User talk:Tkaehfdl1234
Welcome!
|
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 15:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
Tkaehfdl1234, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Tkaehfdl1234! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC) |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your test before you revert it. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
Your recent edit to Cherry blossom has been reverted, (here) with the edit summary "Chan Soo Kim's scholarly paper in 2014 never says so". If you have other information please open a discussion on the article's talk page explaining your point of view. Moonraker12 (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
November 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Korean sword, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 20:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Pepero, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 20:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Japanese war crimes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 20:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 22:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pepero. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 22:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese war crimes. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 22:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)