contributer has decided to call me an idiot, so I don't have high hopes :).

Mr/Ms anonymous, in order for there to be a connection between the two events, there don't have to have been Nazis present in Namibia. Such literal short-sightedness is hardly helpful. It is possible for there to be other links. Eugen Fischer, father of eugenics, and whose book was a standard Nazi textbook during the Nazi era, toured the concentration camps in Nambia, and performed experiments there. It's in Namibia he formed many of his ideas. Hitler cites his work in Mein Kampf. Historians have pointed out the connection. Since Wikipedia is supposed to be NPOV, all that's needed is to point this out, not agree with it. If you think its idiotic and there should have been Nazis in Namibia, fine, but Wikipedia is not a place for original research :) I will add this reference to the article as perhaps it will dissuade other well-meaning but ill-informed contributers, though I'm sure the revisionists would have an apoplexy and will remove it anyway. Greenman 18:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The only revisionist in here seems to be you. Ernham 20:39, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly vandal is back

Ernham has obviously been unbanned again, and is back doing what he does best, punting his own obstinate POV with no attempt to reach consensus. His first act back after a month or so of peace and progress on the article is to revert it back to his previous garbage version, removing sourced references, etc. I'm going to try not to lower myself to his standard and involved myself in an edit war again, (though I can't help trying to get involved when I see utter crap on Wikipedia) but PLEASE, can everyone else viewing this article help stop his vandalism!!!! Greenman 11:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you are the POV-pusher around here who knows little to nothing about the history which you continue to manipulate and lie about. Ernham 20:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Beware of the tigers and Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. -- Jeandré, 2007-04-08t11:00z

There's no point engaging with Ernham :) I'm stepping out of the edit war, but please note it's a pile of POV crap again as Ernham simply reverts without discussion, so perhaps someone else wants to fix it, or get Ernham banned for the xth time :) Greenman 11:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]