User talk:Sanmarg Jain

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Pattavali, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pbritti (talk) 04:37, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Pbritti Greetings! I think there was a misunderstanding. What @Sanmarg Jain did was link "Devardhigani Kshamashraman" to the article dedicated to him on the Pattavali page. Hemchandra Jain (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hi Sanmarg Jain! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Prem Suri several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Prem Suri, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — kashmīrī ^TALK 12:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Prem Suri. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — kashmīrī ^TALK 12:51, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kashmiri,

I've seen your text and I've made sone modification according to your explanation. I've removed some words that you've highlighted. I'm not here to engage in any edit war. But I want to add more content about him.

Kindly tell me more changes that I can do to make this article more effective. Please give me suggestions, I'll apply the same in this article and many more articles in future. I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm learning. Please don't remove the whole edit work. tell me your suggestios, I'll consider it and apply on this article. So both side, there will be win win situation.

Thank you so much:) Sanmarg Jain (talk) 13:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanmarg Jain, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Devardhi (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikishovel,

I don't know who is devardhi. Also I'm not aware of what and why he is doing this. I'm new to Wikipedia and don't know more about this working. I've only created a new page and added more information on Wikipedia with valid citations.

Kindly give me more suggestions, it'll be really helpful for me for this article and in future too.

Thank you. Sanmarg Jain (talk) 10:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Vimalsagarsuri, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Vimalsagarsuri. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 09:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Vimalsagarsuri, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 10:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Vimalsagarsuri. Wikishovel (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Draft:Vimalsagarsuri, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Qcne (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kashmiri further submissions of the Draft:Vimalsagarsuri in it's current form will lead to your account being blocked.

Do not submit it again without a complete re-write to comply with our very strict neutrality policies. It is forbidden to use Wikipedia for promotion.

Let me know if you have any questions. Qcne (talk) 12:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne It appears you tagged a wrong editor. — kashmīrī ^TALK 12:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Sorry. Well, they got blocked in any case. Qcne (talk) 13:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vimalsagarsuri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vimalsagarsuri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 09:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,I'm new to Wikipedia so I've not read that. After seeing your text, I've removed those citations which indirectly promote any product or thing. Thank you so much for your suggestion. Sanmarg Jain (talk) 09:46, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vimalsagarsuri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vimalsagarsuri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vimalsagarsuri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vimalsagarsuri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vimalsagarsuri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Vimalsagarsuri, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 12:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vimalsagarsuri (May 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Pure WP:SPAM

Qcne (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sanmarg Jain! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 12:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason=

To the Wikipedia administrators, Sanmarg Jain (talk) 13:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanmarg Jain (talk) 09:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanmarg Jain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm new to Wikipedia so I've not read Wikipedia guide and upload one article without considering those guidelines. After your message, I've read the whole Wikipedia guideline and I assure you that I will consider Wikipedia guideline in my future projects.Kindly unblock me.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for Unblock: Reaffirming Commitment to Wikipedia's Mission

{{unblock|reason= Dear Wikipedia administrator, Sanmarg Jain (talk) 09:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your unblock request doesn't seem to work properly (it is missing }} for that), and only has one introductory line. Did you mean to write a longer message? Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 11:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sanmarg Jain (talk) 14:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock: Reaffirming Commitment to Wikipedia's Mission

Sanmarg Jain (talk) 09:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock: Reaffirming Commitment to Wikipedia's Mission

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanmarg Jain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm writing to appeal the indefinite block placed on my Wikipedia account.I want to express my sincere regret for any actions that may have given the impression that I am not dedicated to building an encyclopedia.I assure you that this was never my intention.I deeply value Wikipedia's mission of providing free, reliable information to the world.My contributions were made with the aim of enhancing the quality and accuracy of articles within my areas of expertise.I kindly request that you reconsider the indefinite block on my account. I am eager to continue contributing positively to Wikipedia Thank you for your time Sanmarg Jain (talk) 15:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a good start, but is a very general statement. Please specifically describe what was wrong with your editing and what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 08:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Sanmarg Jain this isn't how you format a block appeal. I will format it correctly for you. Qcne (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yea sure

Thank you so much. Sanmarg Jain (talk) 01:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock: Reaffirming Commitment to Wikipedia's Mission

{{unblock|reason=I am writing to respectfully request the restoration of my draft, "Draft which was deleted under section G11 for being perceived as unambiguous advertising. I understand and acknowledge the guidelines against promotional content on Wikipedia.I believe the subject of the draft holds significant encyclopedic value and my intent was not to advertise but to provide factual and verifiable information. I am committed to revising the draft to align fully with Wikipedia’s standards and guidelines.Thank you [[User:Sanmarg Jain|Sanmarg Jain]] ([[User talk:Sanmarg Jain#top|talk]]) 04:28, 26 May 2024 (UTC)}}

(Non-administrator comment) What is your understanding of Wikipedia's neutrality policies, and how do you plan to make the draft fit them? Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:25, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Admin,

I'm reaching out to appeal my indefinite block. I understand the concerns raised, and I'm committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia. I assure you that my future edits will align with Wikipedia's guidelines. Please consider granting me another chance to demonstrate my commitment to the community.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, Sanmarg Jain

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sanmarg Jain (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am committed to contributing constructively and adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines. I apologize for any past actions that may have caused concern and assure you of my dedication to positive contributions.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action, or you have not responded to questions raised during that time. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment, again) Unblock requests aren't about how polite or formal you write them (beyond the minimum expected level of politeness), but they should show that you understand why you were blocked, and are able to explain in your own words what you did wrong and how you plan to not do it again.
You shouldn't use generic wording like "align with Wikipedia's guidelines" or "dedication to positive contributions", but explain in more specific ways what you plan to do differently. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock: Reaffirming Commitment to Wikipedia's Mission

{{unblock|reason=I'm reaching out to appeal my indefinite block. I understand the concerns raised, and I'm committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia. I assure you that my future edits will align with Wikipedia's guidelines.I understand and acknowledge Wikipedia's guidelines prohibiting promotional content. Upon review, I recognize how certain aspects may have appeared promotional.I assure you that my intention was to provide factual, verifiable information on a topic of encyclopedic significance.To align with Wikipedia's standards, I commit to thoroughly, ensuring: Neutral point of view,Verifiable sources,No promotional language or tone.Please consider granting me another chance to demonstrate my commitment to the community.}} Sanmarg Jain (talk) 03:59, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock: Reaffirming Commitment to Wikipedia's Mission

{{unblock|reason= I'm reaching out to appeal my indefinite block.I understand the concerns raised, and I'm committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia.I assure you that my future edits will align with Wikipedia's guidelines.I understand and acknowledge Wikipedia's guidelines prohibiting promotional content. Upon review, I recognize how certain aspects may have appeared promotional.I assure you that my intention was to provide factual, verifiable information on a topic of encyclopedic significance.To align with Wikipedia's standards, I commit to thoroughly, ensuring: Neutral point of view,Verifiable sources,No promotional language or tone.Please consider granting me another chance to demonstrate my commitment to the community}} Sanmarg Jain (talk) 16:47, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]