Talk:Tilman Hausherr

I didn't create my entry, but I added a little bit now that it's there. I'm not angry if admins delete it because they think it's a vanity page :) Tilman 17:19, 25 August 2005 (UTC)Tilman[reply]

It's not a vanity page. Tilman is a well known critic of Scientology. What is vanity is Tilman's additions. Tilman does not provide proof of his claims regarding employment, etc. There are reports that his position as a software developer is just a cover for his actual occupation. --AI (signature added by Tilman)

There's also a report that the moon is made of cheese.Tilman 06:07, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Tilman[reply]

There's also a U.S. State Department report about the German government's religious descrimination of Scientologists. :) --AI (signature added by Tilman)

If it gets deleted, please put some sort of lock to prevent it from being started again, so that it doesn't get used for libel. (see article history) Tilman 20:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)Tilman[reply]

The world want to know more about Tilman's involvement with the critics of Scientology and the German government. --AI (signature added by Tilman)

Regarding second name: AI, in Germany it is not mandatory to use the middle name and most people are known only by first and last name. The choice of using the middle name or not is fully up to the person - so if Tilman does not use his middle name, his choice should be respected. -Irmgard 07:55, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This alleged "middle name" exists only in the phantasy of the RFW site. Irmgard, I've tried to contact you by mail, but couldn't - your address is no longer valid.Tilman 06:07, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Tilman[reply]

I don't know which one you used - might well be. But I checked my mail address here, it is ok - just go to User:Irmgard and click on E-mail this user. Irmgard 07:29, 6 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What's the matter Tilman, don't you like the your middle name Joerg? --AI (signature added by Tilman)

Categorization

"This category is for articles related to Scientology that are stubs." Absolutely no requirement that the subject of the article must -be friendly to Scientology, only related to Scientology -- and although AI claims "Tilman has nothing to do with Scn", he/she immediately contradicts that by adding "and is an enemy of Scn." [1] AI appears to be misunderstanding how categorization works. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:20, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That is your opinion. It's just a stub anyway. And it's just Tilman. --AI 02:42, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scientology stub on Tilman Hausherr

Just a heads-up, but AI (talk · contribs), for some reason, seems hell-bent on removing {{scientology-stub}} from Tilman Hausherr. --Calton | Talk 07:21, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. This AI guy is really weird, and he's currently very angry (see his user page). I like the comment Tilman (...) is an enemy of Scn. I wonder if I could get something more "official" :-) Tilman 07:37, 15 September 2005 (UTC)Tilman[reply]

LOL. Tilman, I am wierd? You're the one that is wierd. You stalk Barbara all over the place with no apparent reason. You obviously want to destroy her credibility and reputation for some reason. Barbara's written reason why you want to do this is probably much closer to the truth then anything you claim. --AI 23:36, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The Scientology stub is innapropriate for Tilman's page. He is not a Scientologist. With Calton's logic we should put Jewish stub on any short Nazi articles. --AI 23:33, 15 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From the stub template: This Scientology-related article...

Reading: not AI's strong suit. --Calton | Talk 02:31, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Calton, no personal attacks. --AI 02:40, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tilman is a German critic of Scientology, that does not mean he is Scientology-related. --AI 02:40, 16 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]