Talk:Migration (2023 film)/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Zingo156 (talk · contribs) 11:59, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 04:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
hi! it’s brachy, back for another review (it’s been a while lol). anyways… better get out of the woods review as soon as possible ;D
Lead
- Box office, runtime and budget not in the body
- The box office is in the body as is the budget (The latter is at the end of the first paragraph in the Development and writing section) Zingo156 (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- found the box office and the budget. No runtime in the body brachy08 (chat here lol) 01:06, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Copyvios
- Pretty concerningly high (62.5%)
- FN 25 has the highest violation (42.5%), especially in the lead.
- In summary, you might want to paraphrase the lead by a significant bit
- That first source, the Deviantart page with a 97.0% similarity rating, copied and pasted Wikipedia, there is no denying that. But I would make a case that the second one, the When To Stream source with a 42.5% similarity, did so as well. That page was published on January 8, 2024 and this was the state of this Wikipedia page a couple of days earlier. The lead is the same. Zingo156 (talk) 05:09, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- The When to Stream page was actually published on January 17, so I think it is safe to say that they copied and pasted off the Wikipedia article's lead. Zingo156 (talk) 05:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
- fair enough. brachy08 (chat here lol) 10:00, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Production and development
- FN 1 does not talk about Guylo Homsy
- FN 2 does not mention Patrick Imbert.
- FN 3 does not mention The Big Bad Fox and Other Tales...
stating
→stating that
- Taken care of! Zingo156 (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
- Last thing has been sorted! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Taken care of! Zingo156 (talk) 11:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
Animation and design
requires backgrounds to be fully visualized and rendered instead of suggested
seems like a weird style of wording. (Try re-paraphrasingeverything needed to be shown
)FN 9 does not say anything about Meledandri requesting the clouds scene in Migration.Where does FN 15 say thatPowell and Renner connected over their love of classical music
? It only says that Renner is a huge classical music fan.
- Done! Zingo156 (talk) 09:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
Release
FN 21 does not containstereoscopic
.FN 19 does not talk about Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken.Is FN 23-4 reliable? Additionally, their names aren't formatted properly but that should be an easy fix.Is FN 26 reliable?FN 27-8 does not mentionJune 19, 2025
- All dealt with! Zingo156 (talk) 06:51, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Box office
- FN 14 and 17 are unreliable.
- Film Music Reporter is unreliable? But it is used in so many good articles. Zingo156 (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- No I am pretty sure it is considered reliable. I found this 2023 discussion. Zingo156 (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Critical response
La Croix
→La Croix's Stephane Dreyfus
- FN 39 does not mention anything about predictability.